ML17305B154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for State Approval for Disposal of Low Concentrations of Radionuclides in Controlled Area
ML17305B154
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1990
From: Conway W
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To: Pratt N
ARIZONA, STATE OF
References
161-03556-WFC-J, 161-3556-WFC-J, NUDOCS 9011050207
Download: ML17305B154 (253)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM pl >>

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS) i I

ACCESSION NBR:9011050207 DOC.DATE: 90/10/24 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET; 8 FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F. Arizona Public Service Co. (fo rly Arizona Nuclear Power RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PRATT,N.V. Arizona, State of / I

SUBJECT:

Forwards request for state approval for disposal of low D concentrations of radionuclides in controlled area.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution /

NOTES:STANDARDIZED PLANT 05000528' Standardized plant. 05000529 Standardized plant. 05000530 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES D ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1 1 PD5 PD 1 1 PETERSON,S. 2 2 TRAMMELL,C.. 2 2 INTERNAL: ACRS e] ei NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OTSB11 1 1 NRR/DST 8E2 1 1 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OC/LFgB 1 0 OGC/HDS1 ' 0 REC FILE 01 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 EXTERNA'5: NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTES 1 1 W~~ ~<~I'~~

D hfwss LL>

D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASIE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR RC ENCL

,C

~5

,t

Arizona Public Service Company P.O. BOX 53999 ~ PMOENIX, ARIZONA'85072-3999 WILLIAMF. CONWAY EXECUTIVEVICEPRESIDENT NUCLEAR 161-03556-MFC/JRP October 24, 1990 Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency Attention: Mr..Norman V. Pratt 4814 South 4'0th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Dear Mr. Pratt Subj ect: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 1, 2, and 3 Permit Application File: 90-001-028.8 Arizona Public Service Company requests state approval for disposal of very low concentrations of radionuclides's described in the attached document.

This application proposes to leave in place approximately 450 cubic yards of slightly contaminated sludge from the PVNGS Unit 1 and 3 cooling towers which has been deposited in the Mater Reclamation Facility (WRF) landfill and covered with uncontaminated topsoil. The disposal site is located on Company owned land which is fenced and is only accessible from the Company controlled area which is routinely patrolled.

Since a determination that the cooling tower sludge was slightly contaminated, PVNGS has taken steps to ensure early detection of the waste stieams which might contribute to the potential contamination of cooling tower sludge. The potential radiological and environmental impacts of the proposed disposal have been analyzed and evaluated and are presented in this application. The cost benefit of onsite disposal versus shipment to a low level waste facility is also discussed. APS concludes, based on the information presented herewith, that the disposal of this material presents no significant impact or hazard to the public health and safety or to the environment.

Should you need further information for this evaluation, please contact J. R. Provasoli at (602) 340-4160.

Sincerely, MFC/JRP/pmm Attachment 901i050207 901024 PDR ADOCK 0500052S P PDC

j i ~5 l'

0 1 + e t

4

)

j 5 d 4k I

"~~~~~~ l1>

I 1

Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency Attention: Mr. Norman V. Pratt Page 2 cc: C. F. Tedford (all w/attachment) 4C:.M..~rammellf S. R. Peterson J. B. Martin D. H. Coe

4i 1 0

0

x P p E C

p p oc V' co 0g Ig Q QJ p IO lll C

>> Z I

'Z C III III I>> 0 Q ce p I>> IE p p P ll1 I

D OI IV lll lU O O QI Q 4 Q WZ D

d:

5 p p O

OI C

O.

W O.

E- o xv oc

~0~

LU ccc&

C a

C O C C O '2

%+~

Lccaul 4)

V Ol III L'I g $

p c P C I C I III C

III 0 C CO 0 C0 c Q Q

Wp 5 ~

f>>

Sl

~I

~~gyggV.

C+99

~

E I

)qgge On OO rE ggSO ~

C

~pC (>>ggf Q

E

~ >>

cP?

'9

<<?>>

go"

-i $

S E I e i" 5- ~

j

'p ~ >>I 1 ng El '  ?

5 t s-I~

/ U 5

~

/ i a

>>I g/o

~

I Poz AI

~o

>>I d ~ gQ P II@/0

~i ~ ~ 0 y ~

g,-( /f

!d ~ Ig

~>>

I

~>> wP6o Tielrr>>

/~/ill'I' I>>

~ ~~

i C

90110 5 0207l OQ 43a

P Ir I

0

LOCATION: 150'orth of Slud e Dis osal Area LOG OF BOR(HG No. M E'W Loe OF MoNITonIHG eaLL Ho. M Ew MATERIAL DESCRIPTIOH pRoTEOTIvE chsIHG I- W VENTED PVC CAP I" IU 1.5'

n. tu 0-0 Z tlat TOP OF RISFR EL GROUHD SURFACE'EL Silty clay,dry,med to lt.brn Silt med sand w/ ravel lt.brn. RISER:

Sl sandy silt, lt.brn. 3p 2II CEMEHT GROUT BACKFILL y me san w c ay a e s eo(

Sl silty clay, massive w/gray green mottling, occas. gypsum crystals;med to sl.reddish brn.

50 sr~'t~

)J IljL 4m Cgt

~ BENTONITE SEAL Silty clay w/sand-clay interlay rs I Sl moist, med. brn. '6' TYPE OF JOINTS: %311sll

-75 Sl silty clay, lt.brn. to sl. Threaded reddish brn,massive, tough drilling. 0.02" slot size pl

-100 ~ ~

TYPE OF FILTER SAND:

No. 3 Montere SEDIMENT TRAP BOTTOM CAP

-125 10" INSTALLATION METHOD: Dual Wall Percussion Hamner 10" Bore Hole

-150 TOTAL DEPTH: lPP COMPLETIOH DEPTH: lpp~

COMPLETIOH DATE: 'ORING DEPTH TO YYATER:

JOB: Aves Construction, Inc. GEOLOGIST; LFG JOB NO.: 253 MONITORING WELL ORAF TSl IAH:

LOCATION: Palo Verde INSTALLATION REPORT. OATE: j 2/1/87 Figure 4.4-3 (Sheet 1 of 2) 44

LOCATION: 1 O'orth of Slud e Dis osal Area LOG OF BORING HO. g E.p

  • LOGiOF MONITORING YIELL HO.

0 LU MATERIAL DESCRIPTIOH 1.5'ROTECTIVE VENTED PVC CAP CASlNG I- ill U

O X TOP OF RISER EL GROUND SURFACE'EL Silt cia med to lt.brn dr Silt med sand w ravel lt brn. RISER:

Sl sahdy silt; lt brn. 90 25 84 I CEMENT GROUT BACKFILL' y me .san w c ay a ers Sl.silty clay, massive w/gray green mottling, gyPsum crystals med to sl.reddish brn.

50 OWm 3I BENTONITE SFAL jP]

Silty clay w/sand-clay inter-la ers sl.moist med brn. TYPE OF JOIIITS: DZlLSh

-75

~- Sl.silty clay, lt.brn. to sl.

reddish brn, tough drilling, Threaded massive. 0.02" slot size-10',100 TYPE OF FILTER SAND:

No. 3 Montere SEDIMENT TRAP BOTTOM CAP

-125 10" INSTALLATION METHOD; Dual Wall Percussion Halnrer 10" Bore Hole

-,150-TOTAL DEPTH 100'OMPLETION DEPTH:

lQQ'ORING COMPLETIOH DATE: DFPTH TO YIATER:

JOB: Ames Construction, inc.

JOB HO.: 253 MONlTORING >YELL ORAFTS}tAH:

'OCAT10H: Palo Verde INSTAt LATlON REPORT OATE: 12/1/87 Figure 4.4-3

{Sheet 2 of 2)

4.5 ANNUAL DOSE'ASSESSMENT The dose assessment analysis for the occupational and member-of-the-public pathways was performed based on the radionuclide analysis of, over 190 core samples taken from the Water Reclamation Facility sludge landfill ". Two dose pathways were evaluated for the- occupational. worker: direct gamma exposure and inhalation of resuspended mater'ial. Three dose pathways were evaluated for a member of the public after operation of the facility has 3

ceased: direct gamma exposure, inhalation of resuspended material, and ingestion involving. consumption of groundwater and veg'etation -grown on the disposal area.

In evaluating the dose pathway scenarios., it was determined that the only significant dose was 'delivered by the direct gamma exposure pathway to an occupational worker. Direct gamma exposure to a member of the public after operation of the facility has ceased is insignificant because of the half-4 life of the radiological constituents involved and additional cover that will be present at that time. Inhal'ation exposures were not considered to be credible due to the minimum 3-inches of soil covering already in-place and the fact that additional cover

- will'e added over the operating lifetime of the facility. The ingestion pathway was also not considered to be credible'ue to the inability of'the Water Reclamation Facility 'sludge landfill to support vegetation growth. In addition potable water for drinking is not viable due to,the high total dissolved solids (TDS) content and depth- of the perched water table.

In considering the sludge inventory, the only significant radionuclides contributing to external doses are Mn-54, Cs-137, and Co-60. Concentration of other radionuclides were measured at or below detectable limits. The

'annual doses for these three radionuclides were calculated using the methodology in Appendix A and are included in Tables 4.5-1 and 4.5-2. The P

estimated total annual direct dose to an individual occupying the sludge disposal area 'for 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br /> per year .is 0.69 mrem. The source term was 46 e

based on area-weighted concentrations derived from 'Figuies 4.5-1, 4.5-2 and 4.5-3, and is somewhat more 'conservative than using. an average of all measured concentrations. Worst case doses were calculated using the peak concentration analyzed for each radionuclide and assuming these peak concentrations were uniformly distributed across the entire disposal area.-

The maximum, annual dose in,this scenario is '3.3 mrem and is included in'able 4.5-2.

Both the average annual andrthe peak annual doses are small when compared to the annual natural background external radiation of 58 mrem for Phoenix, Arizona~~~. In addition, it P should be noted that adjustments for

,.representative values 'of dilution and occupation time, and credit for r

additional planned soil covering would substantially decrease the calculated doses.'

47 e

  • =

Table 4.5-1 Average Annual Whole Body Doses to an Individual Standing on the Dried Sludge, Area-Weighted Dose Annual Average Concentration'Ci/g Rate Dose'rem Nuclide mrem/hr Mn-54 Cs-137 Co-60 2.25 x 5.33 x x 10 10'.7 10'.82 x 10s 3.7 x 10s 2.7 x 10" 7.4 x 10'~

7.4 x 10'~

5.4 x 10" Total 69xl0 Ingestion. pathways were not included due to the inability of the sludge disposal area to support the growth of vegetation and the high TDS content and depth of the perched water table. Resuspen-sion and inhalation of radionuclides is estimated to be negligible due to a minimum 3-inch@ soil covering already in place.

I

'he area-weighted concentration conservatively includes all areas with radionuclide concentrations greater than 1 x 10'Ci/g. All other areas were at or below detectable limits.

The peak concentration is assumed to be distributed uniformly in the sludge across the entire disposal area.

The annual doses assume exposure of 2000 hour0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br />s/year, no decay, and no dilution of the sludge by other sources.

48

Table 4.5-2 Maximum Annual Whole Body Doses to an Individual Standing Directly.'on the Dried Sludge Peak (Maximum) Peak Dose Maximum Concentration'Ci/g Rate Annual Dose Nuclide mrem/hr mr em~

Mn-54 7.00 x 1.2 x 10'.2 2.3 x 10'.4 Cs-137 x 10 x x 10':67 10'.3 x

10'.6 Co-60 2.59 x 10 x 10'~ 10 Total 3.3 K 10 Ingestion pathways were not included due to the inability of the sludge disposal area to'upport the growth of vegetation and the high TDS content and depth of the perched water table. Resuspen-sion and inhala'tion of radionuclides is estimated to be negligible due to a minimum 3-inch"~ soil covering already in place.

The area-weighted .concentration conservatively includes all areas with radionuclide concentrations greater than 1 x 10 pCi/g. All other areas were at or below detectable limits.

The peak concentration is assumed to be distributed uniformly in the sludge across the entire disposal area.

The annual doses assume exposure of 2000 hour0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br />s/year, no decay, and no dilution of the sludge by other sources.

49

A

~ ~ ~ ~ - ~

~ ~

C'igure 4.5-1 MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS OF MANGANESE-54 IN SLUDGE DEPOSITED IN THE LANDFILL (x10'PGi/g)

R l

f f i

~

f a

i f- f l

i a '

i ~

~ i a

Y i e

i i ~ ~ h t

I i s C

i ~ ~ ~

ai i

~ ~

f a f i i '

\

i I II i I V

Figure 4.5-2 MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS OF CESIUM -137 IN SLUDGE DEPOSITED IN THE LANDFILL (x10 pCi/g)

x Figure 4.S-3 MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS OF COBALT-60 IN SLUDGE DEPOSITED IN THE LANDFILL (xl0'pCi/g)

APPENDIX A DOSE CALCULATIONS Assum tions and Tn ut'Parameters E

1. Based on 'nventories and ,dose conversion factors, the. significant, radionuclides in the sludge were determined to be Mn-54, Cs-137, and Co-60. A uniformly mixed slab-source was. assumed in the direct gamma dose calculations.
2. The energy (MeV), yield (8's/decay), and half life (years) data used in the dose calculations are given in. ICRP Publication 38+.
3. The mass a'ttenuation coefficient (cm /g) and mass absorption coefficient (cm/g) for concrete and tissue are given in LaMarsh, 1977~'~.
4. The sludge and soil densities (g/cm ) used in the calculation's are assumed to be 1.20 and 2.00, respectively '
5. The shielded dose c'alculation constants (A, a>, and uq) are derived from LaMarsh, 1977'.

6.. 'For a uniformly distributed interval slab source, assume flux 6 ra s cm - sec s 2 x attenuation coefficien't (p)

This is slightly conservative since the summa'tion term of equation 10.52 of LaMarsh, 1977~'~, is < 1. For the cases evaluated, this term was assumed as I

1.0.

7: Assume a 3-.inch soil cover for shielded dose calculations.

53

Shielded Coolin Tower Slud e Gamma Dose to a Worker (o,) "- ep/2 [A E> [(1 + a>)Ps) + (1-A)E> [(1 + a>)P,] )

where

- flux (shielded)

(<>)'eo)

.CTS conc x CTS dens x conv factor x ield 8's cm s 2 x mass atten coeff for concrete x CTS dens I

shielded dose calculation constant CTS - cooling tower sludge E> number f'rom function graph shielded dose calculation constant-cooling tower sludge density (g/cm ) 3 shielded do se calculation constant D - shielded dose - constant x e, x E x p,,/P x t 0.0576 constant shielded flux (6's/cm'ec)

- energy (MeV) mass absorption coefficient for tissue worker exposure time, 2000 hr/year Area-Wei hted Concentration C, ISO] + ISO' Aig + ISO' ISO' Ai> Isog>] + Iso/ x where C - weighted concentration (pCi/g)

ISO concentration isopleth (pCi/g) from Figures'-3 area within concentration isopleth (ft )

2 A.,

A, - total area 54

REFERENCES"

1. "Water Reclamation Facility Sludge Landfill Analysis Results", letter from Dr.'. John McKlyeen (Arizona State Universitg) to Judd Sills (Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station) of November', 1989.
2. ""Population Exposure to External Natural Radiation Background in the United States", U:S. Office of Ra'diation Programs, Washington, D.C. (April 1981).
3. Personal Communication from Barley (Arizona Nuclear Power Project) to Jim Holian (NUS Corporation) of May 14, 1990.
4. LaMarsh; John R. "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering",

~ Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts (December 1977).

P

5. "Radionuclide Transformations Energy and Intensity of Emissi.on" ICRP Publication 38, Volumes 11-13 (1983).

I ~

55 '

1 5 ' SITE CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Geo ra h and Demo ra h The PVNGS site is located in Maricopa Country in southwestern Arizona, 16 miles west of the City of Buckeye and 34 miles west of the. nearest boundary of the'ity of Phoenix. Figure 5.1-1 identifies the'eneral location of the plant site with respect to roads and highways, communities, and cities in the vicinity. The site area is flat with small scattered hills.

~

To the west and northwest of the site are the Palo Verde Hills, sharply rising to 2,172 feet above- mean sea level: To the south is Centennial'ash, an intermittent stream backed by gently rising uplands with scattered,"

isolated, steeply sloped hills and buttes. Buckeye Valley, bisected by the Gila Rive'r, lies to the east and southeast. To the north and northeast, the terrain is a relatively flat desert traversed by numerous intermittent streams that are typical of the region (refer to Figures 5.1-2, 5.1-3 and Figure 5.1-2 illustrates the plant site, including topographical features.

and the location and orientation of principal plant structures.

The total area of the plant property is approximately 4,050 acres. The

'plant property line coincides with the plant site boundary, Units 1, 2, N

and 3 and their supporting facil'ities 'are located in the northern half of th'e site. The si'te is bounded on the south by Elliot Road and on the west ~

by Wintersburg Road. No public'roads or railroads cross the site. Site elevations range from 890 feet above mean sea level at the southern boundary to 1,030 feet above mean sea level at the northern boundary.

Figure 5;1-5 defines the boundaries of the plant exclusion area. The exclusion area boundary coincides with the plant site boundary; except in the southern portion of the property. Minimum distances from each unit to "the site'oundary is provided in Table 5.1-1.

56

rt >> ts

~ >>e I>>e

,,&'-g

'i I

4I Js c ~ Is>ra I st In I . 0 0 ~ 0 LEGEND tc ln SI < S L.

'0 c' INTERSTATE HIG HVIAY Whs st rank Q U. S. HIGHWAY CI rt>

c t cs >>

'0 tts IP rl n

n n

co

~ RAllROAD 0 Indtcn c .' IC ~ ~I 0

rChan S.i 4 ot ICICE Yc S QE R arete g'P@R"f URK c.

'i Van s - But on Illy\ CARD

'jcn ewen St ktk >try I Res.

I

~ c ae

d. Iltao'SI g]SO AYRila'tile 0%

But>Icy ~ '- . R i!vckcyt R" SI

'I ~ ~ sl ~ v J

ZperitITe Card 0 ~ ~

c>

La. Bvc'keyt Rc. It ~ 00'll t ~ s ~

~jk evckeyt I

t.a Cr sBVCkeyC Rd >r>>hlsieat t Ct ~ 00 Sl Airaor I e ~ t~~ 0 IIOI 0 0 I 0 dtCCC>>ay Rdte ~ OO.SI MOO I I>> II I 0 r0 E.

sn O t ~

~, Savthtrn Art lcooo.s 0

~ 4>

PS 0 el In e 0 Ot 0 ~I c: @ I eitn ~ n nd.I>Coo.s> BUCK EYE 8 scisne Rc trccs.sl PsjNGS BITE SOUNOAR Y te Beiact Rd I ~ too.>s i4CR I Y.

SI IOOOOS> rsctshJ t tie bcck~Mtn. I R d.t,osoo-t> >isa I Crd Iso ~ Oo ~ SI wa<< I ec<ckesscc

>Ca ~ soyomoa 80 0 '

Cl gth ~ib II 1 2 3 4 5 Miles rs tscrrclhcre Rd is>coo.sl n

t In <>0 Caterer 0 Otscf I hlc

'I I Rotc Rd.is SP tr>

I 8vcke,e Park

/ 'Stile cc 0

Js CI ov g n

sv C

Oi ~ ie +I ~~ I

'Il g\ sr tt fjzgys b . y'IICJIII>tl~~~

Isrs ~ I~ ~ ~ ~

le ~ I r ~ slee Qe '0 ~ ~ Ie ~ ~ Palo Verde Isruclear Generating Statio n I~ ~ SO ~

c'rsy

~~ ~

Cil> ~ soi ~ 0am Il ~~~ I t

>> It ~ ~,

PVHGS, REGIONAL PLANT LOCATION

~

II~ 0 figure 5.1-1 57 ICI01105 0207

44 r 7

WE'5TWlhtG RA NSMIS SIC)N l ttt/E5rJVINC5 Z OEVER5 f LINES OE VE R5 Z.

5KYREtVTOPVEFc'.

