|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20205K6141999-04-30030 April 1999 Non-proprietary Version of Rev 2 to Holtec Rept HI-971843, Licensing Rept for Reclassification of Discharge in Millstone Unit 3 Spent Fuel Pool ML20206T3991999-03-31031 March 1999 First Quarter 1999 Performance Rept, Dtd May 1999 ML20205E2361999-03-31031 March 1999 Mnps,Units 1,2 & 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Rept ML20204K1031999-03-19019 March 1999 Non-proprietary Licensing Rept for Spent Fuel Rack Installation at Mnps,Unit 3 ML20207B2271999-02-22022 February 1999 Rev 0 to SIR-99-021, Evaluation of Stratification Loadings in LBB Analysis for Mnps,Unit 2 Surge Line ML20199D4571999-01-0808 January 1999 Progress Toward Restart Readiness at Millstone Unit 2 - Nu Briefing for Nrc ML20197H5871998-12-31031 December 1998 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program, Final Rept,Vol 1 ML20198G7161998-11-30030 November 1998 Rev 0 to EMF-2145, Millstone Unit 2 Large Break Loca/Eccs Analysis with Replacement SGs & Plant Modifications ML20195H7401998-11-30030 November 1998 Station/Unit 3 Third Quarter Performance Rept ML20195C8091998-11-0909 November 1998 Request for Permission to Apply LBB Methodology to Pressurizer Surge Piping, Plant Specific Info Fo Pressurizer Surge Piping ML20195C7731998-10-13013 October 1998 Rev 0 to SIR-98-096, Pressurizer Surge Line LBB Evaluation Mnps,Unit 2 ML20198G7041998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 0 to EMF-2079, Millstone Unit 2 Large Break Loca/Eccs Analysis with Replacement Sgs ML20154P9541998-09-30030 September 1998 Simulator Quadrennial Certification Rept ML20237B4781998-07-31031 July 1998 Station/Unit 3,Second Quarter Performance Rept for Jul 1998 ML20237B2801998-07-31031 July 1998 Rev 1 to EMF-98-036, Post-Scram Main Steam Line Break Analysis for Millstone Unit 2 ML20236V7541998-07-0101 July 1998 Rev 0 to Little Harbor Consultants,Inc, Evaluation of Millstone Self-Assessment & Independent Oversight Programs ML20236U6361998-07-0101 July 1998 Rev 0 to Leak-Before-Break Evaluation High Energy Safety Injection Piping,Mnps,Unit 2 ML20236F5221998-06-30030 June 1998 Independent Assessment of Upper Guide Structure (Ugs) Personnel Contamination Event at Millstone Station Unit 2, Final Rept ML20236F5051998-06-25025 June 1998 Rev 1 to Event Review Team Rept Root Cause Investigation Upper Guide Structure (Ugs) Personnel Contamination Event ML20249C3911998-06-22022 June 1998 Simulator Quadrennial Certification Rept ML20248F4071998-06-0101 June 1998 Final Rept SL-5192, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program for Millstone Unit 3 ML20236P4341998-05-22022 May 1998 Progress Toward Restart Readiness at Millstone Station - Northeast Utilities Briefing for Nrc ML20236F6411998-05-11011 May 1998 Rev 0 to Justification of Continued LBB Compliance for Nu MP2 ML20203H3531998-02-24024 February 1998 Transport of Small Air Pocket ML20216E0961998-02-17017 February 1998 Redacted Safety Conscious Work Environment (Assessment of Nuclear Oversight 980121 Statement) ML20199G8031998-01-31031 January 1998 Radiological Survey for Waterford Town Landfill,Waterford, Ct ML20199D9111998-01-23023 January 1998 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Status Rept, for Period Ending 980123 ML20203H3961997-12-31031 December 1997 Integrated Sys Functional Review for Mnps,Unit 3, Engineering Self Assessment Rept ML20217C2201997-12-16016 December 1997 Exam of Concrete Cores Millstone III Subcontainment Porous Concrete ML20202H2981997-12-0202 December 1997 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Status Rept ML20203H3661997-11-30030 November 1997 Transient Clearing of Air in Loop Seal ML20199G8091997-11-30030 November 1997 Radiological Survey for Equestrian Ctr Harkness State Park Waterford,Ct ML20211F7171997-09-29029 September 1997 Rev 0 to Critical Design Characteristics Radiological Events for Millstone 2 ML20217F9481997-08-31031 August 1997 Non-proprietary Version of Bases for Millstone Unit 3 ECCS Current & Future Ts ML20217Q7101997-08-29029 August 1997 Rev 0 to Critical Design Characteristics Reactivity Events ML20217Q7181997-08-29029 August 1997 Rev 0 