ML17285B060
| ML17285B060 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17285B059 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9003090234 | |
| Download: ML17285B060 (83) | |
Text
REFERENCE:
WNP-2 SEMIANNUAL RAOIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JULY THROUGH DECEMBER 1989 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM LICENSE NO. NPF-21 90030P0234 900226 PDR ADQCK 050003P7 R Poilu
0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 5 4.0 SOLID WASTE 18 5.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATA 24 6.0 DOSE ASSESSMENT IMPACT ON MAN 37 7.0 REVISIONS TO THE ODCM 46 8.0 REVISIONS TO THE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 49 9.0 NEW OR DELETED LOCATIONS FOR DOSE ASSESSMENTS AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATIONS. 50 10.0 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS. 51
I 1 LIST OF TABLES 2-1 WNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES JULY DECEMBER 1989 2 2-2 WNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS JULY DECEMBER 1989 3 3-1 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS MIXED MODE RELEASES MAIN PLANT VENT JULY DECEMBER 1989 . . . 8 3-2 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS GROUND LEVEL RELEASES TURBINE BUILDING JULY DECEMBER 1989 12 3-3 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS GROUND LEVEL RELEASES RADWASTE BUILDING JULY DECEMBER 1989 . 14 3-4 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES JULY DECEMBER 1989 . 16 3-5 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS BATCH RELEASES JULY DECEMBER 1989 17 SCALING FACTORS FOR REQUIRED NUCLIDES, 21 SCALING FACTORS FOR CONDITIONAL NUCLIDES 21 4-3 WNP-2 SOLID WASTE SHIPMENTS JULY DECEMBER 1989 22 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE-1ST QUARTER 1989 . 25 5-2 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE-1ST QUARTER 1989 . 26 5-3 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE 2ND QUARTER 1989 27 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE 2ND QUARTER 1989 28 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE 3RD QUARTER 1989 29
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
~PE 5-6 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE-3RD QUARTER 1989 . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5-7 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE-4TH QUARTER 1989 . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 5-8 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE-4TH QUARTER 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 32 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE 1989 ANNUAL . . 33 5-10 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED AVERAGES FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE 1989 ANNUAL 34 5-11 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE VENTS AND PURGES 1989 35 5-12 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT. LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE VENTS AND PURGES 1989 36 6-1 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSES FROM HNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1989 39 6-2 AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL DOSES FROM HNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1989 41 I
6-3 50-MILE POPULATION DOSES FROM NNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1989 42 6-4 ANNUAL LADTAP II RESULTS FOR 1989. 43 6-5
SUMMARY
OF DOSES FROM NNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 1989 . 44 6-6 50-MILE POPULATION DOSES FROM 1989 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 45
1.0 This report is submitted in compliance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.11. It includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from WNP-2 during the previous six months of operation, with data summarized on a quarterly basis.
2.0 L D The radwaste liquid effluents were released in "batch mode" during the reporting period. Two liquid batch releases occurred during the third calendar quarter and one batch release occurred during the fourth calen-dar quarter. The total time period for the batch releases was 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, with the maximum, minimum and average time periods for a release being 2,4, 1.8 and 2,1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> respectively. The volume of dilution water con-sidered is assumed to be the total volume of recirculating cooling tower blowdown flow for the period. The average flow rate of the Columbia River during July through December 1989 was 8,62E+04 cubic feet per second.
LADTAP II computer runs were performed to determine the calculated dose to an adult (maximum age group). The third quarter calculated dose to an adult was 1.1E-05 mrem to the whole body and 2.5E-05 mrem to the maximum organ. The fourth quarter calculated dose for the adult age group was 6.4E-07 mrem whole body and 1.8E-06 mrem for th'e maximum organ. No abnormal liquid releases occurred during this reporting period.
Liquid batch releases were recirculated prior to sampling. A repre-sentative sample was obtained and analyzed for each batch release. A composite of the batch samples for each quarter was analyzed for strontjum and iron analyses. The methods used for measuring the total radioactivity were gamma spectroscopy, liquid scintillation and propor-tional counting. Table 2-1 provides a summation of all liquid releases during this reporting period.
The percent of MPC limit is based on the total of the MPC fractions using the nuclides in Table 2-2 and the concentrations listed in 10CFR20, Appendix 8, Table 2, Column 2.
Estimated total errors are listed in Table 2-1, and are propagated from individual error estimates of sample activity, sample volume, tank volume, and tank homogeneity. The estimated total errors were calculated by obtaining the square root of the sum of the squares of the individual error contributions and multiplying by 1.96 for a 95% confidence level.
)
'I t
t C 0 0
Table 2-1 HNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Report Period: July December 1989 3l d 4th Est.
Unit Quarter Quarter Total A. Fission and activation products
- 1. Total release (not including 4.
- 2. Average diluted concentration 2.
P li B. Tritium
.0- 22 Fz&
- 2. Average diluted concentration r
~2&03 C. Dissolved and entrained gases
- 2. Average diluted concentration 4
D. Gross alpha radioactivity 2 E E. Volume of waste (prior to F. Volume of dilution water
- At 951. confidence level
Table 2-2 NNP-2 LIQUID EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS Report Period: July December 1989 BATCH MODE 3rd 4th Nuclides Released Unit Quarter Quarter E-2 ~
0 TABLE 2-2 (Continued) ivr gQK: Less than (<) values are not included in the Total For Period values.
The gaseous radwaste effluents from WNP-2 were released from three (3) release points:
- 1. Main Plant Vent mixed mode release
- 2. Turbine Building ground level release
- 3. Radwaste Building ground level release The gaseous source terms from each release point are listed in Tables 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. Table 3-4 provides a summation of the total activity released, the average release rate, the percent of Technical Specifica-tion limit, gross alpha radioactivity and the estimated total error associated with the measurements of radioactivity in the gaseous effluents.
Radioactivity measurements for gaseous effluent releases are performed for fission and activation gases by collecting the samples on charcoal traps and analyzing them using gamma spectroscopy, Tritium is sampled by freeze trapping and analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. Particu-lates and iodines are sampled using particulate filters and charcoal cartridges and are analyzed using gamma spectroscopy.
The percent of Technical Specification limit used in Table 3-4 is the most restrictive value based on the quarterly dose evaluations. The fission and activation gases (air dose) calculation is based on quarterly limits of ten ( 10) milli rads for beta and five (5) milli rads for gamma.
The percent of Technical Specification limit calculations for iodines, particulates with half-lives greater than eight (8) days and tritium are based on the quarterly limit of 7,5 mrem to any organ. Locations 3 through 7 listed below as identified by the latest Land Use Census (LUC) were used to determine the most restrictive value for each quarter to be used in Table 3-4.
Total error estimates are propagated from individual error estimates of sample volume, sample activity and effluent flow rate measurements. The overriding uncertainty in all cases is in the measurement of the effluent and sample volumes. The estimated error was determined to be 36% at the 951. confidence level.
Calculations were performed for releases using the NRC GASPAR II computer program and parameters as outlined in the ODCM. Quarterly doses were determined at the following locations:
Site Boundary; 1.2 miles Jl f 0.7 8.3 E-02 1.7 3rd Qtr. 7.0 E-02 4th Qtr. 1.3 E-01 1.3 2.2 E-01 4.4 IILlhk~
3rd Qtr. 3.3 E-02 0.4 4th Qtr. 1.5 E-01 2.0
~.~2:
(ground and Beyond Site Boundary; 3.5 and 3.4 miles E respectively inhalation pathways) at the location having the highest X/Q values for mixed mode release.
Air DmMixaN.
3rd Qtr.
~~~
1.5 E-01
~ez~mr.
1.5
~mme 1.4 E-01 2.8 4th Qtr. 2.0 2.0 3.4 E-02 6.7 llllht~
E-Ol LZec~m0.1 3rd Qtr. 1.0 E-02 4th Qtr. 1,9 E-02 0.3 4.8 miles SE (ground, vegetables and inhalation pathways)
III ~dt.
3rd Qtr.
Jl t 4.2 E-02 0.4 6m~a 2.7 E-02
~@~ 0.5 4th Qtr. 5.5 E-02 0.5 4.0 E-02 1.8 MH~hMMZ~am >m 3rd Qtr. 4.1 E-02 0.5 4th Qtr. 4.2 E-02 0.6 i<~: 6.4 miles SE (ground, vegetables, meat, cow milk, and inhala-tion pathways) hir.~D~mU. Bain 3rd Qtr. 2.5 E-02 0.3 1.6 E-02 0,3 4th Qtr. 3,0 E-02 0.3 4.5 E-02 0.9 3rd Qtr. 7.9 E-02 1.1 4th Qtr. 2.9 E-02 0.4 4.2 miles ESE (ground, vegetables and inhalation pathways) hl ~B ~>mph 3rd Qtr. 1.0 E-01 1.0 6.6 E-02 1.3 4th Qtr, 1.4 E-01 1,4 2.1 E-01 4.2 iKglg 3rd Qtr. 3.6 E-02 0.5 4th Qtr. 3.6 E-02 0.5
Dl D~ 4.3 miles 3rd Qtr.
4th Qtr.
NE (ground and inhalation pathways) 2.8 E-03 1.4 E-02 0.03 0.1 Gamma 1.6 E-03, 2.4 E-02 LIe0.03cpm:
0.5 LIkcll~RK 3rd Qtr. 1.1 E-03 0.01 4th Qtr. 6.0 E-03 0.1 4.1 miles ENE (ground, vegetables and inhalation pathways)
JDI ~T 3rd Qtr. 4.4 E-02 0.4 2.9 E-02 0.6 4th Qtr. 6.9 E-02 0.7 8.6 E-02 1.7 3rd Qtr. 4.2 E-02 0.6 4th Qtr. 2.5 E-02 0.3 In addition to the reactor site, HNP-2 has a permanent laundry facility located approximately 0.75 miles from the site. Its ventilation system contains HEPA filters on the discharge and is continuously monitored for particulates. Also near this location is a backup chemistry laboratory within the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF). The radiochemical hood within the chemistry lab contains KEPA filters and is monitored for radioactive releases when in operation. Gamma spectrometry indicated no radioactive material present other than that attributable to natural background.
There were no abnormal releases of gaseous effluent during the third and fourth quarters of 1989, There were two reportable Problem Evaluation Requests (PERs) which are included in this report:
PER 289-0836: Technical Specification Table 4. 3.7, 12-1 requires daily channel checks to be performed. Channel checks are required to be com-pared when two or more independent sources of information are present.
The Radwaste Building gaseous exhaust flows from three different fans are
'ummed to form a single signal and sent to two plant computers. The daily surveillances, which defined the channel check as comparing channel computer readings or fan amperage readings and a channel reading, had recorded only one of the computer readings. This recording of one read-ing was deemed incorrect. The plant procedure was deviated to require both readings.
PER 289-0925: A Radwaste Building gaseous sample lines flow sensor failed. A Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) was entered requiring flow estimation for that line on a four hour basis, as required by Technical Specification 3.3.7.12,b, action statement 113. One flow reading was missed at the required time, flow estimation continued and the missed reading was logged. No changes in flow were noted from the prior to the post event readings.
Table 3-1 HNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS MIXED MODE RELEASES MAIN PLANT VENT Report Period July December 1989 CONTINUOUS MODE 3l d 4th
- 1. Fission gases
+ 2
Table 3-1 (Continued)
- 2. Iodines
Table 3-1 (Continued)
- 3. Particulates E-E-
E-
.2 E-E- 4 E-E-
8 E-10
Table 3-1 (Continued)
E- 1 5QJE: -Less than (() values are not include'd in the Total For Period values.