E I /C Y RETIE Z LOCA7 /0 PB R/'

C OOIC tto ticiittt rtvc c.ocrco c coo IIVR cooke coo 0 o rtvtt cooro rivet cootCC

)/t Itctcltt AST tlt tlotiltt AST llii't ttC tie tat tt CAST OC ttota tt AST ttotcttt Ast

~

AS tta ICJ )4001)4 II IIIjo Cd J Jtldi

~

Ics ~ cdotc.d) zlf.ttcJJ tdttdczddc J) rtf /trio dol ooii CCC )I CC vcr= I =ET W.)Z)Z, ZIC )JJ ZIC )17:0 I t)4C ~ dlo iso )t)JJ 14COIOt LESE Nlg lro Jcootdttt IJJzrid tro ~ .Idio ii rti)lftt 3 JZC IO <<0 IJC) tfà ui jcf )IOCJ If I S)tt I )0%t C&st ITI dod)CIJI Ztj)toal lrt Jtitfltd Zti)4.7) Cd 441 ~ IJ 5jo lof OIJ tlo, )17 rd Jci)141 .I Zlf. li>> C a!IIEZ Cf ICCCC tt51.

Clt)IAiu)I ICV.

JC 0 t0000 JC <<A ) 0l CCC Jrd ICJ OIC 7 aif l).ZIC CVO.IB.II tt tt.tc.ta 0 7 JCiotZCII If )I Jt J CSd .)) Zto 171 Cttt I )CIEZ IECCC O'I CV'M

)7 7 ICI. Ilo.t ZI ~ Zoi

)4.)f)ZI Zt).ZI 1 T JCCal)41< OC)tf-

)f7 )Zo JJ C 7 CEItti Ct COlttlnxt IA);.

ttas.nt.u 'EIIC.IIZ.a tti'.ll PUKE.lRK / )O ll J)170) 1 ZI)

J)r Joie Za.sfl.

J))CJ )4 ZIZJI)70 I Q-8 IOII I tCIEZ ICCCZ It'C.

EEI El ct ctCttliu)t tax.

C" ttEX V cttt.sta.sa t)15 Zat.tt I

QC T)tll IECEA')ILl tt))t Iutt5TIVI)/G

( 0-5 IA'IEl SiC)NE atttsstl

'ttr)tlt)t tt/)I

- IVE5TIVI/ Ct QC SriACE Q- Olttt I. I I I Svtttrltt) 5 /to COO rs LJ 0 tt 5 4~ .

~

~ il d

I Jto I 'CYJCM r CS ):5CIE rrii'TCI/C )

Z)IC 000 ~ i fIIC.CCO r i

~~

5t 2' l -~ I I

I t/

/ ~ r/

/rent;.: XO ~:

I /Ol r'rri/

I ro I I

)lt. Cco 'i 5 % 'ii ~ ~ ~ I~

Sia ge ~ ~ / r, t/

'i

. r/0/t/r/ GIEA r' I ) I C 4 O EVApor)Arrorr rs)wo I J I-i'.glt~6ou Tr '(at IEf .t

'iggj//u c, /if~~

0 J

)

I

'i 4 ~

', / 9f~f,$]( d Jio,cco I

I Ciu C

EVA/)O/7) IGN POND vr EK /

ii.

44 r I

'frtf0000

~

Jtctoco I 4 r1I /

v/I/v I =tc5t) Iltl r ~ROAD CCVE.$5 I ~uDCVE'/C5 (rC/rtt/CEQ 9011 e S 02 0 7-0$ 13czvAM5, REv5 NOTE cl)tzs Atsz r~~zo ro )z EocAr.o c

SI 00)JIIIC 5CJLZ palo Verde nuclear Generating Station At)JACEur ro Alto lso orrsEirtto<<

Agr=crtvc 0/ Tovtzrc cocrrtotts.

rtizttc

@PER'MRE ~ CO 0 ~ 44 1)40 CARB )ZZT SjTE GENERAL ARRANGEtatENT (Sheet 1 of 2)

A>so Availab1e On 58 Aperture Card Figure 5.1-2 March '89 Revision 1

.;+zan'rrcrf/ SI APERTURE ff I>> <<// CARD

~ I 5>>

~Q IC I55

.t- jgSO Available Ort Apertttre Card II Il

'a ~

0 51

'o. 45 Il s'1

// J()

o /

w.

/ Cf /

'O~, / 0 I CffttJar\ I/7>> fja/r 1 raa/I/ ajrf/ fl<<S <<<<ja<<ar raa/u sa cv47srtz/Io<

Cs,as<sf

'(+I;W" -! I I

I Icrcf<r <<a/sr<<<<ant fl<<I 4 vHKIIII<l~ a<<nt lra<<<<c j<<r jr/<<<</7 I

c 5

ca<</Ij Iarf vocjat Ca/ac/Sin ICS/VCI II<<S'

<<nf/I <mva I 7I Ktf SZISu ai Kzs<<a Sjr C. Ia/a<n If~ s <<J:I>>

CC V/I le% ~

lr'f/~~~ rca )

4

~

CI <st< o< Jf<CIK I>>K IVI 'Ifu>>fcr /av/

fttsof COOU<>/rsfc<<rvI~/>><<z/s/cr fflrr/rrrss <</ra<<<<sr K<<rt~ // <<r Icscufsst sian /rsnsunr fsacs I/>> /j<<7 0 <J /r r<<s//K<</K<<<<vr<<rr SSC faults<<CC <<<<K jr/<</

l5 sos>> fcsflnctal / sr/Ac sr/a<<<<t <<r r<<44 sc 7 ~ tr lrrct ~/<<<<a<<Knr /I/ t<<r Is cl/ Jcnaz nsrrvrsract

<<fr>>a< urn>>f II/K/JCKI Waar<<j rr /a<<w/4 rc lf Ir<ICI ftC< OC S7CIK SV 4 rs <ssatrf fsr/

fl. v<s<<rara<<as>>s f/K Jl. Csf CCCTCII aO//ar Cl<<4 II Cfl saul raal<< /aaa

/

s<<rrr st Crc <<r sr<<jar/

ts Csr Czlru c>>csfsa< uric n<< ~ I<lilt fs <Jscjlra< v.af csuafrl< vrst

//I

~t <<rrf

/cnt /o<<

til

'II ~ jl<<KKVIIC

/I/>>ac/Ill 4/l $ 4/af>> vt rknlr<<t /f<<K<<sc aaf f<<K Ia 4/as<<ra I/I>> s<<r fcajvct raar I Jl.

s>>sf/re vt sncaac rajas ar<< /cv rja<<a<<//r~jf gfsf>> v/ vf fs<<4 aj ~ /ot <<arcrK//ra<</v Cfsflll/I/ccrcln///C ISIIC .

fssr/ rm sr/sss sfc/rst/<<I carve/c aa. c rcrl/I<</ a<<n raa<<I ll /</jr cscffja <<vlt ///r7 Sl f//I ca/4 jcf. In'ssrt svf f/rvzr rrf4/I Sl ac<<tf<<s <<sit IÃ//<<4<c ar aorajrf I jr~/srr tcvr<<rrvsscc rK/ 4<<K/lf srarararra 901105 0207'iro)

~

lf. jr va/ cr <<K/

~4

<<ra<<

1~~401, REV 6

/cft jnftfwr>>rcess/>>/fscus 4/I/ar/<<j Cu a>>.

frsvrr

~4 lr<<rarrjj rara r<<rras I ~ r jc<<ra av lrrar /Ira,

/4 C//j<<aaa Palo Verde Nnclear Generating Station lr, csacrr fr/ajar ac a<<

jjcj la cljcsr lic~

fa Ijarr jar jr/aac/ Ia<<r a<<<<aj sl.

s/, <<I rt j Ir alas lr. /rf. /alla/

/~r/rrr 1

//v Cl <</4 Ct ssr Ia rri<<a ra<<tr SZTE GENERAL ARRANGcAENT (POWER BLOCK SITE PLAN)

(Sheet 2 of 2) 59 Figure 5.1-2 March 1990 Revision 2

I 0

'I

2L M se ~ si

~ o ~ o ~~ ~

4( e) ~ ~ ~ ~

I e so oo oe ~ ~o ee

(~ i l

~o ~

o~s Coo< ~ el< ~

~

I ~ .,-,. C~<~ ~

.I

~e (lI.

L t

s

~ (~veI i i ~ 1 ~o ee ooe NNW NNE (<Moos ee~

~ ~ ~

tM ee NW NE 0

~e C ~ oo ~ ~ e

~e Q e~ ~ ee

(( eos ~

I to hW oo e&o ~ ~ ~~ ~

-sg ~ Sr

'(;

'. ~ ~ . ~ oo. ~e X WNW

~o ~e a

i

~ ~ ~ ~

IBIles 5 4"-3 21 Sie E ~ oe(e(e(

D~ ~~ ~ 'i, ~

ll

~

~o e ~ os< ~ ~ ~ os~  ! ~~

s ~ <so

.~

(m ~

WSW ~e ESE I ~e

~ Qw so It ~ ~

~

SW /~SE I

~ ite Ia a (

se awe eo ~

I~

SSW we

~

~

sees e es os noo see

~ ~

Scale ~

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MiLs 'alo Verde iluclear Generating Station lMMEDXATE ENVXRONS OF NORTH PALO VERDE SITE 60 Figure 5.1-3 cIO 1 0 Uc 7~9

war I aa P(E At 75

'. 'ouosv or(ter

+ART LLERT PKS -

.-. 'O Kirkfand nd Jct'-'= 779~ *. -': " '" EXPLANATIONOF MAP SYMBOLS riot

~

~c ~2 O)tt Sattt ..Coo(fwtn ..

\ t'ut

'ine-oootl)'o('Sprs',".."

Date <s< dg I " un4aa i(Ill).app -'- ..:.":::Coides 04M. A arne,v ' is Ccaaaa ~ aa cwavvcaw Parce are

$$ $ $ a ly 8 Buckskin tn HORSE MTI TURRET PK . No vrct Brid e.r.r .,- ss $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOLL Lulu)ed Access Oavadcd Ha9)aware EL'078 "-+' <<<<<<uc a a a $$ FREE-Luau)cd Access Owvtcd $ $ 9hways 9 Yarnell - r' -.":.' son

~ 4 <<au <<a a a a i--:.

.y'al 95 +~ht P Ylagone Crow .: fhmb fe Other Owvted Highways ongress ' flee I',

Put

, rker t,oke ANTELOPE P fl. 5786

'-'Kin IPatsoate tach ar aaeaaavwu ara 9anaaaalac, Maaar aocaacaa ~ ~ v wtaaraaaaaaaCI IIROOKLVN PK ONTO-

.; Horse Accumuuled rn(4$ 9$ cctwttn rcd ponrcrs.

~

.:r

<<aaaa CBLACK'PK '>>s-K~ ~putter>> - .

BATTLESHIP PK Octave t.537g d. Gis dots cr lnterchah9es

~ EL (656 V/'hampie MERRITT Pc Black Canyon.

73 Bu(tcr i 11 93 Constellation Rock Thief Sp(P Post OIVctt 7!

m 1

Hoi scsh oc +rh - '7 a a I~

C LORA Bouse Rcs- Qsa Hataunal Inttrstalc H)9hways U Transoahada $ 99hway Rouse CUNNINGHAM PASS hguila

"~4 Castle Hot~~

v'ckeltbvr lo, g. ~10 ~a )~ 9 tt S. Ha9hways - Mtacan and 95 EL 2563

p. dde 8 11 rin s I7 p:Seven Sprs
c',. -"'ATIO (A)It>> Bypass) 5 I

cense)Ame<<anH9hwaya tr'Il g 24 State ahd RIVE!I,<<,.1 st Ma O rh 0

.aarg 23 0 72 Ifing >rp Z (casa ~ <<> nileWer ',Ci oR 0~ Qts ~Ice Pruwnoal Ha9hways Q) wv InterChan9e Numcers ahd Names a

/ d hlcVay M0 rifle' I!ew (efre -'E 7) Secchdary Sta:e. County.

C~i ahd pruvuasaat I99h>>>>

C

' SCICCCC State a)ra)SVICS IND, <<r . IBE)C 93 80 ... ai(tcL . - ~

r, Safome River ahd Rcacscc Parak df

'+

Y/enden Bg Yl!man eer PORT Rc. -,. I'v.v ats

'm.' 0 (9 'c- Ar Csvn n MCOOv(p) I r9 ~

itt ~ s. Ma ~

Cuuny Trans rcl 11> 60 +0 M A Q ove rORES T thtershah94$ and Rett Areaa 14 Hop PA55 C 0 A g ee INO RE Tc ~ Stature and Scrvce mess L 1925 4p

~pi 4 om ~ awe W<<WC

'rs M:

nOerg'MO" JII2 Quartzsite 0

~La Bc(re= ,.(=Fa l tc0oweif,>.. atpcc ~ a a4 waaaa4 u nC a'Tv <<9 a S

~ IVitt BIC H NPK APE '"-t~cLTRIVEf, .It Sb oroAparhcLoke.

j. Other Tyauu9h Hqhwaya

'~(agrrarO L Local TIuou9h Havhways 95 8 a/AD RE$ -

Outer Raada,'tOCaltundahuna an on vary- anaaWry Su99eatedi FELIPf PA55 10 ;C) LokeOO n yrt~n so yr 0 C Goes cr Tc ns. Couhrr Scars. State Cap ta)s 0 0 ah cy EL l29 t TAIL PK SAOOL 0 5 F

Io rOnrte eel Ocr:.

T Z)

+ 1'orfiff Ffa a)4ds'w IRON

'l Gtr cr Urhan Areas Y 3 U M

$ 0Patm Canyon T ct TN M Q pache ~o.

Sprs -

+ VIRGIN PK Jct 0 US. Nascnat Ccmc>>nes HAVE PK 7 EL 4828 +0Cg 20 O Gi dafu PEI 80 80

+~~o Isstene 5'14$

~ a 767 Kofo Mine B0 IIIIL<S 40 aVOOL5 II p oat eye Line rty

~~Sa I,L aoC uz). a

~ 'v 1

Oco Gilbert HA raoe

~ Gode ER <P(ing Florence Jc Kings Ra VA) A d VS. )4acnal Mcnuments Aarooats (CcarrvncrcaL Msrary.

State and Pn)v ncaa( Panas Munro

)I TEE BACK aCTN o EL3 32 ow ~d GIL Soot E<<h campva9 4ckacst

+ Villager., 4'P (veen Creek Ar 82 a 10 St>> ahd Pruvvaoat Parts r~ Pg dr'~

r M RI R 5 iho canatava9 4cdsest o 87

+ 0 Point ~ P o ol'l Occam:

cForlond MINER State Mcrncnals. Monumcnts EL 33 H s tahe 5'ccs tinez Sll.f un INO. Ot I+a ME PK htobi ca!on @ storicol GR Spnn9s ahd Wess ake Hy Hot EL 3793 u Scrings GILA IN)rs p B N I. ~q, RES ~, - 87 9'".9-. EL Pa. C.c . SI C

$ "-t. -enCa Ectrplf I Lw

'onte >i+ AS(0 nt eel ks 737 Rot e RES i Ron COOLl hasp E Poants ot tn)a)est I PERTURB Kofa 80 fOS'r r4 S RA' 12 7 oso Grand CARD Growler Ianfief '0 a palma Ruins Not'I Oome 20. 1 7 l3 c87 Mon (

5 Tollec cq0

'racy

. Oha k e rr piton Misr ( ita Oaleland IABLE T 87 a Also Available On en ter (LI u ll I 80 + E!. 437 ELOY Aperkttre Card o '--cyan(a,)

8 ll hrizc Picacho tCACHO PASS 8 Ilier~ g pfeftlon! 1 r4 ."B ncr Spra 4 0 + rparria F 0 Pt NOP NORTH SHEEP M'y.'I <A, rvcll0 Yo I EL 31504.

a 85 10

'/p Koha ~I Friendly Cors Red 5p cr v a a('entana 0 'I'hi(cs lVC(

Worth Komelik Peck Historicol 10 0 5, I

10 20 30 miles WP Scale f

CI

'-I so~+~a OTtnayas Al(as$ prinq 0 AJO l2 ~P IO' ~ ~

Hickiwan APAG. h egarn o +>

F, h 0<'I 'L Silver Sell I CSJaMCC

'ropr Pr 901105 0207 zf n~'Ot Yaya Chin Santa Rosa +r~ +~,'-CI hwa fojpahuh Tule ll ctt Ihy I

0 INOIAN

+Fr'I Saguaro

<"! Ccet No) L Mon Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

~

a%

18 0 t.

86 Sit Hakya g ~/~~a ~tn a"easye I E=Schuchuli 15 uijOIOa p I M A RESERVAT/ONE+

GEtlERAL ENVXRONS OF PALO VERDE SlTE 61 Figure 5.1-4

I V

U k

II (p

WINTERSBURG ROAD O~

'= I'I

.'(/ I gl pi \ e')

\

Itr,/.

';I'r UNIT 1 p;r:

~ I

~ i+,

UNIT 2 I',";.

UNIT 3

(,'/g lire

'jc/~

K:.- C I,'a.',

LEGEND:

CENTER LINE OF CONTAINMENT PROPERTY PURCHASED E LLIOT ROAD EXCLUSION BOUNDARY tWARD ROAD)

.SITE BOUNDARY PROPERTY PURCHASED OUTSIDE EXCLUSION AREA NORTH 0

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station SCALE IMiies)

SITE AND EXCLUSIQN BOUNDARIES 5:1-5 'igure 62

Table 5.1-1 MINIMUM DISTANCES TO SITE BOUNDARY FROM CONTAINMENT EDGE Site Boundary DisLance (Meters)

Exposure Direction, Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 N 1,037 1, 31.0

  • 1,661 NNE 1. 057 1, 34-2 1, 693 NE 2,, 006 2, 544 2,'755 ENE 1, 9.67 2.. 206 2,336 1,927 2,163 2, 290 ESE 1,967 2, 067 2,023 SE 2,049 2,101'.

2,256 SSE 2,729 025 2.705 S 3,005 2,698, 2,'34 5

'SSW 2,258 1,036 1,607 SW 1,407 1,208 ~

1,057 WSW 1,251 1. 014 809 1,225 993 871 WNW l. 244 1,010 005 NW 1, 254 1, 191 1,045 NNW '. 059 1,342 1.561

a. Based on 22.5 sectors.

63

5.2 Exclusion Area Authorit and Control The applicant owns all land within the site boundary; therefore, the applicant also owns all land within the exclusion area. The applicant has

'complet'e authority to regulate any and all access and activity with'in the exclusion area. There will be no unauthorized public access or 'activity.

allowed within the exclusion area. The site boundary is posted and fenced with. light gauge wire.

5.3 Po ulation Distribution Figure 5.3-1 illus"rates the 1978 estimated residential population located within a 10-mile radius of the plant site. Data are displayed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10-mile distances from the center line of the Unit 2 containment building for 16 compass sectors.

P Figures 5..3-2 through 5.3-10 illustrate the estimated residential "population located within a 10 mile radius of the plant site for the years 1980 through 2030.

5.3.1 Low Po ulation Zone The PVNGS low population zone (LPZ) has been defined as a-6,400 meter (4 mile) radius area, based on the center line of the Unit 2 containment building. The LPZ has been conservatively selected on the basis of providing effective emergency planning for the residents in the LPZ, as well as limiting radiation doses to below 10 CFR 100 limits to those residents outside the LPZ under the most conservative assumptions for a design basis accident.