to Critical Design Characteristics Undercooling Events & Reactor Coolant Flow Reduction Events ML20210H0051997-08-0505 August 1997 Rev 0 to Critical Design Characteristics Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Events & Mslb/Loca Containment Analyses ML20149F0971997-07-18018 July 1997 Rev 0 to Critical Design Characteristics Overcooling Events,Millstone 2 ML20148Q2901997-06-24024 June 1997 Simulator Quadrennial Rept for 1993-1997 ML20148K8221997-05-31031 May 1997 Temporary Use of Atlas Copco Diesel Compressor PTMS900 at Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Maint of Svc Air Sys ML20148R7151997-05-30030 May 1997 Progress Toward Restart Readiness at Millstone Station ML20210S3711997-04-29029 April 1997 Margin of Immunity Determination for SRV Electric Lift for Neut,Millstone Nucelar Site,Unit 1 ML20138E6391997-04-11011 April 1997 Investigation of Possible Deterioration of Porous Concrete Millstone 3 Nuclear Reactor ML20217C2121997-04-0707 April 1997 Rev 2 to S3-EV-9700574, SE for Containment Structure Porous Concrete Drainage Sys ML20137H3031997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 2 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20138E6471997-03-14014 March 1997 Porous Concrete Investigation Millstone 3 Waterford,Ct ML20137C6281997-03-14014 March 1997 Redacted Version of Rev 1 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20141D2881997-02-17017 February 1997 Rev 3 to Maint Rule Unit Basis Document ML20135E3221997-02-13013 February 1997 Independent Review Team Rept 1996 MP -1 Lout NRC Exam Failures ML20133C1451996-12-31031 December 1996 Porous Concrete Mock-Up Testing Phase III W/Containment Mat Concrete 1999-04-30
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217P5391999-10-25025 October 1999 Rev 0,Change 1 to Millstone Unit 1 Northeast Utils QA Program ML20217C8721999-10-0606 October 1999 Rev 21,change 3 to MP-02-OST-BAP01, Nuqap Topical Rept, App F & G Only B17896, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With B17894, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With B17898, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20216J4341999-09-24024 September 1999 Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6 ML20211N8401999-09-0202 September 1999 Rev 21,change 1 to Northeast Utils QA TR, Including Changes Incorporated Into Rev 20,changes 9 & 10 B17878, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With B17874, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20216F5141999-08-31031 August 1999 Rept on Status of Public Petitions Under 10CFR2.206 B17879, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With ML20211G9631999-08-30030 August 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valves ML20211A6561999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2 B17858, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With B17856, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With ML20210J0311999-07-21021 July 1999 Rev 20,Change 10 to QAP 1.0, Organization ML20210E5931999-07-19019 July 1999 Revised Page 16 of 21,to App F of Northeast Util QA Program Plan ML20210C5911999-07-15015 July 1999 Revised Rev 20,change 10 to Northeast Util QA Program TR, Replacing Summary of Changes ML20210A0411999-07-15015 July 1999 Rev 20,change 10 to Northeast Util QA Program Tr B17814, Special Rept:On 990612 B Train EDG Failed to Restart within 5 Minutes Following Completion of 18 Month 24 H Endurance Run Required by TS 4.8.1.1.2.g.7.Caused by Procedural inadequacy.Re-performed Hot Restart Via Manual Start1999-07-12012 July 1999 Special Rept:On 990612 B Train EDG Failed to Restart within 5 Minutes Following Completion of 18 Month 24 H Endurance Run Required by TS 4.8.1.1.2.g.7.Caused by Procedural inadequacy.Re-performed Hot Restart Via Manual Start ML20209D1881999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 20,change 9 to Northeast Util QA Program Tr ML20196J2191999-06-30030 June 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee USI A-46 Implementation Program,In General,Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff Sser 2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20211A6751999-06-30030 June 