ML20029C161
| ML20029C161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1979 |
| From: | Crossman W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Seidle W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20029C132 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-90-361 NUDOCS 9103260336 | |
| Download: ML20029C161 (2) | |
Text
'w t'ait D v1 A1( $
/ p *.e NUCL E Ah ktGUL A10RY COVW$$!ON
[.
'e-R E GION IV
- lA4,
$.37, G11 AYAN PL A Z A DRivt,5Ulf f 1000 1
,A f
%;p y
e p
06nt,a ry 24,19 79 Docket N. 50-498 482 MEMORANDUM FOR:
File THRU:
W. C. Seidle, Chief, RC&ES Branch FROM:
W. A. Crossman, Chief. Projects Section-
- TELEPliONE CONVERSATION WITH A f
SUBJECT:
EMPLOYEE IN REGARD TO QC PRACTICES AT TH AND SOUTH TEXAS PROJECTS 1 received a telephone call from a fome at 9:00 p.m..on January 13, 1979, regarding malpractice in the QC organization.
(See investigation Report No. 50-498;50-499/78-12)
M'e same as they had done at Sout'n Texas, alleged that' they were falsifying Cadwel "as-builts" at Wolf Creek
-th said that when the Cadweld numbers were identified on the "as-bujlt",
ey were not sure that the numbers were in-the-proper location. Sfurther stated that the as-built drawings were filled-in after concrete w'as placed and there was no way of 1anyone checking-the validity of the Cadweld locations.
In regard to Cadweld inspection at Wolf Creek,M said one man was re-sponsibk for identifying the Cadwelds as to their location and when that.
Iran was-sick, no one paid the requirement any attention. - Consequently, 1
-when it came time to locate and identify the specific Cadwelds on the as-built drawings, they were " pencil. whipped" in, heent 'on to also allege that wher preplacement inspectors found things i
out of tolerence and wouldn't sign the pour card, the superintendent would sign the card and the placement-would proceed. Mould pinpoint this activity somewhere around the second week of October 1978 and said a re-view of the preplacement records signatures should show this.
IDI0rr03U00inhj;r;__y;,yj
}l In 2CCGTd:Tf; \\;L b [,c;;;g d yg Act, cxernyG:ns _ 4 1 - y /s)g;,.-- ~
u.
E0l k Y o - % )
~'
9103260336 910314 PDR FOIA KOURY90-361 PDR
file - DN 50-L98; 50-499 51N 50-482
-2 January 24,l{79 In regard to the South Texas Project.hotated that rany of the Civil QC inspectors would tell of rolpractices 3t the site if they had pro-tection. /
said that the inspectors kncw that the NRC had no authority to protect them, so therefore they would not talk to the NRC inspectors /
investigators.
Walso stated that the South Texas Civil inspection checklists were stacking up and there had been no as-built drawing entries since October 1978.
The alleger stated that Mwas no longer working at the Wolf Creek Pioject.
M w.+ovn e ~
W. A. Crossman, Chief Projects Section cc:
W. C. Seidle W. G. Hubacek C. R. Oberg C. E. Wisner E