LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP, Revision 1, Responses to NRC Questions on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2.ML18334A272 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Cook |
---|
Issue date: |
09/18/2018 |
---|
From: |
Westinghouse |
---|
To: |
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
---|
References |
---|
AEP-NRC-2018-66, LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP |
Download: ML18334A272 (10) |
|
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000315/20230042024-01-31031 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023004 and 05000316/2023004 ML24004A1582024-01-19019 January 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0039 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) AEP-NRC-2024-01, Emergency Plan Revision 482024-01-0808 January 2024 Emergency Plan Revision 48 AEP-NRC-2023-56, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor2023-12-20020 December 2023 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor ML23352A3502023-12-19019 December 2023 Dc. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and Request for Information ML23338A2642023-12-0505 December 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination AEP-NRC-2023-45, Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-11-16016 November 2023 Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation IR 05000315/20234042023-11-0606 November 2023 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000315/2023404 and 05000316/2023404 ML23310A1152023-11-0606 November 2023 Notification of the NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information, Inspection Report 05000316/2024002 IR 05000315/20234032023-09-19019 September 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023403 and 05000316/2023403 IR 05000315/20230112023-08-31031 August 2023 Functional Engineering Inspection - Commercial Grade Dedication Report 05000315/2023011 and 05000316/2023011 ML23242A1832023-08-30030 August 2023 Notification of NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report05000315/2023004 AEP-NRC-2023-40, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2023-08-29029 August 2023 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes IR 05000315/20234022023-08-11011 August 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023402 and 05000316/2023402 AEP-NRC-2023-34, Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-08-0202 August 2023 Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation IR 05000315/20230022023-07-24024 July 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023002 and 05000316/2023002 ML23178A2422023-06-28028 June 2023 Reassignment of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch III IR 05000315/20230122023-06-22022 June 2023 Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000315/2023012 and 05000316/2023012 IR 05000315/20235012023-06-21021 June 2023 Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000315/2023501 and 05000316/2023501 AEP-NRC-2023-29, Core Operating Limits Report2023-06-19019 June 2023 Core Operating Limits Report ML23159A0192023-06-13013 June 2023 Information Meeting with a Question and Answer Session to Discuss NRC 2022 End-Of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 AEP-NRC-2023-32, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-0606 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations AEP-NRC-2023-33, Renewable Operating Permit2023-06-0505 June 2023 Renewable Operating Permit AEP-NRC-2023-30, Follow-Up Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump2023-06-0101 June 2023 Follow-Up Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump AEP-NRC-2023-27, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-05-15015 May 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ML23131A3282023-05-11011 May 2023 D.C. Cook Information Request for the Cyber-Security Baseline Inspection, Notification to Perform Inspection 05000315/2023404 and 05000316/2023404 IR 05000315/20230012023-05-0303 May 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023001 and 05000316/2023001 AEP-NRC-2023-19, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2023-04-30030 April 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML23117A0062023-04-27027 April 2023 Review of the Spring 2022 Steam Generator Tube Inspections Report ML23114A1142023-04-25025 April 2023 Information Request to Support the NRC Annual Baseline Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes Inspection AEP-NRC-2023-23, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring for 20222023-04-24024 April 2023 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring for 2022 AEP-NRC-2023-24, Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump2023-04-12012 April 2023 Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump AEP-NRC-2023-20, Annual Report of Property Insurance2023-04-0303 April 2023 Annual Report of Property Insurance AEP-NRC-2023-15, Decommissioning Funding Status Report2023-03-28028 March 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report ML23076A0212023-03-20020 March 2023 Request for Information for NRC Commercial Grade Dedication Inspection; Inspection Report 05000315/2023011; 05000316/2023011 IR 05000315/20234012023-03-16016 March 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023401 and 05000316/2023401 ML23066A1882023-03-0707 March 2023 Information Request to Support Upcoming Problem Identification and Resolution (Pi&R) Inspection at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant IR 05000315/20220062023-03-0101 March 2023 Annual Assessment Letter for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Report 05000315/2022006 and 05000316/2022006) IR 05000315/20220042023-02-0101 February 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2022004 and 05000316/2022004 and Exercise of Enforcement Discretion AEP-NRC-2023-11, Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report2023-01-31031 January 2023 Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report IR 05000315/20230102023-01-31031 January 2023 Phase 4 Post-Approval License Renewal Inspection Report 05000315/2023010 and 05000316/2023010 AEP-NRC-2023-02, Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-01-26026 January 2023 Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation ML22363A5622023-01-0404 January 2023 Relief Request ISIR-5-06 Related to ASME Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration Nozzles