11
Table 3-2 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS GROUND LEVEL RELEASES TURBINE BUILDING Report Period July December 1989 CONTINUOUS MODE 3rd 4th
- 1. Fission gases
-0
- 2. +
,4 T f E+
- 2. Iodines Table 3-2 (Continued)
- 3. Particulates E-m-1 7 4 4 E-E 1 5QIE,: Less than (<) values are not included in the Total For Period values.
Table 3-3 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS GROUND LEVEL RELEASES RADWASTE BUILDING Report Period July December 1989 CONTINUOUS MODE 3rd 4th
- 1. Fission gases E+
- l. +
- 2. Iodines 1 f-Table 3-3 (Continued)
- 3. Particulates 1.7 E-5
<4. E- ~2E- 5
- 1. E- 9~E~
7
- 1. E-5QIE: Less than (<) values are not included in the Total For Period values.
Table 3-4 WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Report Period July December 1989 3rd 4th A. Fission & activation gases
- 2. Average release
- 3. Percent of Tech.
B. Iodines
- 1. Total iodine 1 02 - 2
- 2. Average release 3.
"t f Percent of 4~
Tech.
li C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates
- 2. Average release
- 3. Percent of Tech, 1 i
- 4. Gross alpha D. Tritium
- 2. Average release
- 3. Percent of Tech.
- At 951. confidence level 16
Table 3-5 HNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS BATCH RELEASES July December 1989 Total Maximum Minimum Mean i
Purge 44.3 24.6 0.9 7.4 17
4.0 A total volume of 6,674.8 ft (189.03 m ) of solid waste was transported in 14 shipments during the July through December 1989 reporting period, The total activity of the waste shipped was 786.0 Ci; 396 Ci contained in dewatered spent resins, 390 Ci were contained in Dry Active Haste (DAH).
A.
Dewatered resins accounted for 2,970.0 ft (84.11 m ) of the radio-active wastes shipped during the reporting period. The burial containers were ES-190 and ES-142 liners provided by NUPAC Services, Inc. The total activity of the resins shipped during the reporting period was 396 Ci. The principle nuclides and their percent contri-bution to the total activity are listed in Table 4-3. The solid wastes were shipped to the U.S. Ecology, Hanford burial site using flat bed trailers and NUPAC 10-142 or LN 14-170 casks.
The counting error associated with the total activity has been found to be less than 1.0/ at one standard deviation in previous effluent reports and to decrease with increasing activity. The statistical counting error is assumed to be 1/. for the purpose of this error evaluation.
Other parameters considered in estimating the total error of the activity shipped included the error in measuring the absolute volume, the weight of the waste in the liners, the representative-ness of the sample taken, the homogeneity of the nuclide distribu-tion within a batch or liner and the geometry error in the gamma spectroscopy analysis. The gamma spectroscopy calibration error was approximately 5/. The best estimate of the total error in the activity of spent resin shipped was assumed to be less than or equal to 20%.
B.
A total of 3,704.8 ft (104.92 m ) of DAH was shipped in 36 Container Products Corporation 8-25 steel boxes, 1 NUPAC Services ES-190 carbon steel liner, and 1 Container Products Corporation Type A box. The total activity of the DAH shipped was 390 Ci. The values for the activities shipped were determined by using dose rate-to-curie con-version factors. The conversion factors were based on a nuclide distribution taken from analysis of contamination found in each of the major DAH production areas. The nuclide distribution is updated monthly. Short-lived nuclides were eliminated based on decay of the DAH prior to shipment. A meaningful counting error cannot be gener-ated for the DAH; however, the total error may be assumed to be less than or equal to 20/., since DAH would be subjected to similar error contributions as the spent resins.
18
Scaling factors are based on outside laboratory (SAIC) analysis of hard-to-measure nuclides. The process of updating scaling factors is being initiated. For those waste streams where the scaling or the scaled nuclide concentration is not sufficient to provide a viable scaling factor, the final EPRI Report "Updated Scaling Factors in Low Level Radwaste", NP-5077, March 1987 has been used as a basis for the determination of a scaling factor.
Sampling of individual waste streams was performed with analyses provided by an outside lab. The H-3 concentration was measured per gram of waste material, This value was compared to the Reactor Coolant System H-3 concentration. The scaling factor is derived from the ratio of the H-3 concentration in the waste stream to RCS H-3 concentration.
Sampling of the individual waste stream was performed with analysis by off-site lab to determine isotopic concentration. Ratios were developed between the scaled nuclide to the scaling nuclide concen-tration determined by, analysis. In those cases where the scaling nuclide is not available in large enough quantities to develop reliable (viable) scaling factors, the recommendations made in Section 3 of the referenced EPRI report will be followed.
TRU nuclides would be scaled to Ce-144, as recommended by the AIF report "Methodolgies for Classification of Low Level Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Power Plants." These nuclides are not considered to be present if the scaled values are less than: 1 nCi/g for TRU, 35 nCi/g for Pu-241 or 200 nCi/g for Cf-242. TRU nuclides will be reported if the scaling nuclide (Ce-144) is reliably detected and Cs-137 is also present.
Sampling of individual waste streams has been performed with analyses by an outside laboratory. Cs-137 and Sr-90 concentrations were measured in each waste stream except waste oil. The ratio of Cs-137 to Sr-90 has been determined and is used as the scaling factor for Sr-90 from Cs-137. For waste oil, the values from the referenced EPRI Report will be used for scaling factors. Co-60 and Ni-63 concentrations were measured in each of the sampled waste streams.
The, ratio of Co-60 to Ni-63 has been determined and is used as the scaling factor for Ni-63 from Co-60.
lt Table 4-1 lists scaling factors by waste stream for those nuclides that are required to be reported. Table 4-2 lists scaling factors for the conditional nuclides that are reported only when the scaling nuclide is found to be present.
4.2 The Process Control Program (PCP) used to control solidification at HNP-2 wi 11 be provided by the vendor waste processor, Pacific Nuclear Inc. in accordance with Contract C-20452, and will be subjected to POC review prior to any solidification of radwaste. As an alter-native, approved High Integrity Containers (HIC's) could be used for the transport of wastes requiring stabilization. Other portions of the radwaste program are controlled by the HNP-2 procedures PPM 1.12.1, "Radwaste Management Program," PPM 1.12.2, "Radwaste Process Control Program," and 1.12.3, "Contract (Vendor) Haste Processing." There were no significant changes during the reporting period.
Encapsulation of the Lower Drain Head pipe removed during the R-4 refueling outage was performed per a POC approved procedure. Test specimens were subjected to destructive testing to ensure proper compression strength of the Encapsulation Media (concrete). The Encapsulation was performed within a Type A container manufactured specifically for this one task by Container Products Incorporated.
SCALING FACTORS B
Rwcu CFD EDR/FDR EDR/FDR POWDER POWDER POWDERED BEAD M-3/Rx Coolant 4. 5E-1 4.3E-l++ 4 '0E-1 I 4.30E-1++ 2.22E-l 3. 10E-1 4.0E-5+
C-14/Co-60 6.21E-4 6.4E-S 6.2E-4++++i 1.64E-4 2.90E-2 8.81E-5 1.3E-2+
Tc-99/Cs-137 4.6E-4+ 1.1E-4+ 9.3E-5+ 9.3E-5+ 9.3E-5+ 9.3E-S+ 4.2E-5+
I-129/Cs-137 2.6E-4+ 1.0E-5+ 3.9E-5+ 3.9E-5+ 3.9E-5+ 3.9E-5+ 6.3E-5+
Ni-63/Co-60 4.27-E2 7.74E-3 2.4E-2 4.53E-2 2.4E-2 1.5E-2+++ [ 1.2EO+
Fe-55/Co-60 7.06-E1 2.6E-l 3.4E-l 3.06E-1 1.06E-1 4. 10E-1 1.5EO+
Sr-90/Cs-137 , 2.6E-3+ 1.2E-2+ 1.6E-2+ 5.00E-2 5.91E-3 2.67E-S 3.3E-1+
Pu-239/Ce-144 4.5E-3+ 5.8E-3+ 9.7E-3+ 9.7E-3+ 9.7E-3+ 8.7E-4+ 1. 1E-2+
Pu-238/Pu-239 1.5EO+ 8. OE-1+ 1 ~ 7EO+ 1.7EO+ 1.7EO+ 1.7EO+ 1. 6EO+
Pu-241/Pu-239 1.1E2+ 9.4El+ 9.6E1+ 9.6El+ 9.6El+ 9. 1E1+ 1.2E2+
Am-241/Pu-239 9.)E-l+ 3.9E-l+ 6.6E-l+ 6.6E-1+ 6. 6E-1+ 1.7EO+ 4.7E-1+
Cm-242/Pu-239 9.5E-l+ 7. OE-1+ 9,7E-l+ 9.7E-l+ 9.7E-1+ 5 7E-1+
~ 3.1E-l+
Cm-244/Pu-239 7. 2E-1+ 3. OE-1+ 7.6E-1+ 7.6E-l+ 7.6E-l+ 7.8E-l+ 2.9E-1+
Scaling or scaled Nuclide not present in enough concentration to make determination of Scaling Factor. In these cases the Scaling Factors were obtained from the "Updated Scaling Factors in Low-Level Radwaste" EPRI NP-5077 Final March'1987.
The report from SAIC showed the H-3 concentration in RHCU and EDR/FDR powdered resin greater than Reactor Coolant concentration. The resin mix used in the waste streams are similar. The reactor coolant and condensate H-3 concentration are approximately the same; The Scaling Factor for CFD is 4.30-1 which is more representative of H-3 retention on the two waste streams.
The report from SAIC showed the Ni-63 concentration of sludges at 4.03E-3 uCi/gm which compares to the Co-60 concentration of 3.52E-2 uCi/gm. This comparison would yield a Scaling Factor of 1.14E-l. The above mentioned EPRI Report recommends a Scaling Factor of 1.5E-2. Because of the long period of time between the generation of the waste and the counting of the Sample (approximately 1 year) the EPRI Number is considered more accurate.
The report from SAIC showed the C-14 concentration in CFD of 3.62E-3 uCi/gm which compares to the Co-60 concentration of 5.96E-3 uCi/gm. This comparison would yield a Scaling Factor of 6.07E-l. The above mentioned EPRI report recommends a Scaling Factor of 6.2E-4. It is felt that there was cross contamination of the sample at the lab resulting in high concentration of C-14. The recommended EPRI number will be used' 21
Table 4-3 HNP-2 SOLID WASTE SHIPMENTS July December 1989 A. SOLID HASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL
- 1. Type of Haste Haste Stream 6-month
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, m 84.11 v
- b. Dry active waste, contaminated m 104.92
- c. Irradiated components, control m
- d. Other, (absorbed aqueous liquid) m No
- 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste):
- a. Dewatered Spent Resins 5gcJJ de
- Indicates scaled nuclide
- b. Dry Active Hastes (DAW) 2,7 2
- c. Irradiated Components None
- d. Other Absorbed Liquids None
- 3. Solid Haste Disposition D
22 Flat bed trailer (5) US Ecology 10-142 Cask (1) Richland, HA 14-170 Cask (16)
B. IRRADIATED FUEL, SHIPMENTS (Disposition)
None
- Indicates scaled nuclide 1
P
The meteorological data contained in Tables 5-1 through 5-10 were obtained from the HNP-2 meteorological tower located 2500 ft. west of WNP-2. Data were recovered from 33 ft. and 245 ft. levels. The meteorological data is a composite file from both manual and automated data recovery systems.