64

Annulus lmiles) 0-1 1-2 2-3 4-5 5-10 0-10 Annulus (miles) 10-20 20-30 1 30 40 40.50 10-50 Population 10 490 480 167 2.350 3.497 Population 10,765 14,490, 123,121 724,727 873,103 SI APE@I'UgE CARD A1sp Available 0)t NNH NNE NNH Aperture Card 0

174 0 0 358 t

NE 17 0 0 0 685 147". 10 0

21 10 399 0 0 1044 0

HN' 0 17 ~NE HNk BS 1086 988 0 0 73951 17 10 0 0 3238 0 0 76493 0 0

'0 0 0 319 0 0

0 0 0 1030 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 3 3 0 0 0 '

0 ,o 6178 1087 39335 400862 E 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1090 0 389 0 0 684 HS' 0 0 ESE 0

%70 10 0 859 0, 0 0 0 338 2893 88 SE 0 0 0 0

SSH SSE SSH SSE IS 9 011 0 5 02 07-.o 9 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station POPULATION DXSTRlBUTlON--1978 PALO VERDE SITE, 0 TO 50 MILES Figure 5.3-1 65

Jl' Annulus tmiles) 0-1 1-2 2.3 5-10 0-10 Annulus tmiles) 10-20 2040 3040 40*50 10 50 Population 524 514 180 2,506 3,735 Populauon 11,480 15,454, 131,306 772,880 93 '1,120

', T~ pgg~gQ~V~ RQ" C ~3D NNE 0 3623 186 0 381 N

18 0 0 0 730 1572 10 22 z25 0 1113 0 0 0

7

""" 92 18 NE HN' 0

0 1040 0 292160 0 18 3rH 0 0 81578 c

0 0 p 110 0 340 3356 p 0 0 0 1098 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 588 11596 01950 074<32 E 0 0 0 0 p p 0 o 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HS 1162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g 410 0

0 0

502 0 730 0

0 3086 az 0 0 361 0

SE 0

0 0

0 SSE SSH SSE S l 9011oe oko7-go Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 19 80 PALO VERDE SITE, 0 TO 50 MlLES 66 Figure 5.3-2

I'1 I

t I(

'I

~ ~

s ~

~

~ 0

~

~ 0

!g 1

Annulus (miles) 0-1 1-2 4.5 5-10 010 Annulus (maesl 10 20 20-30 f 3040 40 50 10 50 Population 12 575 563 196 2,753 4,099 Populaalon 12,618 16.984 ". 144,312 849,335 1,023,249

, ~;,~y+9.G~

gp,99 t

,) geOog js'ISO ~rg 0 3982 p pztto<e (

204 0 0 019 20 IQ 0 0 0 803 24 12 467 56 0 0 1223 0

0 438 20 F'NE Hll II I Il ENE 101 i 0 1272 1084 0 i 0 321106 0 20 3796 Q 89660 0 0120 0 0 374 Q

3688 0 0 0 0, 0 0 1207 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 2<1 12705 46106 52143 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 1277 0 0 0 766 0 0 0 I 0 1006 12 0 0 0

0 0 396 3391 16 16 SE t

0 0 0 0 0, SSH SSE SSH SSE S

90] ] 0 5 0 2 0 7l ~j 5'alo Uerde ttluclear Generating Station POPULATlON DISTRlBUTXON--1984 PALO VERDE SlTE I 0 TO 50 3iXLES Figure 5.3-4

a N

0

~ ~

e ~

0 ~

~ 0 ~

~ ~

e 0

~ ~

4 0 0 ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

l ~

~

~ 0 ~ I

~ ~

~

~

1

lf I

ll

Annulus tmiles) 0-1 1-2 23 4.5 5-10 0-10 Annulus lmiles) 10.20 20.30; 30<0 40 50 10-50 Population 0 14 655 230 3,196 4,763 Population 14.643 18,710, 167,474 985,459 1,187.286

~ .. ~~A

,,?

4, sts 0 6621 237 0 487 0 0 931 2005 0

28 0 66 0 1<20 0 0 0 509 23 F'NE h9t 0 1477 1170 0 372636 0 5 23 56 4405 )0 0 0 104009 0 434 0 0 0 4280 0 0 1401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 E 0 0 0 0 403 1<790 5350560511 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  ?

0 0 0 0

1 z82 0 463 831 0 0 0

I 0 600 1168 0 0 0 0 460 3936 119 0

SE 0 0 0

SSE SSW SSE S

cy 01105 0207I-/sf Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

?'?s?)

5 h

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION--1990 PALO VERDE SITE, 0 TO 50 HILES 70 Figure 5.3-6 0

Annulus (miles) 0-1 1.2 2-3 3-4 5 10 0-10 Annulus (miles) 10-20 20.30 30XO 4o.5o 10 50 Population 0 18 858 840 294 4,104 6,114 Population 18,806 25,315:, 215.091 1,265,461 1,524,673 SI APERTURE CARD 0 5935 A1so Avai1ab10 Og 304 0 Ape) ture Card 0 625 N

12 30 0 0 0 0 1196 2575 17 18 696 0 0 1823 0 0 HiN 0 12 150 30 HN E)NE 0 1896 1035 0 0 78589 0 30 5658 0, 0 p180 6

~

0 557 0 33633 0 0 0 5C97 0 6 0 0 0 1799 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 H 0 .

0 0 0 0792 18996 S8718 77717 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 1900 0 5wt 971 0 0 0 HS 0 0 SE ESE 0 822 0 0 j.500 18 0 0 0

0 0 591 5055 153 6 2< 0 24 SE 0 0 0 0 0 SSH SSE SSH SSE S

90110'2 Palo Verde ituciear Generating Station

~kg POPULATION DISTRZBUTZON--2000 PALO VERDE SETE, 0 TO 50 MlLES Figure 5.3-7 71

'I T i' I

'I I'

Annulus tmilesl 0-1 1-2 2-3 34 45 5-10 0-10 Annulus tmilesi 10-20 20.30 3040 40 50 10-50 Population 0 23 1,102 1,080 379 5,271 7,855 Popuiauon 24,153 32,512 276.250 1,625,039 1.957.954 SI APERTURE CARD Also Available On.

0 7622 Aperture Card 390 0 0 803 N NH 39 0 0 0 0 1536 3307

".6 15 23 894 108 0 2342 0

0 J BN 839 39 15 193 0 0 61<669 0 2036 1753 0 8 39 93 0 7266 0 71630 0 p 23 0 715 7060 0 0 0 0

o 311 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 H 0 0 0 0 3861 24397 88257 99814 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p

~ 0 0

0 691 0 0 1133 0 0 SE ESE 0 0 10.-.-

23 0 0 , I 1927 0

0 0 759 197 0

31 0 31 SE SE 0 0 0

0 0

ol SSH SSE SSH SSE 901105 0207 /g Palo Verde 1 nuclear Generating Station POP ULATZON DiSTRiBUTXON--2010 PALO VERDE SiTE, 0 TO 50 ttILES Figure 5.3-8 72

Pp II t!

I

Annulus (miles) 0-1 1.2 2.3 3.4 4.5 5 10 0.10 Annulus (milesi 20-30 30-40 40.50 10 50 Population 0 33 1,576 1,544 541 6,76g 10,463 Population 41,758 354 7g7 2 066 61 1 2,514,386 Si APER. IL:~~K k CA2" NNE AlSO AVQPB'3t" 6 0 9790 Ape 1:~te Cwtl 501 0 0 1031 NE 22 55 0 0 0 1973 28 66 1280 155 0 0-', 3008 0 0 0 .22. 1201 276 55 ENE NE 3128 2102 0 0 789 ~Ã2 0 11 133 9332 0 0 0 220031 0 0 33 0 0

0' 0 918 0 9068 11 .

0 0 968 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 0 E W 0 0 0 0 78Q23$ $ ><11335)281S58E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3140 0 0 0 1323 HS 0. 0 SE HS 1356 33 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 975 8338 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 SSH. SSE SSH SSE S

901185 82 Q7'P Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station POPULATZON DZSTRZBUTZON--2020 PALO VERDE SZ'EEi 0 TO 50 MILES 73 Figure 5.3-9.

I Annulus implies) 0.1 1-2 2-3 5-10 0-10 Annulus imiles) 10 20 20-30 30.40 40.50 10.50 53,630 '55,678 Population 43 1,964 2,025 695 8,695 13,442 Population 39,842 2,679,824 3,228.974 gV

/~PER " 'BEE Ci~D NNH Also Avai:"-bfe Ga 12573 ApP,"f,di Q CQfd 0 1324 28 71 0 2534 5"55 28 1644 199 0 3863 1543 71 NE Hil EHE 0 4018 0 2618 1013908 0 71 170 11986 0 0 83107 p d3 10 0 180 11646 p

0 0 812 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16<6060 E 10 14 0 H 0 0 0 0 10 2864 40203 0

0 0

0 p 0 85 0 0 0 p 0 0033 0 1032 15 z5 HS 14 0 SE HS 0 1741 3178 1252 10708 324 57 57 SE 0 0 SSH SSE SSE SSH 901105 0207 /f Palo Verde ituclear Generating Station 4

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION--2030 PALO VERDE SITE I 0 TO 50 MILES I

~ F 74 Figure 5.3-10

'C As indicated in Figures 5.3-2 through 5.3-10, the population density.

of the LPZ is low and is expected to remain as such throughout the plant life, thereby enabling effective emergency planning. Figure 5.3.1-1 illus'trates the LPZ in terms of topographic features and transportation for evacuation purposes. There are no schools, hospitals, prisons, .or parks -located within either the LPZ or a.5 mile radius.

5.3.2 Po ulation Densit Figures 5.3-3 through 5.3-5 show 'the estimated residential population located within a .50 mile radius of the site for the years of initial'nit operation, i.e.,'1982, 1984 and 1986. Within.a 30 mile radius of the site, the following residential population projections are estimated".

1982 32,187 persons 1984 33,701 persons-1986 35,415 persons 4

'I Table 5.3.2-1 lists the cumulative residential population density within, a 30 mile radius of the site by annulus for the three unit startup dates. As can be seen from Table 5.3,2-1, the PVNGS site falls well below the uniform population density standard of. 500 persons per square mile as expressed .in Regulatory Guide 1.70, Revision 3.

Figure 5.3-10 shows the estimated residential population located within a 50 mile radius of the site for the end of the decade of

,plant life end, i.e., 2030.

Within a 30 mile radius of the site, the 2030 residential population projection is estimated to be 106,914 persons.

75

Ir >> II I hl I 4 'al <<4 hi ~ Sl ~ ~ ~ has 4 II~<<4<<a ~ ~ ~ r so' ~ >> ~ ~ ~ al Isla>>>> ~ I I ~ 1st ~ I)1<<'I tl tl It . )0 'tl ta I I ~ ~

I >> h>>a >> I i>>S ll >>I )<< I ~

<< I>>

~ ~

Ta<>s

~ ~ ~ sai ~ ass<< Is I I w, tt aa>> C I

)I

~

4..) -I

')

) i:, ~,sa I C I )

Ill )4 )1 4 )t )$ I N )~

3 r

~ ~

I~

'.)

Ij'"':. ltI ']

~ 4 I 40,1 (, I I a

~

r I I Is ~ ~ asst I LEGEND

~ at I I I tj I << ~

\ ~ )C I

1 I

~ a I HARD SURFACE, HEAVY-DUTYROAD s

HARD SURFACE, MEDIUM-DUTYROAD

>><<>>IVIn l.: / 4 I>> .<<>>V 'g. IMPROVED LIGHT-DUTYROAD

'4 0 ) ~ ~ 10 I jf I ) I trot=0) UNIMPROVED DIRT ORAO I

~

Q s I.i~s.a I

1 TRAIL

\

lll; s as RAILROAD: Slis(GLE TRACK I O.

.I Y'. I) 0 r'.

L 11

~0

)s I

WINTERSBURG s

ll

~ t.

I

'*-L,Y" '-'

I

~ << I'-

af

~ RAILROAD'41ULTIPLETRACK BRIDGE DRAWBRIDGE 1

<<L X LCO )I I~ qI t) ~ 4 ti ~~ I a>>f TUNNEL

~l) . ~

I a I FOOTBRIDGE h.H >>L 4 I a~)

OVERPASS-UNDERPASS (l )

I / tl

, BUI,LOINGS

~ ~

SL IDWELLING,PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT, ETC.)

~ f L ~

q L)a "..0.. I

ls PALO VERDE 4

SI NUCLEAR ~ I )4 fr.<<.,ij II GENERATING I APERTURE

\ STATION CAR9

,I Oil I II 1>>a

~

I I

1>>is I>>ah J I'ILO <<4 Ii>>

)', I Lval >>rhr<<s I ~ ILO<<0 I <<

g)

~

pesp A++)fQble OD Aperture Card I t t IS (rs :gs ~

I I I~

\

'<<<< I ~

It E

<>

I)OI

',\ I NORTH

~J ' >>( <~ r') I >> ~ I~

~ I I 2 rI I I

I I l III

'l l7 I ix r 4 Tr>> ~

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station I

~

~

/r ( I

+I I I ( t) qaa ~

-8/ I I. ~ tl ha =Ps '4 Cs 4<<.,

ts

>> >>~

I 7'N J

) IDH POPULATION ZONE I.I ~

r

~4

~

I

~ ~ ~

~ I~ Ha ~

~

Irl, s

!i..

(

Cs I Figure 5.3.1-1 76 II0I,1050207 ff

I

CUMULATIVE RESIDENTIAL POPULATION DENSITY HITHIN A 30-MIf E RADIUS OF THE PVNGS PLANT ITE DURING YEARS OF INITIAL PLANT STARTUP (PERSONS'ER SQUARE MILE.)

Miles From Plant 1982 1904 1986 0-1 0 0 0-2 0-3 ~

22 22 2'3 16 37 0-10 12 13 14 0-20 13 13 0-30 1? 13 77

Table 5.3.2-.2 lists the cumulative residential population density within a 30 mile radius of the site by annulus for the end of the

.decade of plant life end.

As can be seen II from Table 5.3.2-2, the PUNGS site falls well below the uniform population density. standard of 1,000 peisons per square mile as expressed in Regulatory Guide '1.70, Revision" 3.

5.4 SITE GEOLOGY 5.4:.1 Site and.Site Vicinit Ph sio ra h The site is located in one of the intermontane valleys of the Sonoran Desert region of the Basin and Range physiographic provinces. This valley, known as the Tonapah Desert, is broad and relatively flat-floored, with through-flowing, intermittent drainage graded to the Gila River, the regional trunk stream. The site lies between two major intermittent drainages, the Hassayampa River on the east and the Centennial Wash on the southwest. These two drainages are within 3 to 5 miles of the site and drain toward the northern bend of the Gila River near Arlington. The major surrounding mountain ranges are the Palo Verde Hills.to the west, the Belmont Mountains to the north, the White Tank Mountains and Buckeye Hills to the northeast and southeast, and the Gila Bend Mountains to the south. Like most mountain ranges in the Sonoran Desert, 'the flanks of the surrounding mountains consist of pediment and alluvial fan surfaces that grade gently to the basin floor. The basin floor slopes gently southward from about 1,500 feet above sea level at the edge of the Belmont Mountains to about 800 feet elevation along the course of the Gila River, southeast of the site. The site is nestled between outliers of the Palo Verde Hills on a flat surf'ace, at about 950 foot elevation. The nearest edge of the Palo Verde Hills i.s about 2 miles west. of the site; the outliers are low-relief, rounded knobs protruding through the alluvium north and south of the site. The Palo Verde Hills range in elevation from about 1,200 feet directly 78

Table 5.3.2-2 CUMULATIVE RESIDENTIAL POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 'A 30-MILE RADIUS

'F THE PVNGS PLANT SITE FOR THE END OF THE DECADE OF PI'ANT LIFE END (PERSONS PER SQUARE MILE)

Mil,es From Plant 2030 0-1 0 d-2 l 3

0-3 73 81 0-5 60 0- 10 43 0-20 42 0-30 38 79

A j

I f

l II I

(

C adjacent" to the site to more than 2,100 feet at their highest point about 5 miles northwest of the site. The basin floor is dissected by several small ephemeral streams which flow southward and are integrated with the Gila River, about 10 miles southeast of the site. The natural, intermittent flow.of water in th'e washes has now interrupted, by an agricultural irrigation system and by PVNGS 'een construction activities. The micro-relief system, leveled'n local areas by agriculture, consists of small rills and gullies that carry the normal*runoff into the washes.

5.4.2 Site Vicinit Strati ra h Figure 5.4.2-1 is a geologic map and simplified stratigraphic column ~ ~

of the area within a radius of 25 miles of the site (site vicinity).

Figure 5.4.2-2 shows'eologic cross-sections illustrating the sub-surface geologic 'relationships of. the site vicinity.

The geologic formations within the, site vicinity are typical of the Sonoran Desert subprovince and include highly deformed metamorphic and granitic rocks of Precambrian age and moderately defor'med volcanic and sedimentary units of Tertiary age in the mountains, and undeformed volcanics and sediments of Pliocene to Holocene age in 'the basins. The metamorphic and granitic rocks are termed basement and moderately deformed volcanic and sedimentary units are termed bedrock, and the undeformed volcanics and sediments are h

termed basin sediments.

The emplacement E

of Precambrian plutons on granitic and. gabbroic composition are 'generally associated with the culmination of the Mazatal Revolution, and resulted in the metamorphism of surrounding rock to schist and gneies. The metamorphic rocks aie the. oldest rocks in the site vicinity and are 'subdivided into three subgroups:

greenschist facies metamorphics, metadiorites, and gneissic, granitic and hornfelsic rocks.-

