ML17198E104

2017 Fer Ile Proposed Es 301-3

ML17198E104
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	04/03/2017
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:	Detroit Edison, Co
Shared Package
ML17061A781	List: ML17198A431 ML17198A462 ML17198D304 ML17198D477 ML17198D649 ML17198E104 ML17198E377 ML17198E544 NRC-17-0005, 2017 Fer Ile Proposed Exam Licensee Letter
References
Download: ML17198E104 (1)

Text

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: Fefrni Z Date of Examination t Zln iil ratino Test Number: 20, J

1. General Criteria lnitials a

b*

ú a.

The operatng test conforms with the previously approved outline; cha are consistent with r0 cFR 55 function distri t*hD /

Aro, b.

There is no day{o-day repettion between this and other operating tests to be admnstered du this examination sn Ã

'.+/

c.

The test shall not d items from the audit Section 1.a rr.Ñ K Ø1 d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different pafs of the operatng test is within limits.

sr

,(

t0ee e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less{han-competent aoolicants at the desiqnated license level.

n & ry

2. Walk-Th Criteria a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facilty licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on of ifa icable

$"1^ h ry b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk{hrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified those forms and Form ES-201-2.

\\ f-cn)

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-30.1-4 and a ts ns T ?

P N

Date t lq lit l-t?'2,r11 zlzS/tz

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewe(.)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

tt I

fn"r 21,?

d. NRC Supervisor -

NOTE: " The facility

1. lndependent signature is not appl NRC reviewer initial icable for NRC-developed tests.

items in Column "c"; chief concurrence ra^t ired