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2,providing Revised Average Daily Unit Power Level & Operating Data Rept ML20196A8451999-06-30030 June 1999 Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20209J0541999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Unit 2 B17830, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20196K1791999-06-30030 June 1999 Addendum 6 to Millstone Unit 2 Annual Rept, ML20196J1821999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 21,Change 0 to Northeast Utilities QAP (Nuqap) Tr B17833, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Power Station,Unit 1.With ML20195H1011999-06-11011 June 1999 Rev 20,change 8 to Northeast Utilities QAP (Nuqap) TR ML20207G6411999-06-0303 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 105,235 & 171 to Licenses DPR-21,DPR-65 & NPF-49,respectively ML20211A6631999-05-31031 May 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2,providing Revised Average Daily Unit Power Level,Operating Data Rept & Unit Shutdowns & Power Reductions B17808, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20211B7351999-05-31031 May 1999 Cycle 7 Colr B17804, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 2.With B17807, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With ML20209J0661999-05-31031 May 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Unit 2 ML20206M4631999-05-11011 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Alternative Proposed by Licensee to Perform Ultrasonic Exam on Inner Surface of Nozzle to safe-end Weld ML20206J8351999-05-0707 May 1999 Rev 20,Change 7 to QAP-1.0, Northeast Utls QA Program (Nuqap) Tr ML20206G6221999-05-0404 May 1999 SER Accepting Util Request to Apply leak-before-break Status to Pressurizer Surge Line Piping for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2 B17782, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With ML20205R3531999-04-30030 April 1999 Addendum 4 to Annual Rept, B17775, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3.With ML20205K6141999-04-30030 April 1999 Non-proprietary Version of Rev 2 to Holtec Rept HI-971843, Licensing Rept for Reclassification of Discharge in Millstone Unit 3 Spent Fuel Pool ML20206E2971999-04-30030 April 1999 Rev 1 to Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2 COLR - Cycle 13 B17777, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Unit 2. with1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Millstone Unit 2. with ML20205Q5891999-04-0909 April 1999 Rev 20,change 6 to QAP-1.0,Northeast Utils QA Program TR ML20205R8751999-04-0909 April 1999 Provides Commission with Staff Assessment of Issues Related to Restart of Millstone Unit 2 & Staff Recommendations Re Restart Authorization for Millstone Unit 2 ML20206T3991999-03-31031 March 1999 First Quarter 1999 Performance Rept, Dtd May 1999 B17747, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
,a DOCKET NO. 50-336 g MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 f
e EVALUATION OF NEUTRON SHIELD EFFECTIVENESS C
'O 100 NOVEMBER,1979 7913399 } } }
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Summary III. Discussion A. Causes of the High Radiation Levels B. Neutron Shield Design & Effectiveness C. Actual Manrem Savings to Date IV. Conclusion V. References o \0\
I. INTRODUCTION During the start-up test program at Calvert Clif fs Unit No.1, higher than anticipated neutron levels resulting from neutron streaming in the reactor cavity were observed within and adjacent to the containment
. building (Reference 1). Millstone Unit No. 2 has a reactor design almost identical to that of the Calvert Cliffs units, and tests conducted during the Millstone Unit No. 2 start-up test program confirmed that a similar condition existed (Reference 2). This condition resulted in limitations being placed on containment and penetration room access during reactor operation in order to minimize personnel radiation exposure. It is believed that these high radiation 1cvels may also lead to the accelerated degration of certain equipment necessitating pernature replacement. Therefore, it became necessary to perform design modifications to reduce the dose rates to more acceptable levels.
