Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML19341A422, ML19341A424, ML19341B423, ML19341C004, ML19341C007, ML19343B857, ML19343D035, ML19343D039, ML19351A069, ML19351G105, ML20003A648, ML20003A650, ML20003A653, ML20005A189, ML20008E635, ML20010B899, ML20010H761, ML20010H997, ML20030D756, ML20031B542, ML20031D162, ML20031D166, ML20031D172, ML20031D176, ML20031D178, ML20032B192, ML20032B195
|
MONTHYEARML19340D1571980-12-15015 December 1980 Response to Intervenor Carolina Environ Study Group 801107 Addl Contentions Re Hydrogen Generation Control.Contentions 5 & 6 Should Not Be Admitted in Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl Project stage: Request ML19341A4241981-01-12012 January 1981 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 3 & 4 Changing Explosive Gas Mixtures in Tanks W/Radioactive Effluents & Deleting Requirement for Hydrogen Monitor in Waste Gas Holdup Sys Project stage: Other ML19341A4221981-01-12012 January 1981 Forwards Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Explosive Gas Mixtures in Tanks W/Radioactive Effluents & Deleting Hydrogen Monitor Requirement for Waste Gas Holdup Sys Project stage: Other ML19351G1051981-01-23023 January 1981 Unexecuted Amend 4 to Indemnity Agreement B-83,changing Amount of Financial Protection Project stage: Other ML20003A6501981-01-23023 January 1981 License NPF-9 for Facility Project stage: Other ML20003A6531981-01-23023 January 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of License NPF-9 for Fuel Loading & Zero Power Testing.Amend 4 to Indemnity Agreement B-83 Encl Project stage: Other ML19341B4231981-01-23023 January 1981 Memorandum & Order Affirming ASLB 801225 Order.Authorizes Director,Nuclear Reactor Regulation,To Issue License NPF-9, Permitting Fuel Loading & Zero Power Testing at Unit 1. Certificate of Svc Encl Project stage: Other ML20003A6481981-01-23023 January 1981 Informs That License NPF-9 Has Been Issued Authorizing Fuel Loading & Zero Power Testing.License & Notice of Issuance Encl Project stage: Other ML19341C0071981-01-28028 January 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 1 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML19341C0091981-01-28028 January 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 1 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML19341C0041981-01-28028 January 1981 Amend 1 to License NPF-9,revising Wording to Prior to Initial Criticality from Prior to Fuel Loading Project stage: Other ML19343B8571981-01-28028 January 1981 Revised App a Tech Specs Page 3/4 8-3,correcting Surveillance Requirements for Diesel Generator Project stage: Other ML20008E6351981-02-23023 February 1981 Tech Specs 3.4.7.2,3/4.5.1,3.5.1.1,4.5.1.1,3/4.5.3,3.5.5.3, 4.5.3.1,4.5.3.2,3.8.1.2,3.11.2.5,4.11.2.5 & Tables 3.4-1, 3.7-6 & 3.3-13 Re Oxygen Concentration in Waste Gas Holdup Sys,Hydrogen Monitor Requirements Et Al Project stage: Other ML20008E6331981-02-23023 February 1981 Application for Amend to License Submitted as Proposed Revision to Tech Specs Project stage: Request ML19343D0351981-04-0202 April 1981 Amend 2 to License NPF-9,correcting Typographical Errors & Revising RCS Testing Requirements Project stage: Other ML19343D0381981-04-0202 April 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 2 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML19343D0391981-04-0202 April 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 2 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML19351A0711981-06-12012 June 1981 Notice of Issuance of License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML19351A0691981-06-12012 June 1981 License NPF-9 for Facility Project stage: Other ML20004F6891981-06-17017 June 1981 Proposed Changes to Tech Specs 3/4.8.1,3/4.3.3.7 & Table 3.3-11 Re Fire Detection Instrumentation Project stage: Request ML20004F6851981-06-17017 June 1981 Application to Amend License NPF-9,consisting of Proposed Changes to Tech Specs 3/4.8.1,3/4.3.3.7 & Table 3.3-11 Re Fire Detection Instrumentation Project stage: Request ML20005A1891981-06-19019 June 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 1 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML20005A1871981-06-19019 June 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 1 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20010B8991981-08-12012 August 1981 Proposed Revised Tech Specs Re Setpoints,Surveillance, Listings,Response Times & Measurements Project stage: Other ML20010B8951981-08-12012 August 1981 Application to Amend License NPF-9.Change Includes Revising Setpoints & Surveillance Requirements,Correcting Measurement Range of Unit Vent Noble Gas Effluent Monitor & Revising Surveillance Requirements.Class IV Amend Fee Encl Project stage: Request ML20030D7561981-08-28028 August 1981 Amend 3 to License NPF-9,modifying Surveillance Requirements for Auxiliary Feedwater Suction pressure-low Pressure Instrumentation Project stage: Other ML20030D7591981-08-28028 August 1981 Notice of Issuance of Amend 3 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20030D7581981-08-28028 August 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 3 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20031B5421981-09-0303 September 1981 Notifies That No Known Public Correspondence Re Amend 4 to License NPF-9 Exists Project stage: Other ML20010H9941981-09-21021 September 1981 Application to Amend Ol,Changing Tech Specs by Correcting Setpoint Associated W/Reactor Trip Initiated by Turbine Trip.Class III Amend Fee Encl Project stage: Request ML20010H9971981-09-21021 September 1981 Proposed Tech Spec 2.2,correcting Setpoint Associated W/ Reactor Trip Initiated by Turbine Trip Project stage: Other ML20010H7611981-09-21021 September 1981 Requests Extension of Completion Date for Review of TMI Action Plan Item II.D.1 Re Relief & Safety Valve Tests Until 820701 Project stage: Other ML20031D1781981-09-22022 September 1981 Advises That No Known Public Correspondence or Irreversible Impact Associated W/Amend 5 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML20031D1721981-09-23023 September 1981 Amend 5 to License NPF-9,correcting Setpoint Associated W/Reactor Trip Initiated by Turbine Trip Project stage: Other ML20031D1751981-09-23023 September 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 5 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20031D1761981-09-23023 September 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 5 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML20031D1661981-09-30030 September 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 6 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML20031D1621981-09-30030 September 1981 Amend 6 to License NPF-9,extending Date for Full Compliance W/Relief & Safety Valve Testing Until 820701 Project stage: Other ML20031D1641981-09-30030 September 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 6 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20031H5181981-10-19019 October 1981 Advises That Fee Waived for Issuance of Amend 6 to License NPF-9,per 811021 Application Requesting Extension of Completion Date for Qualification Tests for Power Operated Relief & Safety Valves Project stage: Approval ML20032B1951981-10-27027 October 1981 Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 7 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Other ML20032B1941981-10-27027 October 1981 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 7 to License NPF-9 Project stage: Approval ML20032B1921981-10-27027 October 1981 Amend 7 to License NPF-9,revising Tech Specs to Change Instrumentation Setpoints,Correct Monitor Measurement Range & Revise Snubber Listings Project stage: Other 1981-06-12
[Table View] |
Text
.