The first three quarters of 1989 were drier than normal with above aver-age precipitation arriving in the fourth quarter. The 1989 dispersion conditions were better than historical dispersion conditions. Early February saw the most severe cold Arctic outbreak since 1916. The meteo-rological system functioned normally through the period. Rapid warming brought a high percentage of Category A Pasquill-Gifford dispersion con-ditions for the remainder of the 1st Quarter. The automated annual data recovery system continued to function at greater than 90'/ joint data recovery for the joint frequency parameters.
Tables 5-1 through 5-8 list the joint frequency distribution at the 33 ft. and 245 ft. levels for 1989 by quarters. Additionally, this report includes Tables 5-11 through 5-12 which list the joint frequency distri-bution for all of 1989. The tabulated stability classes, A-G, are denoted by numerals 1-7 respectively. Numerals 1-7 were used for the wind sub- fields as is noted at the top of each sensor level reported.
The 16 compass sectors in Tables 5-1 through 5-8 pertain to the direction the wind is coming from. Tables 5-9 and 5-10 -are representative Joint Frequency Tables for vents and purges during 1989, Calibrations performed in 1989 produced no values exceeding HNP-2 FSAR meteorological equipment tolerances. Therefore, no correction has been made to the raw data, The NRC Delta Temperature Stability Classification scheme was primarily utilized in the production of the joint frequency tables . Lightning- strikes produced little damage during the year with the improved grounding and current protection devices.
TABLE 5-1 1ST QUARTER 1989 JOINT FREDUEHCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE HAXIHUN MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN MPH ARE:
1
- 0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 6 - 24.0 NUMBERS GIVEH ARE HOURS STAB HIND H NNE HE ENE ESE SE SSE SSM SM MSM NHM CLASS CAT 1 1 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. n 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 20 0.
2 32 13. 7~ 5~ 4. 2. 11. 15. 15. 10. lb. 15. 13, 27. 37.
'0.
- 11. 6. 1 ~ 1. 0. 26. 32. 18. b. 2. 16. 23, 24.
1 4 7. 12. 5. 0. 0. '0. 8. 18. 32. 11. 9. 0. 2l 2I 8.
1 5 Q. 7. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 32. 17. 4. 2. 0. 0.
1 6 0. '0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3~ 8. I ~ 1. 0. 0. 0.
1 Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. l. 0. 0~
2 2 1. 2. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.'. 1. 0. 20 0. 0. 3.
2 l. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 21 0~
2 4 0. ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 5 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 0.
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0.
1 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0.
2 4, 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 1. 0. 2t 3 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 1, 21 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0, 1.
4 0. 0. l. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0. 1. 1 ~ 0. 0. 0.
5 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 0.
4 2 b. 1. 1. 0. 1. 1. ~ 1. 5. 50 3. 70 4. 9. 10. 9.
5I 0. 7~ 1. 0. l. 5. 11. 10. b. 30 2~ 5I 2~ 8.
4 4 7. b. 2. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0, 21 1. 4, 8. 2. 1. 3.
5 13. 7I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0.
4 6 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 20 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 1 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 21 0. 1. 2. 1.
5 2 17. 20. 4e 6. 2I 2l 5. 17. 20. 17. 15. 20. 18. 28. 40.
5 I b. 9. 14. 20 20 9. 23. 28. 12. 9, 10. 10. 24. 82. 41.
5 5I 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 4. 6~ 9. 30 4. 5. 8~ 15. 27.
5 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. i,Q, 0. 1. 4, 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0.
5 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
I 5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. '.
0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 1. 0. 1. 0.
6 2 11. 9. 3. 0. 0. '0. 7. 9. 9. 7. 19. 13. 24. 20.
6 6. 2. 2. l. 0. 1. 1. 6. 26. 4. 9. 3. 4, 4. 12. 18.
6 4 0. Q.'. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 4. 1. l. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 6
6 5
6 7
'. 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.'.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2I 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7 I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 1. 0.
7 2 5~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 5. 4. b. 4. 9. 20. 5.
- 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 8. 1. 1. 1.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL NUMBER OF HDURS USED = 1847 HISSING = CALH = 12 VARIABLE = 24
", l p,h I
p IWV lp p ,
n p p ~ ~
p, N p P
~ 4
~ I Np n
It n 4 JI p
- r. ~ ) ~ n pp npp ~- I
- nn nil
~ I p
ff' 'p
~ 4
~ i p n
"I n '
p
~ I,,
~ I n'" ~ v 4
p
~ ~ ) ~ n p
WP ~ I ~ n n n
~
' N ~ h N
~ n d ~ I I
p ~ It ~4 WJ tt AP It ~ n
~ I't
~ W I'
n I'
4 ~ ~ j tf I WP
")
~
4 II
~ 4 n I pp p
Nil ~ I p f'p p pt p n I
~-
NJ n pf I
~ hr n
,Iqnn p'll
TABLE 5-2 IST QUARTER 198'9 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FRON HOURLY AVERAGES FRON TAPE NAXINUN MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN NPH ARE:
0.6 2" 3.0 3 " 7.0 4 - 12.0 5," 18.0 6 - 24.0 NUMBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STA B MIND N NNE NE ENE ESE SE SSE SSM Stt MSM M NNM CLASS CAT I 1 1 ~ I. I, 0. 0, 0'. 0. 0. l. 1. I, 0. 0. 0. 2.
1 2 22. 18. 5. 9. 4. 3. 4, 12. 9. 6. 13. 12. 6. 11. 12. 21.
I 3 13. 7. 8. 30 2, 1. 5. 26. 13. 6. 8. 29.
1 3. 7~ 2% 1. 0. 1. 6. 18. 27, 19. 8~ 2i 8. 19. 14.
I 5 30 16. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 20 8. 27. 12. 4. 1. 3. 1. 1.
1 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0~ 0. 28. 70 6. 0. 0. 0. 0.
I 2
7 1
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 0.
- 0. '. 0. 70 0.
8.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2 2 0. 0. 1. l. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 1. 0, 0. 0. 2i 2.
2 1; 2. 0. 0~ 0. 0~ 0. 0. I. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 0.
2 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 1. 0. 0, 0. 0. 1. 0. 0.
2 5 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 2~ 0.
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 7 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. O. 0. 0. 0. 0.
3 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0, 2t 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. '0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. I.
3 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 1. 2, 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0~ 1. l. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0.
5 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. . 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 1, 0., 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
4 2 2. 4. 1. 4, 0.'4.
- 6. 4. 9. 2. 0. 2. 0.
- l. 7. 6. 20 0. 1. 7~ 2. 6. 50 2~ I. 4~ l. 7.
4 4 1. 0. 0. 1. 20 8. 9. 2. 1. 0. 1. 30 4, 3.
5 27. 5I 0. 0. 0. 0. 6. l. 4. I ~ 0. 1. 1. 0. 1. 1.
4 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 5. 0. 0. 0. 0. '0. 0. 0. 0.
- 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 I 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 1. 20 0. 20 2.
5 2 13. 8. 4. 7. 2I 3I 5~ 9. 12 ~ 12. 70 11. 18. 8.
5 3 18. 18. 8. 2. 7. 15. 27. 25. 13. 9, 2. 7. 28. 54. 21.
5, 10. l. 0. 8. 9. 16. 9. 12. 4. 3~ 4. 41. 14. '.
a 5 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 6. 5; 10. 20 0. 20 5 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 3~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 1 I ~ 2I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 3~ 0. 0. 1. 0. 0~
6 2 70 20 4, 2. 2. 6. 10. 5. 4, 50 8, 4, 70 8.
6 4, 30 5. 0. 1. 5t 18. 5. 7I 5I 7~ 2. 8. 10.
6 4 2. 0. 1. 2. 0. 0. 10. 7I l. 50 1. 8. 12.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2~ 1. 1 ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 7' 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0, 2. 0. 0. 1. 0.
7 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
2 5. 4. 1. I ~ 1. 2t 1. 5. 2~ 1. 4. 3j 3I 3.
3 1. 0. l. I, 1. 3. 7. 5. 1. 0. 0. i. 20 1 ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 2I 0, 0. 0~ 0. 50 2~ 1.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0, 0. 0.
.7 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0~ 0.
7 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
il TOTAL NUNBER OF HOURS USED = 1837 NISSINB = 0 CALN = 32 VARIABLE = 14 IV "h
I~
If) h
- ~ 1 l& hhh 1
~" I<<' ~ I ~ I ~ h i)A
~ . ~R
~ '
~1 ~ \ ~ ~ (I hh ~ j fi P
~
f<< ~ h)t
~ E
't
~ r
~ V ,
Pg ~ I
~ 1
~
Eh
~ tr ih I <<h/ ~
A
<<V VI
~ 0 V ~ E' 1
~" ~
~ 'I 1 hf
~" I!
~ <<
~ f h
~ 8 ~
~ "V ~ 4 hh <<h PI ~ Rt ~ r I'
A Ph
~
ht rh' Pi) ~ h I ll - N
~ ~ k Ih'8 't P"
~ 1 ~ 4 h ~
tl h f tlk ~ hl ~ P J ~ I
~ I h f h~ h h ~R ~ I ~ 7
' h
~ ~ V ~ t.
PJ ~ '1
~ 4 h
- hl ~ \- h ft ~ ~ 4 4 ~
R
~ h ~ 4 I" I h 1'
'v'h
~ ~
~ t ~ "f A
~ RP ~ r 'h <<I, Pt
~ 1 ~ 4 n
Pv ht ~ ~
1
~
~
~ 'll <<R. ~ 'r ~h
~ f h h 1 ht ~ )
I(
li h ~ ~
TABLE'-3 2HD QUARTER 1989 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE HAXIHUH MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IH HPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 6 - 24.0 NUHBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STAB MIND N NNE NE EHE ESE SE SSE S SS¹ SM MS¹ M MNM NM NNM CLASS CAT I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. . 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 1 15. h. 1. b. 6. 9. 8. 8. 12. 13. 18, lb. 17. 16 ~
1 26. 25. 20. 5. 4, 9. 16. 34. 37, 32. 25. 31. 27. 22. 31. 38, I 17. 15. 0~ 0. 1. 2~ 10. 26. 18. 12 8. 12. 4.
1 2. 2. 20 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 1. 4, 3~ 20 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0., 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 20 20 1. 3. 3t 2. 1. 0. 0.
2 2. l. 1. 2I 1. 0. 1. 2~ 6. 5. 20 2I 20 7~ 3~
2 2. 1. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 1. 3. 1. 1. i. '.
2, 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 0. l. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 1 ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 2~ 0. 0. 2~ 0. 0. 0. 0.
.3
'. 0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0, 4,
2.
0.
4.
l.,
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
2.
1.
0.
2.
2I
- 0. 20 0.
1.
l.
,0.
4, 0.
4, 4.
20 5,
20 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0., 0. 0.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0~ 0.
4 4
4 4~
10.
30 4,
0.
2.
4.
3.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
5.
1 ~
1.
14.
4, 3.
7l 16.
4.
12.
12.
3~
10.
6.
10.
10.
h.
11.
5t
'. 11.
5.
12.
14.
6, 6.
6.
4 1; 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2~ 6. 2I 2. 0. 6. 0.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l.
5 0. 20 0. 30 7~ 8. 5~ 8. 8. 8. 7I 10. 7.
5 30 4, 4. 1. 0. 0. 2. 7. 12. 16. 10. 6. 8. 18. 19. 15.
5 4., 0. 0. 2~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 6. 9. 8. 9. 12. 18. 1 ~
5 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 5. 0. 2. 1. 1. 4, 0.
5 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2S 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 '1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
11.
1.
50
- 0. '.
20 0.
0~
1.
0.
0.
- l. 1.
10.
7.
8.
50 50 20 4,
2~
4,
- 5. 6.
9.
10.
12.
12..
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. l. 0. '.
