ML20028F801
| ML20028F801 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Perry |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1980 |
| From: | Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027A600 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-545 NUDOCS 8302040396 | |
| Download: ML20028F801 (1) | |
Text
f'o[ YL}5 I
1' g,' ** % q'o ss UNIT ED ST ATES
!*ia NUCLE AR REGULATORY COf.'. MISSION
{.;hg,,7p,. 'y REClONlli g gf4y 799 s<oostvrti sono s
s.,
f ot r u rttvu. st tisois toiar Junr 23, 1930 Charles E. florelius, Assistant to the DirMt [24 G
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
Cordell C. Williams, Chief, Projects Section 2
SUBJECT:
PERRY PROJECT - ALLEGATI0t; LETTER RECEIVED BY THE LICENSEE Attached for your inforr.ation is a copy of a letter received by the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company from a former Perry site electrical inspector. We requested and received a copy of the letter from CEI. The
\\
individual who wrote the letter has not contacted the NRC as yet.
h Corde Williams, Chief Projects Section 2
Attachment:
As Stated cc:
G. Ficrelli D. Hayes J. Hughes O
e B302040396 821230 PDR FOIA HIATT82-545 PDR
UklTEDSTATES eQ NUCLE AR REGULATORY COf,', MISSION
$ k. f
+g b*
j-GL f fJ E L LYN, IL L Pdots 60137 NOV 19 GB0 Docket No. 50-440 '/O QI Docket No. 50-441.gy The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company ATTN:
Dalwyn R. Davidson Vice President - System Engineering and Construction Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Gentlemen:
This refers to C.5 inspection conducted by Mr. J. Hughes of this office on October 2-31, 1980, of activities at the Perry Nucicar Plant Project, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Construction Permits No. CPPR-148 and No. CPPR-149 and to the discussion of our findings with Nessrs. M. R. Edelman and G. W. Groscup and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-compliance with NRC requirements, as described in the enclosed Appendix A.
This notice -is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office within thirty days of your receipt of this notice a writte, statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, except as follows.
If the enclosures contain infomation that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you mast apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such infomation from public disclosure,'
The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the
-infor=ation is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that j
proprietary infor=ation identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application.
~ h{v&
w--,
The Cleveland Electric
- Illu inating Company
~
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,.
G. Fiorelli, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice Violation 2.
IE Inspection Reports No. 50-440/80-25 and No. 50-441/80-23 cc w/encis:
Cent.ral Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR Local PDR NSIC
+
TIC l
!!arold W. Kohn, Power Siting Commission 1
}
Mr. Daniel D. Wilt, Attorney Helen W. Evans, State of Ohio 1
i 4
RIfp R
RI RIII He
.cs '
K alin Williams Fiore li
++-
a.
bA
~
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Docket No.'50-440 Cc:pany Docket No. 50-441 Based on thr: results of an NRC inspection conducted in October 1-31, 1980 it' appears;that certain of your activities were not conducted in full co:plianer. with NRC requirements.. This item is an infraction.
10CTHFD, Appendix B, Criterion IX (Control of Special Processes) and PNPP PSAR Chapter 17, Section 17.1.9.6, requires that the contractor...estab-lish controls over special processes for all safety class equipment.and structures.
As a minimum, the, procedures will identify equipment, prepar-ation, para. meters, processing details, etc.
CEI Specification for Installation of Safety Class Piping - Group 1, spec. no. SP-44-4549-00 revision 1, Section 2:04.10 states that " piping shall be in proper alignment before connections are made.
No piping shall i
be " cold sprung" or prectressed unless it is so indicated on the Engineer's Drawings".
4 Contrary to the above, on October 23, 1980, the inspector observed fabri-cated spool pieces nos. 1-E15-32 and 1-E15-33 were being cold pulled into position.