80

f I

1

I rl I Zi 1+A

~r '4 I

-'I:. I I I

l 1

V gl

SI APERTURE CARD Aiso PjvailaMe On Aperture Card SOUTH tt(RTH A' 3000 3000 INTERSECTION OF B-B' 0 2MO 4.CCO Ccarcmial Wash Propcrry ioaopah Oeserl .:@ra. FKKT i~ Sile palo Verde Clay Osa VERTICAL SCALE

~~~  ! ~

I OOKED Os, I Os;. I ~ ~ ~ ) I Oibt .~

~ ~

Oibt ~ ~ 0 20gOO 40,00C Sea LeveI f:::::::::::.Pfp+arI::::.i:::::::-:::::. Sea Level

-1000'.. FKKT 1 ~ 'I t:.::.i':i:Jt,, HORIZOttTAL SCALE

-IOOO' Vcraaal Ksaaacralionr 6.6iX 8 SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST B 3000 I INTERSECTION OF A-A

-IOOO'assoyaropo Level '::::::::::I:"'"::"I:W

~ .

Oslr Ccaicaatal S

Wash i ~ t ~

nita, PA.O VKRDK HILLS

'"bs

~ ~

Oibt ipalo Verde

~

~a OFa

~

Clay

~ ~

Oib t River w::y:;;;::llpCer:::

3000'OOO'eo IOOO'ea Level

-1000 Figure 5.4.2-2 GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTIOiV 901105 020y gl 82

l J

The greenschist metamorphic rocks make up, onl'y a small fraction of the rocks in the site vicinity. They crop out' miles west of C

Gillespie -Dam and on the east flank of Saddle Mountain. The metadiorites are rare intrusive bodies found only in conjunction with the greenschist metamorphics in the Gillespie Dam area. The A C e

gneissic rocks are. the predominant'metamorphic subgroup in the site vicinity and compose about'ne-third of the Belmont Mountains and all of the Vhite Tank Mountains. A large segment of the Gila Bend Mountains, 20 miles west "of Gillespie Dam, is compos'ed on gneiss.

Scattered outcrops, of gneiss are also exposed 2 miles south of Gille'spic Dam. The granitic rocks are represented by granite and quartz monyonite, including aplite and alaskite, outcrops in the eastern portions of the Belmont Mountains, Maricopa Mountains,'he entire Buckeye Hills, and in the Gila Bend Mountains. Although not exposed in the Palo Verde Hills, granitic basement rocks were encountered in exploratory borings beneath the site property.

Bedrock in the site vicinity consists almost entirely of Tertiary volcanic rocks and Tertiary volcanoclastic and sedimentary rocks unconformably overlying the Precambrian basement rocks. The age and composition of these rocks-are similar to those throughout the entire Basin and Range province, Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks are exposed in the western portion of the Belmont Mountains and the south-central flanks of the Gila Bend Mountains.

Sedimentary rocks in the Gillespie Dam area consist 'of arkosic conglomerate, lahar deposits, tulfac'eous sandstone, and eros'sbedded sandstone. The Tertiary sedimentary members of the sequence are interbedded with the Miocene 'ndesite and basalt .flows, flow breccias, and pyroclastic rocks. The Gila Bend Mountains are primarily composed of andesite and basalt which range in age from 19 to 28 million years before present. In the Palo Verde Hills, basaltic andesite, diabase, and basalt, with minor amounts of interbedded tuff, are approximately 17 to 21 million years old.

83

i.

Basin filling deposits overlying the Tertiar'y .volcanic sedimentary bedrock sequence are talus, colluvium, alluvial fan, basin alluvium, lacustrine, and fanglomerate. Ages of alluvial fan deposits on the surrounding mountain flanks range from Terti.'ary to Holocene, based .

on potassium-'argon ages of overlying basalt flows.. Two series of alluvial fan, deposits, (QYfn and TVfn) are stratigraphically below the Arlington and Gillespie basalt flows and, therefore,'re late Pliocene in age (greater than 2 million years before present).

Massive, extensive clay deposits penetrated by numerous water wells in Phoenix and Gila Bend basins attain a thickness of more than 700 feet between Phoenix and Litchfield Park and 850 feet 'in the Gila Bend Basin. These clay deposits are usually continuous across individual basins but'here is no direct, evidence that they are continuous between adjoining basins.

Late Tertiary and early Quaternary basalt flows interbedded with and overlying the basin sediments are the youngest volcanic rock units in the site vicinity. Four extensive olivine-basalt flows overlie Gila River terrace deposits and alluvial fan deposits. Whole-rock, potassium-argon ages. of these flows are:

Gillespie: 1.3 to 4.2 million years (nine samples) average age 3.3 million years.

Arlington: 1.2 to 3.2 million years (six samples) average age 2.2 million years Sentinel: 1.71 + 0.25 million years (one sample)

Gila Bend: 2.5 to 6.5 million years (three samples) average age 4.5 million years 84 e

i 1

I I

The youngest volcanic flows appear to be similar to widely scattered geomorphically young vents and flows throughout the Sonoran Desert subprovince. These volcanics are generally shown'on published maps-as Quaternary basalts, but the age data given above shows them-to be earliest Quaternary and/or latest Tertiary in age.

P 5.4.3 Pro erties of. Subsurface Materials Soil properties presented herein were deriv'ed from investi'gations-conducted at five unit areas which included the location of two potential units (Units 4 and 5). ~

The'engineering proper'ties of subsurface soils were inyesti;gated by drilling, sampling, laboratory testing, and geophysical- testing techniques. A summary of the generalized stratigraphy and associated eng'ineering properties is presented in this section.

Profiles depicting the generalized stratification, of subsurface materials at. the units down to bedrock (approximately 300 feet) are

. shown on Figures 5.4:3-1 through 5.4.3;3. The actual detailed soil stratification of the upper 65 feet is shown in the detailed excavation mapping of each of the power block excavations. The

'disclosed by the mapping is consistent with that 'tratigraphy derived from borehole information.

85-

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

0 ~ ~

I ~

I

~ I I ' I I ~ ~

I ~ I I ' I I I . I I I ~

I ~ I

~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I

' I . ~

~

~ . ~

I ~ ~

iLwL>

~ I I ~

I ~ I ~ ~

I I ~ I

~ I ~ I

~

' ~

I ~ I ~ ~

)tT))lp)))i]f))

R ~ ~ I ~ ~

~ ~

I . I ~ ~ I

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

'.I + . '

I I I I

~ I I I ~

~ I I I ~ ~ ~ I ~

~ I

~

~ ~ ~

W

~ ~ ~

, h .

,q

  • a 'h

~

i 1 ( ~

11 CX

ELEVATION 960 920 (IeeII 880 840 LITHOZOV SEQUENCE 811 812 819

!!!!1!!!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!Illll!!!!l!,

810

'815 '88

! l!,!lil<ill>llll,'le>>>>>>>>llil iiiiiiiliiliilIilllllli 814

~ "(> "'e'n J 82 UNIT 1 SECTION A

'!!'!!!l!llllllklllllllllllli 81 A'A 82 (,

iliilllii>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iliiiiiiiiiiiiiie 7ii iiii>. iiiiiiliiillliliilliilllllllllllllllili 830 gSO Ay~-,~QQIe Gee

~yoorfqe1:e CQE'6 lliillllililllllllllllll/i//i/ii///fi Iililliilliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll SEQUElICE

- G C

0 ELEVATION STRATIGRAI'HIC Ifeee) 1000 eEO e20'80 640 1e 800 600

('I( '

> 0

~. j,i'>(e(e- (49>) ?~,e e (cA (cII'('i. j~ ie .~r."(e ji(~ ',4q>k 7e pf ~

e .e:e (':i()', e(cv',. (( -, '-e~~

o ~ i I ht

~>

160 220 220

~ '( ~

c40 ~> ~ ~ ~ (

.Q . o O'o.

~ ~

+~g.Q 0'b. g '> o: o O"4I ~

Ce.(e W '~4'eO 'O +(e.4~ ~ ~Q'~~'Mg:

~ 4 O. gl C).e o 0( ~O Q. -'bW 600

~'o 's so ~" ~ s> ~ +QoyQC>> 'oCiO< C((goO>ee(e

~

4+. 0 gO'>0 ((Q (e $ 0 jsQe Q(

Q ~

~,~ 5cO E 0 520 e( ~

4?0

+ + + +

( + + +

+ +

j+ +

+

+

J Figure 5.4.3-1 GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNIT 1 I

(Sheet 2 of 3)

(

87  ; 902205 0207l ~%

p 41 l ~

UNIT 1 SEI:TION B B ELEVATION ELEVATION (feet) {feet) 1000 1000 960 STRATI G RAP HIC 960 LITHOZONE "82 SEQUENCE SEQUENCE 84 Bl 483 '818 8 920

~"w)":~ p'j~i s"~4 ""~

-::~...-r.-... I-.-. 8 C

920 i "". .:; 1-"

...,,;,',I

~ ~

O

~,. ~ " I 880

~ ~

I<l!I!!/ IIIIIII ~

t<jlljlllll I

I

'!i[I!!Ilj!f ilii IIII E SS0 840 840 SI APERTURE CARD 800 800 Also Available On

~-Zv <i~~Z4: Aperture Card 760 760 720 720 I

680 640 600 .4QQ'p.4'..~ I.o'Q 0 o Ij' DI., 'Q" O-.jj.'Q.g4" e.r a OO::4 m. 600 560 520 520 901105 0207 480 IIO palo Verde jfuclear Generattng Statton 440 440 t

GEOLOGIC PROFILE* THROUGH UHXT 1 (Sheet 3 of 3)

~ Ir 88 Figure 5.4.3-1

li 1

C I

~

0>e (I'~

GENERALIZED SOIL AND ROCK ~)SO gq(td8 Cs~

D ES C R I P T I ON S r Lgrg SILTY SANO, GRAVELLY SILTY SANO and SANDY SILT; (SM,ML), brown to yeHow brown, thin clayey silt horizons.

SANO with SILT; (SP), brawn to yellow brown, scattered CROSS SECTION LOCATION lenses of silty sand, clayey sand and gravel.

812 UNIT 2 811 SANDY CLAY - CLAYEY SANO; (CL4C), red brown to red yellmv, occasional gravel. Bg 822 8Se 815 GRAVELLY SILTY SAND, SANDY GRAVEL, and CLAY- 'I 1

EY SAND; IM,GP. Gyf,SC), brown to yellow. NORTH 814 SILTY CLAY and CLAYEY SILT; (CL-CH, ML), brown to 84 yellow red, occasional thin sift and sandy silt horizons.

~

~1 82 83 SANDY SILT, CLAYEY SILT and CLAYEY SAND; (ML, 834 SC), brown, 1ocaNy ~coos, occasional siity sand horizons.

aip p.~~>>i~i <! SANDY SILT, SILTY SAND, CLAYEY SANO; (MLiSM, gg-r~>> 818 SC), brawn ta red bravrn, accasianal andy clay horizons.

jjclg'~

~sss '5-SILTY CLAY and CLAYEY SILT; (CL-CH, ML), brmvn to yellow red.

SILTY CLAY; (C L.CH), red brawn. EXPLANATION Lithozone units as noted in section 2.5.1.2.2 SANDY SILT, SILTY SAND, SILTY with SANO; (ML, SM), brown to yellow brown, occasional clayey sgt horizons. 5 Stratigraphic member

~ Barings used to construct profiles FAH GLOME RATE; red brown, herd.

Borings projected to profile line AN DESITE; purple gray, herd, aphanitic.

SCALE 901105 0207 40 20 0 40 80 120 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNIT 2 rsheet 1 of 3) 89 Figure 5.4.3-2

'll I I' h yA

~ r l

v ~,,

f

EVATIptt rtrep IJ0 co 60 LITHOZONE.

SEOUE'ICE 812

~ ~

810 16

~ ~ I t81 I>

",jjjlijfjIjlljjjjljjli

(~

82 rtI UNIT 2 SECTION. C 81

! I! III!lljllij!ij!II!lllIIIII

.k';

II!!!I!',I!.I:I C'I 83 818 t8 j I!!II!IllllillllI!Iillll!!Ill!Jllllilllllli!

> ~ >"-". ~ >r" 6 I!!IIIII!IIIIIIIIII

'I. o t>v >' '>

828 I'

rfu qotp~c<<~><<>>t 0'r~~r't '%A >>>rt'st <<h .t>

830 APERTURE CARB Also Available Og Aperture Card 832 2>>ir p:i+r 'a ~<<Y( >c~g'pt>>>pq'~t i. <<t3 > <~w+wr<< '<<<<r ~

Illlllijil ELEVATIC'.

STRATIGRPAHIC SEQUENCE.

C

'0 Iteet) 860 820 840 60O

~ K

>~

jep

~ "> '>'

K 22P 660 640 PoCt~o.et '" O'Ct.

o GQj t'.0

)fr'rp'Vg. g 0'ig o0.'.'jgo.t QOCre~;4'6-O,

<. o .. o

~,

go'~~opgO p., V, 04rjp~Opgjo'!pp eg OtpQ'.0~$ : g 0 .

A o. O;og43 . 0'-".%+o. O.O ~G '00

~

0 600 Seo t Q 0 6> P Qo P 0,'g'OO (jour>CHOO!>> OCI y~>~rrr 4>j ~>t y~g Q < ~ 4<<3

.<0:~;Dodo:4?0,'-O5'oO,.-.'0

~~-'q O'-a Figure 5.4.3-2 460

+ + + P

+ GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNIT 2 (Sheetj 2 of 3) 440

~ 't 90 rj 01 I05 02 0 y~ g ttt

I

Sl p ~4

<<L<<

LINIT 2 SECTION D D' ~ <<gf ELEVATlON (feet) ELEVATIO~-

(feet) 1000 1000 LITHOZONE STRATIGRAPHIC 960 SEQUENCE ,B4 SEQUENCE Bl . 83 +BS

~<<<<, <> '<<'

~

gZ

.....<<&7" r.':.',.'."';.:.:.

~

C 920 <<

920 I >liilllll!

IIIIIIIIII!! iliii' 880 880 840 840 800 800 760 760 j <<<<'t ~

/ 1 I

720 720 i 680 680 640 640

<<0"

' o L

600 ...g'..q .-.oO.'O:..';.

") 'O'~.,o 600 kg ~, j.o.j:.

,op. .o.e+ g..'g.g:0;.0.0:o~,'.a~ o.- Po..o.o 560 .'o:;0:::

560 oj:g'o:ogDpo;0  :: .0:.ng0.oe..o.:0::,:o..og'~40:+,;-.~....e 520 520 a'o;.'o cj

.:;~.'.0'0 :.'o'.:.-.'-O.'C <

~-0,'i';~<OO.::.:ol)"

II eppes 05 0207~/ $

'.o:.m"ri -i"'-

'<j ~, >>'

480 o. 480 Palo Verde t fuclear Generating Station 440 440 1

GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNET 2 (Sheet 3 of 31 91 Figure 5.4.3-2

<<g

GENERALIZED SOIL AND ROCK DESCR I PTI ON S SILTY SANO, CLAYEY SANO SANDY SILT. (SM,SC, e ML), brown to yellow brown, cclczreous, acca:ionzl fine 812 to medium grained gravel.

~ BS SILTY SANO, SANO; (SM, SP4hl), brown to yellow brown, CROSS SECTION LOCATION occasional horizons of silty sand and clayey sand.

UNIT 3 818 CLAYEY SANO, SANDY CLAY; (SC, CL-CH), brown to 88 ~

red brawn, occasional gr(vtl. 822 814 SILTY SANO, SANO, CLAYEY SANO, SANDY SILT; F

(Shl, SP, SC, ML), brown to yellow brown, occasional thin lenses of silty clay. 82 NORTH j ~ F 81 SILTY CLAY; (CL.CH), brown to red yellow, occasionzl thin lenses af clayey silt and sandy silt.

SANDY SILT, CLAYEY SILT and CLAYEY SAND; (ML, 818 SC), brawn, locally micaceous, occasional silty sand horizons.

85 SANDY SILT, SILTY SAND, CLAYEY SANO, SANDY CLAY; (ML, SM, SC, CL), brown to yellow brawn, locally 830 micaceous.

SILTY CLAY, CLAYEY SILT; (CL.CH, ML), brawn to red yellow, nan calcareous ta very calcareous.

SILTY CLAY; (CL-CH), red brown to yellow red, calcareous.

SILTY SAND, SANO with GRAVEL, CLAYEY SAND, SI SANDY SILT; (SM, SP, SC, hlL), brown to yellow brown. APERyURp CARR EXPLANATION INTERLAYEREO FLOW BRECCIAS and FLOWS; gray, hard, moderately to highly fractured. Also AvaIIRble Cn APerfttrt'grd Lithozone units as noted in section 2.5.1.2.2 SANDY TUFF and CLAY; red to gray white, dense to very dense, crudely stratified. Stratigraphic member Bonny used to construct profiles 9011 0 5 02 o 7 ANOESITE; purple gray, herd, aphanitic.

Boriny projected to profile line Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station k4.':.

.~A<.

SCALE aa 20 0 aa 80 t20 GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNIT 3 (Sheet 1 of 3) 92 FEET Figure 5.4.3-3

'(

0 h

sj; APERTURE CARD Also Available Og Aperture Card UNIT 3 SECTION E E EVATION 11e as)

ELEVATSC Isecs) 300 10 LITHOZONE ~

811 810 STIIATI0 11 AFNl C 760 SEQUENCE 812 89 815 814 '82 81 08) SEQUENCE 96

.( ("- ~

833 A

320 C

921

)IIllls!III!slliIiiiiiiiilillll!

Ii II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllllillllislll llill>>l!Ilail>>ll<<ill<<lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll sliiississssssi(((("sss'::;,"-ss((ssss ':. s(sssss( sl(l;(

SSO I<<! I<<>>lllII lllill. IIIIII F ss",

840

~ ( (~ s <<g<<7p SOC 760 ~ +(s ( ~

s (g ( w (y ~ . (<<( ) <<g( y')q~ 766 720 726 80 68'ssss

~

6 Fichu 600 + + 60i

+ J +

+ +

560 i6'20 57'80 440 e 5.4.3-3 44 GEOLOGIC PROF LE THROUGH UNIT 3 t

(Shee 2 of 3) 9012 05 0207~ PIP

<< 93

\

'I

-l E

0

UNIT 3 iECTIQN F F ELEVATION (feet) ELEVATIOll SI 1000 (feet) APERYURE 1000 I

CARD LITHOZONE STRATIGRAPHIC

<<82 860 SEQUENCE SEQUENCE B4 81 <<83 B18 <<85 860 I Also Available On

~ Aperture Card 1

920 820,"

jqljl jjL!f,')i:LiUJJ'fjj !IIII III I IIIIII/!Iii 880 ><sufi F

880 l 1

84 840'

,G 800

~ I ~p/ a~a (.4 I;h, ~1+ r '( l4 ~c w )lp~~A~)gf, 800 760 760; 720 3 720'80 680 ",

N 640 640 f

I 600 600!

+

+ +

560

+ + + 1

+ + 560;

+ + +

+ +

+ + +

520 + 520 I L

480 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 440 440 GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH UNIT 3 (Sheet 3 of 3) 94 Figure 5.4.3-3

l

. of fine sands, silts, and clays of low plasticity are also common within the .transition zone. Such soils, classified as SM-ML and SC-CL, are generally 'stiff to hard and exhibit localized calcareous, cementation. Layers of sands with low silt and clay content (typically less than 30% fines) "are also encounteied within the transition zone.. The sands within the intermediate zone are generally medium dense'to very dense'.

I The intermediate zone generally increases in thickness "and h

complexity of laye'ring from Unit 1 southward. At Unit 1, the transition b'etween the upper coarse-grained and lower fine-grained zones is very abrupt in most areas and the intermediate zone is discontinuous in 'those areas. At Units 2 and .3, the intermediate zone generally occurs within the interval of approximately 30 to 50 feet deep, immediately above the well-defined stratigraphic member E contact.

The lower zone deposits primarily consists of medium to highly plastic, hard clays. Sands and s'its comprise a very small portion of the formation. Layering within the deposits is uniform and relatively'flat. Several major layers are traceable across the site.

5 4.3.2 Static Soil Pro erties The results of the field and laboratory testing program were used to evaluate -the engineering properties of site .soils.

Typical static material properties foi site soils are presented in Figure 5.4.3.2-1. Grain size and plasticity characteristics of various soil" layers are presented in Figures 5.4.3.2-2,and 5.4.3.2-3. Results of standard penetration tests in granular soils beneath Units 1, 2, and 3 are presented in Figure 5.4.3.2-4. A summary, of shear strength 'est results. is presented in Figure 5.4.3.2-5 ~

96

E r

I 1

1 L'

J

5.4.3.1 La er Desc i tion To determine representative engineering properties, the subsuiface profile has been subdivided into three soil depth zones representing different dispositional environments and generally exhibiting different engineering characteristics.',

For discussion purposes, these zones are defined as the upper zone (0 to 30. feet), intermediate zone (30 to 55 feet), and lower zone (55 to 300 fe'et). These depth zones correspond approximately to the following geologi:c lithozoners and stratigraphic, members presented on the geologic profiles and maps of excavations:

