ML20055D339

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Request for Comment/Concurrence on Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70 Re Notification of Incidents.Fr Notice for Publication Should Not Be Released Until Further Notice
ML20055D339
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/17/1989
From: Shelton B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To: Meyer D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20055C192 List: ... further results
References
FRN-55FR19890, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-70 AC91-1-027, AC91-1-27, NUDOCS 9007060193
Download: ML20055D339 (4)


Text

%

y

's.

ll aus

'~g UNITED STATES

+

NilCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

i I

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20566 Q

JAN 171989 MEMORANDUM FOR: David L. Meyer, Chief Regulatory Publications Branch Division of Freedom of Infomation and Publications Services /ADM Office of Administration and Resources Management FROM:

Brenda Jo. Shelton, Chief Records and Reports Management Branch Division of Information Support Services /IRM Office of Administration and Resources Management

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR COMMENT / CONCURRENCE ON THE PROPOSED RULE,10 CFR 20, 30, 40, AND 70, " NOTIFICATION OF INCIDENTS In response to your subject menorandum, tP Records and Reports Management Branch (RRMB) provides the following:

The Paperwork Reduction Act statement is correct for the subject rule.

X The Paperwork Reduction Act statement should be changed to statement number 3 of the "Re';ised Paperwork Reduction Act Statements for Specific Situations" and the enclosed second paragraph must be added.

X Do not release the Federal Register Notice for publication until further notice.

The Federal Register Notice car, be released for publication.

is a copy of the RRMB memorandum to the program office ig our concerns with the subject rule.

the RRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our with the subject rule will be fomarded at a later date, emorandum to the program office is not required.

Bren J. Shel on, Chief Records and Reports Management Branch Division of Information Support Services /IRM Office of Administration and Resources Management cc: Joe Mate, RE

887 M2'3 'o6626 Sg3x 1

20 55FR19890 PDR

J

.=

Public' reporting burden for. this collection of infonnation is estimated to average hours per response, including the time' for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

Send coments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of infonnation, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Records and Reports Management Branch, Division of Information Support Services /IRM, Office of Administration and Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC 20555; and to the Office of Management and Budget.

Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0014), Washington, D.C. 20503.

L 1

l

].[t 4=

3. ' Amendments to existing requirements.

-The accompanying Commission Paper should contain a statement similar to that in the rule.

h e? ' ?v:1, Final Rule c6

[ProposedRule PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This proposed rule amends information This final rule amends information collection requirements that are

' collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act subject to the Paperwork Reduction of 1980 (44 U.S.C.- 3501 et seq.). This Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 rule has been submitted to the Office etseq.).

These requirements were approved of Management and-Budget for review by the Office of Management and Budget approval number 3150-

-and approval of the paperwork requirements.

1

.\\

y 4.

OMB approval requested at the final-rule stage.

The accompanying Commission Paper should' contain a statement similar to that in the rule.

There are two situations for which OMB approval may be requested at the final-rule stage.

One is explained in the sample statement below. The other covers emergency collections of

'information (see Section 3507(g) of the Act) that would require a case-specific statement.

Proposed Rule Final Rule

' Not applicable.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT The information collection requirements in this final rule were not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget at the proposed-rule stage because the proposed rule was published prior to April 1,1981, when the Paperwork Reduction Act became effective. Therefore, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted this final rule to the Office of Management and Budget for any review appropriate under the Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.). The effective date for the information collection requirements in this rule provides the 60 days required for 0MB review.

@ut OSVE i

s e

<J' 4

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average

_ hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the-data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send consnents regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of. info 1 nation, including suggestions far reducing this burden, to the Records and Reports Management Branch, Division of Information Support Services /IRM, Office of Administration and Resources Management. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission. Washington, DC 20555; and to the Office of Management and Budget.

Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0014), Washington, D.C. 20503.

I lk ( Q

-