See paragraph 2 of this report for details.
i i
9 t
e 4(4-b O
~
U.S. !.11 CLEAR REGULATORY CO"NISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTJON A*eD ENFORCEMENT REGION III Report Nox. 50-440/80-25; 50-441/80-23 l
Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 License Nos. CPPR-148; CPPR-249 Licensee:
C1cveland Electric Illu:sinating Co:pany P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44301 Pacility Name:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units I ar.d 2 4
Inspection at:
Perry Site, Perry, OH Inspection Co ueted:
ctober 1-31, 1980 Y
K t/ w^
Inspector:
u.h
,!/ M /#
I - @/&&
/
Approved By:
C.C. Williams, Chief
?)///7/ J~O Projects Section 2
/
/
Inspection Su. nary Inspection on October 1-31, 1980 (Report No. 50-440/80-25; 50-441/80-23)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE. Regional Resident Inspector (RI) of safety related construction activities, including welding of reactor recirculation system piping; containment spray system piping; install-1 ation of electrical conduit; and electrical quality records.
This inspection involved 108 inspection hours by one NRC inspector.
Results:
In the four areas inspected, one item of noncompliance was identi-fied (infraction:. Unit 1 - failure to follow procedure and specifications) e l
i 4
9 F
~
DETAILS Persons Contacted
- H. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department
- G. Groseup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department W. Kacer, General Supervising Engineer, CQS
- J. Kline, General Supervising Engineer, Construction B. Barkley, General Supervising Engineer, Design P. Martin, General Supervising Engineer, PQS G. Leidich, CQS QE Supervisor K. Combs, CQS Engineering Aide S. Tulk, CQS Lead Electrical Quality Engineer T. Thcmpson, CQS Electrical Quality Engineer E. Christiansen, Nuclear Electrical Engineer Other Personnel R. Matthys, CQS Quality Engineer (GAI)
R. Williams, CQS Lead Mechanical Quality Engineer, (GAI)
R. Crofton, CQS Lead Piping Quality Engineer (GAI)
G. Parker, CQS Quality Engineer (GAI)
K. Pech, Assistant Project Manager (GAI)
The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel during this reporting ~ period.
~
- Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Licensee Action en Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/79-01-01; 441/79-01-01):
CEI Quality Engineer-ing QA audit to verify the validity of General Electric (GE) Product Quality Checklist (PQC). The inspector reviewed CEI's audit report No. 300.545.1100, dated December 4, 5, and 6, 1979. The scope of the audit included:
seismic and environmental qualification documentation for the Emergency Core Cooling Systems Motors Standby Liquid Control System Motors, and Main Steam Isolation Valves Leakage Control Blower Motors.
With regard to test plans and quali-fication documentation for the H13 panels, electrical components, control room, and GE procured electrical equipment, the development of the test plans is behind schedule and none were available for revies by the audit team. The Resident Inspector (RI) will continue to monitor this area.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (440/80-02-01; 441/80-02-01): Housekeeping /
industrial safety concerns. The RI observed the cleanliness and safety throughout the plant and determined that it was satisfactory.
Interviews with the safety officer and contractor craftsmen indicated that there was an indoctrination training prograw for all new personnel. The inspector observed the availability of contractor QC inspectors in the welding areas and determined that this area is satisfactory.
~
s 2-1.
~ -.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (440/80-16-02; 441/E0-15-02):
Failure to docus.cnt in process inspection of deturring (reaming) activities during the installa-t ion of field cut conduit prior to May,1980. The inspector reviewed L. K. Comstock (LKC) Inspection Report No. 123 dated September 19; 1980.
LKC inspected conduit installed prior to May 15, 1980, per LKC QA/QC Pro-cedure 4.3.1, titled, " Cable Tray and Conduit Installation", and per conduit installation drawings D-215-111-F and D-215-08t:-G.
The RI has no further questions on this matter at this time.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
P'. ant Tours, Units 1 and 2 One or more plant areas were toured several times each week during this reporting period to observe general construction practices, area cleanliness, and storage / maintenance. conditions of equipment, piping, conduit, an cable trays.
d No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
2.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Observation of Velding Activities Unit I a.
The inspector observed welding of the Reactor Recirculation System Veld No. B33-1-B11 on traveller No. TI-B33-011.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with traveller; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) welding procedure requirements were met; (4) work area was free of weld rod stubs; and (5) physical appearance was acceptable.
b.
The following welds were ccmplete or partially completed; B-33-1-A6 is complete, B33-1-A7 completed and needs a final visual examination, B33-1-B7 comple.ted and needs a final visual examination, B33-1-A10
,is complete and needs an RT and visual examination, B33-1-A4 and B33-1-B4 are partially complete.
The RI will continue to monitor the welding activities and review the final documentation of the above mentioned welds, c.