Stratigraphic D'e th Zone feet Geolo ic Lithozone Members Upper (0 to 30) Upper LZ5 A and B Intermediate Lower LZ5 C,D, and Upper-(30 to 55) (Transition)

Lower (55 to 300). I.Z4 and LZ3 E,F,G,H,I,J & K I

The upper zone contains granular soils deposited in a high energy environment. Such deposits primarily consist of relatively well-graded silty and clayey sands with some fine gravel. Relatively uniform, fine, and medium sand layers are

. also present, to a lesser extent. With the exception of the upper 2 .or 3 feet which are generally loose, the deposit is gener'ally medium dense to dense. Zones of caliche cementation

.are common.

The intermediate zone represents a,gradational interface between the upper coarse-grained pluvia deposits and the underlying, fine-grained lacustrine deposits. It consists'f crudely

'I stratified clay, silt,, and san'd layers of limited lateral extent. The clays are generally medium plastic, hard and exhibit extensive ca'lareous cementation.'radational mixtures 95

I I

f

Q

~I'KaYmZ CWRD AISO PyEI7hbl<

0>

MAJOR SOIL ~ TYPES

SUMMARY

OF ';,SOIL PROPERTIES ~pe=.ture Cgc.g DESIGN SHEAR STRENGTH Ory PARAMETERS Oco:ce OEPTH LITHO.b GENFRALIZEO OEPTH STRATIGRAPHIC OESCRIPTIONS SYMBOLS Unit Moisture Vcid ol Sp df;a C cu EXPLANATION He<0 ZUrtE LITHOLOGY ZONE MEMBEll VrciSht Content Ratio aber Gailry toe 0 INI ".al ILstI Oistl ItsH f;-f: .','.jjjYi,; 37 106 027 0.59 2.70 36 LITHOLOGIC SYMBOLS 20 UPPER SiLTY SANO CLAYEYSANO occrfoaal Sravets. 19 87 4 Ocpth below criffnal native Sround surface

'Lc C Intcrtsyercrd SILTY CLAYS, SILTY SANOS, SM t06 I 0.58 97 40 SM4t M 10 22 I 039 0.65 92

~~crc3vn tv""

RI INTERMEOIATE D CLAYEY SAtlOS; >>ith Sradational mixtvrcs ot 36o tI Refer to Setisfis proRtss, Fitvres 7.8-54 Urovth '.;i'~c;,":.,ie GRAVELLYSAND upper P tine sands, tSr sad days. .66 b 2.5-48.

~ I lover E SILTY CLAY; occaional leases at sandy silt. CL,CH i 98 26 0.42 0.73 97 2.71 15o 20 20o 1.2 5.0 clayey silt and sSty sand. c Refer to ditcurionin tccGon 2$ .42.1. c 80 FINE StLTY SANO4AIIOY SILT aad CLAYEY SM41L. SC CL 99 25  ;-'.bwv>SI SANO4ANOY CLAY.

ScR types cre detiacd in accordance wild sts UniSied Sol '~pi'r."i sv CLAYEYSAND Sl L.TY SAND 100 Clari'.icstian System. Oval dsri".icatiors indicate border I linc ms(crids.

I

~ i i G 120 i i I SILTY CLAY;occasiond day ay silt Mnscs. CL. CH 06 26 0.43 0.76 93 i ~

1 Movtvre Contents and saturation above the pcrchcd wsa.

140 level werc determined utiaS samples obaited from cuter SANDY CLAY SAiiDY SILT torinSs drilled>>ith no drBIfnS Ovid.

flttE SILTY SAtt04*NOY SILT snd CLAYEY GM4IL, SC.CL 98 26 042 073 97 222 SAN04ANOY CLAY g

Escept whcrc other>>ra noted, mcrrvrc contrast prcnsc3y SILTY CLAY. CL 101 25 0.41 0.68 100 222 5.0 dcunuincd froin samples obtisncd bdov, ttc water taMt LOV(ER. FINE CLAYEY SANO4ANOY CLAY and SILTY from rotary wash borintp. Some at the fsw deyees al sat vatisn observed in Sranutar scil: br law ate iiatrr table may cmv SILT 200 SCIL. SM4IL 107 21 0.37 058 a8 2.vs I SAN04ANOY SILT. ts due to thc ineviatls moisture lares dr~shit am pit hand.

lipS.

220 I

240 ~ i i i 9 Insutficieat cr no data SILTY Ct.AY.

SILTY CLAY CLAY:"Y SILT

=.9 25 0.41 0.7i 100 2.jl 260 280 300 CLAYEY SANO4ANOY CLAY, StlTY SANO; occasional Sraveh. SCIL. SM 108 21 320 340 I l)O M,N,O,P ROCK.

360 Figure 5. I'4.3. 2-1 l

SUI"IIIARY OF SOIL PROPERTIES 97 V 9 011 0 5 02 07i>>.y f

L ~

I

,)

rtA M~&Ibi R IUU I ION wtel lk C ~ I~ lo 4 ~ '1'I ~

GRAVEL SAND FINES (Silt or Clay)

Co Fine 0 r1 Medium I F n U.S. STANDARD SIEV E NUMBERS HYDROMETER 3 1 1/2" 3/4- 3/8" 4 '10 20 40 60 100 200 100 I I i 1 90 I- I I I I 80 U,

vo

~. eo QJ 60 z .

40 I-z 30 O

20 10 10 5, 0.6 GRA IN SIZE'IN MILLIMETERS 0.1 4

0,06 '.01 y> Iwf. N~>.vt; 0.005 0.001 0.0006 4

/

PLASTICITY CHART 60 A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SOILS ARE NON PLASTIC 50

~ CH X

Lu 40 O

z 30 0

I- CL CO

~ e 2O I~4 P MH Bt OH 10 J~

Mt. CL ML 5OL ML 0

0 10 20 0 40 50 60 70 80 , 90 100

", LIQUID LIMIT (A) ILTY ANO "LAYEYSANDS (SM, SC, SM SC, SP SM)

STRATIGRAPHIC MEMBERS: C, 0, & Upper E TYPICAL DEPTH RANGE: 30' 55'igure 5.4.3.2-2 (Sheet 1 of 4)

GRAIN SIZE AND PLASTICITY

SUMMARY

INTERMEDIATE ZONE 98

G RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

~ tan c ~ sa+w + ~ s e ~

GRAVEL SAND FINES (Silt or Clay)

Co ine oars Medium I ne U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8 ' 10 = 20 40 60 100 200 90

,l)( I I!IlI !

1 80 7o yh I

I 4o I-30 CJ CC 20 10 0

10 5 1 06 0.1 0.06 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PLASTICITY CHART 60 A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SOILS ARE NON PLASTIC 50 CH X 40 O

Z 3O' I- CL V) 2O MH &OH 10 Ct.+ ML 8(OL ML 0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT (B/ FINE SILTY SANOS - SANOY SILTS (SM ML, ML)

STRATIGRAPHIC.MEMBERS: C, 0, B Upper E TYPICAL OEPTH RANGE': 30' 55'igure 5.4.3.2-2 (Sheet 2 of 4)

GRAIN SIZE AND PLASTICITY

SUMMARY

INTERMEDIATE ZONE 99

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION welt IOL lijltlWt4 llltfe GRAVEL SAND FINES (Silt or Clay) 0 inc, 0 Medium 'ne U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER

~ 3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100'00 80 UJ 70 =.5,~~It

~ eo

6. 3 K~>

I-R 30 CJ uj 20

.0'4 HA@'t 10,6 r

0.6 0,1 0,06 0.01 0.006 0.001 0.0006 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PLASTICITY CHART, 60 50 CH

,X 40 O

Z 3O 0

Vl CL

> 2O MH & OH 10,

~ML CL~ ML &OL ML 10 i 20 30 40 50 ~ 60 V 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT (C) CLAYEYSANOS -SANOY CLAYS ISC CL)

STRATIGRAPHIC MEMBERS: C, 0, & Upper E TYPICAL OEPTH RANGE: 30' 55.

Figure 5.4.3.2-2 (Sheet 3 of 4)

GRAIN SIZE AND PLASTICITY

SUMMARY

INTERMEDIATE ZONE 100

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

~i ~ l0% CEklbtM~ Iti lo GRAVEL SAND FINES (Silt or Clay) 0 inc o Medium n U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 3" 1 1/2"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 Qo 80 ro z

40 I-30 CJ K 20 CL 10 10 6 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0006 GRAIN SIZE IN MIILIMETERS PLASTICITY CHART 60 50 CH X 40 O

z 3O O

I-th CL ~ ~

~

0 2O OH

~I 10

~ML CL ML&OL 0

0 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT SILTY CLAYS (CL. CH)

E STRATIGRAPHIC MEMBERS: C, 0, & Upper E TYPICAL DEPTH RANGE: 3I' 55'igure 5.4.3.2-'2 (Sheet 4 of 4)

GRAIN SIZE AND PLASTICITY SUIIMARY INTERMEDIATE ZONE 101

~eo aa asovv av I ~

GRAVEL SAND F INES (Silt or Cl )y)

US. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 QJ 30 10

'lo 5 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.006 0.001 0.0005 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PLASTICITY CHART

'eo CH X 40 0

Z

~ ~

3O O ~ ~ ~

CL

> 20 MH & OH 10

~ML CL7 ML &OL ML 0 10 20 30 40 60 60 20 80 Oo

'LIQUID LIMIT (A ) SILTY CLAYS (CL, CH)

'\

STRATIGRAPIC NUMBERS: Lower E & G TYPICAL DEPTH RANGE: 55'-70' 75' 160'igure 5.4.3.2-3 (Sheet-1 of 6)

GRAIN SIZE'AND PLASTICITY

SUMMARY

LOWER ZONE 102

t I

(

i

'\3 rIHIIV oi LC LJ IO I 0 I DV I IDIO

<<0 ~ W, 41VS ~ ~ I~

GRAVEL SAND FINES (S ll or Cloy)

In Medium Fn I . U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 100 3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 50 100 '00 50 I-X 50 U

uI 70 b rb i

>~, so l'L' CC III 60 z

II.

O j IX:

0 10 10 5 1 0.6 GR'AIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.1 0.05, 0.01 0.006', 0,001 0.0006 PLASTICITY CHART 60 X 40 O

z 3O 0

l- CL 2O MH & OH 10 l7

~i(8 I. C I. ML &OL ML 0

0 10 20 30 40 60 5Q 7Q 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT (B) FINE SILTY SANDS - SANDY'SILTS (SM4lL, SC CL),

STRATI G RAP IC NUMSE RS: F TYPICAL DEPTH RANGE: 70'-75')

Figure 5.4.3.2-3 (Sheet 2 of 6)

GRAIN SIZE AND PLASTICITY SUGARY LOWER ZONE 103

1 l

I

KCITPRM&l~RKTRZ53tKR~

II%AIWllmW m R rue IIMNII I ~ Um lllN mlUaaj W IIIN I II Ilm II IIUI!l N UUR I UN I IGNIUI

~ HIIII lllfI IUIII N BRIINN W II NlUIII llm IIUIII~II

.IIl NIIllll UllINNUll

. IIIIEEIUIII IlllmEIIlllNN IIINNtUII IIE Ill IINN!II

.lacer IIIN&l IIRIllll IN~II

~

~ ~

t r

f I

I I

I

K ~

~ '

ill EllIHIEE R llElllll

. ~

III m IIIII E Hl mRllIII 4S ma~llll llllllEIEIIII

aa RR mkm ll II IR l5 I IIIEEllll IINEEIIIII I ~ IIIILIE Illm SIR MEIIIII

, Ill ~

III m ~ I'l II ll Ilm t llmSRElllII 55E IIII all ~ Ell [III I KHlllll

~ mIH II lllllmElm

v

. IlbbE Nbkk

~ II IISEm Illld II E ~ kllllIbl IIII III I NbbEkllIII ~ kllllSaaEkmll I EklllIbkkbill 1llbE IlI UE b lEkl IllbkkbII

. NbbE lb ~

dI IIR IId k

.dl I

lblbbE bbEI Ilm I bdl HIIEIEki II IIIdbaEkeid Im~t I

dlbbEk lldl I HIIEekH >

Ib ~ IIInk

~ llblk IUE I mURIH blERlmEII~HIII HlkEkHI I Eb

I I

I h

IS%IIIII E Hll m lHI HIHlaallttlm lm IR III I HIHIIIIIKHIIIH QIHII IfNISRHIII

.I 5 f It IIIHH IIII IHIRI8mWHfWIRHtll

.I S II

.I IHH HIH I ~ IH ill fill IIII II

.I HR I Ift HtlmWfHII I HS II Har

~ I IIH UH f I ~

IIIill HIHmatt INNING II EIIHIHIS%IIIIIISQHIII

~ ~

't i<<

4 i 353 S S ~ ~

5 tuQ g 3

A

~ ~

i $ K$ v ~ \

G 0~ ~

.c ~

g t <<<<<<

tO t g 'h <<t-a I-M ~ ~

g ~ ~ ~ ~

Ci 'c3 O ~ ~ ~ t ~

X V<< ~ ~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

g ca ot ~ ~

co CD Z <<(

~

~ ea AJ c4

~ ~ CD i

Z LA i

Oti o K CD

~ ~ Q7 Q

~ ~

t ~

~~

O CD ri

~ ~ Q uP I3S~I ss3uzs Nsounou3no 3nao3333

<< ~ I" ,<<I<< "i

~ ~

o

~ t ~

~ ~

i ~ ~

~

~

O ~ g

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

O O

Fi 'li i<<i ID i<<i QI (8S'AJ SS3UJS N30uflou3AO 3AIL93993 PQ E cn u)WR X HH cv

~

HOZ (Q Q Pl Z OCM h H CU

~ '

~

vl WQO

~

O 00 Fl

~

B C4Z OH

$ s ~

Z O ~

~ ~

~~

A Z ~

~

~ ~

\

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

) ~

~ ~

~ ~

~~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

I,'

~

~ ~

~ ~

25 25 UNORAIHEO SHEAR STRENGTH EFFECTIVE SHEAR STRENGTH EffECTIYE SHEAR IN SITU CLATS 20 20 STRENCTH IH SITU SAHOS 6ACXFll.t.

20 S ~ O'~ 5.O 6'~36 Ci 0 S'~36' ~0 15 15 6 b I cv b

o IQ ~ 10

~ ~

~ - 60

~0

~ < ~ ~

~ ~

I O

~ ~

80

~ ~

~ ~

0 0 ~

100 0 5 . 10 15 20 25 %0 354 0 15 . 20 25 10 35 p'i CFI'+ (F3 p' (XSF) 0 ~

(XSF) 2 2

120 4

25 25 IAO 0 6 12 OHORAIHEO SHEAR STREHGTH (XSF)

Cf f S'44/c %NEAR TO 2 A .. Ah STRENGTH STRENGP 20 20 IH SITU CI,ATS IH SITU CLATS 6~20'~ 1.2 S> 15'* 2.0 SI 44

~ 44 lC

~ 44 hC Ic 15 APERTURE b CARD b b 10 Also Available On 10 Aperture Card

~

'r~

C ~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

10 15 01 +(F3-2 20 (XSF) 25 30 15 P

20

=

>o"f. These streams are tributaries of the Gila River, which drains most of 'the southern halE 'of Arizona. Other local water courses include Winters Wash and a wash draining a narrow'trip extending a few miles north of the plant site. Figure 7.0-1 shows the locations of rivers and washes relative to the site.

There are. no dams on East Wash, Winters Wash or the Hassayampa River.

There are se'veral small detention dams on Centennial Wash, the 'argest being a.low'eaithfill dam about 45 miles upstream Erom the site, which has a capacity of about 100 acre-feet.'here are several large water storage dams on the Gila River system upstream fr'om the site. The locations of these dams are shown in Figure 7.0-2. Data on these dams are presented in .

'Table 7.0-1.

7.1 Flood Historv C

The U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) op'crates a water-stage recorder on Centennial Wash that gauges the runoff from 1,810 square miles, and a flood hydrographic recorder on Winters Wash that gauges the runoff from 47.8 square miles. The Centennial Wash, gauge datum is 773.22 feet above msl and is obtained by u'se of a water-stage recorder. The base discharge is 1,000 cubic feet per second, with the flow regulated by several small detention dams. The Winters Wash gauge is a flood-hydrograph recorder located at 1',080 feet msl. The base discharge. is -100 cubic feet per .second, with neither storage nor diversion above the station.

114

~ ~

~ ~

~

)9es

~SOS). S c' So 2 )9) S on

)94$ do Ileavef Cf

$ 0$ ) S

)94)

Svs) i $ 094

'lear

>a Were oe ki,a $ 01 $ 4 a lao 'I " ~ ~

CS

$ 011 alii io ai

ee $ 019 4 i, L 1920 o 4~

~(

r. ~ 9$ 0 ~ 90$

Verde ee

)09) <<4 4 919 dii e)44 A n e9 ra S I 24 e940 SISS e,)44 1

$ 04$ ns

)II) 4 SI 00,1 SIOI e9vv a I94$

Sl)v ~

/ S Ivv,4 I 0 4 o

r 4914 er Sl)4 a $ 09'I ( o C 0

H I 919, ~

I', Sl)4.4 ~

Ii e

~1)i SI JS )IVV G,a slol.s 491$

Aoii~ e re II e)eO e)OS I a)e ra SI 0) e(,

$ 1)V )S

$ I)e SI 2 I SI I)

E ~ SO C

IV e94$

Sna I~ lleia'VIS

$ 020 0 Cae I e,an X Sl "l9 'I

~ 44$

Saii Carloi Vp

~ 19$

Ceo A Ae ~ ervoir 1 Sl'1$ I:iiv paean \ 49li 4 SI9$

eo'Iv e ~ 4$ ire

~ 1$ 0 I'Ieo e49$

Sl'94 elv el $ $

ee

~ 1)$ ~e<ra ~ i~

LEGEND X PLANT SITE A COOLIDGE DAM B ROOSEVELT DAM C HORSE MESA DAM D MORMON FLAT DAM NORTH E STEWART MOuNTAIN DAM F HORSESHOE DAMi G BARTLETT DAM H WADDELL DAM I MCDOWELL DAMSITE 10 0 10 20 30 40 MILES GAGING STATIONS SCALE CENTENNIALWASH NEAR ARLINGTON 1

NEAR TONOPAH 2 WINTERS WASH NEAR MORRISTOWN 3 HASSAYAMPA RIVER GILLESPIE DAM 4 GII.A RIVER BELOW Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 22v Y4

!gveayl IaOCATIONS OF DAMS AND GAGING STATIONS Figure 7.0-2 116

t

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I

~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~

I ~ ~

~ ~

I ~ ~

I 1

For the period of record (1961' 1977), maximum recorded discharge in Centennial Wash was 14,500 cubic feet per second on July 31, 1961. Maximum recorded discharges in Winters Wash for the period of record (1962 - 1977) was 3,640 cultic feet per second on September 25, 1976. Tables 7.1-1 and 7.1-2 give the peak discharges recorded for Centennial Wash and Winters Wash, respectively.

Maximum recorded discharge of the Hassayampa River, as recorded by a crest-stage recorder located near Morristown, Arizona (whicn gauges the runoff fr'om 774 square miles), was 47,500 cubic feet per second on September 5, 1970. The period of record for the gauge near Morristown includes the water years 1939 - 1947, 1954, 1956 and 1964 -,1977. Table 7.1-3 gives the

~

peak discharges recorded for the Hassayampa River. The datum of the gauge is 1831.16 feet above msl. From October 1938 to June 1947, data is from the water-stage recorder; from June 1947 'to November 1963, there is miscellaneous data only. There are annual peaks for 1947 and 1964 -1965 only.

Maximum observed discharge'f the Gila River, at the USGS gauging station below the Gillespie Dam (which- gauges th'd runoff from 49,650 square'miles),

was,85,000 cubic feet per second on December 28, 1923. The period of record for the Gillespie Dam gauge includes the years 1921 to 1977. (A maximum, discharge of 250,000 cubic feet per second'was estimated to have occurred in February 1891 at the Gillespie damsite.) Table 7.1-4 shows the peak discharges recorded for the Gila River below Gillespie Dam.

118

I l

(

1 I

I I

1

Table 7.1-1 P CENTENNIAL WASH NEAR ARLINGTON, ARIZONA.

Gauge Discharge Water 'Year Date .

Height'(ft) (ft3/s) 1961 July 23. 1961 4.70. 14,500 July =29; 1961 3.71 3,870',110 1962 Sept. 6, 1962 .3.09 1963 No flow 1'9 64 July 31, 1964 3,. 74 2,890 1965 Feb..7, 1965 .3.27 1, 040 1'966 Sept. 13. 1966 4. 13 5,500 1967 Sept. 5, 1967 3.27 1,040 1968 Dec. 19, 1967 4.11 5,330 H

1969 Aug. 29, 1969 3.25 990 1970 Sept. 5, 1970 4.71 11,900 1971 Aug. 20, 1971 3.91 2,040 1972 No flow 1973 Oct. 7, 1972 4.52 ~

9,340 1974 Aug. 4, 1974 2.93 105 1975 Oct. 28, 1974 3.55 755 1976 Sept. 26, 1976 4.38 7,800 1977 No flow a ~ Partial water year started Jan'uary 1961.

119

Table 7,1-2 WINTERS WASH NEAR TONOPAH, ARIZONA (Sheet 1 of 2)

Gauge Discharge Water Year Date Height (ft) (ft3/s) 776( )

19 Sept. 5, 1962 62'963 Sept. 3, 1963 100(

1964 Aug. 1, 1964 5.67 680 Aug. 1964 6.00 850 Aug. 1964 5.89 790 Aug. 1964 4.56 250 1965 Feb. 7, 1965

'.91 800 Aug. 14. 1965 5.20 470 1966 Dec. 10, 1965 4.96 390 1966 Sept. 13, 1966 4.91 3 8'0 1967 Sept. 3, 1967 6.11 900 1968 Dec. 19, 1967 6.86 1,350 1969 Nov. 15, 1968 6.2 960 Aug. 29, 1969 5. 68 700 Sept. 13, 1969 4.37 180 1970 Mar. 2. 1970 4.28 150 Sept. 5. 1970 5.15 48G

a. From floodmarks.
b. Annual peak prior to installation of gauge.
c. Estimated.

120

Table 7.1-2 'I WINTERS WASH NEAR TONOPAH, ARIZONA (Sheet 2 o'f 2)

Gauge Dms'charge Water Year Date Height (ft) ('f t3/s) 1971 Aug . 20, 197 1, 5. 10 1, 000 1972 Aug. 12, 1972 4.70 *795 1973 Oct. 6, 1972 5.80 2,100' 19 7 4 Mar. 20, 1974 4 .'0 900 1975 Oct. 28, 1974 4 . 2 560 1976 Sept. 25, 1976 10. 1 3, 640 1977 Aug. 16, 1977 (c) 121

, ~

P Table 7.1-3 HASSAYAMPA RIVER NEAR MORRISTOWN, ARIZONA 'Sheet 1. of 3)

Gauge Discharge Water Year Date Height (ft) (ft3/s) 1939 Dec. 20, 1938 7.30 2,700 Sept. 4.. '1939 6.6 1,240 Sept. 6. 1939 8.7 6,200 Sept. 12, 1939 '6. 5$ 1, 600 1940 Feb. l. 1940 5.9 160 1941 Oct. 5, 1940 7.18 2,460 Dec ~ 24, 1940 7. 30 3,350 Feb. 25, 1941 6. 96 ,2,600 Mar. 2, 1941 8.36 6,100 Mar. 5, 1941 6.66 2,.040 Mar. 14, 1941 7.90 4,060 Apr. 11, 1941 7.57 3,020 Qpr . 15, 1941 7.05 1,320 July 24, 1941 7.50 2,110 Aug. 9, 1941 7.73 3,460 Aug. 29, 1941 7. 27 2,050 1942 Aug. 5', 1942 5.7 '00

