|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20209H6691999-07-12012 July 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Update Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Adition & Addenda of ASME BPV Code ML20203G6131998-01-26026 January 1998 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Interim Rept 739459-97,dtd 971015 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20203G6031997-12-0404 December 1997 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure PLA-4330, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-06-0808 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control PLA-4193, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety1994-08-31031 August 1994 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety ML20046A9531993-07-20020 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20045F7971993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule in Part & Opposes Rule in Part ML20045D7461993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Disagrees W/Maintaining 100% Rate for Contractor & Vendor Employees ML20044F8361993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rules ML20044F7511993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. PLA-3744, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners1992-03-0909 March 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners PLA-3568, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-0808 April 1991 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a PLA-3462, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants ML19332G5261989-12-0606 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Industry Has Made Substantial Progress Re Maint Performance as Indicated by Respective Performance Indicators,Commission Insps & Plant Conditions PLA-3175, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants1989-03-29029 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V4001989-03-0202 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Program at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Maint Rule Has Potential to Significantly Undermine Util Initiatives & Direct Limited Resources Away from Real Improvements in Maint PLA-3157, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained1989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained PLA-3118, Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule1988-11-17017 November 1988 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons PLA-3019, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking1988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking PLA-2726, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift1986-09-25025 September 1986 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift ML20138A9521985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D4441982-11-0202 November 1982 Response to Aslab 821026 Order Requesting Info on RCS Leak Rate Detection.Util Preparing Tech Spec to Limit Increase in Unidentified RCS Leakage to 2 Gpm within 4-h Period ML20027D4471982-11-0101 November 1982 Affidavit of Wj Rhoades Correcting Response to Hearing Question on Leak Rates.Leak Rate Sys Capable of Detecting 1 Gpm Per Hour.Tech Specs Will Require Shutdown for Unidentified Leakage of 5 Gpm.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D8321982-09-0909 September 1982 Original Signature Page to Sh Cantone Affidavit.Svc List Encl ML20027B2291982-09-0909 September 1982 Stipulation of Withdrawal of Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions Re Supply of TLD ML20065A9541982-09-0909 September 1982 Affidavit of Sh Cantone Re Dosimetry for Emergency Workers at Plant.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20027B2351982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of AL Belser & Rj Hippert Responding to Questions in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting Stipulation Withdrawing Exceptions.When Stipulated Number of Dosimeters Available, Emergency Workers Will Be Protected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20027B2331982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of Ma Reilly Responding to Question in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting 820909 Stipulation. TLD Necessary to Document Exposure of Officials Helping Contaminated Evacuees ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062J6391982-08-13013 August 1982 Order Directing Parties to Identify Person Presenting Arguments at 820908 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Response Requested No Later than 820831 ML20058J6651982-08-0909 August 1982 Order Rendering ASLB 820412 Decision Authorizing OL Issuance Effective.Full Power OL Not Yet Authorized ML20054L5081982-07-0606 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 & Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Pa Fails to Prove Dosimetry Issue Timely Raised. Citizens Failed to Comply W/Procedure.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054L2841982-07-0202 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Issuance.Commonwealth Fails to Justify License Condition Imposition Re Availability of Dosimetry.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J5611982-06-25025 June 1982 Brief Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Exceptions Fail to Comply W/Commission Regulations & Raise Issues Not Presented Before Aslb.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D2191982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief Supporting Commonwealth of PA Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0801982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief in Support of Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ols.Shortage in Supply of Dosimeters for Emergency Workers Clear & Uncontroverted. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A2751982-04-21021 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054C6551982-04-15015 April 1982 Response Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820402 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Requirements for Reopening Record Not Met.No Showing That Allegations Raise Significant Safety Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050D4191982-04-0202 April 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Based on Important New Info & Recommendations to NRC Commissioners & Congress.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2701982-03-26026 March 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Emergency Evacuation Plan ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069B0301981-12-22022 December 1981 Reply to Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B0791981-12-16016 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M2141981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections ML20039A1951981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20038C0131981-12-0303 December 1981 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1999-07-12
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20011A2321981-10-0101 October 1981 Support for Contention 4 & Position on New Contentions. Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 Should Be Denied Since Util Cancellation of Unit 2 May Be Best Solution.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20011A2121981-09-30030 September 1981 Appeal of ASLB 810924 Memorandum & Order,Section 5,granting Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 2 Re Magnitude of Doses from Releases of Radioactive Matl.No Basis to Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20010J6231981-09-30030 September 1981 Response Supporting NRC 810911 Motion for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Radiological Health Effects of Isotopes Other than Rn-222 & Tc-99.Health Effects Adequately Addressed in Fes ML20010H7931981-09-22022 September 1981 Answer Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 810912 Notice of Appearance for Purposes of Presenting Direct Testimony & Motions Before Aslb.Consolidation of Contentions Unnecessary.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20140B1981981-09-10010 September 1981 Response Supporting Applicants 810828 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Fuel Cycle Doses.Also Moves for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Radiological Health Effects of All Isotopes ML20140B1931981-09-10010 September 1981 Answer Opposing Susquehanna Environ Advocates 810822 Motion for Allowance of New Contention.Motion Is Untimely & Balancing Factors Do Not Weigh in Intervenors Favor. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140B1651981-09-10010 September 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 14 Re cost-benefit Balance.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & NRC Entitled to Favorable Decision as Matter of Law ML20010G2271981-09-0808 September 1981 Comments on Susquehanna Environ Advocates 810831 Filing on Expert Witnesses.Filing Inadequate & Fails to Meet ASLB 810814 Mandate.Reserves Right to Seek Relief If Intervenor Files Testimony.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20010G2981981-09-0808 September 1981 Response to ASLB 810814 Memorandum & Order,Filing Qualifications,Identities,Subj Matter & Substance of Testimony of Expert Witnesses for Contentions 2,6,9,11,14,20 & 21.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20140B4381981-09-0202 September 1981 Answer to Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 810827 Filing. Applicants Oppose Several Motions & Arguments.Allegations Re Chlorine Portion of Contention 2 Are Moot.No Valid Reason for Addl Prehearing Conference.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010F4541981-08-31031 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7C Re BWR Core Spray Nozzle Cracking.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20010F5411981-08-31031 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 7B.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010F4741981-08-31031 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7B Re Cracking of Stainless Steel Piping in BWR Coolant Water Environ Due to Stress Corrosion.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists ML20010F4431981-08-31031 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 7C.Related Correspondence ML20005B7991981-08-28028 August 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Magnitude of Radioactive Doses That Will Be Imparted on Public by Release of All Isotopes During Fuel Cycle.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20005B8241981-08-28028 August 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue,Supporting Applicants Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Fuel Cycle Doses.Related Correspondence ML20010F4001981-08-27027 August 1981 Response in Opposition to ASLB 810814 Directives & Motions on Testimony & Public Hearings Conference.Date That Correspondence Is Required to Be Mailed Is Incorrect & Only Two Aspects of Contention 2 Are Listed for Consideration ML20010C9811981-08-19019 August 1981 Statement of Issues for Commonwealth of PA Participation,Per ASLB 810727 Memorandum & Order.Particular Interest Shown in Contentions 5,7(D),11 & 21.Related Correspondence ML20010C8631981-08-18018 August 1981 Renewed Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 17.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact to Be Heard.Applicants Are Entitled to Favorable Decision as Matter of Law ML20010C8671981-08-18018 August 1981 Memorandum Supporting Applicants' 810818 Renewed Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 17.Michaelson Affidavit Sufficiently Addresses Issues & Constitutes Adequate Basis for Granting Motion ML20010C9491981-08-18018 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Geniune Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 17.