- i. 4~ 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2~ 2. 0. 0. -1 ~ 20 51 6. 1. 2~ 3~ 20 5~ 10
- 5. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 1. 12. 6. 3. 1. 0. 1 ~ 2. 4,
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 20 0. 0. 0. 0. , 0. 0. 0,. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. - 0. 0. 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
- 0. '.0. 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
TOTAL HUHBER OF HOURS "27" USED -" 1738 HISSING = 0 CALM = VARIABLE = 40
4 $
' -, 4 E'
[t$ 'I 4 "t)htQ lh
)4) 4 4
v ~I tg ~ I
~ U 4 Ht Q'h, )) H th hh,
~ f',>>
~
4 ~4
~
~
Eh l
.ll ~ '
~ I, 4
~ .
EV
! It If U ~ ~
pr)
It
- p. ~ 4
~ h II 4 4 ~
I 4 U
- >> ~ V 4 I
~ U 4 4
'I 4
~ k h 4\
I 4 4 ~ ) p I
~ H 4 4 4
~ I
~ 4 >>
14 ~ I 4
~
, J.' H'>>
>> H
~
pe
~ 44 4"
~ '
'I ~ ~ ft
~ 4 4 'I I I
~ Ei
~ I' d ~ lf 4 4. I 44 4 I
at pr
~ I HV
~
K
~ ~ k! ~
I'H 4
~ I 44 )4 Hl 4. ~
,1 4 HH h
I 44
~
~ 4)' I ~ I, ~ 444 4 I I 4 Ek p ~
4th EU
~ I
~ !
~
~
I I, ~ 'V ~ >>
t I>>
4 >>
t
~ '. '>>
TABLE 5-4 2HD QUARTER 1989 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR, THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE MAXIMUM MIHD SPEEDS FOR EACH CATESORY IH NPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 6 - 24.0 NUMBERS BIVEH ARE HOURS STAB MIND H HHE HE ENE ESE SE SSE S SSM SM MSM ¹ MHM NM NHM CLASS CAT 1" 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 1. 0, 0, 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 2 6. 7. 0. 2I 2I 5. 9. 6. 12. 12. 6, 11. 9. 8.
1 3 18. 23. 17. 15. 11. 12. 15. 18. 27. 32. 22. 15. 13. 18. 14. 19.
1 4 4. 10. lb. 10. 33, 8. 8. h. 13. 18. 21. 22.
'2.
- 11. 9. 9. 5.
1 5 6. 0. 0, 50 9. 4. 2. 4, 9. 1. 2. 11. 4. 6. 10.
1 6 0. 0. 0. D. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 2t I ~ 1. 20 7 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 2 1. 0. 0. 0. 1.,
2 0, 0. l. 0. 0. 0. 1. 20 2t 0. 2~
2 4 0. 0. i. 1. 3. 0. 1. 2. 0. 0. 20 20 2 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 2I 0~ 1 ~
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 7 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
3 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 1. I ~ 2~ 0. 0~ 0. 0. 1. 0.
2i 2. 0. 1. 0. 2. 1. 1. 0. 0. 3. 2.
1 ~ l. 0. 0. 4. 1. 2I 2I 2l 5. 1 ~ 2t
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 2. 2. 0. 1. i. 2.
6 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 'I 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0~ 0.
4 30 l. 0. 0, 0. 3, 3. 1. 2. 0. 2, 2. 20 4 1. 5. 3. 2I 5. 3, 5~ 4~ 5~ 1. 12. 7. 30 50
- 3. 4~ 3. 2. 1. 8. 2. 8. 8. 8. 8. 5. 9. 10. 12.
4 2~ 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. b. 4~ 5~ 5. 7. 5. 8. 1.
- 0. , 0. 0. 0. 0. ,
- 0. 0. 0. 21 0. 5. 4. 0. 0. 0. 2.
4 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ip, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 1. 1. 2I 0. 0. 2~ l. 0. h. 1. 20 1. 1. 3~ 1. 8.
5 6, b. 8. 3i l. 1. 0. 3. 7. 7. 7. 6. 11. 5. 7. 14.
5 5. h. 2I 30 0. 1. 1. 2. 12. 10. 9. 12. 10. 9. 5. 2I 5 0. 0. 2. '.
- 0. 0. 0. 3. 3. 8. 12. b. 6. 7~ 2. 5.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 3I 4, 0. 1. 0. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0.. 20 1. 0. 2. 0. 0. 1. 2. 4, 6. 4. 1.
6 8. 6. 9. 5t 8. 0., 2~ 4. 7i 20 3I 5t 5~ 7~
6 1. 3. 3. 2I 0. 0. 0. 0. 20 2. 50 30 2. 1.
6 4~ 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 0. 3~ 3~ 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 1. 0. l. 0. 2~ 1. 5. 4. 1. l. 1 ~ 1.
- 0. h. 8. h. 2. 0. 5. 7. 3,'. 2. 1. 2t 3~ 20 1. 0. l. l. 0. 0. 2t 2I 0. 2~ 2~
- 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. l. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL NUMBER OF HOURS USED = 1609 HISSIHB = 148 CALM = VARIABLE = 21
a ~
- 9 9 et Itt
- 9) ~ 111 t I'et IIe(tt h)
V II I f,
~
~ 4 9 49 et 9 U ~ hf r
~ I ~ J 9 II ll V
~ gt VI eef I 9 "9
I
~9 9 9 V
~ I 9 ~
~ 'I 99 I'I II 9" "jv ~
0
~ Il ~
I 9 ~, 4 9 I,'
9 9' a It 9 IV 9 11 ~ I ~ 4 t 9 '4 "J t'
~ ~ ~ 9 9 I 4
9 I 9th Ie <<4't 4
~ i II f'I 1 9,P ~ (9 99 VC ~ I 9
Jt. ~4 9 '
th 9'! ." et' tl 4 ~ t/
ev ~ tti 94 11 vIt 94 ~~ 9' fe t. f
'= ll ) ~ it ~ a
.8 ~ '9
~ ~
et re ~ tf 9 v'
~ ~ ~ 4 el 9 hf '
h 9
,8 ~ f ~ 9 9
~4 ~ ' ~ ~ Vh ~ l'
~ I I
~ ~
I IV 9'4
~ I ~
f eQ et)
I
~ te ~ 9 9 ~ fl ~ 1 ~ 4 eafl 9
~ 4 9
~ '
9tt 9 4 'V 4 9' ~V ~
g'tl h I
~ f I ~ i 9 ~ J ~ tf
~ It I
~"
VJ
TABLE 5-5 3RD QUARTER 1989 JOlttT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIOtt FOR THE 33 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROH HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE HAXIHUH MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN HPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7' 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 6 - 24.0 NUHBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STAB MIND N NHE NE ENE ESE SE SSE SSM SM tlM HNM CLASS CAT 1 1 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0, 1. 2. Q. 0.
1 2 20. 15. 3~ 4, 5~ 5t 12 15. 16. 8. 15. 11. 15. 18. 15.
1 59. 38. 8. 0. 2. 4, 8. '3.
- 45. 23. 12, 15. 11. 15. 23.
1 4 14. 5. 0. 0. 0. , 0. 0. 3~ 27. 32 lb. 6. 2~ 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. l. 'o
- 2. 1. 0. 1. 20 0.
I 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. '0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0.
I 7 0, 0, 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1 0. 0. 0. 0. '0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 2 1. 2t 0. 1. 0. 20 2t 1. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0.
2 4. 3. 2I 2I 1. 2. 1. 6. 9. 1. 0~ 1. 2I 4. 6.
2 4 2. 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 0. 2. 1. 0. 1. 1. 1. 3. 1.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0~ 0. 0. 1. 0. 0~
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
3 2 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2$ l. 0. 2~ 0. 1. 2I 3 30 1. 0. l. 4, 7. 2. 2. 0. i. 50 4 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 2~ 5. 3. 2t 1. 1 ~ 20 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. i. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~
7 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0, 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0.
4 2 6. 5. 2. 1. 3. 1. 2. 1. 70 1. 2. 1. 1, 6.
4 10. 12. 4. 4. l. 10. 26. 22. 5I 6. 6. 4. 10. 11. 20.
4 8. 1. 0. 1. 0. 5. 6. 8. 3~ 17. 30. 4,
- 5. 0. 1. 2~ 0. Q 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 2I 0. 1. 5. 0.
4 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 7 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0.
5 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. l. l. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0.
5 2 8. 9. 1. 0. 6. 50 4. 10. 6, 4. 8. 6. 10. 12.
'5 10, 20 3. 0. 2. 28, 12. 9. 3. 5. 7. 12. 25. 19.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 4I 1 ~ 2. 20 '1 ~ 1. 10. 10. 1 ~
5 5 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0.
5 6 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 7 Q. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 1 l. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 2 21 15. 20 2. 4. 10. 14. 7~ 5t 6. 4, 4, 11. 8.
6 3 7~ 10. 4. l. 1. 6. 19. 30. 11. 7~ 5. 6. 18. 15.
6 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 11. 3. 4, 20 3I 3. 0.
6 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3~ 0. 0~ 0. 0.
6 6 0. Q. 0. 0, Q. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. Q.
6 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.'. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 1 i. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
7 2 29. 45. 21. 5~ 54 3~ 7. 10. 15. 20 12. 30.
- 11. 12. 9. 1 ~ 0. 0. 5. 14. 23. 2. 2t l. 0. 5. 12. 11.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0~ 0. l. '.
0.
5 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
'7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, ,0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL tiUHBER OF HOURS USED = 1976 HISSIHG = CALH = 15 VARIABLE = 79
,I I 0
,0 gv Q J444 0 t
~ 0 00>>J I 4 AI ~t "I 4 40
'4
<<4I 40 0'
<<CC ~ >>
~
0 I ti <<HJ
)I 0 I ~
00 0
0 0 0
I 4'
>> 4 40 ~ 0 I~
~ 4' 444 u' <>
f 0'P ~ \
0 I
0 0 I I,I '
4'k tl
~ 0 y 4p RN' <<I J'4 f I<< 4l 4
I Yy ~
044 44.C ~ I a44 ~" ~E 0>>JI
~ I ~ I ~ ' ~ (!
II 4 4>> I
~ ~4 ~ 4~
I IH 0 0 I ~ I y ~ 4 0
~ 4 0 ~,I
~ EL I ~ A 0 ft 0'
~
>>y J4
~ ~ 0 JI 4 ~
h Iy ~ 4'
<<IJ 0I'
'4 0 ~
0 0 0 4
~ '- ~ I 0
4 I 0 ~4 0 4C 4l I 0 Yy
~
I' 0 4
II ~ 0 ~ >>
~W 04 $ ~ 0 I'i ~ ~
4
~ J ~ tt
~4 t
44
~ 1J .'!f>> :
N. 0,
~ 4>> 0
- 4) I 04 'Ig
~ 4.' ~ ~
440 'lI III ~ '4 0
. ~
~
"I 4
TABLE 5-6 3RD QUARTER 1989 JOIHT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIOH'FOR THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROH HOURLY AVERAGES FRON TAPE HAXIHUN MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATE60RY IN NPH ARE:
0.6 2- 3.0 3- 7.0 4-12.0 5-18,0 24.0 HUHBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STAB MIHD NHE NE ENE ESE SE SSE SSM SM MSM M MHM NHM CLASS CAT 1 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. .0. l. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0.
2 lb. 9. 2I 3~ 0. 4. 10. 8. 10, 16. 15. 7~ 11. 11. 10.
I 33. 34. 16. 5. 6, 5. 19. 18. 38.