_17/' 170 isvs iuv
II. SlHDIARY The optimum solution to the radiation streaming phenonema was determined to be a water tank placed over reactor shield annulus (Reference 3). The results of this shielding modifications are:
(1) neutron dose rate reductions ranging from factors of 25-151 for the 38' 6" level (operating floor), 50-90 for the 14' 6" level, and 7-30 for the -3' 6" level; and (2) gamma dose rate reductions ranging from f actors of 5-30 for the 38' 6" level, 2-15 for the 14' 6" level, and 1-8 for the -3' 6" 1cvel.
These reduction factors are based on results obtained after shield in-sta11ation,uhich assumed a 100% power level of 2700 Mw(th) as opposed to the measurements obtained before installation, which assumed a 100% power level of 2560 Mw(th). This fact, in addition to the change in core leakage, based on the new core loading arrangement, make the measured reduction approximately 30-40% less than that actually experienced.
The measured reduction factors are slightly in excess of the f actor of 40 designed reduction for the operating floor. The total dose rate for areas of the containment which are occupied as required by operating personnel are now in general less than 100 mrem per hour.
III. DISCUSSION A. Causes of the liigh Radiation Levels A review of the Millstone Unit No. 2 shield arrangement indicated that the high radiation 1cvels inside the containment could be cauced by streaming from: (1) the annulus between the reactor vessel flange and the primary shield wall, (2) the annulue between the reactor coolant piping and penetrations in the primary shield wall, and (3) the access opening through the lower segment of the primary shield wall. Based on the tests conducted during the start-up phase of the units, it was determined that the most significant contribution was the cavity streaming region since the highest dose rates were measured in the areas surrounding the reactor cavity.
B. Shield Design & Effectiveness Since initial plant start-up in 1975, various alternate shield designs have been investigated and ultimately rejected for various reasons. The shielding concept that was finally selected consists of two water filled stainless steel semi-circular tanks. Uhen the two halves are joined in place by the four hinge pins, they form a collar around the reactor vessel head at the flange elevation and span the gap between the reactor vessel and the refueling cavity floor.
The neutron shield was designed to minimize stay time in the reactor cavity area during installation. The work inside the cavity was the major contribution to the total man-rem required for the initial installation of the shield. It was originally estimated that three man-rem would be required for this task. Af ter the work was completed, the exposures recorded on the radiation work permits were totaled. The entire task required 1.5 man-rem, half of the estimate. () ) (lk
'U
The shield was also designed to minimize the time required for the removal and installation during each refueling outage. This is cal-culated to be two man-rem per outage, half of this due to activation of the shield and the remaining due to activation of other structures within the containment building and other sources. The minimum total annual dose savings was calculated to be 12 nan-rem per year. This is for the case of containment entries only for the purpose of obtaining anfety injection tank (SIT) samples as required by the technical specifications.
With the increased operational flexibility resulting from the shield, it is estimated that there could be a savings of 100 man-rem per year.
Figures 1-4 show the results of neutron measurements and Figures 5-8 the results of the gamma measurements taken at 10%, 50% and 100% power. All results are extrapolated to 100% power. All neutron measurements were performed with a PNR-4 neutron ren-meter and all gamma measurements were performed with ionization chambers. In some cases, the PNR-4 readings were verified with the use of an Anderson-Braun meter.
As can be seen in Figure 1, the neutron dose rate reduction factors varies from a factor of 25 for areas overlooking the cavity to 100-150 for areas near the containment building wall.
Figure 2 shows reduction factors of 50-90 for neutrons on the 14' 6" 1cvel. Neutron dose reduction factors of 7-30 are shown on Figure 3 (elevation -3' 6"). Inside the personnel air lock, Figure 4, there is a neutron dose rate reduction factor of 50.
The gamma dose rates are reduced in much a similar manner as the neutron. The highest reduction occurring on the 38' 6" level (Figure (J2 / / 4 7 5 isvJ l J F -
O 105
5), lower on the 14' 6" level (Figure 6), and even lower on the -3' 6" level (Figure 7). Points N7 and N2 actually show an increase in gamma dose rates. This is because t!.e major source at these points was not streaming but nearby piping and the fact that the reactor power level has now been increased by approximately 5% over the Cycle 1 pouer level.
