ML24173A086
| ML24173A086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2024 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | Detroit Edison, Co |
| Bryan Bergeon | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML24088A300 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML24173A086 (1) | |
Text
Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist Fermi 2ILT 2024 Retake Exam -JPMs ONLY Facility:
Fermi 2 Date of Examination: June 2024 Operating Test Number: 2024-2 General Criteria Yes/No a
b*
c#
- a.
The operating test meets the criteria on the associated test outline.
- b.
There are enough test items so that test items will not be repeated on more than 1 day of A-the operating test.
- c.
The operating test does not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s).
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is minimized.
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
Walkthrough Criteria
- a.
Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:
task standard initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time critical alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path" operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.
Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers:
/
/
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrume
-a b out of service, but it does not cue the op ators into expected eve
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of rel d vents.
- 3.
Each event description consists of e ol g:
the point in the scenario it isto be i the malfunction conditions that are ent red to initiate the event the sym s/cues that will be visible to the crew xpected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
ES-2.3, Page 10of 19 Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y
- 5.
The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to observe and evaluate applicant performance.
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any en simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant ha een evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the plan dscenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in ccordance wit S-3.4.
- 10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applican to be signifi ntly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evol tion specified the version of Form 3.4-1 submitted with the scenario set.
- 11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar um ro reid ti 'e tical tasks across scenarios, when possible.
- 12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to su ort licensin ecisions for each crew position.
Actual Attributes by (Y)es / (N)o TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBU S per Scenario (See ES-3.4)
Scenario No.
a b*
c#
- 1.
Malfunctions after em gency operating procedure (EOP)
/
/
entry (1-2)
- 2.
Abnormal eve (2-4)
/
/
- 3.
Major tra ents (1-2)
/
/
- 4.
EOP ntered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
/
/
- 5.
ryinto a contingency EOP with substantive actions
/
/
1Iper scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios prepared for the scheduled exam)
Preidentified critical tasks (> 2)
/
/
Printed Name/Si nature Date
- a.
Author
..dTT~
, i4M 20.2.
- b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
etcJZ L7Wy 5;-' 0 e-ZoZ4
- c.
NRC Reviewer (#)
NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.
ES-2.3, Page 11 of 19 Bryan A. Bergeon Digitally signed by Bryan A. Bergeon Date: 2024.06.05 12:39:19 -05'00' Bryan A. Bergeon Digitally signed by Bryan A. Bergeon Date: 2024.06.05 12:39:39 -05'00' PAUL ZURAWSKI Digitally signed by PAUL ZURAWSKI Date: 2024.06.05 17:31:01 -05'00'