- 22. 18. 1&. 13. 17. 30, 1 3I 15. 10
- 0. 0. '0. l. 10. 23. 34. 12. 7. 7. 6. 8.
1 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 9. 9. 4. 2. 1. 2.
1 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2l 20 1 ~ 0. 0. 2~ 0.
1 7 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. , 0. 0.
2 1 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0.
2 2 0. 0. l. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 0. 2. 0. 0. 1.
2 1. 24 l. 2$ l. 2I 2~ 4. 0. 2~ 1. 0~ 2~ 3~
2 2. l. 0. 1. 0. 0. l. 51 3. 1. 3. 4.
2 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0.
2 2
3 6
7 1
2 0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
t.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 1.
0.
0.
0.
0'.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1 ~
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0, 1 ~
0.
0~
2'.
0, '.0.
0.
- 0. l. l. 0. 3. 4. 5. 4, l. l.
1 ~ 20 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 20 2I 3~ 1. 0. 2.
5 0, 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 0. 20 2. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.'. 1. 0., 0. 0. 0. 0 l.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0., 0.
1 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 2 1. 3. 0, 1. 0. 0. 5. 0. 0. 0. 4. 2. 1. 4.
- 8. 70 7~ 7I 5. 2I 5. 11 10. 16. 9. 20 4. 7. 11. 10.
4 8. 11. 4. 0. 1. 0. 2. 6, 3. 12. 8. 2I 8. 8.
4 5 b. 21 l. 0. 0. 1. 0.. 0. 3~ l. 24. 14 4 6 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 0. 0. 21 4
5 7
I 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2t 0.
2~
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
- 1. '.
0s 0.
0, 5 2 1. 6. 2~ 2I 2I 20 7. 0. 2~ 3, 2~ 8.
5 14. 6. 1. 0. 20 4. 1. 10. 12. 8. 20 6. 3. 13. 22. 6.
5 4. 5~ 1. 0. 0. 1. 0. 3~ 12. 9. 11. 4I S. 50 10. 19.
5 5 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 1. l. l. 1. 1. 4, 13. 9.
5 6 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. l.
5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
& 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 2 3. 6. 5. l. 4. 8. 9. 5. 20 30 2. 2. 4~ 8.
6 13. 4~ 4~ 5I 4. 20 21. 20. 7I 5~ 4. 10. 7t 15.
6 4. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1. 7. 21. 4, 6, 5. 6. 16.
6 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 2I 7~ 1. 5. 1 ~
6 6
7 6
7 0.
0.
0.
0~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0~
1.
0.
0.
1.
'.0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 7 2 4o 10. 10. 20 6. 10. 50 4. 4~ SI 6. 12. 6. 5.
- 20. 22. 18. 6. 8. 3. 4. 9. 10. 12. 8. 9. 50 10. 16.
- 4. 1. l. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 8~ 2~ 2I 0. 9. 7.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4, 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. h." 0. 0. 1. 4. 0. 0. 1. 0.
TOTAL HUNBER OF HOURS USED = 2035 HISSINS = CALM = VARIABLE -" 35
a 4
4
)t(4 e m' I'I la ~ I oi a it e
,'l l ~ I 4
Af I E ~
~
4" v I R( ~ 4 C F o ~
4.1 E I vt 1
~ '1, f
ml
~
I= V f aP 4
h 4
~ E a
~ 1 I hv ~ '
R
=
~ ~
~ 4
~"
~ R ~ I o(, ~ h" II l I Ih 4 4 ~ 'I
~ 4 ~
ol 4 (I (
~ I' am t
I'v t I ~ ~ <<1, ~
4
~
'o h I ~ 4
~ I
~ -4 ~ I I'l
~J
~ IL l h
gR ,j 'I
,>>' ~ I, lh e ~ a 4
~ I m I o of '
'h 4( (4 ~ il ~ 'I ~
~,"I I lht R'v ~
'I
~ I 'll
~ IV t I (
E 4
4 t
II t .imam, ut
'Ilo (i ' rl I
TTtBLE 5-7 4TH QUARTER 1989 JOlttT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FRON HOURLY AVERAGES FRON TAPE NAXINUN MlttD SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN NPH ARE:
0.6 2- 3.0 3- 7.0 4-12.0 5-18.0 - 24.0 NUNBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STA B MIND N tIE NE 'NE E ESE SE SSE SSM SM'SM M , MNM NNM CLASS CAT 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 8. 5I 5l 0. 0. 2~ 8. 10. 7. 10. 6. 9. 6. 6. 12.
1 22. 11. 1. 0. 0. 1. 5. 17. 15. 5. 30 2. 30 5. 16. 18.
1 1. 4. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2~ 7. 9. ?e 30 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 20 1. 0. i. 0. 1. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
2 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0~ 1.
2 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 2I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0.
2 2
3 H
0, 0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20 1.
0.
0~
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0~
2.
1.
'. 0.
0.
0.
0'.
2~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4~
0.
0, 0,
0.
0.
2I 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2I 1.
0.
0, 0.
0.
2I 20 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0.
0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
2 3. 2. 1. 0. 0. 0. 2. 1. 2. 4. 30 2. 6. 11. 11.
- 5. 2I 2I 1. 0. 0~ 30 20. 14. 7. 2I 2~ l. 27. 16.
4 4 4, 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 6. 18. 10. 5. 2l 1. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. lb. 8. 0. 0. 2. 0.
4 6 7
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
0.
0.
- 0. '.0. 0.
0.
.0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5 5
5 I
2 l.
36.
18.
12 0.
'1 0.
6.
0.
1.
5.
- 0. 1.
1, 3.
10 0.
'6.
0.
14.
79.
0.
26 82.
2.
28.
26.
32.
0.
29.
8.
1.
29.
14.
0.
36.
30.
0.
42.
26.
0.
40.
21.
5 5. 1. 1. 0. 0, 0. 1. 9. 20. 19. 9. 9~ 4. 8. 2I 5
5 5
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
0.
0.
14.
0.
0.
4, 0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
'.0.
0.
l.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 1. 1.
6 20. 9. 3. 0. 2. 3. 8. 8. 13. 14. 13. 11. 28. 30. 31.
6 2I 4~ 9. 1. 0. 0. 1. 15 ~ 38 ~ 22. 70 7. 6. 12. 19. 13 6, 0. '0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4, 6, 1. b. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ,0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.' 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0, 0. ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 l. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 2. 2.
7 30. 26 4~ 0. 0. 2I 0. 6. 11. 12. 10. 12. 13. 19 35. 34 ~
- 10. 20 0. 0. 0. 7. 15. 5. 6. b. 13, 18.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2I 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL NUNBER OF HOURS USED = 2073 HISSING = CALN = VARIABLE = 46'
I 4 lml ~ .
II[1<<
I tm "Ill il,(( Jr 4
4 44 ~- ~ EI IC h
ml[ ~ tm 4 l,m 4 4
~E
~ 4
~
mt E
4 It
"'l W
lt
~I J
~ I
,t ~ 4 4 Mhtf hi t hl
. 4 4'.
~ I 44 ~ 4 ~ IJ ~ ~
4
~ I) ,lh 4
, Ifm ~ ~ EJ 4 tl I
~ '4
'4 Vi I
4 1 ~ IJ
~
~ 4 41 44, ~
ti WEI I
4 I'
4 4
~ M ~ 4 tm t ~
I' ~ I
~
fi,
~ 'I ~
i' ~ ' 4 [I' ~4 ll 4 ~ 4
'hh ~ I '. 4' I,
~
~
i
~
J
~ 4 4 t
4
~-
~
pr, l
44 ~
I 'I
,! fm
~ 4 44
~ t 4 ~
'I 4 4 4 4
~ MJ4 lh h ',I
~ I ~
~1 "i
~ ht
~ 4 ~ Ik ~4 4
Ih- l I 41 I
~ 44 4 ~ I
~ <<[ ~ I [~
~ t
~ lh 4 4'.E 4
4
~ [ p
TABLE 5-8 4TH QUARTER 1989 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIOH FOR THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FROM TAPE HAXIHUH MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN HPH AREl 0.6 2 - '.0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 & - 24.0 NUMBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STA B MIND N NNE NE ENE ESE SE SSE SSM SM MSM M MNM NNM CLASS . CAT 1 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. . 0. 0. 0. 0. "
1 2 8. 0. 0. 1. 10 5. 7~ 54 4, 7I 5I 5~ 11.
1 21. 5. 1. 1. 0. 1. 8. 19. 11. 8. 4, 5. 7. 9. 26.
1 4 3~ 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 4. 8. 10. 6. 1. 0. 30 2I 4. 0.
5 4. f. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 4. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 6 0. 0~ '.
0.'. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 0. 1. 0. l. 0. 0.
1 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 2
2 2
4 0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 0.
~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0, 0.
'.0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2l 0.
1.
2~
0.
2 5 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 2~ 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ,0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 2 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. '.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
3 2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0." 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 1.
~
3 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 20 20 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1 ~ 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 2. 50 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0., 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 b. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 3. 0. 3. 10. 30
- 6. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 2. 9. 13. 7. 2~ 3~ 0. 16. 10 4 f. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 7. 15. 13, 50 2i 0. 2. 14.
5 4~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2I 2I 15. 7I 1. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 9. 7t 1. 0. 0. 1. 0.
7 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 3. 2~ 1. 0. ,0. 0. 0.
5 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. l. 0. 0.
5 2 20. 18. 10. 1. 2I 3. 11. 22. 28. 16. 23. 19. 25. 29. 28.
'5 3 12. 4. 9. 4. 1. 2. 7, 51. 55. 23. 14. 9. 13. 24. 35. 35.
5 7. 1. 0. 0. 0. 5. 38. 41. 26. 12. 4. 5. 13. 10.
5 5. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 23. 13. 8. 30 7. 4, 1.
5 6 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 6. 8. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0, ,0 ~ 0. 1. 0. l. 0.
2 10. 7. 6. 2. 5. 2. 10. 10. 9.. 9. 10. 14. 10. 13. 14.
6 9. 7. 2I 1. 1. 6. 7., 13. 14. 10. 7~ 11. 12. 14. 21.
- 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 20 10. 17. 11. 2I 5. 4. 6.
6 5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2I 2I 4. 7. 0. 1. 6. 0. 0.
& 6 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. =
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 1 20 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0.
7 2 12. 8. 7I 2 ~q 4, 5. 9. 8. 70 7~ 5. 11. 5I 8. 8~
f2. 6. 8. 1. 0. 6. 19. 20. 7. 9. 8. 5. 8. 19. 30.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 'I 5. 4. 10. 23., 6~
5 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. f. 0. 0. l. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL NUHBER OF HOURS USED = 2083 HISSING = 0 CALM = 1& VARIABLE = 21 -32"
ei Q tt 'I! >It;Ci IC I II <<2 I F > lq
><< I, I
~
4>
I> '4 II 4 f ~ e I
4 I ~ u Fl
~
f' I ~>
<<CI 4 J ~ >
FI ~,>
~ '
\
= ~ I
<<V 4
~ II ~ 4 C<<
el
~
'l ~ !
4
~4 ~ t e e e
)X<< F<<,
~
I 0,' ll ~
~
W 4 4 ~ J
~
4
~ M4
~> > 4 e
<<J >uI ~ X 4 4
~
I ~ ll F.