AEP-NRC-2022-66, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 2 Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring2022-12-15015 December 2022 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 2 Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring AEP-NRC-2022-46, Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program 2019-008, Interim Guidance for NEI 03-08 Needed Requirements for Us PWR Plants for Management of Thermal Fatigue in2022-12-12012 December 2022 Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program 2019-008, Interim Guidance for NEI 03-08 Needed Requirements for Us PWR Plants for Management of Thermal Fatigue in ML22340A1392022-11-30030 November 2022 Submittal of Revision 31 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report and 10CFR50.71(e) Updated and Related Site Change Reports IR 05000315/20220112022-11-0404 November 2022 Design Basis Assurance Inspection (Teams) Inspection Report 05000315/2022011 and 05000316/2022011 IR 05000315/20220032022-10-28028 October 2022 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2022003 and 05000316/2022003 AEP-NRC-2022-58, U1C31 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2022-10-24024 October 2022 U1C31 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report AEP-NRC-2022-61, Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-062022-10-24024 October 2022 Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-06 2024-01-08
[Table view] Category:Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARAEP-NRC-2022-03, Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-022022-01-20020 January 2022 Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 AEP-NRC-2021-68, Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation2021-12-16016 December 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2021-43, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request for Limited Coverage Examinations Performed in the Fourth 10-Year Inspection Interval2021-07-21021 July 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request for Limited Coverage Examinations Performed in the Fourth 10-Year Inspection Interval AEP-NRC-2021-16, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding CFR 50.55a Request Associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval2021-02-25025 February 2021 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding CFR 50.55a Request Associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval AEP-NRC-2021-18, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency2021-02-18018 February 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency AEP-NRC-2020-50, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency2020-07-0909 July 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency AEP-NRC-2019-56, Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Response to Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic2019-11-0404 November 2019 Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Response to Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic AEP-NRC-2019-32, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Unit 2 Leak-Before-Break Analysis and Deletion of Containment Humidity Monitors for Unit 1 and Unit 22019-08-22022 August 2019 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Unit 2 Leak-Before-Break Analysis and Deletion of Containment Humidity Monitors for Unit 1 and Unit 2 AEP-NRC-2019-40, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Address NSAL-15-1, Rev. 02019-07-30030 July 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Address NSAL-15-1, Rev. 0 AEP-NRC-2018-81, Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping2018-11-27027 November 2018 Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping AEP-NRC-2018-82, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Alternative Request for Elimination of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Threads in Flange Examination2018-11-20020 November 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Alternative Request for Elimination of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Threads in Flange Examination AEP-NRC-2018-64, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping2018-09-27027 September 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping ML18334A2722018-09-18018 September 2018 LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP, Revision 1, Responses to NRC Questions on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2. AEP-NRC-2018-45, Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning 2017 Decommissioning Funding Status Report2018-08-0909 August 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning 2017 Decommissioning Funding Status Report AEP-NRC-2018-01, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 2016-012018-05-25025 May 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 2016-01 AEP-NRC-2018-23, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Funding Plan2018-04-11011 April 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Funding Plan ML18092A0842018-03-28028 March 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Supplemental Information Regarding the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program ML17346A7662017-12-0808 December 2017 Enclosures 2 & 3 to AEP-NRC-2017-56 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels and EAL Technical Basis Manual AEP-NRC-2017-56, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels2017-12-0808 December 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels AEP-NRC-2017-30, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.9.3, Containment Penetrations2017-05-26026 May 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.9.3, Containment Penetrations AEP-NRC-2017-16, Submittal of Focused Evaluation in Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Regarding Near- Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Flooding2017-05-11011 May 2017 Submittal of Focused Evaluation in Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Regarding Near- Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Flooding AEP-NRC-2017-09, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program2017-02-27027 February 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program AEP-NRC-2016-81, Unit 2 - Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTP-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee Control-Risk Informed ...2016-11-0303 November 2016 Unit 2 - Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTP-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee Control-Risk Informed ... AEP-NRC-2016-80, Response to NRC Generic Letter 2016-01: Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools2016-10-31031 October 2016 Response to NRC Generic Letter 2016-01: Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools AEP-NRC-2016-79, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-10-12012 October 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident AEP-NRC-2016-69, Follow-up Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to License Control-Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force.2016-09-0909 September 2016 Follow-up Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to License Control-Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force. AEP-NRC-2016-56, Response to Seventh Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2016-07-12012 July 2016 Response to Seventh Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-48, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee-Control...2016-06-16016 June 2016 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee-Control... AEP-NRC-2016-54, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force Initiative 582016-06-16016 June 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force Initiative 58 ML16169A1152016-05-0606 May 2016 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 - Response to Sixth Request for Additional Information the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-24, Response to Fifth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2016-02-19019 February 2016 Response to Fifth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-14, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation2016-01-21021 January 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2015-11, Response (Part 2) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-12-17017 December 2015 Response (Part 2) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term ML15323A4332015-11-16016 November 2015 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent with Previously Licensed Conditions. ML15323A4342015-11-16016 November 2015 Response (Part 1) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-98, Supplemental Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program2015-10-30030 October 2015 Supplemental Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program AEP-NRC-2015-99, Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11 and 3.8.1.152015-10-30030 October 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11 and 3.8.1.15 ML15308A0932015-10-15015 October 2015 Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group (Pwrog), 15066-NP, Revision 1, Responses to Follow-Up NRC RAI 2 on the D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2, Reactor Internals Aging Management Program. AEP-NRC-2015-86, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent With. Previously Licensed Conditions.2015-09-18018 September 2015 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent With. Previously Licensed Conditions. AEP-NRC-2015-80, Response to Third Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-08-28028 August 2015 Response to Third Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-88, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code, Section XI Repair Requirements2015-08-24024 August 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code, Section XI Repair Requirements AEP-NRC-2015-75, Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-08-24024 August 2015 Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-69, Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program2015-08-0606 August 2015 Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program ML15223A4362015-07-28028 July 2015 PWROG-15066-NP, Revision 0, Responses to Follow-Up NRC RAI 2 on the DC Cook Units 1 and 2 Reactor Internals Aging Management Program. AEP-NRC-2015-64, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-07-17017 July 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-63, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding 2014 Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Inspection2015-07-17017 July 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding 2014 Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Inspection AEP-NRC-2015-60, Response to a Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11, and 3.8.1.152015-07-0909 July 2015 Response to a Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11, and 3.8.1.15 AEP-NRC-2015-66, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Exigent License Amendment Request Regarding Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation2015-07-0202 July 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Exigent License Amendment Request Regarding Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation ML18219D0951978-09-29029 September 1978 D.C Cook - Acknowledges 07/12/1978 Letter Advising of Additional Information to Complete NRC Staff'S Review of D.C Cook Nuclear Plant'S Ice - Basket Stress Analysis ML18219D7991978-09-29029 September 1978 Response to Request for Additional Information on Ice Basket Stress Analysis, Prepared by Westinghouse Electric Corporation 2022-01-20
[Table view] |
Text
Enclosure 13 to AEP--NRC-2018-66
- LTR-SDA-11-18-41-NP, Revision 1 "Responses to NRC Questions on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Non-Proprietary)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
@we~inghouse
- To: Pete Brusamonti Date: September 18, 2018 From: Eric D. Johnson Ext: 412-37 4-4584
- Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Fax: 724-940-8565 Revision 1
Subject:
Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2
References:
(as noted in Attachment 1)
A License Amendment Request (LAR) was submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the application of Leak-Before-Break (LBB) evaluations to the Accumulator piping, Safety Injection (SI) piping, and Residual Heat Removal (RHR) piping at the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP), Unit
- 1. The NRC staff reviewers have determined that additional information is necessary in order to complete its review and have issued a series of Requests for Additional Information (RAis) which relate to the analytical methodology, processing of analysis inputs, assumptions applied in the evaluation, demonstration of specific criteria and requirements, or other technical aspects of the submitted reports.