C. Actual Man-rem Savings to Date Several weeks af ter the installation of the neutron shield and the start of Cycle 3 operation, a primary coolant system leak developed inside the containment. This leak was repaired at full power with an expenditure of 0.4 man-rem. It is estimated that an additional 10 man-rem would have been expended to repair the leak at power without the neutron shield.
A second repair was recently made at full power. This repair was on one of the safety injection tanks with a resulting exposure of 0.5 man-rem.
For this repair, the shield saved 20 man-rem.
Additional man-rem savings are routinely gained every month for the purpose of obtaining SIT tank samples. Before this shield, each entry resulted in an expenditure of 1 man-rem. With the shield, this has decreased to 0.15 man-rem.
1,7 < ' 17o 4 avs nac
IV. C0!;CLUSION The water tank shield design has proven itself to be an effective design for the reduction of neutron streaming near the vessel flange. This design has superior qualities in that it takes a minimal expenditure of man-rem for initial and subsequent removal and installations and provides the necessary reduction in total dose rate. This goal was accomplished without unduly compromising other design considerations, bb f 33~
O 107
V. REFERENCES
- 1. MPR Associates, Inc., Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Plant Unit No. 1, Report of Temporary Shield Modifications, MPR-457, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, February 1975.
- 2. Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit II, Radiation Survey Results in and Around Millstone Unit II Containment Building, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, April 1976.
- 3. W. G. Counsil letter to R. Reid, dated Febraary 23, 1979.
3 I)'b o 108
MILL 5 TONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO 2 Neutron Survey B = Before Shield
- A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction R = Thousands (R/hr) mrem /hr a 41 L t yt t CC'4T AINv C N T DI' e**) ,
t t o:wT B A RF
' N1 60R 1R 60
- g. N20* *N8" $2 N2 60R 1R 60 N3 60R - -
N4 60R 1R 60 N5 65R 1R 65 f
[g8 . N19 N6 4R 40 100
- N7 1. 5R 10 150 N8 1. 5 R 10 150
- N15 .N2 .N16 . N1 oN17' .N18 N9 SR 150 33 N9
- N10 20R 600 33 N11 10R 400 25
. I e NS N12 6R - -
N22 N21 N14 ( , N10 N13 10R - -
N14 10R 400 25 N15 10R - -
$13 Il3 1I12 }I4 'h11 N16 6R - -
N17 10R 400 25 p - Q>\%
- N18 6R - -
\ .* N25 l
I E' l N19 SR 60 83 N20 1.4 R 15 93
. D' N21 7R 80 88 N23 N22 2R 30 67
. N7 67 N23 2R 30 94 . g N24 2R 30 67 N25 3R 40 75
o 109 100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels Based on 13%, 50% and 100% surveys y <
J b,-
MILL 5 TONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UN1T NO. 2 NEUTRON SURVEY B = Before Shield A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction R = Thousands (R/hr) caoVND LEVEL CONTAINMENT (14 A") mrem /hr E REsuLTs PCINT B A RF N, N1 400 N6 N2 300 6 50 N3 300 6 50 N5 N4 800 l j *N7 N5 900 10 90 N6 300 0 N7 300 NO -
10 -
) N9 -
. N8 . N4 j l l .
N9
. N3 N1 1
, N2 'g 636 5 136m 100% Power (2700 Mwth) Rai.iation Levels - -
Based on 13%, 50% and la's% Surveys bk ]
MILLSTONE ItuCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 NEUTRON SURVEY B = Before Shield A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction R = Thousands (R/hr) arem/hr
.i LEVEL CON T AlHMf MT (.3* 4") RESULT 5 POINT B A RF t
N1 200 N2 175 25 7 N1 N3 250 8 25 9A N4 250 10 31 1p N8 N5 250 gg j N6 200 8 25
^'
-v
- N2 N8 -
e
\ / . N9 N10
. N11 _
~
RX e e J N4 N11 /
J
/ / \\
-~
e$12 D C I so ,
l
~ ~
ELEVATOR
- a e
N5 n6 .