~ e ~ <<
t
>I>
'4
~ ~ I )e
~ 14 IA >I I I 4 4> ~ '
i >
4- . ~ 4 1 4
~ t Ae
>I
~" ~ 'I W
~, ~"
~ 'I
.Ct ~ ~
~>
~ e I! '. I
<<k
~ e I '
<<qe 4 41 tl 4 I
~
P ~ - 4 I
,(
A ~ Itl
~ I 1~ 1
~ 4 WC ~
I I II
,~ ~
4
<>>P V4V lit(I rtp)~ "
III I I AV
/<<v ~ I Iil
~ ~ tp ~
I'h V
~ ~ I al >
", el If 4
~ I ~ I V.k ~ I
~ ' I' I 'v ~ I
/
't ~,' ~
11
~ I ~a 4
lr
~ ~ 4 El
~ ~
~ I
/I ~1 4 1 4
~ l ~ 1 4 4 (I ~ '.
~,I ~
1
~V ea ~ t 4
~ 4 a ~ I
~ I ~
I I t<<
~ I
~ '
I ~ I>I 4 ~ 'I
/I ea
~ I/ ~ V
'J et aa ~ 1 ~ hl 4
I ( 4 tr
~
~M ~
L' I PL h
~ f 4
If W /IA Ir,a h
I tf pp 4 ~ '/ ~ I J~ ~ Rr V V ~I ~ ~ ~v
'a(
E rl 4 ~ V" "v It I a hv ~ aa \ Ia I
A /Iv tft ~
I'fe
~ I/ ~ I I
4 ~ ~ a Ir V ~ '/
VI f>>
~ I ~
I
~ (
~ 3 fh I IEJ VR
~ 4 Ih
~I
'I ~
I" v'
II
~ V / ~4
~ L h' 4 4
TABLE 5-10 VENTS It PURGES 1989 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUI'IOH FOR THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERAGES FRON TAPE NAXIMUN MlttD SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN HPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3,0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 -'1&.0 6 - 24.0 ttUNBERS GIVEH ARE HOURS STAB MIND NNE tiE EtfE ESE SE SSE SSM SM MNM NM NNM CLASS CAT 1 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1, 1, 0. 0. 0. 0, 1 20. 19. 5. 7. 30 50 13. 16. 10. 14. 13. 10. 12. 14. 16.
1 20. 22. 12. 5. 6. 0. 7. 29. 13. 16. 9. 10. 13. 13. 19. 26.
70 17. 12. 6. 15. 6. 16. 25. 27. 20. 8. 5. 4. 15. 9.
1 9. 16. 0. 5t 9. 0. 2. 9. 27. 12. b. 4. 2. 0. 30 1 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 28. 6. 70 0. 0. l.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 70 7. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. l. l. 0. 0. 1. 20 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2.
2 4, 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 2t 1.
2 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0. l. 1. 30 0. 2I 1. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1 ~ 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0.
3 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 2l 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. l. 1 ~
- 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1. 20 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 0. 2.
2I 2. 0. 0, 0. 0. 1. 1. 20 2I =0. 1. 1. 1.
3 0. 2. 0. 0. '.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 50 0. 0. 1. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- l. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 1.
4 4. 2. 1. 0. 0. b. 4, 5. 2. 1. 0. 4, 20 12, 1. 1. 0. 1. 11. 9. 6. 20 6. 5. 11.
4 6. 5. 3. 0. 1. 0. 0. 8. 10. 70 7. 30 .
- 2. 4, 7.
4 17 5. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 1. 5I 5~ 2~ 2. 0. 4.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Q. 5. 0. 4. 30 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 2. 1. 20 5 12. 8. 5. 0. 6. 2~ 2I 7. 13. 14. 15. 7. 12. 18. 12.
5 24. 21. 11. 4. 2. 4~ 35. 41. 16. 6. 3. &. 25. 59. 31.
5 12. 9. 30 2l 0. 20 5~ 21. 24. 15. 5. 5. 5. 40. 10.
5 30 0. 0. 20 0. 0. l. 5. 8. 17. 70 2. 4.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 0. 5~ 4, 0. 20 0. 0. 0.
5 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 1. 2l 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 2~ 0. 0. l.'. 0. 0.
6 9, 7. 3~ 30 20 1. 9. 11. 7. 6. 6. 9. 6. 8. 4, 6 6. 8. 11. 7~ 3~ 6. 17. 11. 11. 8. 9. 7. 12.
6 6. 20 4, 0, 1. 0. 11. 12. 11. 50 9. 5.
6 l. 0. 0~ 0. 1. 0 ~, 0. 1. 1. 7~ 6. 1'.
- 1. 4. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. Q. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1, 20 0. 0. 1. 0.
7 6. 7. 1. 3. 2~ 4, 20 5~ 3t 1. 4. 8. 4.
2l 10. 5. 5. 20 1. 3. 4. 10. 12. 8. 20 1. 1. 2. b.
- 6. 1 ~ 1. 0. 1. l. 0. 2~ 6. 20 0. 1. 8. 5. 5~
20 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0.' 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL NUNBER OF HOURS USED = 2346 NISSINS = CALN = 30 VARIABLE - "20 "34-
- 3f lff 4319 llh ~
"'4 I
FH pf)+
9 th H
lf 3
I il 9th tlf.l I, .
Htt ~,il, VII tJ 3 II lh I IIII.
3 I 11' IH ~ 3 I
I ~,1
~ ~
~ 3 ~ 44 4
4 I 4' ih if 1 I I - ~ I~ ~ 3 ~ l
'V 4'h 7 4
~ 1 1
4 I'V it 3ff 7 3H 4 ~
I I I
~t ~ 0 ~ 4 4 4
~ I el I I IV ,1 I '4 ~ Q
~ 4 ~ I fh
~ y ~ Il I"
~ 'I fe I ~ '
~ ~ Ilf ~ 3, ~ I I
I 3 IH
~
I ~ 7 il 4
et i
~ I I 1 I'J h 46 ~ ~ 4
~
~ 3
~ V ~ {f
~ 3 It
~ ~ 4
~ =' ~ Hl I ll It ~ ll ~ ti I If
~ ~8
~ V IV , 'lH
~ I 4 ~ lJ, Ae I,,
41
~
I IV
~ IH ~ lJ ~ fl 40
~ 4 9 'I' ~ I ~ V 1 'I 4 ~H HH
~ I ~ he ~
>1 H 1 'f I'
~ V 3 h'I
~ J
~ ie 4 ~
~ <31
~
H3 ~ I ~ 4 tie I
~ I ~ I
V TABLE 5-11 1989 ANNUAL JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 33 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FROM HOURLY AVERA6ES. FROM TAPE NAXIHUM MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATE60RY IN NPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7.0 4 " 12.0 5 - 18.0 6 " 24.0 NUHBERS 6IVEK ARE HOURS STAB MIND N HHE HE EHE ESE SE SSE SSM SM MSM HHM CLASS CAT 1 1 2. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. l. 1. 0. 2>> 2>> 1.
1 2 75; 37. 21. 11 15. 17. 40 48 ~ 46. 40. 50. 53. 50. 68. 80.
1 127. 85. 35. 6. 14 30. '00.
129. 78, 44, 51. 47. 54. 85. 103.
1 31. 38. 20. 0. 0. 7~ 28 ' 80. 89.'7.
42 23. 15. 18 38. 12.
1 5 2, 12. 2>> 0. 0. 0. 0. S.
'6.
- 10. 5.
- 13. l.
1 6 0~ 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 8. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0.
1 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 0. 0.
2 2 4. 2. 1. 1. 0. 4, 5. 2. 4, 4, 3. 2. 0. 5.
2 8. 4~ 4~ 2~ 2~ 2>> 9. 17. 6. 2>> b. 4, 4~ 14. 12, 2 4 5. 1. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 7. 9. 2>> 2. 2. 6. 1.
2 5 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2>> l. 0, 0. 1. 1. 0.
2 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0.
2 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0.
2 1. 2>> 0. 0. 0. 1. 5. 2~ 2~ 2>> 3~ 6~
- 3. 4, 1.'. 5. 5. 8. 13. 11. 7. 6, 5. 4. 4, 7. 13.
4 1. 0. 2>> 2>> l. 1. 6. 6. 9. 10. 8. 4~ 6. 2.
'5 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 0. 1. 0. 4. 0.
6 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. I. '
0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
? 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
1 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. l.
2 19. 15. 6. 2. 4. 3. 8. 4. 17. 14. 16. 13. 19. 29. 32.
- 30. 18 17. 6. l. 8. 23. 71. 53. 30. 21 ~ 20. 20. 27. 52. 50 4 4 22. '0.
- 6. 0. 1. 0. 6. IS. 42. 31. 15. 18. 18. 31. 46. '.
5 14. 8. 2~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.. l. 18. lb. 5. 5. 6. 13.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 7. 0. 0. 0. 2e 0. 0.
7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
5 1 2. l. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0, 1. 0. 4. 0. 2. 1. 2.
5 2 64. 44 21. 8. 7. 10. 20. 30. 61. 60. 56. 65. 67>>>> 90. 99 5 47.
'0.
- 27. 8~ 4~ b. 31. 137. 134. 35. 29. 39.>> 84. '152. 96.
5 9. b. 0. 0. 0. 1. 17. 33. 39. 22. 23. 14. 34. 51. 31.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 23. 4, 1. 4. 10. 0.
5 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2~ 0. 0. 0. 0, 0~ 0.
5 7 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 1 1. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0~ 4. 1. 0. 2~ I ~ 1.
6 2 63. 38. 13. b. 6. 17. 36. 30. 32. 32. 28. 37. 49. 74. 71.
6 13. 13. 25. b. l. 9. 47. 99 ~ 40. 25. 17. 21. 28. 59. 58.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 70 19, 9. 11. 4. 1. 5. 7. 0.
6 5 ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 2~ 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0.
6 6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
6 7 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
7 1 3. l. 0, 0, 0. 1. l. 1. 0. 20 i. 4.
7 75. 73. 27>> 5. 5>> 6. 9. 24. 37. 18. 20. 23. 32. 39 ~ 64. 79.
7 26. 19. 14. 2. 0. 0. 6. 34. 52. 10. 12. 8. '.
- 8. 15. 30. 38.
4 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2>> 0. 0. 1. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL HUNBER OF HOURS USED = 7634 HISSIH6 = 0 CALM = 28 VARIABLE = 189
~ 'N IJ 1
TABLE 5-12 1989 ANNUAL JOINT FREQUENCY OISTRIBUTIOH FOR THE 245 FT LEVEL CALCULATED FRON HOURLY AVERAGES FRON TAPE NAXINUN MIND SPEEDS FOR EACH CATEGORY IN NPH ARE:
0.6 2 - 3.0 3 - 7.0 4 - 12.0 5 - 18.0 - 24.0 HUNBERS GIVEN ARE HOURS STAB MIND H HHE HE EHE ESE SE SSM SM MSM M MHM HM HHM CLASS CAT I l. 1. 1. 0. 0. 1. 1 ~ 1. 3>> 1. l. l. 0. 1. 2.
1 52. 35. 17. 12. 6. 12. 19. 35 ~ 35. 45 ~ 35. 30 38. 36. 49, 1 85. 69. 42. 24. 19. 19 ~ 47. lb. 70. 91. 51. 43. '2.
- 47. 64. 104.
I 13 32. 28. 11. 33. 19. 35. 60. 66. 64. 37. 23. ,26 ~ 38. 27.
'3.
- 17. 0. 5. 9. 20 7. 22. 40. 25. 20. 15. 9. 8. 13.
I 0. 0 0, 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. Ol 32. 9. 12. 2>> 2~ 3~ 2~
I 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 7. 9. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0, 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 1. 0. 2>> 2>> 1. 0. 0. 4. 6, 2. 2. 0. 4.
2 5>> 6. 3~ 2~ 2>> 5. 2>> 6. 5. 2~ 5~ 1. 2~ 9. 8.
2 2. 1 ~ 4, 0. 1. 8. 5. 6'. 1. 7. 4, &. 5.