The inspector toured the 1&SE welding material issuing station located at the Intermediate Building.
It was determined that (1) the welding materials are properly identified and segregated; (2) the temperature of rod ovens is maintained; (3) calibrations af temperature gauges are current; (4) records are properly kept; and (5) issuance and return of welding materials are controlled in accordance with approved procedures.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i 3.
Installation of Safetv-Related Penetrations The RI observed work activities including handling, protection, inspec-tion, and welding of safety-related penetrations.
a.
The inspector observed the in process welding of penetration P-103, LPCS pump' suction, in accordance with Drawing B312-631, Revision D.
b.
The inspector reviewed the field weld process sheet.
c.
During this reporting period, the inspector reviewed NDE quali-fication records for two liquid penetrant inspectors (Pullman),
to verify that their qualifications were current.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Observation of Safety-Related Piping Welding Activities Unit 1 The inspector observed, on October 23, 1980, that fabricated spool pieces Nos. 1-E15-32 and 1-E15-33 were being cold pulled into position with a 2 1/2 ton "come-a-long".
The inspector could not determine if pulling the pipe a few inches would cause permanent cracking or permanent deformation in the pipe. Upon questioning the contractor, nonconformance report (NCR) No. CQC-1922 was generated. The NCR stated that this operation is not to be used, unless temporary cold springing is done without exceeding elastic limits of the pipe. The NCR also gave acceptance criteria for temporary cold springing. This condition represents an item of noncompliance as identified in Appendix A.
(50-440/80-25-01)
Note: The above mentioned condition was previously brought to the licensee's attention in IE Inspection Report No. 50-440/80-19; 50-441/80-17.
5.
Reifew of Procurement Records, Units 1 and 2 a.
The RI reviewed qualification documentation packages for Westing-house supplied Emergency Service Water Pump House Ventilation Fan Motors IM32-C001A, C001B; 2M32-C001A, C001B, and Diesel Generator Building Ventilation Fan Motors IM43-C001A, C001B, C001C, C002A, C002B, C002C; 2M43-C001A, C001B, C001C, C002A, C002B, C002C. The qualification documentation package verified that the specified
'ests were successfully completed in accordance with the speci-fications and purchase order.
The review included:
(1) CEI Purchase Order No. P-1189-S.
(2) Material Receiving Reports, MR No. 11914,12156, apd 12368.
(3) Ciibert Associates Equipment'Specificaticas SP-648-4549-00, Revision-1 and SP-551-4549-00, Revision 0.
(4) Vestinghouse Certificate of Compliance dated April-13, 1977, which stated that all loads, stresses, and deficctions were within allowable limits and that the seismic qualification included in the documentation package was by the analysis method.
(5) The' aging test was performed by accelerated aging simulation in accordance with IEEE standard 334-1974 at 210 C.
The test results appear to be satisfactory.
(6) The equipment qualification data was included in the quali-fication documentation package as Vestinghouse document WCAP-9112 and was stated to be in accordance with 1EEE standard 323-1974. This document included the following parameters:
(a) Temperature:
-20 F to 122 F (b) liumidity: below 90%
(c)
Pressure:
atmospheric (d)
Irra'distion: 12 x 10 R
..e y -
(c) Aging:
40 years b.
The inspector reviewed documentation for Brand-Rex electrical cable to confirm that specified tests were successfully completed in accordance with specifications and purchase order.
The review included:
- (1) Material Receiving Reports (MRR's) 12587, 12095, and 12543.
(2) Purchase Order 16802.
(3) Gilbert Associates cable specification, SP-561-4549-00.
(4) Brand-Rex vertical tray flame test, dated March 9,1976.
(5) Franklin Institute Research Laboratories test report number F-C4113 titled, " Qualification Tests of Electric Cables for Class 1E Service in Nuclear Power Plants" dated May 1975.
(a)
LOCA Testing (b) Thermal Aging Test (c)
Radiation Exposure Test
. i
y f
(d) Steam / Chemical - Spray Exposure Test (6) Gilbert Associates Incorporated (GA1) Ictter, PY-GAI-Ven-0003, dated October 20, 1980, to Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company which stated that the guidelines set by IEEE-323 and 383 and the requirements of Specification SP-561-4549-00 are approved for Perry Nuclear Power Plant application.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Other Areas Inspected During this reporting period, the inspector reviewed personnel quali-fication records of the four electrical quality control inspectors (Level II) assigned to the. Construction Quality Control Section. The requirements were checked against ANSI N45.2.6.