The purpose of this letter is to provide a response to each of the six RAis. These responses are intended for transrnittal to the NRC for supporting the completion of the LAR review and acceptance.
It is noted that the *current LAR review and RAis are specific to CNP Unit 1, but since the LBB evaluations for these piping systems enveloped both CNP Units 1 and 2, the responses to these RAis are also applicable to CNP Unit 2.
Revision 1 of this letter is being issued to update Reference 11 to the latest revision.
If you have any questions please call the undersigned.
Author: Eric D. Johnson* Structural Design and Analysis - II Verifier: Momo Wiratmo* Struc.tural Design and Analysis - II Manager: Benjamin A. Leber* Structural Design and Analysis - II
- Electronically Approved Records are authenticated in the Electronic Document Management System.
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 2 of8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1 Attachment 1 Responses to RAis on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break (LBB)
Evaluation for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2
- This record was final approved on 9/18/201812:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 3 of 8
- Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1 Responses to RAis on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break (LBB)
Evaluation for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 Introduction This attachment provides responses to each of the six Requests for Additional Information (RAis) which have been issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in Reference 1 following their initial review of the License Amendment Request (LAR) for the application of Leak-Before-Break (LBB) evaluations to the Accumulator piping, Safety Injection (SI) piping, and Residual Heat Removal (RHR) piping at the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP), Unit 1.
References
- 1. "Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Application of Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for Accumulator, Safety Injection, and Residual Heat Removal Piping, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit No. 1, Docket No. 50-315," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (electronically attached in PRIME).
- 2. Westinghouse Reports, WCAP-18295-P (Proprietary) and WCAP-18295-NP (Non~proprietary),
"Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology," January 2018.
- 3. Westinghouse Reports, WCAP-18302-P (Proprietary) and WCAP-18302-NP (Non-proprietary),
"Technical Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology," January 2018.
- 4. Westinghouse Reports, WCAP-18309-P (Proprietary) and WCAP-18309-NP (Non-proprietary),
"Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology," January 2018.
- 5. Standard Review Plan: Public Comments Solicited; 3.6.3 Leak-Before-Break Evaluation Procedures; Federal RegisterNol. 52, No. 167/Friday August 28, 1987/Notices, pp. 32626-32633.
- 6. NUREG-0800, Revision 1, Standard Review Plan: 3.6.3 Leak-Before-Break Evaluation Procedures, March 2007.
- 7. "Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Review of Leak-Before-Break Evaluation for the Accumulator Line Piping as Provided by 10 CFR 50 Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 4 (TAC NOS.
MA7834 and MA7835)," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 7, 2000.
(the Safety Evaluation Report is included in Westinghouse WCAP-15107-P-A, Revision 1) 8... [
]a,c,e
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 4 of 8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1
- 9. [
]a.c,e
- 10. [
- 11. Westinghouse Reports, WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1. (Proprietary) and WCAP-18394-NP, Revision 1 (Non-proprietary), "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D .C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR, Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Seo pe Leak-Before-Break,"
September 2018.
RAis and Responses Two weld locations in pipe Segment III of the accumulator lines have lower maximum faulted stresses than 5 weld locations in pipe Segments I and II as shown in Table 5-1 of WCAP-18295. However, Table 6-1 of WCAP-18295 shows that the 2 weld locations in Segment III have much larger leakage flaw sizes than the 5 weld loca tions in pipe Segments I and IL RAl-1 Since it would be expected that weld locations having high faulted stresses would lead to a larger leakage flaw size than the weld locations with lower faulted stresses, explain why the 2 weld locations in pipe Segment III have larger leakage flaw sizes than the 5 weld locations in pipe Segments I and II.
- Westinghouse Response to RAl-1:
The critical weld locations for the Accumulator line LBB evaluation are chosen based on the highest faulted load conditions, as described in Section 5.1 of Reference 2. The leakage flaw size evaluations (Section 6.3 of Reference 2) consider the normal operation load conditions. As such, the faulted stress values in Table 5-1 of Reference 2 are not indicative of the leakage flaw size The normal operating stresses for the critical weld locations in Segment III of the Accumulator line piping are ~onsiderably lower than the critical weld locations in Segments I and II, as shown in the follow ing table:
Weld Location Normal Operation Segment Node Stress (psi)
I 2-Sl-59-10-307 14,198 2-SI-58-9-160Y 10,576 2-SI-58-9-162 10,731 II 2-SI-58-6-184N 14,821 2-SI-58-6-184F 14,951 2-SI-56-3-458F 2,561 III 2-SI-56-3-456 2,246 Note: Normal operation stress values are taken from Tables 3-3 through 3-10 of Reference 2 for the critical weld location nodes.