2 I~ 0~ 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2~ 1. 1. 2>> 2.
2 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2>> 0. 0 0. 0. 0.
3 0. 0. '0. 0. l. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ,0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 ~ 3>> 1. 2>> I. 6. 2.
- 6. 7>> 20 2, 2. 0. 6. 6. 6. 6. 4. 5. 1, 7. 9, 5>> 1. 0. l. 4. 4. ~ 7>> 9~ 7. 4. 8. 2~ 5.
3 0. 2. '.
- 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 3>> 10. 3~ 2>> 3. 2. 2,
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2>> 2>> 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1.
0.- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
0.'. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. I ~
~
- 12. 7. 5. 4. 5>> 2. 1 17. 7~ 14. 7. 7. 9. 13. 12.
- 16. 19.'17; 12. 10. 6~ 19. 38. 29. 33. 21. 8. 17. 27. 31. 32.
4 15 17. 8. 2. 2. 9. 7. 32. 38. 26. 2&. 15. 13. 11 36. 27.
5
'9.
8~ 2. I, 1 ~ 0. 9. 3>> 12. 24. 15. 13 10.
'2.
- 33. lb.
6 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 5. 2>> 10. 14. 0. 2. 5. 2.
I>>
7 0. 0. 0. 0~ 0. 0. 0 2>> 2>> 0. 0. 0. 0~
1 1. 1, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3. 2. 2. 2.
2 35 18 6. 11. 10. 10. 23. 41. 41. 33 ~ >> 34. 33. 49. 43 52.
- 50. 34, '6.
- 11. &. 14. 23. 91. 99. 51. 32. 23. 34 70. 118. 76.
26 lb. 5. 0. 10
- 15. 59. 74. 57. 36.,23. '4.
- 68. 78. 36.
5
'0.
- 0. 0. 2. 0. 1. 12, 12. 42. 27. 17. 10. 22. 21. 15.
6 I ~ 0. 0, 0. 0. 0~ 0. 2>> 0. 12. 12. 0. 2>> 1. 3. 1.
3>> 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.
- 1. 3~ 0. 0. 0. ,0 ~ l. 1. 2>> 3>> 1. 0. 2. 1. 0.
- 23. 19. 15. 11. 10. 7. 29. 2&. 22. 22. 24. 24. 22. 26. 26.
- 35. 23. 23. 17. 12. 13. 36. 43. 48. 24. 23. 20. 31. 34. 53.
- 10. 2. 8. 6. 2>> 3~ 2o 21. 31. 36, 15. 9. 17. 29. 24. 26.
5>> 0. 0. 0. l. 0. 0. 13. 11.. 7. 7>> 10. 5. 1.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 1 ~ 0. 0.
- 0. 0. 0. l. 1. 0. 0. l. l. 3. 0. l. 1. 0.
- 22. 26. 21. 13. 10. 12. 18. 17. lb. 20. ,17 ~ 12, 22. 21. 18. 17.
20.
'8.
- 33. 34. 30. 16. b. 14. 34. 42. >> 31. 23. 9. 14. 32. 49.
- 8. 1. 2>> 1 ~ 0. 8. 12. 9. 5~ 1. 26. 31. 15.
5 2>> 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 1. 0. 4. 6. 0. 0.
6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
- 0. 0, 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 6. 0. 0. 1. 4, 0. 0. i. 0.
TOTAL HUNBER OF HOURS USED = 7564 NISSIHG = 148 CALN = 48 VARIABLE = 91 a,
II I
r
The doses to the maximum individual from NNP-2 liquid effluents were calculated using the LADTAP II computer code and the site specific input parameters.
Table 6-1 lists the doses to the maximum individual by calendar quarters respectively.
The doses by calendar quarters to the average exposed individual are listed in Table 6-2. The 50-mile population doses by calendar quarters are listed in Table 6-3. Table 6-4 provides annual dosages to the average individual and 50-mile population doses from liquid effluents.
All doses were calculated using the LADTAP II computer code.
An evaluation of the nearest orchard (approximately 3 miles downstream) using Columbia River water for its irrigation showed an adult total body dose value of 3.0E-05 mrem/yr, thyroid dose of 4.0E-06 mrem/yr., and an ddt'>>t organ dose value of 1.1E-04 mrem/yr. The population doses at this loca-tion showed a total body value of 9,6E-05 person-rem, thyroid dose of 5.8E-06 person-rem, and an organ value of 2.5E-04 person-rem.
ddt doses at and beyond the site boundary. Table 6-5 furnishes a summary of quarterly air and organ doses. It also provides the annual total body and skin doses at and.-beyond the site boundary. Table, 6-6 lists 50-mile dose using values obtained from the ALARA annual inte- the'nnual grated population dose summary (person-rem). Table 6-6 also provides the annual individual doses associated with each pathway. These values were obtained by dividing the ALARA integrated dose (person-rem) by the 50-mile population (252,356 year 1987) and converting to mrem. The GASPAR II runs utilized quarterly and annual 'meteorological data and site specific input parameters pertaining to food productions.
6.1 II f li The NNP-2 Visitor Center was evaluated for assessment of radiation dos'es to "Members of the Public", due to their activities within the site boundary. The ODCM assumes an eight (8) hour per year occupancy by "A Member of the Public" at the Visitor Center. The dose assess-ment resulted in an annual calculated whole body dose of 2.6E-04 mrem. The annual thyroid dose was 2.9E-03 mrem and the maximum dose to any other organ was 3.7E-04 mrem. The air dose contribution was as follows; Beta air dose was 2.2E-03 mrad and the Gamma air dose was 3.5E-03 mrad ~ The direct radiation contribution from TLD results calculated to an average of 1.4E-01 mrem per eight hour period.
CI The annual assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed "Member of the Public" to show conformance with 40CFR Part 190 is assumed to be located in the Taylor Flats vicinity (6.4 miles in a Southeasterly direction). The NRC Gaspar II computer code with annual source terms and XOQDOQ meteorological data was used to obtain the dose assessment from gaseous effluents. It is assumed there is no dose contribution from liquid effluents at this loca-tion. The assessment of the maximum age group resulted in annual calculated total body dose of 6.4E-03 mrem. The annual thyroid dose was 1.2E-Ol mrem and the maximum dose to any other organ was 7.4E-03 mrem. Exposure pathways were ground, vegetables, meat, cow milk and inhalation. The air dose contribution was as follows: Beta air dose was 6.2E-02 mrad/yr and the Gamma air dose was 5.1E-02 mrad/yr, An annual assessment of radiation doses to a "Member of the Public" was also made at a location in the vicinity of 4.8 miles southeast.
This location receives irrigation water from the Columbia River as mentioned in paragraph 6.0 above. The annual GASPAR II computer run resulted in a child total body dose of 8.0 E-03 mrem. The annual child age group thyroid dose was 1.1 E-Ol mrem and the maximum dose to any other organ for the child age group was 1.1 E-02 mrem. The annual Beta air dose was 1.1E-Ol mrad and the Gamma air dose was 1.0E-01 mrad. The annual dose contribution due to liquid releases using vegetation from the irrigated food pathway and the child age group of the NRC LADTAP II computer run showed a total body dose of 8.7 E-05 mrem. The annual thyroid dose was 9.8 E-06 mrem and the maximum dose to any other organ was 1.6 E-04 mrem.
The direct radiation contribution showed no significant amount above normal background, The 1989 annual average TLD summary was 92 mrem per year.
Table 6-1 I DI D D IDE E 1ST AND 2ND QUARTERS 1989 1989 1989 Cumulative Cumulative Total Body Total Body Max. Organ. Max. Organ.
/ /
Fishing Drinking Shoreline No liqui d batch releases occurred du ring Swimming, I Boating the First Quarter of 1989.
Vegetables Leafy Veg.
Milk Meat Total 1989 1989 Cumulative Cumulative Total Body Total Body Max. Organ. Max.,Organ.
r Fishing 1. 7E-03 1.7E-03 4. 2E-03 4.2E-03 Drinking 3.1E-06 3.1E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-05 Shoreline 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 3.9E-05 3.9E-05 Swimming 6.4E-08 6.4E-08 6.4E-08 6.4E-08 Boating 1.8E-06 1.8E-06 1.8E-06 1.8E-06 Vegetables 1.2E-05 1.2E-05 4.4E-05 4.4E-05 Leafy Veg. 4.3E-06 4.3E-06 1.8E-05 1.8E-05 Milk 1.0E-,05 1.0E-05 2.1E-05 2.1E-05 Meat 2~E~ ~M5. fLZE=Q6 ED%
Total 1. 8E-03 1. 8E-03 4,3E-03 4.3E-03
Table 6-1 NT (1) 3RD AND 4TH QUARTERS 1989 1989 1989 Cumulative Cumulative Total Body Total Body Hax. Organ. Max. Organ.
r Fishing 1. OE-05 1. 7E-03 2.3E-05 4. 2E-03 Drinking 6. 2E-08 3. 2E-06 5.3E-07 1.0E-05 Shoreline 3. 2E-07 3.'3E-05 ,
3.7E-07 3.9E-OS Swimming 5. 7E-10 6.5E-08 5. 7E-10 6.5E-08 Boating 1.6E-08 1.8E-06 1.6E-08 1.8E-06 Vegetables 1.2E-07 1.2E-05 4.2E-07 4.4E-05 Leafy Veg. 3.7E-07 4.7E-06 3.3E-07 1.8E-05 Milk 8.3E-08 1.0E-05 2.9E-07 2.1E-05 Heat Z 2ME ~F~i LLF~ KEE~
Total 1.1E-05 1.8E-03 2.5E-05 4.3E-03 1989 1989 Cumulative Cumulative Total Body Total Body Max. Organ. Max. Organ.
m/
Fishing 5.4E-07 1.7E-03 1. 4E-06 4.2E-03 Drinking 2.9E-08 3.2E-06 1. 3E-07 1.1E-05 Shoreline 2.8E-08 3.3E-05 3.1E-08 3.9E-05 Swimming 7.0E-11 6.5E-08 7.0E-11 6.5E-08 Boating 2.0E-09 1.8E-06 2.0E-09 1.8E-06 Vegetables 2.5E-08 1.2E-05 6.9E-08 4.4E-05 Leafy Veg. 4.6E-09 4.7E-06 7.1E-08 1.8E-05 Milk 9.4E-09 1.0E-05 6.4E-08 2.1E-05 Meat 3 '1&92 ~MS RJS~ EJEEEi Total 6.4E-07 1.8E-03 1.8E-06 4. 3E-03 (1) Age Group Adult: Maximum individual resides at Richland and fishes near the NNP-2 outfall area.
Table 6-2 1ST AND 2ND QUARTERS 1989 Total Body Max. Organ Total Body Max. Organ Fish No 1 i qui d batch 2.3E-05 5.5E-05 Drinking Water 1.6E-06 5,2E-06 Shoreline releases occurred 2.5E-06 3.0E-06 Swimming 1.4E-08 1.4E-08 Boating during the first 3.5E-09 3.5E-09 Vegetables(a) 1.0E-07 2.7E-07 Leafy vegetables(a) quarter of 1989 2.2E-06 7.4E-06 Milk(a) 8,1E-07 1.6E-06 Meat(a) ~F&2 F~
Total 3.1E-05 7.4E-05 3RD AND 4TH QUARTERS 1989 Total Body Max. Organ Total Body Max. Organ Fish 1. 4E-07 3. OE-07 7.0E-09 1. 8E-08 Drinking Water 3. 2E-08 2.7E-08 1.4E-08 6.4E-08 shoreline 2. 4E-08 2.8E-08 2.0E-09 2.4E-09 Swimming 1. 3E-10 1.3E-10 1.6E-ll 1.6E-11 Boating 3.2E-11 3.2E-11 3.9E-12 3.9E-12 Vegetables(a) 1.1E-09 2.7E-09 2.1E-10 4.1E-10 Leafy vegetables(a) 1.9E-08 1.5E-07 2.3E-09 3.3E-08 Milk(a) 6.8E-09 1.9E-08 6.9E-10 4.3E-09 Meat(a) 'kJHH8 9 ZEE5 ~F~ ~E~
Total 2,3E-07 5.4E-07 2.7E-08 1. 2E-07 (a) Values are obtained by dividing the total population ALARA dose by the total population served from irrigated production and converted to mrem.
