ML20202H298

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Status Rept
ML20202H298
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/1997
From:
SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202H281 List:
References
NUDOCS 9712100239
Download: ML20202H298 (11)
v • d • e


Text

-

a MILLSTONE UNIT 3 INDEPENDENT CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM STATUS REPORT DECEMBER 2,1997

.$5

~$ ~~

Project Milestone Schedule Tier 1 System Review 12/19/97 RSS Modifications & SV#/MOV Calcs 1/15/98 Tier 2 Review Complete Tier 3 Review 12/15/97 Final Report issue' 2/01/98

  • Depends on DR resolution time

~h--

Era"'888:8ua8:2J P

pm

l Tier 1 Schedule Activity Scheduled Completion System Reviews 12/10/97*

New Mod Scope 1/15/98 System / Mod bEC-wns 12/15/97 O&M and Testing Reviews 12/19/97 Corrective Action Reviews 12/15/97"

  • Assumes NRC tmptance of MOV sampling plan

" Corrective Action implementation review not included A

J8p

"~7 ~

3 Tier 1 - System Review Status, SWP QSSIRSS Total.

Total, %

Pop. [ Comp Pop. l Comp System Boundary Definition N/A 100%

N/A.

100%

DocumeniGathering (RFis)

' N/A ^ ' "iOO%' ~N/A' ' 100%

Screen NU CMP Findings N/A 100 %

N!A 100%

Identify' System Require.

"655^.'i00% "T485 ' "100%"

Caicuiation Reviews 455 ~ 100 %~ 'i48' "Y00%

Component Reviews 1543 100 %

1681 100 %

Topical Reviews 2

75%

0 N/A Dispasition System" Require.

~65F ' ~97% ~ 1485" ' ' 95%

peyews^

"74 "63*f

'7 ~ ~',Ui3 C_.

2 i

i

1 l

Tier 1 - System Review Status HVX DGX Pop. : Compg _ Pop. LC_omp,.

System Boundary Definition N/A 100 %

N/A 100 %

~ IA" ~100'E" " N/A "100%

Document Gathering (RFis) '

N Screen NU CMP Pndings N/A 100 %

N/A 100 %

'ide55E[ShtUin 5equire, ~

~480 1065~ "U0i~"i665~

Calculation Reviews 310 64 %

362 73 %

~

^~

C6mponoit ReviUws 159n 51 5 '1727 '"61;4

'Drhwing Reviews

~ 230~~ " 9'8%'

~ 319' 53%

Topical Reviews 3

33 %

2 0%

Disposition System Roquire.

480 28%

602 23%

Reviews 23 10%

47 Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Status GWP QSS/RSS Total Total

  • 4 Pop. Comp. Pop. - Comp Scops Wikdown Boundary 1726 100% 1497 100%

Dwgs Redfind W5fkdown"Dwgs 603 "100"k'414' "100"5" Physidal Dwg Review vs.

~ 731' 100'% " 734 10d45 Upper Tier Dwgs Fun 5tional9.'ddowns 1148 100%- ~ 857 ^10d%

(No. of Dwgs)

Modifica'. ion Walkdowns -

48 100%-

6 100%

,@gof Mods); _ _,, _ _., _,_,_

g

~.Jh -~.

8 j

l Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Status HVX DGX i

Total Total

................... _.... Pop. ; C prnp.! Cornp.,: Cpgp,.

Scope Watkdw/n Boundary 1806 ' 09%

1070. 62 %

Dwgs Redline Watkdown Dwgs 132 44 %

150 38 %

'PEysidii disi5cview vs.

417~~566% : 305 I66fi Upper Tier Owgs Functional Walkdowns 579 47 %

655 54 %

(No. of Dwp)

Modificati6n Watkdowns

~ 25 56 %

35" ~67's '

(No. of Mods)

,,,). _

4i.6'3 7

Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status SWP qts /RSS

- Total! %

M a:. %

......... _. -..._.................... P op. :.Coynp.,, Pop.,, Com p.

System Soundary Defriiton N/A : 100% N/A 100 %

Document Gathenng (RFis)

N/A.100% ; N/A 100%

Screen hO CMP Findings "N/A~~100% ' N/A' l 100'i identfy System Require.

102 100% i 175 - 100%

OPS /MEd/ Test:ng/Trairung# ~ 294" 98 i "435' "9 @5 '

Procedure. Reviews.

...102.....98%.... _175.......98 %

Otspositon System Regaire.

Mod Reviews 24 25 %

3 25 %

  • OPS and Mamt Trainino reviews condated on Wava 1 & 2 Systrems M

4

9 Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status HVX DGX Pop. iCompi Pcr. iCamp System Boundary Definition N/A 100 %

N/A 100 %

Document Gathering (RFis)

N/A 85 %

N/A 85 %

Screen NU CMP Findings N/A 100 %

N/A 100 %

Identify System Require.