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010C0771981-08-13013 August 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Which Questions Magnitude of Facility Low Level Radioactive Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010C1471981-08-13013 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 2 on Source Term ML20010C9781981-08-10010 August 1981 Memorandum of Law in Response to Applicants' 810727 Ltr.All Parties in Proceeding Have Right to Present Rebuttal Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20010B3971981-08-0707 August 1981 Memorandum in Support on 810807 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Quantity of Rn-222 to Be Released During Fuel Cycle ML20010B4091981-08-0707 August 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Contention 1 Concerning Rn-222 ML20010B4041981-08-0707 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Rn-222. Issue Should Not Be Relitigated Under Accepted Principles of Collateral Estoppel & Stare Decisis.No Genuine Issue to Be Heard ML20009H2281981-08-0404 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7(a).Related Correspondence ML20009H2301981-08-0404 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7(a).No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20009G9951981-08-0303 August 1981 Memorandum Supporting Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 3.Assertions Refuted in Jm Vallance Affidavit & Some Assumptions Are Contrary to Aslab Rulings ML20009H0251981-07-30030 July 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 3.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & Applicants Are Entitled to Decision as Matter of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20009F8371981-07-28028 July 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 11 on Onsite Storage of Spent Fuel ML20009F8431981-07-28028 July 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 11 Re Onsite Storage of Spent Fuel.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists.Motion Supported by C Herrington & DW James Affidavits.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G8391981-04-0909 April 1981 Answer Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 810327 Motion Requesting Hearing on Applicants' 801223 SNM License Application.Motion Does Not Comply W/Commission Regulations. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19290G6301980-11-24024 November 1980 Request to Deny Applicants' Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Chlorine Due to Studies Demonstrating Relationship Between Cancer Rates & Chlorinated Compounds in Drinking Water.W/Certificate of Svc ML18030A4731980-11-0606 November 1980 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing ML18030A4131980-11-0606 November 1980 Statement of Matl Facts Re Absence of Issue to Be Heard,In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 on Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine ML18030A0181980-11-0606 November 1980 Pleading in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Issue Narrowed by Intervenor/Sponsor Via Response to NRC Interrogatories.W/Certificate of Svc ML18030A1621980-10-29029 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Environ Coalition on Nuclear Power Petition for Commission Review of ALAB-613.Intervenor Petition Sets Forth Nothing Which Warrants Different Conclusion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A1591980-10-27027 October 1980 Statement of Matl Facts Re Absence of Genuine Issue to Be Heard,In Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 16 on Cooling Tower Discharge.Sys Designed to Evaporate Water Daily from Towers W/O Radioactive Releases ML18026A3101980-10-10010 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Applicant Request Re Interrogatories on Safety Issues.Environ Phase Must Take Priority Over safety-related Discovery Per ASLB 791030 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A1401980-08-22022 August 1980 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which No Genuine Issue Exists to Be Heard in Support of Request for Summary Disposition of Ozone Portion of Contention 17.Max Ground Level Ozone Concentrations Near Lines Will Be Far Below Allowable Limit ML18030A1431980-08-22022 August 1980 Request for Free Hearing Transcripts Per 800725 Fr Notice Re Procedural Assistance Change in Adjudicatory Licensing Proceedings.Prior Denials Damaged Ability to Properly Litigate Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A4411980-08-22022 August 1980 Request for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 17 Dealing W/Ozone.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists to Be Heard.Responses Due in Three Wks ML18026A3001980-06-13013 June 1980 Response to Aslab 800521 Memorandum & Order ALAB-593, Requesting Environ Coalition on Nuclear Power to Inform Aslab of Extent of Relief Sought.Intervenor 800530 Request Must Be Dismissed as Moot.Certification of Svc Encl 1982-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
Thorns s J. Halligan Box
..,q qq g:Z3 Scranton, Pa. 18501 December 1$ , 1979 Honorable Richard S. Schwe1ker United States Senate rla ah ington, D. C.
Dear Senator Schweiker:
The enclosed document submitted to the Atom1c Safety and L1censing Board 1s also, inclus1vely, an urgent appeal for your assistance. K1ndly read the enclosure (especially Part I) carefully and take affirmative action at the earliest possible opportunity in the public 1nterest.
In your letter of July 16, 1979, you took notice of our "special concern over the Nuclear Regulatory Commlss1on's handling
~
of the licensing process for the proposed Berw1ck nuclear fac111ty."
You stated.,that you would have your staff "look into the matter."
Qur petit1on addressed to you and Senator Heinz (contained in our reply to the Licensing Board.) will certainly give you that opportunity con'cerning the Berwick atomic power station now under construction.
He would apprec1ate your full cooperation on this vital matter and hope to hear from you very soon. Your office may contact both
.'4s. Ire e t P.O. Box 377, RD l, Berwick,'a. 18603 (717-542-4900);
Nr. & Nr s. David and Nary K. Creas at 925 East 2nd gt., Berw1ck, Pa.