41
Table 6-3 L P I D 1ST AND 2ND QUARTERS 1989 Total Body. Max. Organ Total Body Hax. Organ r -r Fish No liquid batch 5.2E-05 1.0E-04 Drinking water 1.3E-04 3.4E-04 Shoreline releases occurred 4.4E-04 5.2E-04 Swimming 2.5E-06 2.5E-06 Boating during the first 6.2E-07 6.2E-07 Vegetables 1.0E-06 2.7E-06 Leafy vegetables quarter of 1989. 2.2E-05 7.4E-05 Hi lk 7.8E-06 1.5E-05 Heat ~2E~ j 2~
Total 6.6E-04 1.1E-03 3RD AND 4TH QUARTERS 1989 Total Body Max. Organ Total Body Max. Organ Fish 3.3E-07 6,7E-07 1. 7E-08 3. 4E-08 Drinking water 2.5E-06 2.2E-05 1.1E-06 5.3E-06 Shoreline 4.2E-06 4.9E-06 3.6E-07 4.2E-07 Swimming 2 'E-08 2.2E-08 2.7E-09 2.7E-09 Boating 5.6E-09 5.6E-09 6.9E-10 6.9E-10 Vegetables 1.1E-08 2.7E-08 2.1E-09 4.1E-09 Leafy vegetables 1.9E-07 1.5E-06 2.3E-08 3.3E-07 Milk 6.4E-08 1.9E-07 6.6E-09 4.1E-08 Meat ZJK~ LJHM8 E~L Total 7.4E-06 2. 9E-05 1. 5E-06 6.1E-06 Table 6-4 AD E L A. VE E D D L D E LI ID E FL Total Body. Max. Organ r
Fish 2.3E-05 4.6E-05 Drinking water 1.7E-06 5.4E-06 Shoreline 2.6E-06 3.0E-06 Swimming 1.4E-08 1.4E-08 Boating 3.6E-09 3.6E-09 Vegetables(a) 1.1E-07 2.8E-07 Leafy vegetables(a) 2.3E-06 7.6E-06 Milk(a) 8.3E-07 1.6E-06 Meat(a) ~l. F~
Total 3.1E-05 6.5E-05 B. 0 LI I E Total Body. Max. Organ Fish 5. 3E-05 1.0E-04 Drinking water 1.4E-04 3,5E-04 Shoreline 4.5E-04 5.3E-04 Swimming 2.5E-06 2.5E-06 Boat)ng 6.4E-07 6.4E-07 Vegetables 1.1E-06 2.8E-06 Leafy vegetables 2.3E-05 7.6E-05 Milk 7.9E-06 1.5E-05 Meat ~FH5 Total 6.8E-04 1.1E-03 (a) Values are obtained by dividing the total population ALARA dose by the total population served from irrigated production and converted to mrem.
Table 6-5 1989 Lamiim: 1.2 miles site boundary Calendar Quarters Plus Annual Cumulative, 1989 First Second Third Fourth Annual Quadxr. 9m~ Quadxr Qmzhe CumQ~iv Beta air dose (mrad)* 2.7E-03 1.4E-02 7.0E-02 1.3E-Ol 2.2E-01 Gamma air dose (mrad)" 4.6E-03 1.1E-02 8.3E-02 2.2E-01 3.2E-01 LacaUm: Beyond Site Boundary 4.2 miles ESE Reporting Period Calendar Quarters Plus Annual Cummulative, 1989 First Second Third Fourth Annual QmrMc Qu.acier. Quarter Qu Mar Gem~~
Beta air dose (mrad)* 8.1E-03 1.5E-02 1. OE-01 1.4E-01 2.6E-01 Gamma air dose (mrad)* 9.6E-03 1.0E-02 6.6E-02 2.1E-01 3.0E-01 Site Boundary Annual Annual Total Body Dose (mrem) 2.4E-02 Annual Skin Dose (mrem) 2.7E-02 Beyond Site Boundary Annual Annual Total Body Dose (mrem) 8.0E-03 Annual Skin Dose (mrem) - 7.4E-03 lmai.Lan: The typical sampling location having the highest annual cumulative organ dose based on Land Use Census. 6.4 miles S,E. (ground, vegetables, meat, cow milk and inhalation pathways).
Calendar Quarters Plus Annual Cumulative, 1989 First gggMi'r ~~ ~~
Second Third Fourth Quate~
Annual Ggmgijjggp Maximum organ dose 3.0E-03 4.2E-02 7.9E-02 2.9E-02 1.5E-01 (mrem)**
" Technical Specii'ication 3.11.2.2.
44
TABLE 6-6 50-MILE POPULATION DOSES FROM 1989 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Total Body Max. Organ
~Ph ~
Exposure r
Plume 1.1 E+00 3.4 E+00 Ground 3.0 E-02 3.5 E-02 Inhalation 1.6 E-02 6.1 E-01 Vegetables 1. 6 E-02 1.7 E-02 Milk 8.1 E-03 1.6 E-01 Heat MJ 49 Total 1.2 E+00 4.2 E+00 AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL DOSES FROM 1989 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Total Body Max. Organ
~m~i~ ~i~m Plume 4.4 E-03 1.3 E-02 Ground 1.2 E-04 1.4 E-04 Inhalation 6.3 E-05 2.4 E-03 Vegetables 6.3 E-05 6,7 E-05 Milk 3.2 E-05 6.3 E-04 Heat M3U~
Total 4.7 E-03 1.6 E-02 (a)
The 50 mile population doses divided by the population within 50 miles of the Plant by direction and radii interval and converted to mrem.
During this reporting period, Amendment No. 7 was made to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
7.1 This rationale is intended to provide a concise explanation of the changes made to the NNP-2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) for Amendment Number 7.
Page iii; this change was necessary so the list of tables would for coincide with the sequence of the respective age groups those tables within the text.
- 2. Page 2; this change is made to clarify that the NRC approved computer code LADTAP II can be used to evaluate dose analyses for liquid radioactive effluent.
- 3. Page 3; changed the average release rate from 2690 gpm (6.0 cFs) to 808 gpm (1.8 cFs) to correspond to actual operating average and to clarify the concern in Item 2 of the Technical Evaluation Report by the NRC review. This is consistent with the 1.8, cFs value used to- obtain the "applicable factor" used in the F~ factor for equation five (5) on page six (6).
Page 8; Aij is changed to Ai~ to be the same terms as is used in NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants." The near field area is clarified with the statement "within one quarter-mile of the release point" as per NUREG-0133.
- 5. Page 9; the reference to Radiological Programs Calculation Log 88-3 is made to comply with the intent of NUREG-0133, Section 4.3.1 as recommended by the NRC Reviewer in Item 9 of the Technical Evaluation Report.
- 6. Page 29; Aij is changed to Ai~ for same reasons as stated in four (4) above.
- 7. Page 33, Sections 3.0 and 3.1; the additional statement to Section 3,0 is made to provide the means for the use of the NRC approved computer code GASPAR II, to perform dose analyses for gaseous radioactive effluents to the atmosphere. It also provides for the use of the GASPAR II subroutine PARTS which can be used to determine dose factors used for Appendix I of 10 CFR 50 compliance. This additional statement to Section 3,1 is to clarify that for gaseous effluent dose calculations, the site boundary will be considered as 1.2 miles in all geographical directions.
Page 34; an error on the meter range was noted and is corrected to 10-10" cpm from 10-10'pm. The main plant air ventilation was changed from 98,000 cFm to 80,000 cFm based on the actual operating results of the building's HVAC system being balanced.
Pages 35 and 36; an error being noted on the meter range is corrected from 10-10'pm to 10-10" cpm.
The paragraph in 3.3, page 36 was changed to relate with the wording of the Technical Specifications.
Page 38; "at or beyond" has been changed to "at and beyond" to be consistent with the wording in the Technical Specifications.
Page 39; Wg and WM definitions have been changed to be consistent with the Technical Specifications wording of "at and beyond." A statement pertaining to the method of evaluating meteorological data was added.
Tables 3-2 and 3-3 have been reworded to indicate the typical locations where GASPAR II dose determinations will be calculated based on the current Land Use Census (LUC) with identifying pathways at these locations and typical long term X/Q and D/Q values.
Page 40; the term subsequent has been clarified to mean "Subsequent Meteorological" reports.
Pages 41, 42, 43 and 44; wording has been changed to be consistent with Technical Specifications.
Pages 50, 52 and 53; this change is necessary to correct the wording as the fraction being available for deposition and not the amount being present. Reg. Guide 1.109-26.
Pages 56 and 59; "and beyond" was added to the definition of X/Qj to be consistent with Technical Specifications wording.
Page 61, Table 3-2; this change reflects the typical locations with their associated pathways, where dose determinations will be calculated based on the current Land Use Census (LUC).
Page 62, Table 3-3; this change provides the long term meteorological data for those typical locations where dose calculations will be performed. ,This meteorological data may be used in the absence of current year data.
Pages 63a-67, Tables 3-4 and 3-5; NP-239 has been added to these tables.
- 19. Page 70, the FL and Fg values are those referenced in Table E-15 of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, and will be the values used in the necessary Rv calculations.
- 20. Page 86; this change was made to clearly identify reference number 10.
- 21. Pages 88 and 89, Table 3-16 and Table 3-17 respectively; these tables are provided as informational data and provide "typical" locations where dose comparisons have previously been made.
sarilyy They were not actually "special" locations. The change was made to indicate them as "typical" locations and not neces-within the site boundary.
- 22. Pages 94 and 95; these changes were made to eliminate the differences in the wording and requirements as stated in the ODCM and in Technical Specifications. This change should provide for better clarification in conducting and evaluating Land Use Census results.
- 23. Pages 98, 99 and 100; Table 5-1 has been changed to eliminate the differences in the wording between the ODCM and the Technical Specifications.
- 24. Page ill; this statement has been added to clarify that the NRC computer codes LADTAP II and GASPAR II as described in NUREG/CR-4013 and NUREG/CR-4653 respectively will be for those dose determinations provided in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Report.
7.2 These changes do not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determinations.
7.3 Amendment Number 7 to the ODCM was reviewed and approved during POC meeting 89-50 dated December 13, 1989.
7.4 This section consists of Attachment 1 which is a complete revised copy of the WNP-2 "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" <ODCM).
Attachment 1 is sent only to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
8.0 V I E L No changes were made to the Process Control Program (PCP) (PPH 1.12.2) during this reporting period which required POC approval.
POC (89-14) approved PPH 11,2.23.18 TP for the encapsulation of the Lower Drain Head pipe which was removed during refueling outage R-4 (April 1989).
9.0 gg~PJ)l. ET D 9.1 No new locations were identified by the 1989 Land Use Census (LUC) which require the performance of dose calculations.
9.2 No additional environmental monitoring locations were identified during this reporting period.
9.3 No sampling locations were deleted during this reporting period.
10.0 5ggg I ID AE 5XSI!R5 No major changes were made to the radioactive waste systems (liquid, gaseous, or solid) during this reporting period.
51
1