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE CF NUCLEAR REACTOR RECULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. J TO LICENSE NPF-9 DUKE POWER COMPANY INTRODUCTION The McGuire Unit 1 Technical Specifications were issued on June 12, 1981, as an integral part of the Facility Operating License and are standard Westinghouse PWR Technical Specifications reflecting plant specific design.
Pursuant to Condition 2.C.(11)j the licensee was required to complete qualification tests of power operated relief valves (PORVs) and safety valves by October 1,1981, to meet the requirements for Item 11.0.1 in NUREG-0737.
In response, the licensee is participating in 'the generic program that is being conducted by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to qualify PWR relief and safety valves and associated dis-charge piping in accordance with NUREG-0737 requirements. As originall's scheduled, testing of all valves in the EPRI program was to be completed by July 1,1981, with the licenseo plant specific evaluation and documentation required by October 1,1981.
The licensee as a member of the PWR Owners' Group is not oble to meet this schedule due to a need for additional testing.
EVALUATION Anomalies have been observed in results of tests of some of the relief and safety valves tested in the EPRI program to date. As a result, the utilities sponsoring the test program the PWR Owners' Group, have requested EPRI to perform additional tests which will allow for core definitive characterization of the observed valve behavior.
On July 17, 1981, the staff met with EPRI and the PWR Owners' Group representatives to review the status of the safety and relief valve testing and to discuss the expanded test matrix. Although the exact number of additional tests will have to be determined as the progran progresses, the test program managers estimated that it could take from four to eight months longer than the original test completion date of July 1,1981, to complete the expanded test program.
The reported test results indicate that, while the initial screening criteria were not met in some cases, all PORVs tested will function in the primary mode (pressure relief) as required. Additional PORV tests are being planned to evaluate the effect of variable water seal temperature on valve closure times. The test results to date indicate that some valves axperience a delay of as as much as 70 seconds in closing '
time due to low or ambic..c water seal tenperatures. However, the valves closed on their own and on disassembly and inspection no damage was observed which might affect tieir ebility te open or cicae en du..:end.
These s caulis du nui iinikoic a sisniiivani
, omee pfuty..cnncnrp.in...the..s.tnLf *.S..xies........
iuaucue> ?....
... -. -. - ~ ~. -
8110130012 810930 PDR ADOCK 05000369...... ~~ -
om>
~ ~ ~
- -- ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.
P PDR OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usc--mm I nne ronu m oreoi nncu om
.,a.
.z The testing of safety valves to meet the NRC requirements has necessitated the design and construction of a new facility at Corbustion Engineering. Th;s facility is the first of a kind with the capability to perform meaningful operability tests for large spring-loaded safety valves over a broad range of fluid inlet conditions.
The safety valve test results to date indicate a need for additional information regarding the effects of inlet piping configuration and adjusting ring settings on safety valve operation.
Based on our review of the EPRI' test progran to date, we have concluded that the program represents a fully responsive effort to meet Comission requirements and that the additional testing proposed will provide naeded information to assure that the technical requirements of item II.D.1 of HUREG-0737 will be met. Since testing to date has not uncovered problems with safety and relief valves which are considered significent to the safety of operating plants, we believe that good cause has been shown to extend the HUREG-0737 completion date for PORY and safety valve testing so that the extended EPRI program may be carried to completion on an orderly basis. The latest estfuated test completion date is March 31, 1982.
Based upon the above, we have concluded that the licensee has complied with the requirements of this license condition to the extent practicable at this time, and that it is in the best interest of the public to extend the date for full compliance with License Condition 2.C.(11)j to July 1,1982.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION We have~ determined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any signi?i-cant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR Section 51.S(d)(4), that an environmental impact statenent or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be 3
prepared in connection with the issuance of this at.endment.
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the consideration discussed above, that: (1) because the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be con-ducted in conpliance with the Comission's regulations and the issuance of this amend-ment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date: September 30, 1981 4
- omce>
4 su m u )
.one>
Anc ronu sia nompecu oua OFFICIAL RECORD COPY' usm.a mi-mm
.