(717-759-l018), and. myself at the. above addr ess (717-$ 42-165$ )
Yours truly Cor re sponde Citizens Ag nst Nucl r Dangers gooioe ol 7g
~
\1 r
\ ~
'RfnHeb Wfnfee Aenmfe WASHINGTON, D.C. TO510 July 16, 1979 Miss Irene Lemanowicz, Chairrrar.
Citizens Aqainst Nuclear Daagers Rt. 1, Box 37 7 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603
Dear Miss Lemanowicz:
Iri view of the accident at Three, Mile Island, I fully understand your cor.cern over auclear plants currently under construction at various sites throughout the country, including .
those being built at Limerick aad Berwick, Pennsylyariia. Uatil we have assured ourselves that inadequate desiga and operating features which appareatly contributed to the 'Three Mile Island accident cari be corrected, it would be highly imprudent to go on building plants which may incorporate some of these same features. Re are in the process of reassessiag our auclear
- erierqy polx,cies, and the people liviag in the shadow of urifinished or pioposed plants are entitled to know whet,her they will be safe. Until we are certain that potential hazards to public health and safety can be controlled, we should approach any expansion of nuc"-ear development with extreme cautioa.
I have also noted your special concern over the Nuclear Regulatory CommissionIs haadling of the licensing process for the proposed Beruick auclear facility. I have asked rry staff t.o look into the matter.
Again, thank you for lettiag me have your thoughts.
Siacerely, Richard . Schweiker Uaited States Senator RSS:tg
December ll, 1979 STAT"" 0. AV.=". 1CA U <1TEDPZGUL.".TOPAZ NUCL" AR COi":.ISSION the .:.atter of PZ.;Sv'LVA':IA PO'GB AIvD LIC~T CO. Docket Kos. 50-$ 87 AL~~""=:=."Z~ EI "CTHIC COOP=-rATIVE, IttC. 50- 88 (Berwick Atomic Power Plant (Sus".uehanna Units 1 and 2 CITIZ~r. ',S AGAINST 1UCL" AR DANG."RS P TITION FOR A GOVZW~"~"EHT INQUIHY; HZPLIES TO DISCOVE~ OHD" R s I',OTIONS ON INT~",OGATOHI S B":-O~E T; E ATO'~IC SA'v'ND LICE'lSING BOARD FOR:)'AHD The Citizc'ns Against Nuclear Dangers (Citizens) state for the record that the order to reply to the di'scovery interrogatories in Part II below are submitted under protest. The Citizens will not enu=erate the lengthy reasons at this time, out will point out that the o ion pending before the Board pertaining to discovery filed by the Citizens has not been add.essed properly by the Board, nor has the issue been resolved, in apparent disreeard for due process of law.
- rom the outset of the proceedings on Berwick, the HHC has shown an obsession with trying to place the burden of proof for every contention on the citizen interveners. The burden of proof rests p.imarily with the Applicants, to show conclusively that the problems identified in the valid contentions concerning the Berwick atomic power plant can be rectified. prior to issuance of an operating lice~se. The Applicants are not cooperating with this ob)ective, in our gud~ent.
Like~ise, the NPC has thus far failed in its safety ove.sight
=-an"a e to pro'oe the Berwick operation in a diligent manner. For exa= le, the NRC staff has not submitted so much as one discovery
".'s+ion be ore the Board for the Applicants to answerer prior to vid n.ial hearin>s. Put the 'Hi?C has asked. several hundred
~
-..reasonable cuestions of the interveners. Incredible as this is,
-:.e Board has tolerated this by its acquiescence, and. also attempts to arbitrarily restrict or eliminate the First Amendment ri-"hts o t:".e interveners in their orthri~~ht and civic-minded intervention.
PA~T I
-he Citizens now urgentlypetition the United States Senators
=" o~ the C" mon;;ealth of Pena ylvania to oversee this fed ral proceedint= in he public interest by directing the General Accountin~
0:"ce (G.-'.0) o send a team of investigators to the premise o -he Per-.<<ck plant site for an in-depth inspection, and the recu'sition relevant documents, end to take depositigns from selected
.e=- loyees o contractors vendors and PPOL personnel assigned to
- -e. ~ick..here has occurred some very serious construe ion
'cie. c'es at 3err~ick uhich have oeen covered-up. The ultimate act of rrhich could possibly make the accident at hree .'<ile
~
look like a church picnic.