u,4 3 ; p 100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels 0 111 Based on 13%, 50% and 100% Surveys
MILLSTONE MUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 NEUTRON SURVEY B = Before Shield A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction R = Thousands (R/hr) 3e 6" ELE WEST WN STW PFNs T R A TION DOOu PIP [CH A $g Mrem /hr
- ESULTS POIN T B A RF N1 N1 20 N2 100 e N4 N3 30 N2
- PEnsoNNEL N4 30 HATCH N5 300 6 50 e N7 N6
, N7
\ N8 N8 -
8 f N6
100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels Based on 13%, 50% and 100% Surveys '7
'O 112 -
MILL 5 TONE MUCLEAR POWER STATION I
UMT NA 2 GAMMA SURVEY
, B = Before Shield A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction mrem /hr
- i L t V f L C C'M AtNU C N T DI' 6")
, R = Thousands (R/hr) sEsutis i Fo:wT B A RF N20*
N1 8R l.7R 8R l.7R 5
5
- u. N2 N3 8R - -
N4 8R l.7R 5 10R l .7R 6
/ p- NS 0
8 e N19 N6 450 20 22 f' v N7 225 10 22 N8 225 10
~
- N15 .N2 .N16 . N1 oN17' .N18 N9
- N10 4R 600 7 373 2.5R 400 6
. e e N5 N12 1.5R - -
N22 N21 N14 N10 2.5R - -
, N13 N14 3.2R 250 13 N15 2.5R - -
$13 h3 }I12 }I4 111 N16 1.5R - -
N17 2.5R 400 6
/~%s N18 1.5R - -
- \ .* N25 I b l N19 1R 50 20 N20 180 20 9
- F N21 1.1R 40 27 N23 N22 400 20 20 T--~
'94 e {g N24 450 17 26 N25 450 25 18 100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels -
Based on 13%, 50%, and 100% Surveys '
-O kk
MILL 5 TONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 GAMMA SURVEY B = Before Shield
, A = Af ter Shield RF = Factor of Reduction caoUND LEVEL CONTAINMENT (tr A") R = Thousands (R/hr) mrem /hr g RESULT 5 PONT B A RF N, N1 60 N2 50 6 8 N3 60 25 2 N5 N4 130 8 16 i } eN7 N5 130 8 16 N6 50 25 2 v O N7 50 8 6 NO -
8 -
) N9 _
, N8 . N4 V N9
. N3 i
T _
N1
. N2 100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Les els ,
Based on 13%, 50%, and 100% Surveys ,,,
MILL 5 TONE I!UCLEAll POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 CAMMA SURVEY B = Before Shield A = After Shield
, RF = Factor of Recution R = Thousands (R/hr)
/hr
, 1 LEVEL CONTAINMENT (-3' 4") RESULT 5 POlHT B A RF E
, N1 15
'y N2 20 24 1 N3 40 20 2
- A N4 40 6 7 Q N8 N5 40 I sc N6 30 10' 3 N9
^~ *
, y7 250 280 1
~ ~ ~ ~
N10
~. N8 -
20 e
N / . N9 N10
. N11 -
l RX I -
e e J N4 N11 /
d
/ / \\
12 O - C --- m N7 3, ,
op ELEVATOR NS a
}
N6 e ,
100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels Based on 13%, 50% and 100% Surveys "'
15
MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 GAMMA SURVEY e
B = Before Shield A = After Shield RF = Factor of Reduction R = Thousands (R/hr)
- 19'6" ELE WEST HN STu PFN r TE A TION ROOu PIP E CH ASE mrem M
- RESULT 5 POIN T B A RF N1 N1 2.5 e
N2 15 4
e N4 N3 4 4
N2 e pra5oNNEL N4 NATcH N5 35 3 12 e N7 N6 g N7
\ N8 N8 -
6 f N6
{
b b 'f-100% Power (2700 Mwth) Radiation Levels -
Based on 13%. 50%, and 100% Surveys ~
0 116