70 95%

140 100 %

OPS!Maint/ Testing / Training 117~35 f ~~398 30%~

'~

Procedure Reviews.._ _.

.79 Disposition System Require.

........... _..30%.. _.

48%

140 Mo' ~ Reviews "26~iOV.'58' "DW d

g f-Tier 1 - Programmatic Review Status Corrective Action Reviews UlRs ACR/CRs SYSTEMS

! Total Total Pop. :.Compj Pop, i Comp SWP 210 96 %

254 ! 92 %

QSSIRSS~~

'~286" 98%'

~116 ~82 %

4 TOTALS 861 97 %

673 94 %

l S

~

L Tier 1 - Programmatic Review Status Corrective Action Implementation Review 1534 CA documents were screened to determine which ones would be reviewed for implementation 225 were selected Lir.t provided to NU

_e.%

JIe l3 Tier 1 - Programmatic Review Status DDR Reviews

- DDRs selected for detailed review 35

- Reviews complete 18

- Reviews in progress 14

- Additionalinformation required 3

~~

)

6

l t

O Tier 2 - Schedule a

Tier 2 is complete.

g g...

Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status Additional Corrective Action items for Review 71 Documents (LERs, OIRs, ACRs/CRs, UIRs)

- RFI 460 issued; documents received except:

4 of 8 OIRs not scheduled for closure 3 of 14 UlRs not scheduled for closure 1 FSARCR - No date available 35 E&DCRs - 100% Complete Ah.~.

7

Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status Past Change Reviews Sample Docs Size Comp ; Needed?

- Procedures 70 100 %.. ~..

No hehsing Occuments~ ~ ~

}2 { ~ }'j00 (

. 'No.

~

~

Vendor Manua:s 3

100 %

No Uke for-Uke Replacements 16 100 %

No 40' 100 %

No Setpoints "MEE6e't"e55asn's 15-~"~~id6%

tio""~"

CommTGrade Dedcatidns

~"

' 100% ' ' ~d~~

N 10 NCRs and EWRs 32 100 %

No Section XI Repairs and Repimnts 10 100 %

No

  • Sampie ' f 20 changes has b'een o

obtained. Letter issued to NRC.

h, ~~-

m---

Tier 3 - PRG Schedule

  • Current change process - Complete Past Change reviews - Complete Current change implementation - 12/5/97 NRC Sample of CA Documents - 12/15/97 i

awaiting FSARCR 97 MP3-254 7 CA documents not completed by NU l

jf

~ ~ ~

i 8

Discrepancy Summary 729 Preliminary DRs initisted

+ 492 Valid Preliminary DRs issued to NRC/NU/NEAC

+ 96 Preliminary DRs considered invalid 141 Preliminary DRs in process 174 NU Resolutions entered into database 88 NU Resolutions reviewed by S&L

- 74 Accepted and Closed

- 13 Not accepted Retumed w/ Comments 1 Pending review of implementation of NU corrective action Ah b~

Discrepancy Summary Of the 74 Acceptable and Closed resolutions

- 38 Confirmed Discrepancies

- 20 Previously identified by NU

- 16 Non-discrepant conditions

  • Of the 38 Confirmed Disuepancies 21.evel 3 36 Level 4 M.

9

Discrepancy Summary NRC Significance Level for the 492 issued Preliminary DRs 0

Level 1 0

Level 2 136 Level 3 356 Level 4 4

jl"3

~f ~~

DR Type & Level Summarf (Preliminary DRs)

Discrepancy Type Level 3 Level 4 Calculations 91 184 Component Data 34 76 Corrective Actions 12 32 Design Change Process 7

3 Drawings 3

91 instaltttion implemenmtation 11 52 Installation Reglurements 2

5 Licencing Documents 27 57 O&M and Testing implementation 0

5 O&M and Testing Procedures 1

19 Procedure Implementation 1

4 Testing implementation 0

4 es{ing Requirements 6

2 4

)p,.

10

N rtheast Utilities - Mill:t:ne Unit-3

~

Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Preliminary DRs issued, NU Resolutions, and S&L Review of NU Resolutions 9--

BOO M I

+

. ~

700 - ---~---------------- ----------------------------------------.------------- - - - - - - - - -

6G0 -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

con.

400....... _ _ _ _ _.. _ - _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _.

300- - - - - --------------- ---------- --------------------------------------------------- --

1 200-------------------------------w-------------------------------------------------

109

.A 1

0-24-Oct 31-Oct 7-Nov 14-Nov 21-Nov 23-Nov 5-Dec Dec 19-Dec 26Dec 24an 94an W-Ending l--G-DRs issued --e-NU Responsex -- A--S&L Reviews -ul--DRs Expected l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20202H298&oldid=4079817"