P.o ocol would dictate that the con"ressman from he lith
'tric.'f Pennsylvania should request any GAO inqui."y.;.oi~ever,
"'"..="t con-"res~~ n;>ill be resip.inp from the Congress in a few weeks.
A vacancy nd a vacuum will. be created. Therefore, as the at-large
=-" ected re resentatives o. the people of Pennsylvania, including
-'"..=- lith District, it is clearly your responsib1lity Senator Sc'",r.'eikcr and Senator Heinz to presently look into the N=.C
mi h ndlin~ of the Berwick licensing case, including the 1ntense
-lstreatment of the lnterveners...your constituents'This is a for=al petition Senator Schwciker and. Senator Heinz to use your
".oo" of lees to initiate a GAO investigation of the Berwick atomic power plant construction sit,e, and, the unor thodox and intimidating preliminaries to public hearings on Berwick conducted by the Z~C.
To be convinced of t'e legitimacy of your constituents'.
leva"..ces, thc Citizens suggest that your administrative aides arrange to meet <<1th the four separate intervener groups so-..ctime ln january, 1980, at Berwick, Pa. to take statement,s and ootain relevant data. ~ ach intervener has their own story to tell.
Secondly, Senator Schwelker and. Senator Heinz, you could eac'. urge the .!:-.C Commlsslo..ers to direct the withholding of any further res r ic..ive orders pertaining to the intervention on Berwick until i-our o flees reccivc and evaluate these constituent-intervener complaints.
PA'RT II Dn Cctober 9, 1979, the Citize..s submitted a motion to -'he
~os~ t:.at, stated in part "Citizens "-alnst Nuclear Dan"ers =.ove .or a protective order by the Board against thc massive amounts of discovery docu. entation demanded by the.N..C staff which is
'o ressive and inappr'oprlately burdensome'nder'.the Commission'
'es o= -roc dure." This motion <<as preceded, over a perioD of by various valid ob]ections to t'e Board from the Citizens and ot'.:er intervening groups, taken +ogether to form a litany o
"=-..'lzate oo1ections. The Board as of this date 'has not yet issued a de lnl ivc ruling concerning a protective order, and we recuest the =o. rd to do so presently. The Citizens believe that 'his motion holds p.ccedence.
The Citizens inadvertently omitted t'e inclusion of the Applicants in the Octob r 9th mot" on. Thcref'ore, the Citizens hereby amend that motion to read: "The Citizens .4gainst Nuclear angers move or a protective order by the Board. against the massive amounts of'iscovery documentation demendedby the HHC staff, and the Anolicants, which is 'oppr essive and inappropria ely bu densomc'nder thc commission' rules of procedure.
The Board' memorandum and Order on Discovery Notions, dated October 30, 1979, purports to instruct the parties to the intervent'on what to do next in the botched-up pre-hearing proceedings. This Order is also r piete i:i h code records. Unfortunately, the Citizens are not trained in the art o. cryptography and have not been 'ole o oreak the N.-.C code; anymore than they could decipher the citations in past, orders, of restrictive administrative NHC rulings at, past un elated hearin.~s in far flung corners of the continent., as well as, dealin-- <~1th such matters as floating nukes off the Jersey shore I
and. presumably all the shins at. sea.
The Citizens will nevertheless attempt to respond to the most recent Order. It may appear that the Board considers the voluminous discovery interrogatories relevant and meaningful. The Citizens are inclined t,o a<~r ee, but they should be answered, by the most cualified persons.
It is also obvious from the correspondence over the past year author ed by the distinguished and learned attorneys or the Applicants end the g>C legal office that, the Board can expect almost non-stop objections at public hearings from them I
challenging the credioility of whatever interrogatory responses hat are filed by interveners based mostly on their limited second-hand research.