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM; (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
~
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 5 of 8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1 For the critical weld locations in Segment III, the consideration of significantly lower normal operating loads necessitates a much greater leakage flaw length in order to establish the flaw opening area which produces the evaluation leak rate of 8 gpm. Additionally, the operating pressure in Segment III is significantly lower than the other weld locations - 644 psig for Segment III as compared to 2345 psig for Segment I and 2235 psig for Segment IL The lower operating pressure results in a much lower pressure differential driving the leakage rate. This condition also necessitates a greater leakage flaw length order to establish the flaw opening area which produces the evaluation leak rate of 8 gpm.
Table 7-1 of WCAP-18295 shows that the 2 weld locations (2-SI-56-3-458F and 2-SI-56 456) in pipe Segment III have an exact margin* of 2.0 between the critical crack size and leakage crack size. The weld locations in Segments I and II have much higher margins between the critical crack size and leakage crack size. The footnote to Table 7-1 states that the calculation for welds, 2-SI-56-3-458F and 2-SI-56-3-456, is based on the methodology in Section 7.2, which is the ]-integral method. The critical crack size for the weld locations in pipe Segments I and II was calculated based on the limit load method.
RAI-2 a) Explain why the critical crack size for welds 2-SI-56-3-458F and 2-SI-56-3-456 were calculated based on the ]-integral method, whereas the critical crack size for the rest of welds were calculated based on the limit load methods.
b) Section 7.2 of WCAP-18295 discusses the ]-integral method in general, but does not present any details of the critical crack size calculation using the ]-integral method.
Provide the details of critical crack size calculation for welds 2-SI~56-3-458F and 2-SI-56-3-456, such as the Ramberg-Osgood parameter and exponent, load combinations, J applied, and J resistance.
Westinghouse Response to RAI-2:
As identified above for RAI-1, the Accumulator line leakage flaw sizes for the critical weld locations in Segment III are considerably larger than the leakage flaw sizes for critical weld locations in Segments I and II. Due to these larger leakage flaw sizes for the w~lds in Segment III, it was not possible to establish the required margin of 2.0 (References 5 and 6) between the leakage flaw size and the critical flaw size using the conservative limit load method for calculating the critical flaw size. The ]-integral flaw evaluation methodology was utilized at the locations in Segment III to demonstrate the required margin of 2.0 between the leakage flaw size and the critical flaw size. Consistent methodology has been accepted by the NRC on past LBB review applications, as documented in the Safety Evaluation Report for the Point Beach Accumulator Line LBB (Reference 7).
The details of the ]-integral evaluation in Section 7.2 of WCAP-18295 (Reference 2) were kept brief for the purpose of limiting proprietary information and the need for additional bracketing and redaction from the non-proprietary version of the report. Details of those evaluations are provided as follows:
Critical crack size calculation:
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation}*
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 6 of 8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision I
- Ramberg-Osgood parameter and exponent:
A ]-integral evaluation requires the use of Ramberg-Osgood parameters which establish the non-linear, elastic-plastic characteristics of the material being evaluated. For the locations being analyzed using the ]-integral methodology (welds 2-SI-56-3-458F and 2-SI-56-3-456), the faulted total stresses are significantly less than the material yield stress as shown in the following table:
Weld Location Maximum Faulted Material Yield Segment Node Stress (psi) Stress (psi) 2-S1-56-3-458F 6,974 28,960 III 2-SI-56-3-456 6,975 28,960 Note: Maximum faulted stress values are taken from Table 5-1 of Reference 2 for the critical weld location nodes and material yield stress is taken from Table 4-1 of Reference 2 for the 120°F operating temperature.
