ML20011F324
| ML20011F324 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/03/1989 |
| From: | Rosenthal A NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | Bradley Jones NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011F315 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-34-89-347, FOIA-90-3 NUDOCS 9003050118 | |
| Download: ML20011F324 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:D3nni Sj - !( i v 1.; y
- L.cy% ~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .Fyr. m = #j. 3 l g, h, 3 iUNITED STATES 8 A "g
- [
wAsHWOTON,0. C. 20686 -Q ) a hh -2. j
- * *D '
April 3; 1989 3 om W n. Bradley W. Jones,-Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail stop 16 H3 Washington,-D.C. 20555-l Re: Contract No. NRC-34-89-347 Dear Mr. Jones As required by Section F.4 of the above contract, this l; is my letter progress report for the period between February 28,.1989, (the commencement -date of the contract) and March ll 31, 1989. During that period, I worked primarily on the-kl investigation involving the Office of Investigations.(OI) l handling'of the Ellison allegations and certain related i L matters..In that connection, among other things, I examined the' voluminous materials contained in the files of the Office of Inspector and Auditor (OIA) pertaining to this - investigation;Jconducted interviews of seven NRC officials and employees; prepared an-introduction to the investigative report; reviewed interview-reports prepared by an Office of l the General.. Counsel (OGC) attorney detailed to assist in the y k ' investigation; arranged for the issuance of a subpoena ducas L - tecum;~~and, in general, mapped out the strategy for the pursuit of the investigation and, as:necessary, consulted with persone-within the agency on matters pertaining to it. In addition, I preliminarily-examined.the files pertaining to three other OIA investigations that were transferred to me because they involved OI. Finally, I reviewed in detail an OIA report of an-investigation involving OI that had been L completed prior to February.28. Although signing that l' report, I appended a supplemental. memorandum of my own. 1 No problems or delays were encountered during the . reporting period.- The anticipated failure to obtain an L early. affirmative response to the subpoena ducas tecum may l - cause some delay in completing the investigation to which that subpoena relates. My daily log is attached. As required, it reflects the - number of hours devoted each day to work specifically in the performance of the contract and, if any, work as a member of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel. 9003050118 900301 PDR FOIA AIROZO90-3 PDR w me-w
~. ~ 3.; t
- ' 4. -
't 2 The contract costs incurred during this reporting period consist entirely of my_ compensation,.as followst' 15 8: hour days at-$500.00 per day $_7,500.00 5
- 7. hour days at $ 62.50 per hr 4 2,187.50
.i ' 2. 3 hour. days at $ 62.50 per_-hr-375.00-Total $10,062.50
- l All' services were performed within the 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., period (as specified in Section B.3) except on March 17 (see-log).
'If any other information is desired, please let me know. ' Sincerely, )b j . Alan S. Rosenthal J L'
Attachment:
As stated' l. 1 l'.- ..i i l :' _l 'l 1 L l' 1 -sa -t - * - =
- 7; y;;- e 4
- * ? x.
- 1..,
] = ' j ' s,. l 'l Nn p _- v [$ b h-l-ALAN S. ROSENTHAL TIME SHF:ETL-FOR PERIOD FEBRUARY 28 - MARCH 31, 1989.= p REFI ECT3 NO TJ ME DEVOTED TO 03 ' 3 NVEST3 GAT]ONS ' AND APPEAJ. 6 F PANEI, WORK, RESPI:CT3VELY _.(MFASURED J N. HOllRS) V I DATE -INVESTIGATION ' APPEAL PANEL Feb' 28 8 .[ . Mar. ' l-8 f Mar. 2= 8 it.d Mar. 3 8 -~ Ma r. 6 8 g Mar. 7 8 Mar. 8 7 3 (3:30 p.m. - 4:30 p Mar. 9 7 1 .(3:30 p.m.;- 4:30 p ~ Mar.-10 7 1 (11:00 a.m. Noon) j x. Mar.'13 8 Mar. 14: 8 ( -{ Mar.'15 -8'- . Mar. 16 8: ~ Mar. 17 3.-(7:00 a.m - 3 (10:00 a.m. -- Noon) .a 1, 10:00 % m) 1:00 pm. - 2:00 p.r l a p Mar. 22 8 j I o Mar. 23 8 L~ 1 ) Ma r'. 24 8 1 Mar..27 7 1 -(11: 00 a.m. - Noon) ' i Mar. 28-8 Mar. 29 7 1 (10:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.) L Mar. 30 8 i Mar. 31 3 (8:30 a.m. 3 11:30 a.m.)
- }}