ML23200A221

Form 2.3-1 Outline Quality Checklist

ML23200A221
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	02/08/2023
From:	NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB
To:	Detroit Edison, Co
Bryan Bergeon
Shared Package
ML22007A059	List: ML23200A216 ML23200A217 ML23200A218 ML23200A221
References
Download: ML23200A221 (1)

Text

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Examination:

Task Description (Y)es (N)o Item a b* c#

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the X instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (K/A) categories are X appropriately sampled.

b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. X X

c. Justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are acceptable. x )( X

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario X set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument X and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.

o b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of X x

- applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule X without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 X and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

X X

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

X )(

X

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on X )(

Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). X

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in X the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' X C- audit test(s).

c. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is X X

)

sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including X probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

X

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is X x X

appropriate.

c. Check whether K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater X z than or equal to 2.5.

X X

o d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. X X X

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. X X

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior reactor operator).

X ( X Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author Q~cra sk.a~n - t .

b. Facility Reviewer (*) n)er~k42'_' //o 2o z3

c. NRC Reviewer (#) Bryan A Bergeon /

_______________________________ 1/27/2023 NRC Chief Examiner Bryan A Bergeon /

__________________________________ 1/27/2023 NRC Supervisor April M. Nguyen Digitally signed by April M. Nguyen Date: 2023.02.08 09:45:56 -06'00'

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column"c." This may bethe NRCChief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.