Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML19291B901, ML19291B903, ML19309G757, ML20004B639, ML20011B241, ML20011B243, ML20031C991, ML20039F146, ML20040D603, ML20041C142, ML20041C150, ML20050F889, ML20052F775, ML20052G848
|
MONTHYEARML19270H4761979-07-23023 July 1979 Forwards Request for Addl Info to Be Sent to Licensee in Order to Complete Review of 770722 Submittal Re Technical Assistance Contract 10026.Response Required within 45 Days Project stage: RAI ML19254D1071979-09-18018 September 1979 Requests Addl Info Re Loss of Offsite Power on 770920 to Aid in Review of Offsite Power Sys Adequacy.Requests Reponse within 90 Days Project stage: Approval ML19250C3611979-10-30030 October 1979 Forwards Request for Addl Info on Degraded Grid Voltage Determined During Review of 770722 Submittal Re Second Level of Undervoltage Protection for Engineering Safety Feature Loads.Proposal for Tech Specs Change Required Project stage: RAI ML19291B9031979-12-0707 December 1979 Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Sys Voltage Project stage: Other ML19291B9011979-12-0707 December 1979 Forwards Rept Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Sys Voltage Project stage: Other ML19290E0331980-02-13013 February 1980 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Loss of Offsite Power Events.Requests Response within 90 Days Project stage: RAI ML19312D3491980-02-29029 February 1980 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Sys Voltage to Complete Review of Project stage: RAI ML19309G7571980-04-28028 April 1980 Forwards Addl Info Re Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Sys Voltages & Replacement Pages for 791207 Rept in Response to NRC 800229 Request Project stage: Other ML20004B6371981-05-21021 May 1981 Application for Amend of License DPR-57 to Revise Tech Spec for Instrumentation Which Initiates Disconnection of Offsite Power Sources Project stage: Request ML20004B6391981-05-21021 May 1981 Tech Spec 3.2-12 for Instrumentation Which Initiates Disconnection of Offsite Power Sources Project stage: Other ML20031C9801981-10-0202 October 1981 Application to Amend Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,changing Tech Specs Re Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements for Degraded Voltage Relays & Loss of Offsite Power Relays Project stage: Request ML20031C9911981-10-0202 October 1981 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements for Degraded Voltage Relays & Loss of Offsite Power Relays Project stage: Other ML20011B2431981-12-0202 December 1981 Corrected Tech Spec 4.9.A.6 for Limiting Condition for Operation & Surveillance Requirements Re Degraded Sys Voltage Project stage: Other ML20011B2411981-12-0202 December 1981 Forwards Corrected Tech Specs Pages 3.9-4 & 3.9-4a Re Degraded Sys Voltage,Per 811002 Amend.Typing Error Corrected.No Wording Changed Project stage: Other ML20039A9831981-12-0707 December 1981 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Adequacy of Electric Distribution Sys Voltages.Response Requested within 30 Days Project stage: RAI ML20039F1461981-12-10010 December 1981 Advises That Components,Including Relays,Potential Transformers,Associated Auxiliary Relays & Power Supplies Are safety-related Equipment.Util Should Propose Tech Spec Changes That Include Surveillance of Components Project stage: Other ML20041C1501981-12-31031 December 1981 Station Auxiliary Sys Offsite Source Voltage Study Project stage: Other ML20040A9471982-01-12012 January 1982 Responds to 811207 Request for Addl Info on Electric Distribution Sys Voltages.Info Includes Test Results or Vendor Certification Re Contactor Capability for Continuous Operation at 98.2 Volts.Drawings Encl Project stage: Request ML20040D6031982-01-26026 January 1982 Proposed Tech Spec Pages Re Emergency Power Sys Project stage: Other ML20040D5991982-01-26026 January 1982 Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5 Changing Tech Specs Re Surveillance of Undervoltage Relays & Associated Components of Emergency Power Sys.Response to NRC Encl Project stage: Request ML20041C1421982-02-18018 February 1982 Forwards Southern Co Svcs Hatch Units 1 & 2 Station Auxiliary Sys Offsite Source Voltage Study, Clarifying Emergency Power Sys Capabilities.Assumptions 15,21 & 24 Outlined Project stage: Other ML20050F8911982-04-0505 April 1982 Safety Evaluation Re Adequacy of Facility Electric Distribution Sys Voltages.Design Acceptable Project stage: Approval ML20050F8891982-04-0505 April 1982 Notifies That Electric Distribution