a. From high water marks in well.
b. From floodmarks.

122.

t Table 7.1-3 HASSAYAMPA R'IVER NEAR MORRISTOWN, ARIZONA. 'Sheet' (1).(2) of 3)

Water Year'ate Gauge Height.(ft*)

Discharge (ft3/s) 1943 Aug. '3, 1943 9.9 7,700 Aug. 14. 1943 8.52* 3,800 Sept. 26, 1943 6.80 1.200 1944 Oct.'0, '1943 7.68 2,420 Feb. 24, '1944 7 '2 1,510 Aug. 9, 1944 8'. 10 3., 520 1945 Aug. 2, 1945 '7. 55 2, 200 Aug. 10, 1945 6.98 1, 110 1

1946 July 22, 1946'ug.

7.38 ~ - . 1',510 11, 1946 7.50 2,090 Sept. 17. 1946 7.60 2,310

'Only mis cellaneous record Ju ne 1947 to Nov. 1963 1947 Aug. 8, 1947 8,95(a) 6, 000 E

1954 1O.5O(a) .

1956 1O.15(a) 1964 July 1964 1O.1(b) 4,000 1965 Sept. 2, 1965 9,280 1966 Dec. 10, 1965 9.77 2,700 Dec. 30, 1965 ..9.41 . 2,000 Sept. 13, 1966 10.03 3,210 1967 Sept.. 1967 8.75 1,150 123

I i

Table 7.1-3 HASSAYAMPA RIVER NEAR

'Sheet MORRISTOWH, ARIZONA (1).(2) 3 of 3)

,Gauge Discharge Hater Year Da te '.Hej.ght ( f t) (ft3/s) 1968 Dec. 19,'967 10.61 4,800 1969 Sept ~ 13, 1969 8.15 650 1970 Mar; 2. 1970 .9. 05 1, 500 Sept. 5. 1970 19. 05 47,500 1971 Aug. 18, 1971 9.07 2000 1972 Aug.. 27, 1972 6.67 700 1973 Oct. 7, 1972 7.81 2,000-1974 July 20, 1974 7.30 -650 1975 July 29, 1975 7. 27 50

'976 Feb. 9, 1976 8. 800 34'.08

-1977 Aug. 15, 1977 1,600 124

t j

Table 7.1-4 GILA RIVER BELOW GILLESPIE DAM, ARIZONA( 2.) (Sheet 1 of 5)

Gauge Discharge Water, Year Date Height (ft) (ft3/s) 1891 Feb. 1891 250,000 No record 1891 to 1921 1921 22, 1921

'ug.

3.25 26,800 1922 Jan. 4, 1922 3.67 32,'700 1923 Sept. 20, 1923 2.00 13,100 1924 Dec. 28, 1923 6.00 85,000 Datum chan e 1925 Sept. 2. 1925 0. 68 2,500 Sept. 6. '1925 1.73" 9,570 Sept. 20, 192S 2.23 15,200 I

'926 Oct. 6,= 1925 ~

1;28 6,160 4, 1925 'ec.:

0.72 2,700 Mar. 31, 1926 0.88 4,060 Apr. 8, 1926 3.15 26,700 Apr. 21, 1926 1.02, 4,760 July 27, 1926 0.87 3,520 Sept.. 9, 1926. ,1.05 '4,620 Sept. 30, 1'926 '3.95 38,300 1927 Dec. 8, 1926 1.84 10,600 Dec. 15, 1926 0.68 2,500 Feb. 18, .1927 5.45 67,300 Mar. 12,'927 1.04 4,560 Mar. 17, 1927 .0. 81 3,160 Sept. 13, 1927 3.71 , 34.900 a ~ Gauge height affected by .d'rawdown due to open sluice gates.

b,. Approximate discharge with sluice gates open.

125

Table 7.1-4 GILA RIVER BELOW r GILLESPIE DAM. ARIZONA(2) (Sheet 2 of 5)

Gauge Discharge Water Year, Date Height (ft) (ft3/s) 1928 Feb. 6, 1928 1.70 9; 220 Aug. 3, 1928 1.26 5.600 Aug. 29,,1928 0.70 2,350 1929 Apr. 6', '1929. 2.74.r 20,700 Aug. 19. 1929 0.60 2,050 Sept. 5, 1929 0.88 3, 680 Sept. 26; 1929 1.15 5, 210 1930 Mar. 19, 1930 , 0 '2 3,160 Aug. 10, 1930 2.19 13,900 1931 Feb. 16, 1931 2.50 17,500 Aug. 6, 1931 1". 20 5,470 Aug. 12, 1931 1.45 7,530 Aug. 31, 1931 1. 41 6,930 1932 Oct. 3, 1931 0.73 2,36,0 Dec. 11, 1931. 1.00 3, 690 Feb. 11, 1932 4.47 44,500 Feb. 20, 1932 1.78 9, 670 Mar. 3, 1932 ~ 1. 65, 8, 260 Mar. 12, 1932 0. 67 2,090 Mar. 22, 1932 0.92 3,270 Datum chan e 1933 Oct. 9, 1932. 5.70 2, 180 1934 Aug. 30, 1934 5.88 3,100 1935 Feb. 10, 1935 6.60 7,470 Feb. 17. 1935 5.73 2,240 Mar. 17, 1935 6.06 3,890 Aug. 25, 1935 5.84 2,380 Sept. 1, 1935 5.71 2,140 126

Table 7.1-4 GILA RIVER BELOW GILLESFIE DAM, ARIZONA(2) (Sheet 3 of 5)

Gauge Discharge Water Year Date Height (ft) (ft3/s) 1936 July 29, 1936 5.90 3,240 1937 Feb. 9, 1937 8.43 45,800 Feb. 17, 1937 7. 67 18,400 Mar. 16, 1937 6.00 4.520 Mar. 19. 1937 7 ~ 77 21,300 1938 Mar. 5, 1938 9.95 60,000 1939 Aug'0, 1939 5;70 2.200 Sept. 5, 1939 2.43 .2, 500 Sept. 13, 1939 5.97 3,240 1940 Aug. 19, 1940 5.87 2,620 1941 Jan. 4, 1941 6.16 5.850 Feb. 10, 19'4l 5.68 l. 910 Feb.,16, 1941 5.44 1, 040 Feb. 1.9, 1941 5.65 1,800 Feb. 24. 1941 6.57 '7,180 Feb. 28, 1941 6.70 7,250 Mar. 5, 1941 7. 07 10,800 Mar. 16, 1941 9.45 45,800 Apr. 5, 1941 5.95 3,060 Apr. 18, 1941 8.08 25,300 May 5, 1941 7.05 10,600 Aug. 12, 1941 5.43 1,010 1942 Dec. 13, 1941 5.30 580 1943 Aug. 5, 1943 5.75 2,200 1944 Feb. 25, 1944 5.29 580 1945 Aug. 14, 1945. 5.53 1,350 1946 Sept. 19, 1946 5.85 4,290 Sept. 24, 1946 '.92 2,880

/

127

Table 7.1-4 GILA RIVER BELOW

'GILLESPIE DAM, ARIZONA(2) (Sheet 4 of 5)

Gauge Discharge Water Year Date .Height (ft) (ft3/s) 1947 Aug. 9, 1947 5.63 4,390 1948 Aug. 9, '1948 5.23 330 1949 Aug. 7, 1949'ct.

5.42 976 1950 19. 1949 5.56 1.460 1951 July 28, 1951 , 2,340 Aug. 4, 1951 5.96 2,880 Aug. 28, 1951 7.55 16.600 19,52 Jan. 22, 1952 5.23 430 1953 Nov. 20, 1952 5.10 115 1954 Aug. 12. 1954 5.64 1,760 1955. July 25, 1955 10.56 1. 870 Aug. 8, 1955 10.70 2, 240 Aug. 14, 1955 11.05 3,420 Aug. 28, 1955. 10.82 3,660 1956 No flow 1957 Jan. 29, 1957 10.14 205 1958 Sept. 13, 1958 10.40 976 1959 Aug. 17, 1959 10.22 480 1960 Jan. 19, 1960 10.31 '40 1961 July 23, 1961 10.21 380 1962 No flow 1963 Oct. 4, 1962 10.09 100 1964 Aug. 14, 1964 10.15 230 1965 Sept. 4, 1965 10. 07. 230 1966 Dec. 30, l965 10.52 1,600 Jan. 2, 1966 16.1 64,200 128

Table 7.1-4 GILA RIVER BELOW GILLESPIE DAM, ARIZONA(2) (Sheet 5 of 5)

Gauge, Discharge Water Year Date Height (ft) (ft3/s)

Jan. 8. 1966 12.27 12,200 Feb. 16, 1966 10.48, 1,720 Sept. 15, 1966 10.40 1.340

'19 67 Sept. 6, 1967 lo. 41 1.390 1968 Dec. 12, 1967 11.09 5,710 Dec. 26, 1967 11.01 5,240 Feb. 19, 1968 10.47 1,720 Mar;. 2. 1968 10.50 2,130 Ma'r. 15, 1968 10.43 1.480 1969 Aug. 30, 1969 10.04 214 1970 Sept. 6; 1970 II

,11.26 6,180 1971 Aug. 27, 1971 10.34 1,090 1972 No fl'ow 1973 Oct. 7. 1972 10.60 2,340 Oct. 22, 1972 10.48 1,720

'Jan. 2. 1973 10.55 2,080 Mar. 1; 1973 10.40 1,340

'Apr. 3,.1973 12.20 (a) 18,000 (b) 18, 1973 'pr.

11'. 37 13,000 (b)

May 3, 1973 1O.65(') ,6,ooo May 10, 1973 ~

11.20 10,000 (b)

May 14, 1973 10.42 5,ooo 1974 Apr. 3. 1974 1. 62, 59 1975 Oct. 29, 1975 1.79 80 1976 Sept. 27. 1976 10.51 1, 920

. 1977 Apr.'5, 1977 10.04 100 129

I 7.2 Offsite Flood Desi n Considerations The plant site is not susceptible to flooding by the Gila River, the Hassayampa River, or the Centennial Wash. The nearest approach of the Gila River to the site is 6 miles to the southeast; the probable maximum flood state of elevation 776 is 175 feet below the lowest plant grade of 951 at Unit 3. The Hassayampa River is 5 miles to the east, with a high-water level of elevation 942. A topographic ridge between the plant site and the Hassayampa River (minimum elevation 975) provides a natural barrier against site flooding from the Hassayampa River. Centennial- Wash is approximately 5 miles south of Unit 3, with a probable maximum flood le'vel of elevation 888. The only drainage affecting plant design is from, nearby offsite sources and from onsite sources.

Potential offsite flooding sources are East Wash and Winters Wash. Since these washes have no reservoirs upstream from the plant site, flooding could occur only from precipitation. Protection of safety-related

., facilities 'from inundation by offsite flood sources is achieved .by the location of the facilities beyond the extent of flooding. East Wash has been realigned to flow past plant facilities along the east boundary of the site, 7.3 Onsite Flood Desi n Considerations The site is subject to potential flooding from East Wash and Winters Wash.

Flood protection is achieved by site grading such that all Seismic Category.

I facilities will be located beyond the extent of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). The ground elevation along the west. side of the site is raised to limit the extent of PMF on the site. A maximum of about 10 feet of compacted. fill was placed in the cooling'tower areas, such that ground between the peripheral road and the power block areas will be above the PMF levels. A drainage channel designed to carry 50 year flood flows" will convey .flood waters from the northern portion of the site, west of the peripheral road to a discharge point south ofthe power block area.

130

'I East Wash has been realigned along the eastern edge of the site to maximize use of the site for other facilities and to limit the extent. of the PMF The normal channel of East Wash has been blocked by an embankment between the two hills on the northern edge of the site. This embankment forces flood flows around the small hill i-.. the northeast corner of the site and cuts off any flow through the 'old channel. An additional embankment has been constructed 'along the eastern edge of the site to prevent flooding of the site .proper. Both embankments are constructed to elevations sufficient to prevent any over topping by a PMF and associated wave runup and wind setup. The East Wash embankments have been constructed of material excavated from the reservoir and power blocks. The elevation of the north-'acing embankment "is approximately 983 feet msl to meet existing contours at the southern end.

The embankments are designed to withstand static and dynamic effects of floods corresponding to the PMF. The outer faces of the embankments are protected from erosion by providing a riprap zone.

8.0 GROUNDWATER The site area (5 mile radius) is in the lower Hassayampa-Centennial groundwater basin. This basin encompasses an area of about 400 square miles, The hydrogeologic profile of the site area is defined by three major sedimentary" units, each having distinctly different lithol'ogic, and hydrologic characteristics. These units, found in most Central Arizona water basins are identified herein as:

~ Upper Alluvial'nit

~ Middle Fine-Grained Unit

~ Lower Coarse-Grained Unit The generalized hydrogeologic profile of the site area is depicted in Figure 8 0-1.

~ A description of the sediments as they relate to the groundwater regime of the site is presented in the following paragraphs.

131

t 0

SI r<<

APERTURE CARD Also Available On A.per tore Card EXPLANATlON L I THOLOG I DESCRIPT IOHS t

UPPER ALLUVIAL UHIT SITE BOUNDARY SITE NORTH SILTY AND GRAYELLY SANDS, WITH SOME SILTS ANO CLAYS (LZ-5)

BDUHOARY 1200 SOUTH Cl "IOOLE FIHE GRALHEO UHIT (AOUITARO) tv gl III 1200 I I << I I 1000 IL..rl IL, IL I UPPER loME: SII.TY CLAYS WITH SII.TS SILTY SANDS g >> SOME ANO (LZW)

~ I 1000

.<<gag LCA~II I LONER ZOHE: PALO VERDE CLAY (LZ-3) 800

~A",".W%~

~ ~ 800 ~ Ck LOWER COARSE 6RAIHEO UHI T 600 fl r

600 I SILTY SAHO, SAHO ANO GRAYEI.LY SANO (LZ-2)

j."-. ~N+~ ~

>~ ~4

~ ~ ~

Coo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

I aA ~

~

' r r FANGLOMERATE (LZ-1)

~~ L ~~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~

(/Lr I L I/( . ~ ~ g ~ ~ II' 'Lay W C, AOO

~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'L ~

~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~

20D ~ ~ YOLCANIC FLOWS AND FLOM BRECCIA rlr/ r>//IL%/rL / I(LL/I /r rlI (I 4(L ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ I I~ ~

I(~ / ((i <<

IL

/ /

/~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4

~

' g ~

200

/'I/ l/I r/Lr I(/L /

~ ~ Ar (L 'L L Lgw7(grlL I

~ ~ Il ~ ~

' (

~

lr /hlr I( \/rl +I/ lg ' +L<<,O

~

BRECCIA Lgr/I I L/ 'L//L L I LLI /I lw L

wtL I

r/I/Lrj~Pf / L gwg glg I/ l III

~

LT\q L

9 Lr Lr lr / I r I \<<L/%/ / lr lw Ltrl lr \/I grli I/

I>> (<<g L

~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ TUFFACEOUS AHO ARKOSIC SANOSIO?iE Lg qr'L I~

(rlillr \/L<<L lrr+/r IL ~r 'l

~ ~

r~

L/ L/rwl(L /I r lr L L L/q L>> ~I ~ ~ I

~

~ Q %++IN rr

<<QO>> L qyL

+i+- g~ ~ I Ir%/ IL I 'L ilr LI I I r'r ~

/ \<<L ILL<< ~

~ r L I L((

'I rl//l

~

gh I ~ + r r I>>, r g 'LIIL( / TUFF I/ Flrlrl / I ~~rI \~ r ~ (Lg/ L / .rl ~ />~ r r~ L,L/ I I wlrr I L ~ I I L//LI ~

A I

~ / L

~

" ~ ~ I

'/L I I L I lrgl L lrl(g>>L/L

/ ( '>> I ( I/ L f/

I 0;I 8ASEMEHT COHPI,EX I 'l (rL( ( r r/ (IL/r Lrll I/L/I I

~, L~ I(%/ I I L I w SCAI.E

/>>, /I+~ l rl r GRAHITIC ANO METAMORPHIC ROCKS

~

HORIZONTAL: I"

I" t2000'ERTICAL

=,Ioo'ERTICAL EAACCERA IOH: SX WATER LEYELS MARCH 1979)

HOTE: OIP OF YOLC XIC FI.OX BEOOIHC IS NOT EXAGGERATED.

PERCHEO MATER ZONE REGIOHAL AOUIFER

~ <<

Figure 8.0-1 GENERALIZED HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION OF THE SITE 132 j

901I 05 0207 <<3f,

'I rE

U er Alluvial Unit This unit consists of primarily silty and gravely sands of varying proportions with interlayered, discontinuous lenses of clays and silty clays. This unit. extend's to a depth of about 30 to 60 feet beneath the site. In'dividual layers are about 3 to. 10 feet thick, and are

'I

. characteristically moderate to poorly bedded. The stratification is typical of sediments deposited in a high-energy fluvial environment.

Primary sedimentary structures identified during the detailed geologic mapping of power block excavations consist of channel cut and fillfeatures.,

The permeability of the upper alluvial unit soils was determined by inflow and outflow (pumping) type field tests. The typical horizontal permeability of these deposits is about 10 gallons per day per square foot (5 x, per second). Because of the extensive stratification, the 10'entimeters vertical permeability (not measured) can be expected to be significantly lower than'he horizontal permeability.

Middle Fine-Grained Unit This unit consists of massive, continuous layers of clays and silty clays, interbedded with layers and scattered lenses of clay'ey silt, clayey san ..

and silty sand. The thickness of the unit is about 250 feet. The upper c'ontact of'he middle fine-grained unit is equivalent to a well-defined boundary between two distinctive depositional environments and can be clearly identified across the site. Locally, the'ontact is transitional where a few scattered lenses of silt and fine sand are encountered. The middle fine-grained unit corresponds to lithozones 3 and 4 of the geologic=

model. The distinction between the two zones in the middle fine-grained unit is based on subtle but definite differences in geotechnical and 133

0 r

7 I

hydrologic properti.es. Silty clays of medium plasticity predominate in the upper zone (lithzone 4), while clays of somewha" higher plasticity predominate in the lower zone (lithozone 3 -- Palo Verde clay). The two zones are separated" by a relatively continuous coarse-grained soil layer.

The permeability characteristics 'of soils in the upper portion of the unit were evaluated by both laboratory and ,field tests.

. The vertical permeability, de'termined laboratory tests, is on the order of 0.001 gallons

'per day per'quare "foot (5 x 10 centimeters per second) and 0.01 gallons per day per square foot (5 x 10'entimeters per second), respectively.

Lower Coarse-Grained Unit In general, the lower coarse-grained unit is described as a "variably" cemented conglomerate which lies directly on the undifferentiated basement complex. In the site area, the lower coarse-grained unit consists of a tilted interbedded sequence of vol'canic flows and flow breccias, tuffs, tuffaceous sandstones, and coarse-"grained arkosic sandstone. The flow breccias (which may be interpreted as the "variably cemented conglomerate" )

are common throughout the sequence (lithozone 0). Locally mantling this volcanic/sedimentary section are -deposits of moderately to well-lithified conglomerates (lithozone 1). The entire sequence is overlain by an unlithified to poorly-cemented silty sand, sand and gravely sand (lithozone

2) ~

The . permeability of the regional aquifer was assessed by reviewing irrigation well pumping and performing an aquifer pumping 'test. Yields from irrigation wells which tap the regional aquifer range from 400 to 2,800 gallons per minute. The average specific capacity is 35 gallons per minute per foot of draw-d'own. The aquifer pumping test, performed on irrigation well resulted in a calculated I

transmissivity of 100,000 an'xisting gallons per day per foot and a storage coefficient of 0.005. The pumping rate during the test was 2,360 gallons per minute.

134

8.1 Groundwater Conditions In the site area, the groundwater reservo'ir consists of an extensive regionai aquifer and a local perched water zone, Re ional A uifer In the site area, the lower coarse-grained unit, described above, comprises the regional aquifer that extends to over 400 square miles. The regional aquifer is bounded by the mountain masses that encompass the lower h

Hassayampa-Ce'ntennial area.

The 'primary recharge source to the regional aquifer in- the site area is underflow from upper Hassayampa Valley, north of the site area. The general flow direction is north to south. Reversal of flow direction occurs locally when the groundwater levels are depressed due to pumping for irrigation purposes. Infiltration of'recipitation, surface runoff, and return flow from irrigation in the vicinity of the site comprise a small portion of the total recharge of the regional aquifer. Discharge from the regional groundwater reservoir occurs as underflow to Arlington Valley and pumpage from irrigation wells.