Site conducted written proficiency testing for all four individuals before certification, and supporting requirements such as eye / physical exams and indoctrination training, were documented. The period of qualification was documented on the Certification of Qualification for each individual in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.58 and ANSI N 45.2.6.
All personnel records are current and the inspector has no further questions at this time.
Exit Interview The inspector met with site staff representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) on October 3, 17, and 24, 1980. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspections performed. The licensee acknowledged the findings.
Attachment:
Preliminary ?nspection Findings
\\
i OTTJ CE OT INSPECT 3 0N AND ENTORCD'T.NT PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS l-LICENSEE 2.
REGIONA1. OFFICE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
IE REGION III L ' DOCKET NUMEERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION 30-440;50-441 CPPR 148;CPPR 149 10/1 - 3/80 UI 6.
k'ithin the secpe of the inspection, no ite=s of noncompliance or deviation were found.
9 j
The f c11oving r.atters are. prelitinary inspection findings:
N These prelitinary inspection findings vill be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
Management at the Region III Office and they vill correspond with you concerning any enforcement action.
~CA
/MM SN
/#
iuclear Regu1 fdry Co=mismA@m I".sp3reRed 3
OFFICE OF INEPECTION AND ENFORCDjEity PRELIMINARY INSPECTION tit DINGS l'
1.ICENSEE,
2.
REGIONAL OFF3CE o
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
IE REGION III l.
DOCKET NIESERS 4.
LICENSE NUMSERS 5.
DATE F NSPECTION 50-440;50-441 CPPR 148;CPPR 149
/0 k-O
/
' ithin. the scope of the inspection, no ite=s of noncompliance or deviation
{
6.
were found.
The fo,llowing r.stters are prelicinary inspection findings:
N Q
9.
These preliminary inspection findings vill be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
~.,
Manage =ent at the Region 11I Office and'they vill correspond with you concerning any enforcement action.
W-
//cf/12,W si
- /cIcar Eeg Tory Corrission Inspector
'[
^
. s *,..
OFT) CE OF IM.I Et*1' 0:: /,';r, U:ycyct;,f,;;3 ;
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FINDINGS l'
2.
REC 3ONAL OFF3CE
- 1.
LICENSEE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CD.
IE REGION III 3.
DOCKET'NU".SERS 4.
LICENSE hYr3ERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION 50-440;50-441 CPPR 148;CPPR 149 10/20 - 24/80 L'ithin the scope of the inspection, no items of nonco=pliance or deviation i
~
6.
were found.
The f ollouing matters are preliminary inspec. tion findings:
7.
~
4 SEE ATTACHMENT These prelirinary inspection findings vill be revieued by TRC Supervision /
Q 8.
the Region III Office apd they will corr pond with you i
Management at concerning any enforce =ent action.
7 f6
')6dl, 0 ear Reg /Iator Corr.ission Inspectc N
g J
-.2
s i
gs for.rcs of VIOU7Tod pkSAsh '
{QLro-wo
.wamm
%pu
, s3 - vs't 1..
[3 cu eA ori C0 42auAt c n / O f C-W 5 c.
cwAA/ A 6 HCL }4 2f IWo A
nyew,xddc>1td ofy /bb r
ace 4h.
w-e a d a w6 rLA a, f/
nyAA.~ e aup-mxx n 4&.
a ca e,9 4 s c~ e xx (cAJgs(M6 n) ad PDPP esse cbf n, ss /z n.&pra ced Ga w&A,. utdeat o,aki:.w y
pa p J/aajer du-p
~1 d
j aaa e
. e-n,a-) 4
/W A t<s bi n e-f a +
A OA/ S i1, OW/~2 i
d sJ ns n
n,.,
mw-h a
j49 cw pg ~&v &g-p n,n s s m esr*/ ~ ~ a /
Feef,;7 9:o 4' /o./.e$A Y l
u! Nh t
- --aa 329 m &
AJAh A aa n-, Ass n s!?xd m f x165
'l y'
- xLu, n
g u,
, y s] &
dwM 9-,a :w,,, - ~
u =~
- y OAR,Jy L&p a.
- "
d 7
h
.