Sys Voltages Comply W/ General Design Criterion 17 & Are Acceptable Per 791207, 0428,1009 & 820112 Responses Project stage: Other ML20052F7821982-05-0606 May 1982 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 88 & 27 to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively Project stage: Approval ML20052F7751982-05-0606 May 1982 Amends 88 & 27 to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively, Amending Tech Spec Resulting from Reanalysis & Mod of Plant Sys & Components Deemed Necessary in Order to Avoid Consequences of Degraded Grid Voltage Condition Project stage: Other ML20052G8481982-05-14014 May 1982 Requests Remittance of Class III Fee for 811002 Application Re Degraded Grid Voltage Project stage: Other 1981-12-02
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Hatch |
|---|
|
Text
b y } g(,k y_
UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\\g(
l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 a
v4/
February 13, 1980 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 Mr. Charles F. Whitmer Vice President - Engineering Gecagia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Dear Mr. Whitmer:
We are currently reviewing the adequacy of the offsite power systems of nuclear power plants and in particular, the loss of offsite power events at your facility.
One aspect of this review concerns the history of experienced total and partial power outages and attendent degraded voltage or frequency conditions of the grid.
In our review of this matter we have drawn upon the information provided to us via Licensee Event Reports and followup letters which have been sent to us.
Our records do not indi~cate that you have experienced any loss of offsite power events either completely or partially.
Please review your experiences and, if any are identified, then report tnem in answer to this letter and furnish the related infomation as included in the enclosure.
Please provide your response for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Power Plant Units Nos.1 and 2 to us within 90 days of the receipt of this letter.
Si ncerely, p
Chief Operating Reactors dranch #3 Division of Operating Reactors Encl osure:
Request for Additional Information 8 0 03 0 40 0'fo
.s Mr. Charles F. Whitner Georgia Power Conpany cc:
G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shrw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge l'0, M Street, N. W.
Wasnington, D. C.
20036 Ruble A. Thomas Vice President P. O. Box 2625 Southern Servi;es, Inc.
Birmingham,, Alabama 35202 Ozen Batum P. O. Box 262)
Southern Services, Inc.
Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Mr. William Widner Georgia Power Company Power Generation Department P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Mr. L. T. Gucwa Georgia Power Company Engineering Department P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Accling County Public Library Parker Street Baxley, Georgia 31413 Mr. R. F. Rogers U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 710 Baxley, Georgia 31513
s REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.
For losses of offsite pcwer where less than all offsite pcwer was lost:
1.
How many circuits to the offsite network are normally available and how many were lost during the event?
2.
What was the cause of the event?
3.
Why did the other lines not fail when some did fail?
4.
Was any voltage increase or decrease experienced just prior to or during the outage?.If so, p, lease give details, voltages reached, affects, etc.
5.
Was any frequency decay experienced just prior to or during the outage?
If so, please give details, lowest frequency reached, cecay rate, affects on equipment cperation, etc.
5.
How long was power unavailable from the circuit?
7.
Date of Event.
3.
For losses of all offsite power:
1.
How long was the power off? How long for partial recovery? Please give details.
2.
If turbine trip occurred, how soon after did 10 of offsite power occur?
3.
If power was recovered promptly (10 minutes or less), was it due to automati:
or manual actions?
4 Was any voltage increase or decrease experienced just prior to or during the outage? If so, please give details, voltages reached, affects, etc.
5.
Was any frequency decay experienced just prior to or during the outage?
If so, please give details, lowest frequency reached, decay rate, affects on equipment operation, etc.
5.' Date of Event.
O.
Were there any other loss of offsite power events cther than we have listed?
If so, please give details of eacn event.
.