Piezometric levels in the vicinity of the site are at depths ranging from 100 to 250 feet below the ground surface. A water level contour map of aquifer in the lower Hassayampa-Centennial area was constructed thegional by the USGS .and is reproduced in Figure'.1-1. The most conspicuous-hydro'logical features indicated by the water level contours are the large cone'of depression beneath the site, and a broader but shallower cone of depression south of the site. A smaller cone of depression also occurs immediately north of the Palo Verde hills. The cones of depression have been formed by long term pumpage from irrigation wells in the area.

Artesian conditions prevail within the aquifer in the site area.

Confinement is generally provided by the middle fine-grained layer.

135

R.SV n i 8 I

I 33'30 9

295 07!

~ ~

1073 297

~2) I

~

e=

I 062

~857 e

""0

~ e 237 055 0

v

~

r 0!

~ ~

>I(

I

>>>pi

'52'"

0 ~E 06>J Zno e 0)0

'95

.j, 035 Hr>G TOHO>

('<196 AHI 2241 lgn 917*

~

=lr3 103 966>

974

-~l'37 I7 lcr i-/>..

9 1 ' t V 100 e 955 I 4

o 100 960'l

~c>I

~

I 145 r 900 95 9G5:

!39 i>>

6,

>6 I",9)55

>44

')Hp

!47 0' >4, 4 ~

959 9 i

~806 I

ft =A 51 T I f9tg cp>pflct/s I

-'942: 936.. I'43'I 4'if 72, lp~~ jS H I 16 J

~

G U~ ~~ c ) .. I 933> L- 50~

r rr ~~4+~/q904

~ R

~891 -

> ~

I~r.'>>tfl>75 ~ 6 022 90 J SIH .,

n~921 69 i72 920 EXPLANATIOH 6 ~

065 Z 45 y 911 ld6906 15 /) 097 I Lr '!OH .') "~! 7- ~55 toe NELL IN SNIICN NAIER LEVEL NAS HEASOREO IN 19SZ--First 1 >I

~ , i 1080

~:, goo >

44 n>n>bec 209, 'I ',I Ij-'-~877

'9 61ss is depth to <<ster In feet befo<< land surface. Second ~

nunbec, 908 IZZ34 IS the e ltftude of the <<etec level in (eet level above nean sca l 905 31

/i ~ 904 'EE

~ 44>>cc EIE>EE' 99 . ~89 41 / 4>>V

)I , Q~o SEOROCK oc

!VOLCANIC> GRANITIC> HETAHORPHIC> OR SEOIHENIART ROCK)--

S>>ter n>>y OCCur fn <<eathered or (ractuyed thin elluvfun overlying confolfdated rochs tones, Joint systens, 890 t <<P-'300 J ~0'0 "i-~ 8 '.V.H.G.S; cc

'I . 7I 847

.~

>I+

~~8>>.

'83a>

y 6 I I p I13 g,l 4>> .

~>>by

<>r(282S>7(14'2594>f! ivii ' ~

~

9

-- '815-.n NAIER BEARING UNlls IcLAT~ sILT ~ 0 1 812 I M

~

sAvo> GRAYEL> BAsALTI .6~~ rJ>,j>9 907 sso o RATER.LEVEL CONTOOR--Shp<<S eltf\ude O( the <<ster level. OaShed

<<herc epproxf>>ate. Overfed>>herc uncertain. Contour ~32 ~ ~35 -'.

687 I I.>rl> yi Fn.sy'< 793 ~

~

I n tccvat (

So ( cet on the nap end lo feet on thc 005 s76 I 072 o gc ~

p 79>c Inset. Oatue fs nean I sea level lii ic>ja q~

lh <<50 S.

00'>

~ 4 ~

r 783'c. ARL IttGTON PHOENIX ACTIVE HAPIAGEHENT AREA SOS.SASIN SIR¹6OARV 88 el

~ ISJLLEHS ~ j Q. 0/

~

(IJT

'" 'Pi'.=O'O.

219 .,I 66!. 'IJ f '>a657

. a 621

>y~

I; fJv j 4) ~

128>> I

~."03,7.>Q.ef

' IJ !>,6) 207

'g-662 ~t. ~

I 46>> > I 22 4

'i380 8

163732" O 'I i .'57 '.r;>,

( INSET) ) n>>>y,<'i'.'.

Section showing groundwater conditions PALO VEROE NUCLEAR GEHERATIIIG SIATIOtt in the Hassayampa sub-basin of the OEPTH TO MATER AHO ALTITUOE OF THE MATER LEVE'L IH THE PERCHEO ZONE Phoenix active management area. SCALE I:62,500 de .~::".n J-..y

- h.ia,i>gg il l~'y' Id."200u. I 33 15' >I R. 8 M.

,'.';: 9" ]miIIV~~0 '

~

113 nap 112 45

~ . GILLESP IE OAH R.TM '8 <<ca For readers who prefer to use metric units rather than inch-pound >r units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report R. 5 M.

are listed below:

SI Hul tip l inch- ound unit To obtain metric unit APERTURE inch'oot 25.4 millimeter T. 63I iP, *L>~.

ci Cy>>'. ) ac<< T. CARD 0.3048 meter 3 mi le 1.609 kilometer 6. S.

square mile 2.590 square Also Availab1e On acre 0.4047 kilometer'quare hectometer II. 6 V.

acre-foot 0.001233 cubic hectometer Aperture Card gallons per minute 0.06309 liters per second 0 5 HILES Fi g ure 8'.l-l 0 10 '('LGI-!C-TERS DEPTH TO MATER AND ALTITUDE OF THE CONTOUR tHTERVAL ZOO FEET MATER LEVEL, 1982 MIIH SIJPPLEIIEtITART CONTOURS AT 100-FOOI'HTERVALS 136 90110 OAIUH 15 HEAII SEA I.EVEL SCAI.E I: IZ5.000 5 0207 ~ g g

+1 Lg r.

0

Perched Water Zone The Palo Verde site is situated in an area that was under cultivation from about 1950 to late 1975. Water for crop irrigation was pumped from the regional aquifer. Most of the water was consumed by the crops (primarily cotton) through evapotranspiration. The remainder of the water perclated

=

through the upper alluvial sediments and perched on top of the underlying aquitard (middle fine-grained unit). The shape of the perched mound is consistent with the shape of the irrigated area within the site. Water

~

table conditions prevail within the perched water zone.

During the 25 year period of agricultural activity at the site, the prime source of recharge of the perched water zone was excess irrigation water that percolated through the upper sediments. Since 1975, when agricultural activity stopped within the site, the only source of recharge has been precipitation and surface runoff. However; as evidenced by the sharp decline in perched water levels since 1975 (3 feet per year average) local l

natural recharge is insufficient to maintain the perched mound. The decay of the perched water mound is caused mainly by radial flow outward from the center of the mound and some downward leakage through the aquitard.

137

I I

0

8.2 Re ional Water Use Water for irrigation is the major use of groundwater in the lower Hassayampa-Centennial area. An average of 78,000 acre-feet per year was pumped during the period 1.'.6 through 1972. The water for municipal and domestic use, also obtained from the groundwater reservoir, is ve'y small.

Annual pumpage for municipalities, livestock; or industrial purposes is less than 1% of the total.

The production history of wells in the lower Hassayampa-Centennial area is compiled in Table 8.2-1. The table ].ists well locations for known active and the annual pumpage rate for each well for the years 1966 through

'ells 1972. A steady decline'f the water levels in the area began about 1950.

due to the increases in pumping of groundwater for agriculture. The water level has declined by as much as 100 feet near the centers of cones of depression during the past 25 years. The water level decline is attributed to pumping of wells and the resultant spread of the cones of depression and consequent interference effects between wells.

8.3 Accident Effec'ts Contaminated water, if accidentally spilled during plant operation, may seep through the ground surface. For this postulate'd occurrence, the contaminated water will'nfiltrate downward through the unsaturated soil and reach the perched water table about AO feet below the land surface.

It will then disperse into the perched groundwater. Further downward movement of water from the base of perched water zone is restricted due to the presence of the Palo Verde clay layer about 200 feet below the ground surface. For the conservative analysis used in this study it is assumed T

that seepage could occur through 'the Palo Verde Clay layer. Consequently, two systems are analyzed for the possible effect of a contaminate'd water spill: the perched water zone and the underlying regional aquifer. The impact of such postulated accidental seepages on the system, and, in particular, on the existing wells located in the 5-mile zone around the site area, is analytically predicted and its consequences are assessed.

138

Table 8.2-1 PUMPAGE RECORDS OF'ELLS IN TllE LOWER HASSAYAMPA-CENTENNIAL AREA (Sheet 1 of 2) minuend. nusir nrr. (lii ncnu-rcr71 NO. 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972

,(8-1-5) 6ddb2 80 7aab 80 10bcc 1 2 10ccc 1 5 15bbb2 2 2 16bbb 556 654 470 663 0 16bca 558 550 372 448 0 17ncd 105- 117 92 9Ci 212 328 140 2lbbb ~ 249 284 34 14 0 21ddb 82 75 58 81 30 3G 27bbc 101 40 54 49 41 55 48 28aaa2 83 74 Gl 81 15 56 (8-1-6) 7bdd 258 240 249 309 290 302 154 8abb 398 1.959 799 852 435 758 715 loaab 592 812 7G3 709 492 GG1 813 llbca 40 35 97 33 18 103 161 20dab 57 76 42 76 20dbb 4 25 43 129 486 478 1,155 849 63 106 315 97 22 24 44 27cbc(b) 790 916 655 779 1,277 27ddc(b) 723 957 34abb 2,099 2.G84 2 '73 2,17G 2,157 2,105 2,343 2,583 3,638 34acc 2g279 2,960 2,319 2,914 2,247

.34adc'b) 166 31 45 0 (B" 1-7) lbbb 1,725 1,820 2,690 2,800 3,064 2,991 3,815 (8-2-6) Sdaa 1.374 1,3G3 1,277 1,707 6daa 1,827 1,659 1,997 2,087 Baaa 1,580 1,372 2,193 2,303 9bba 1,334 979 1,995 ~ 1,896 16caa 561 414 448 647 17aae 1,925 2,200 2,193 2,412 17C)ila 1,022 1,479 1,4G3 1,565 19bbb 20 19daa 89 207 680 998 20bba 041 806 ,981 600 20daa 758 7Ci2 827 6G1 545 802 604 21bba 386 662 466 670 23aab 3G4 1,140 1,205 '70G 807 805 705 24cba 100 28bab 1, 184 1,494 1,829 984 1,340 1,661 1,767 3 ldila 1,557 2,325 2,581 2. 394 2,365 2,258 2,505 32db 33caa 658 1,341 994 962 1,134 1,069 2,038 (B-2-7) 12cbb 20 14cbb 1,241 1,489 '"

1,461 1,866 22bbb 22cbb 549 670 355 353 144 246 23ccb 773 1,399 1.454 1,453 1,685 1,631 1,562 25bca 15 35 475 386 588 1.058 946 2Gaac 1.9 2.1 3 4 4 26abb . 619 884 682 724 759 713 697 26acb 1,286 1,588 1,305 1,216 ),340 1,467 1, 479 26bab 318 516 674 802 1. 106 '70 823 27aab 358 491 607 594 598 28bab 1,020 1,067 909 919 667 1,283 1,390 28bbb 528 564 442 394 410 466 559 34bba 653 822 393 80 36abb 1,324 1,996 2,012 2,041 3,198 3, 407 3,414 36bba 477 952 895 845 776 720 606 36cbb 503 1,110 1, 121 1,056 887 986 832

a. Data compiled from files of Hater Resources ()ivislon. U~ S. Ccological Survey, Phoenix, hrirona.
b. Hells located within the )iVHCS Site.

139

Table 8-.."-- l PUMPAGE RECORDS OP WELLS IN THE LOWER HASSAYAMPA-CENTENNIAL AREA. (Sheet 2 of 2) n<II<unt. ru(Itin<It) t tu nCIIt:-rt:I:TI WCt,l tIO. 1966 19G7 1968 1969 197 <) 1971 1972 tc-1-5) lcdd 500 3bas, 422 3VO 502 106 4aaa2 26 21 44 46 13nab 2,429 2.028 1,633 2, 193 13aad 1,624 1,3)0 790 1,018 13bad 917 1,07G 1,578 1,647 1,431 l. 255 13bba 787 1,049 13cdd 9.) 0 1, G)Ci 1,245 1,)67 2 tc(1<l SOI 7 3Ci 302 67II I,330 SSC 22ccc 614 1 541 .531 857

'I TABLE OF COIITEIITS SECTION pAGE NUMBER 1.0 PURPOSE

2.0 REFERENCES

3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 Operation of the Landfill ,7 5.2 Sludge Disposal Monitoring 8 5.3 Monitoring Contingency Requirements 9 5.4 Monitoring Requirements(Record Keeping 10 5.5 Compliance Reporting Requirements 11 5.6 Site Inspections 12 5.7 WRF Disposal Requests 13 APPENDICES C

Appendix A - WRF Slu'dge Landfill Disposal Request 14 Appendix B WRF Sludge .Landf ill Monitoring Repor t Form 15 C

Appendix C,- Chain of Custody Form 16 Appendix D - Visible Emissions Observation Form 17

~'lS 000 REV.SIR S4 ~ A

'i t

I l

1 l

I I

~ ~

PRQCEQUr.=

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING NCI.

STATION MANUAL VOAD-SZZ04 REVISlGN of

'RF SLUDGE 'LANDFILL PROCEDUP Page 3 17

".0 PURPOS.

This procedure is to provide the necessary instructions and guidelines to ope.ate the Sludge Disposal Landf'll within compliance to meet state permit requ'.ements. This document conta'ns all of the requirements for'he operat'on and maintenance of the Sludge Disposal Landfill. Ho other documents Qr correspondence will. take precedence for the .operation and/or maintenance of the Sludge Disposal Landfill.

This procedure will be modif'ed as appropriate to reflect any changes that may occur to, the state permit requirements regarding the operation and/or maintenance of the sludge disposal landfill.

I'.0 REFERENCES 2.1 Implementin'g References 2.1.1 Test Hethods for Evaluating Solid Paste.

SV-846, 2nd Edit'on.

Physical/Chemica'ethods KsRD sz~o1, ~M pratcc+ivc 6)ui (men't Proc~<~ ~

2.2 Developmental References I

2.2.1 Groundwater Quality Protection Permit Ho. G-0'077-07 as provided in the Ari"ona Revised Statutes (A.P..S. 36-1851}.

2.2.2 Landfill Operation Plan issued by the Solid Paste Un't of the ADEQ.

2.2.3 State of Ar'=ona Groundwater Quality Protection. Permit Rules and Regulations (A.A.G. R18-9-l,00, et. seq.}.

2.2.4 Palo Verde Huclear Generating Station - Revised Landfill k.X 5 S,et'age Operation Plan. Jan. 6, 1987.

3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIOHS 3.1 ~ 'Abandoned means permanent cessation of facility operation. as determined by, the facility owner. Facilities which are temporaril.y shut down are not considered abandoned within the context of "these regulations.

3.2 'Activity means any human activity including institytional, commercial, 'manufacturing. extraction, ag.icuitural or residential land use which may involve disposal of ~astes or pollutants which may result in pollution of groundwaters of the State.

~t1l 000 HKV.Oat Sl4*

F'RQCr"=i~UP ""

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING NQ. ~

STATION MANUAL v)oAO - BZZod Rr"=VIS I QrV QR,F SLUDGE. LANE FILL PR,OcGD~RF Pa't 3A Q,.X.5 p~)u rrrerhe Huckprnr Gener a+in~ 5"rrr4ion, Rgdcd'rrrg Ccrnr ikrnenk '7i.~ir,irg SgsWe~, g4enng N0. (e~ ];~)g)

~ oala74

~ ox<18(

< o>l'764

~ o~l~8<

~ o~Se 6I

a PROCEDURE PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING NO.

STATION MANUAL ROAD-87.304 REVISION s

WRF SLUDGE LANDFILL PROCEDURE Page 4 of 17 v

3 ~ 3 'ADEQ'eans A"iaona Departmen:, of "-..vironmental anality( ft Oy t h),

3 4 "Adverse impa'ct upon groundwater quality" means any measurable change to the physical, chemical or biological character of.

groundwater caused by additi.on of pollutants or wastes.

s 3.5 "Approved" or "approval" means approved in writing by the Director of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.

3.6 'Aquifer" means a geologic unit that contains saturated permeable material. to 'yield usable (drinking water, agriculture, industry,,

etc'.) quantities of water to a well or spring.

3.7 "Director" means the Director of the Arizona Department of Environmenta'uality or his duly authorized representative.

3.8 'Discharge" means the addi.tion, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting or dumping of. any pollutant into waters of the State from any point source.

3e9 'Discharge Impact Area'eans the potential area extent of waste I

or pollutant migration as projected on the land surface as a result of a discharge or disposal. from a facility.

3 '0 Discrete sample" means any individual sample collected in less than 15 minutes.

3.11 "Disposal system" means a system for disposing of wastes e'ither by surface or underground methods and includes sewerage systems, treatment works; disposal wells and other systems.

'3. 12 Facility" means any system or activ2,.ty'.$ n'which or by which

'disposal occurs or,has occurred on either*a. continuous or intermittent basis.

3.13 "Groundwater".,means water under the surface of the earth regardless of the geologic structure in which it is standing or moving. Groundwater does not include water flowing in underground streams with ascertainable beds and banks.

3.14 "Ope'rator" means any person who makes management decisions regarding facility operations. 1 3.15 "Owner" means any person holding legal or equitable title in any real property subject to these regulations.

PV2lb COO AEV.byb2 Sb ~ A

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GEINERATING PRGC"-OU~a NO.

STATION MANUAL 'BROAD-Scc.04 R~cyISIQN of '7

'RF SLUDGE LAHDFILL PPOCEDURE Page 5 3.'16 Permit" means a rule. certi f:cate,:letter or anY other docunent by, the "Director authori=ing aed condit'ioning the discharge 'ssued of any pollutant to groundwarer from any point source or disposal of .wastes from any disposal system identified in A.R.S. Sec.36-136.G.S.

3.17 "Pollute means to cause pollution.

3 '8 "Schedule of compliance'r compliance schedule" means a written document issued by the Director which identifies requirements and times for compliance with either or both the water quality standards in A.A.C. Title 9, Chapter 21 'or the permit regulations in A.A.C. Title 9, Chapter 20.

3 '9 "Site" means the area where any facility is physically located or an activity is conducted, including adjacent land. used in connection with the Eac'lity..

F 20 Vector'efers to an organi'sm such as an insect that transmits a pathogen.

4.0 'RESPOIISIBILI IES 4.1 WRF Operations 4.F 1 The sludge disposal landfill shall be operated in accor'dance with plans approved by the Solid Waste Unit of ADEQ, the Groundwater Quality Protection Permit and subsequent Aquifer Protection Permit rules and regulations. I

~ 4 '.2 All,materials that may be dumped in the sludge disposal.

landEill are approved and non-hazardous under the State Ha=ardous Waste Regulations. The permittee shall at all times properly 'ope.ate and maintain the sludge disposal to maintain compliance with the terms and.conditions 'andfill of the permit.

l Combustibles, hazardous wastes, and putrescible materials may not be dumped in the;sludge disposal landEill.

&414Wo A4V.4i44 $ 44 A

f

(

i

,I

F RQC:-DUFF""

PALO V:"ROE NUCL=AR GFNE~Ai tNG NQ.

STAl 1'ON MANUAL 'ROAD-6 7.: "". "

RFYlSiGN SLUDCE LAND-.":LL PPOC:-DUP- pa-e 6.o: L) 4.1.5 The materials vhich may be dumped include t

(a) devar.ered sludges generated at VRF

/ I (b) lime gr'r. or lime ~aste ~hi h mav 'be 'rom lime used 'n clean'ng acid spills. from ne traliaing beds. or sma quant'ties spi'led during 1'-.e unloading (c) soda ash and soda ash Masres ~hich mav be from soda ash used in cleaning acids sp'lls or small quan 't'es spled=