J3'c,e Load combinations:
]-applied:
]-resistance:
- This rerord was final approved on 9/18/201812:06:39 PM. {This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 7 of8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1 Section 8 of WCAP-18295, WCAP-18302, and WCAP-18309 states that fatigue crack growth is not required based on the NRC Standard Review Plan (SRP). It is noted that in the LBB applications for the primary loop piping in 1999, and pressurizer surge line in 2000, the licensee performed fatigue crack growth calculation for the primary loop piping and pressurizer surge piping as shown in WCAP-15131, and WCAP-15434.
RAI-3
Consistent with SRP, Section 3.6.3.III.l 1.C.v, demonstrate that the crack growth is stable and the final crack size is limited such that a double-ended pipe break will not occur.
Alternatively, explain why fatigue crack growth analysfirn,--riot required for the accumulator, residual heat removal, and safety injection lines. /
- Westinghouse Response to RAI-3:
A separate report, WCAP-18394 (Reference 11), has been issued to document fatigue crack growth evaluations for the D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 Accumulator lines, RHR lines, and SI lines.
By letter dated November 8, 2000 (see original RAI, Reference 1), the NRC approved the LBB application for the pressurizer surge line for CNP Unit Nos. 1 and 2. In the corresponding safety evaluation, in accordance with SRP 3.6,3, the NRC staff reviewed the load combinations, including torsional moments, on the pressurizer surge line piping.
RAI-4
Consistent with SRP, Section 3.6.3.III.11.C.ii, explain how torsional moments were considered in the load combinations in WCAP-18295, WCAP-18302, and WCAP-18309
-when calculating the critical crack size.
-Westinghouse Response to RAI-4:
As discussed in Section 3.1 of the respective WCAP reports (References 2, 3, and 4). the torsional moment is conservatively included in the total applied bending moment load. The total applied bending
, moment for each loading combinations are calculated by the following equation:
where, Mx = X component of moment, torsion My Y component of bending moment Mz Z component of bendingp1oment This method of combining torsional moment loads into the total applied bending moment using the square root of the sum of the squares is consistent with SRP, Section 3.6.3.III.11.C.v (Reference 6). The evaluations in these WCAP reports follow this moment combination methodology for both normal operating load conditions (leakage flaw size) and faulted load conditions (critical flaw size).
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 8 of 8 Our ref: LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP Revision 1 The NRC has approved the license renewal application for CNP Unit No. 1. In Section 3.3 of Enclosure 2 to the LAR, the licensee stated that the LBB analysis does not include any time dependencies, and the LBB application would not impact CNP Unit No. 1 license renewal.
RAI-5
Provide justification why the LBB analysis has no impact on CNP license renewal.
Specifically, explain why the fatigue crack growth of postulated flaws in the subject piping was not performed for the period of extended operation. '
Westinghouse Response to RAl-5:
By inclusion of fatigue crack growth evaluations in response to RAl-3, the application of LBB for these auxiliary piping systems does now include associated time dependencies. As documented in WCAP-18394 (Reference 11), the fatigue crack growth evaluations for each piping system bound the transient projections for the 60-year period of extended operation.
By letter dated December 20, 2002 (see original RAI, Reference 1), the NRC approved a rrieasurement uncertainty recapture power uprate for CNP Unit 1. The staff notes that pipe loads may be increased after implementing the power uprate.
RAI-6
Discuss whether the pipe loads used in the LBB analysis for the subject piping include the effects of power uprate. If not, explain.
Westinghouse Response to RAl-6:
The effects due to implementation of the measurement uncertainty recapture (MUR) power uprate for CNP Unit 1 were previously evaluated for each of the piping systems. It was determined that the operating parameters considered in the piping stress calculations for each system either bound the MUR operating parameters or would result in a negligible impact to the pipe loading conditions. As such, the piping loads used in the LBB analyses are representative of the MUR uprating operation.
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
LTR-SDA-11-18-41-NP Revision 1 -Proprietary Class 3
- This page was added to the quality record by the PRIME system upon its validation and shall not be considered in the page numbering of this document.**
Author Approval Johnson Eric D Sep-18-2018 11 :22:23 Verifier Approval Wiratmo Momo Sep-18-2018 11 :25:42 Manager Approval Leber Benjamin A Sep-18-2018 12:06:39 Files approved on Sep-18-2018
- This record was final approved on 9/18/2018 12:06:39 PM. (This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)