during soda ash unloading C'nstr( Hcte. Cc4M Pajt (,p,

'iscellaneous non-putrescible. non-ha"ardous.

~

non-radioac t 've sludges that may ccme from the cleaning,

~ and')

~ l of a WRF lime softening process sump.

r g ~~

lr Wk ~ 1 o o>> ~

\

~~

o

'I ~

~. '1 4 ~ 1'6 Zf. a vector prbblem occurs, a vector program vill be implemented for the sludge disposal landf'll.

'I 4 ~ 1.7 Any litter that exists on or around the Land&'ll shall be picked up"'and disposed.

l 4.2 PV)tC"

~ Station Services 4..2 1~ Station Services shalI be responsible for the heavv equipment operations of the sludge disposal Landfill ~

4.2'.2 Station Services shall be responsibl'e for the designation of appropriate dump locations and move such Locations adequate material for a lift has been dumped.

4.2. 3 The sludge disposal landfill MiLL be maintain~d during inc],ement Meather. Equipment. chill be avaable to support rhis operat,ion. I

~>I %0 1tV slit SI4 s

PALO VERDa NUCLEAR GE¹RATtNG P RQC~DUR:-

STATlON MANUAL NO.

ROAD-itZZ04 REVISIOi"4 I RP SLUDCc, LAND.=XLL PROC DUU Page 64,0. 17

~>fc ~

g < Ol I g 7h e QJ Q r u f r0 v i a n n e n a n j e q u c I( <I c

I m en t +o ha u

~<<. ~~ ~e't.,F~~~ <<-~s p

<~ +I~

u g< dp~ II prj gers wi II I r au> .yf j$ Ml'H re, du.+ conTra( I dr(vers uuill limj I y ,'a/ uiraj'lei" priv'err uzi I r educe Wrje . a~.un~ I

'Ia i'Iclf )II a+ounI- oF dus i crea tea by Preaking

<'ludge cl us+'j'.

I. jo .jo en>ure lusf cc nf'ra I drij'e'rs mt I( +hor<uy h ly hose t('uck/ pl'ai lers fo inclucle-

  • unJersIE~,

+ires and V

I t

l I

I

PROC=DURE PALO YERDE NUCLEAR GENERAI1NG NO.

S IAT1ON MANUAl WOAD-SZ20<

Rc.YISION

~n'RF SLUDGE LANDFTLL PPOCEDURE Page 7 of '7

  • ~

4;2.4 The. area. around the landfill is virhin the confines of the S~ sc 7A oe

)ob-.site dust. control'rogram

~+In c

'and vill be treated the same.

'z 4.3 Technical Support Group 4.3.1 Sampling, monitor'ng, records keeping, and sending samples to a state approved laboratory shall be the responsibil'ty of

. the WRF Technical Support Group.

4.3.2 D'ata obtained from laboratory test res'ults (the original fdrm) shall be forvarded to ANP? Environmental Licensing for

-the annual report to the State and copies kept for records.

C 4.4 Env'nmental Licensing 4.4.1 Environmental Licensing shall. submit the Comprehensive Annual Report to the ADEQ per'tep 5.2.6 of this procedure.

~

4.4.2 Environmental Licensing shall provide a copy of the Comprehensive Annual Report to the WPP'echnical Support Group.

4.4.3 Environmental Licensing shall be the normal point of coamIunications, either oral or vritten. with all contact'or applicable federal, state and local regulatory agencies regarding the operation of the WRF Sludge Disposal Landfill.

4.4.4 Environmental Licensing shall be responsible for all groundwater monitoring associated with the landfill.

4.4.5 Environniental Licensing shall make Visible Emissions Ob'servation checks monthly and complete the Visible Option Bmssions Form (Appendix D). 'Ihe form shall be retained and filed at the hbter Reclination Facility. Additional checks will be nede as re-quired by changing conditions.

5. 0 IIISTRUCTTOIIS 5.1 Operation of the Landfill 5.1.1 The landfill is a surface drying landfiLL used for disposaL of sludge produced in the lime treatment process at, "RF and sha)1 be solely operated by AIIPP personnel.

5.1.2 Sludge vill be transported to tho: disposal area 'and spread

~'~O:0 ~EY i~it !I~ a lifts.

0 PALO YERDE-NUCLEAR GENERATING NO.

STATION MANUAL gOC6DQRG'ROC:-DURE &octo- g22og

'EVISION goffI I t Pa e 7A of, 17 r

5eeuices s hali be irsi>oesible Fos pic OvD I n] d.( o.S 45 <++

i t

$ ~~ l$ i ye huSW:

~ 5 \ H i roasts +'o a.nk Prem +Re '~an r s' e s ~h~Ic +nic~s krIqc o+ +he fr y r

$ >I IYLis I l1)

Sp I"Cak I Ag OitI l"4.t Il ~

+CQCSSal t 4 ~~

sg p'o servIc s aha'i( be <<s0 fOa~~ays o A g(ea $o>. +h~

( ~t,~~ ~~6.ri'ng a~<

ge,g I) ea~e~, d ~~]

gp;I( csea +hat's

+ k ~g (( tlat ~I+tlAIZ+~

'tll eye>>W ki >'b>saba ~

J

$0t oaed Q,7 shat~ (<<Iog I <<Il'f < e"~ +~~

e~ovc.. sp.( tie<

r

'2

C

~

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR 6" Nt=RATlNG PROC"= iR"=

STATlON MANUAL WOAD-82"04 R:"V}StON VRF SLUOG:- LAHDF'1LL PROCFDUP.:- page 8 of l 5.}.3 The sludge wil.l be al3.owed,to dry before it is spread 1'fts of one'(1} foot deep.

5. 1.4 The process of spreading and leveling <<ill result in compaction to approximately 90X of maximum dens'ty.

5.1.5 Additional lifts will be added in the same manne. unt'l a depth of six (6) feet is reached.

5.1.6 After the six foot dearth xs reached. the site shall be covered with approximately one foot (1') of clean earth.

5.1.7 Stat'ion Serv'ces shall grade the landfill as to prevent moisture runoff. The grading shall remain similar to the natural contour of the site.

e 5.2 Sludge Disposal Monitoring 5.2.1 A composite sludge sample, comprised of a minimum of four (4) locations representative of the disposal activities shall be taken at che sludge disposal landfill by 'the WPF Technical'upport, Group.

I 5 '.2 'These samples shall be taken twice yearly in accordance with EPA SW-846, 5 '.3 A "Chain of Custody" form will accompany the samples when sent to the selected laboratory. The form may be, Append'x C of this procedure or one similar.

gravc,l shat'l be. on <<Lesig<o++d t ><8 s '~xc epf PQ e

2 g~~p, ~ a,@Y ia.l or ~ainkdl lh +4< I<A~~t lI IC pvtia o:0 aEv cia Sea A

PROCEQURE PALO VERDE NUCLEAR NO.

GENERAT1NG'STAT1ON MANUAL ,WOAD-82204 REVISION WRF SLUDGE LANDFILL PROCEDURE Page 9 of 17 5 '.4. The samples shall be analyzed by EPA approved test methods.

(Test Methods for Eva'luating Solid Waste, SW-846, 2nd Edition) for the following constituents..

Physical/Chemica'ethods C"nstituent Alert Level pH Less than 2 or greater than 12.5 Arsenic 5., mg/1 or EP Toxicity Barium 100 mg/1 or E? Toxicity Cadmium 1 mg/1 or EP Toxicity Chromium (Total) 5 mg/1 or EP Toxicity Lead 5 mg/1 or EP Toxicity Mercury 0.2 mg/1 or EP Toxicity Selenium mg/1 or EP Toxicity Silver 5 'mg/1 or EP Toxicity

'.5 The, WRF I'

Technical Support Group shall submit the test results'o Environmental Licensing.

5.2 ' Environmental Licensing shall report the results to ADEQ in the Comprehensive Annual Report. The Annual Report shall include a summary and evaluation of all past and recently obtained data. The data analysis shall include'he presence of any trends and natural variability.

4 4 1 tl The sludge disposal monitoring is only part of the report as it pertains to water quality.

5.3 Monitoring-Contingency Requirements I

5 ~ 3.1 Exceeding Alert Levels in Sludge Samples.

5.F 1.1 Exceeding alert levels shall necessitate verification sampling and 'may necessitate remediation at the facility.

ll W1l6 000 AEV,542 S64 A

PALO YERDE NUCLFAR GENERATING OUPa STATION MANUAL'ROC NO.

WOAD-82704 REVISION WRF SLUDGE LAIIDFILL PPOCEDUP E Page 10 of

.1=7'.3.1.2 ln the event leve's are exceeded, Environmental L'icensjng shall notify,the. Water Po}:lution Compliance Unit wxtn n 72 hour~ of becoming a~are of the exceedence 'to determ'ne the appropriate action foi the condition.

5.3.1.3 .A scope of work wh'ich addresses corr'ective and remedial actions must be submitted to the Department (ADEQ) for review and comment within 30 days of becoming aware of the alert levels having been exceeded.

~

5.3 1.4

~ An approvable cont'ingency plan must be submitted to the.

Department for review within 180 days. after the, leve's were exceeded.

5.3.1.5 Upon approval of the contingency plan by the Department, the pl'an will be incorporated into the'ermit.

5,4 Monitoring Requirements/Record Keepin'g The WPP Technical Support Group shall retain records and/or.

provide access to a11 monitoring information for a period of at least 'three (3) years from the date of sample. This period may be extended by the Department by written request.

The request, shall be coordinated through Environmental Licensing. Copies of records shall be furnished to the Department upon written request.

5.4.2 Records of monitoring shall include but are not lim'ted to the fo1 lowing:

5.4.2.1 Date, time, exact place, and name of person who obtained the sample.

5.4,2.2 The date(s), name(s) of the person(s) and laboratory who performed the, an'alyses.

5.4.2.3 The analytical technioues or methods used to perform the analyses. ~

'5.4.3 Monitoring results shall be reported at intervals specified by the Groundwater Protection Permit and subsequent Aquifer Protection Permit as reflected in this procedure.

5 '.4 Calculations which require the averaging of measurements shall utili-e an arithmetic mean uniess it can be demonstrated that another method would more accurately describe or be representative of the monitored activity.

PV2I6 00D REV 6162 Mi A

I 1

i

'I I

~

~

PAL'0 VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING PROCEDURE NO.

STATlON MANUAL ROAD-8ZZ04 REVISION WRF SLUDGE LAtIDFILL PROCEDURE Page 11 of 17 5.5 Compliance Reporting Requirements 5.5.1 Modifications to 'the facility which are not described in the Groundwater Protection Permit require an advanced written-notice of ninety (90) days and shall be coordinated through and submie.ted by Environmental Licensing.

5.5.2 The permittee. shall notify the Department within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or becoming award of any permit violation. The Department may require a written report within 30 days documenting the following: ll 5.5.2.1 A description of the non-compliance and its cause.

5.5.2.2 The period of non-compliance, including exact dates and times, and the anticipated time period'uring which the non-compliance 'is expected to continue if it has not corrected. been'ompletely 5.5.2.3 The plan of action. taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of, non-compliance and if applicable, shall be in accordance with an approved

'contingency plan.

5.5.2.4 Monitoring or- other informatinn which indicates'hat or pollutant may cause an endangerment to an any,'aste aquif er.

5.5 2.5

~ Non-compliance w'ith a,permit condition, or mal'function of the disposal 'system which may cause fluid migrat.ion into or between aquifers.

5.5.3 The DepartmI nt shall be notified in writing at least 180 days prior to abandonment of the facility.

5~5~3 ~ 1 The permittee may be required to submit a detailed post-closure plan for appr'oval which shall, describe, what the physical condition of the landfill site will be on" the date operatioris are terminated.

PV215 000 AEV.bell Sd4 A

t t

t

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATINQ I'ROC'UR:"

NO.

STATlON MANUAL '40AD-82204 REVISION MRF SLUDGE LAIIDFELL PROCEDURE Page .12 oi 1/

5.5.3.2 The Department. may require the post-closure plan include the following:

(a) .A description of monitoring procedures to be

'implemented by the permittee including monitoring .

frequency, type, and locat.ion which will be implemented to ensure post-closure activities will not violate groundwater quality standards.

(b) a description of procedures for maintaining the existing groundwate: quality protect'on systems (c) a schedule and description of physical inspections to

.be conducted following abandonment (d) a description of future land or water uses or both

'hich may be precluded as, a result of the abandonment (e) identification of responsibilities for post-closure cleanup or remedial action in the event of pollution of waters of the state 5,.6 Site;Enspections .

5.6;1 The Department may routinely -inspect the landfill dump site and/or the records for purpose of determining compliance.

5.6.2 'he Department may obtain samples.

5.6.3 The Department may analyze or cause to be analyzed any samples either on site or at another location.

5.6.4 The Department may take photographs of the waste and/or equipment processes and'conditions of the site.

5.6.5 may inspect and copy any pertinent records.

~ ~

The Department report.s, or information and test results, 5.6.6 Any pertinent infnrmat'ion .required by the permit. to be maintained by. the permittee shall be available for on-site inspection during normal business hours:

5.6.7 Split sanqi16.s nr copies of photographs shall be available to the permittee if so requested at the time the samples or photographs are taken.

Pv216400 REV,642 664 A

I E

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATlNG STA)1ON MANUAL VOAD-Sd.ZO4 p) = V IS I 0 i'0 VRF SLUDGE LAHDF1LL PROCEDUPE Page 13 i)f 17 waste materials from pVWGS departments natside the WRP, v b umped at the sludge disposal landfill only if th are appro d.

The MF udge Landfill Disposal est form mus- be filled in to equest approval ee Appendix A) ~

The igtp Manager (nr 'esignee) shall approve the material for dum

' ': he material conforms to

~

acceptible m rials (see 4.le5).

Afte pproval has been obtained, t material may be ped in the sludge disposal landfill.

gsdgtb OCO gtKV ~ PC2 Sld d

0 t

0

R" V/SlCN VRF SLU. G:- LAtf~F'LL PROC:-DUR:- Page i4 o: 17

~ 4

,......Reques~ar Ran e: Dais,'

. 0 fiMMi .'

EXPic<:

I, 6, . Ma-.e.f'ia. ~r ~c ~o~

....... WcaT'i~~ j

@ps I'l .....Confro,u Tgf Of lgspl ~

I Con~n+Q / gnoun,

.. D~p.s'it.~/Od~:

C.. Sa~qI< Z<@r~~or, S>np1e f' Rna Iubjs. Per Qr~cd, GC:

.. Rnm~qsis PcAor~ck bg; pc(J$Ana,)qadi gi C

I b f OQL Cs l Usia + Sar pIe.~.

  • PwmcMcd Qg: 'aPi~ Nhcgan, C.'hernia rg

, Y Ver' 'ig o - rat'~~4~~ Yes hIo 3

f., Approval criteria set, forth in the Cround~ater Quality Protection ll'er e

per it g g-pp77-p1 and 4VF ProcedurROAD-8220< for the disposal o

'-t7.F Mastes in the MRF Sludge Lan4Eill. the material described n

erein is approved Eor disposal in the 4RF Sludge LandEill.

WttlfCO tgygA ilute Date MRF Hanager

0 0

'ALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING PROC-""DURF NO.

PPEHDIX B STATION MANUAL VOAD-'8ZEOI Pape 1 'of REVISION WRF SLUDGE LANDFILL PROCEDURE Page 15 of 17 VRF SLUDGE LANDFILL IIOHITORING REPORT FOP%

NAME OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE OR lIETHOD DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED ~

LAB RESULTS

'OHSTITUEHT TEST DATE TEST PERFORMED BY:

H Arsenic Barium Cadmium (Total' Chromium

~ Lead Mercur Selenium Silver This form or a similar form may be used by the laboratory performing the analysis ~ The testing shall be performed in accordance Kith EPA approved test methods per SM-846. The form used shall be signed by the "Manager"

'or higher management signifying authenticity of'he results.

Laboratory Manager Date PVRld 00D HFV,dlt2 dd<A

J I

t j

I t

0 APPKIIKI . C WOAD 82E04 Page 1 of 1 r

WAF SLUDGE LhtlOFILL PPCCKDURE Page 15 of l.

I ) I c )

JGB PBCJKCT HIHE lt C / SAHPI 'IIG HETHGD / I I .I U 0 I / / / t / I I I I fHN I / / / / ./ / / I I 8 T I / / /, / / / / I

.I SAHPLKRS: K h I / / / / / / / /' I I ISIGHATURc.l A I / / / / / t H / / / / ./ / / .I 0 E ./ / / / / / .' -

BEHARKS LAB

/'/

I c I )CI C i )FR / / / / / / / I PHYSICAL h?PKARAIICK, etc) I I.D.

SA!I?LE ) DATE ( T HK i 0 R 1 SAHPLZ LOCATION . S I / / / / /

IVK'IT. I / / / / / / /

) P / / / I ! / /

) )

I

) ) I I

) AE IllJ SHFD oT; I SIGIIATUAE) ) CAT HE jRECEiVED BY'SICNA UAE) AELII)AU Is)tED BY: I S tlhTUAK) ) DAT;TI..E I AKCEiWED BY c IS IIATUAE) (

I I I I I I - l I I . ) I ~

I I I

)RE i)I/DISHED BY ~ SI I IATUBE) )

~ DA EIT HE RECEIVED BY ISIGIIATURE) AELIttgUISHED BYc iSIGNATUAE) ) DATE:T!HE ) BECKcVKD Bic i SIGNAF )BD) (

I I I I )

) I

'F I...

I ) I )

RE tl'<CI Jiic 0 ill' S IGilh ~ I DATKc INK

' ) BECK VKO FOR LABORATORY ) J)ATE/TIHE ilEHhtlKS I ) (Bvtts)GIIATuBK) I I ) ) ) I

PROCEDURE PALO VERDE NUCLE'AR GENERATING NO.

APPEtIDIX STATION MANUAL WOAD-S4204 Page 1'f D 1

REVISION WRF SLUDGE LhllDFILL PROCEDURE" Page 17 of 17

.VISIBLE Et1ISSIONS OBSERVATION FORtt Date Company Name Name of Source Business Address L'ocation of Source Representative Cont ac ted

, Description of Emission Outlet l Equipment: I IE.S;P. I . ICyclone I IScrubber Other Stack Height't. Area sq.ft. Temperature '

OBSERVATION CONDITIONS Sky Background of Plume Sketch of Source, Operational Boundaries l Position Qf Color of Emissions Temperature Effect of Wind

-'el. Humidity Velocity cn Observations:

.I Observer.

W N

I I

S Photographs Time Plume is: I I Attached I I Detached Point Plume. Read ft. from Stack Distance o f 0 bs e rv . Pt . from Stack ft. Stack or Outlet: 0 'Plume Reading Source Condition: I I Upset I INormal Point f+I Plume Direction: --> Observer Position X Sun Position PERCENT OPACITY PERCENT OPACITY Time 00 I 30 I 45 Time 00 15 30 45 Highest Average Opacity for 24 Consecutive

'bservations Applicable Emission Standard;. I Opacity Source is 'in Compliance with Emission Standard?

Yes I I No" Comments:

Signature of Observer. Jbserver's Certification Expires PV2IS.fj00 PEV 8/82 58d A Ot-.

.