F Therefore, in order to assist the Board in conductin- public
- ".carin"s fairly and expeditiously the Citizens are oroposi..g that
."..e Board utilize its extraordinary power of subooena and oose every a- licable specific discovery cuestion formulated by the HHC s aff s-..d t.he Rpolican s o be answered by the aopropriat,e oualified government officials at the state and federal level ~.ho have first-hand expert knowledge of these matters in the course of their government service'. These swovn deoositions'ccomoanied, by T
c'"..nical supoovting documents, when aoolicable, should be obtained in ti~e to be duolicated and. distributed. by the Board to all parties sixty days prior to the start of oublic hearings. The'Citizens will acceo. +hesc expert factual resoonses in lieu of t'eir own replies ani as +he basis for their testimony and accompanying backs ound, information. The Board should also call as witnesses at, the hearings so~e of the persons whose affidavits they have obtained. This a" ternative should satisfy. the N~C staff and. thc Aoplicants because they will obtain thc all ged needed information concerning their i..terro.",.atcvies and be assured of what to expect from thc intervener s ior to the hearings.
Th oersons the Citizens wish the Board to interview at gover..ment exoense of cour se, are tho e persons, such as an exec +'ve divector, who have direct resoonsibility for the envi"on .e...al or health and, safety polic1es and ovograms of their a=e. cy of government. Xn addi+ion, those persons in these agcncics 0 in the course OL t heiv duties, performed the actus 1 tests, surveys, and comouter modeling, etc., or prepared on-line reports.
r=levant to the inter rogatories, should definitely also be
':e-..-'i. icd and interviewed. under oath.
The agcncics to be contacted for this in ormation incl~ "e,
~
out not necessarily liziited to, =r e the folio;iing:
Co~mon:chealth of Penn svlvan ia Covernor' Energy Council
- 2. Governor ' Of fice of State Planning 6: Dev.eloonent
'Pa. Department of ".ealth
-ureau of Laboratories and Eoideaoilogy 4~ Pa. Department of hgriculture Bureau of Aniz 1 Indust,ry Bure u of Foods and Chemistry Pennsylvania Emergency -!anagenent Agency, Pa. Deoart~ent of Environmental ".-.csources Division of Hazardous ilast'e 'nagenent Division of '"ater Quality Bureau of Radiation Protection 8: Occuoational Health Divisions of Environmental Radiation, Radiation Control and. Occu ational Health.
7~ Pesnsylvania Fish Commission Bureau of:lat,er ';)ays
- 8. Pa. Public Utility Cozaission Bureau of Conservation Economic and =nergy Plenninj
- 9. Su "ouehanna River Basin Commission Federal Com~issioner--U.S. Secretary of Interior
"=overnors of '.le;v vore, Pennsylvania, lIaryland (State Cozziscioners)
U.S.."rmy Coros of Engineers Baltimore Regional District Office U.S. Secu ities and Exchange Co zission
- 12. Federal Energy Regul tory Commission U.S. Decartnent o .nergy Oak Ridge ><,ational Laboratories Argonne ~!ational Laboratory
- 14. U. S. tTuclear Regulatory Commission
=.esident Inspector Ber~~ick Aton5.c Po:~er Plant Division of Site Sa ety and Envi'ronnental Analysis Div i s i on o f P ro ) e ct >!ana gem ent Light ';later Reactors Division of Systems Safety Containment Sy stens Bran ch Div" sion of Reactor Operations Insoection Reactor Sa fcguards Licens'ng Branch
~
he Cit zens hereoy move the 'Board to adopt the aoove racon..cndation to subpoena the responsible government officials to r" spond to the a plicable interrogatories, rephrased if necessary so as not to slant the questions, in order to obtain ob)ective and authoritative expert ans~rers that will be admi siole oe.ore the Board. The Citi"ens urther move the 'Board to convene a s ecial pre-hearing conference on this subject at ';lilkes-Bar re Pa.
or 3er:(ick, Pa. in January or February, 1960, to arrange the details for the taking o depositions, and setting the guidelines, etc.
The Board may ~:ish to include additional cuestions of its o~m to speci. ic contentions at that time. The conference could also c" arify any other issues outstanding concerning the forthcoming publ" c '.. ea rin~ s.
Respect u" "~ submitted Dated: Decemoer ll, l~o7~o- Thorn s J. Ha ligan Correspondent
~ I r TI"F IIC-'+" 0 F c" R'I'ICZ Petition or . Government Inouir; Re lies To,Discover Order; I'.otions On Interro,"-.stories Before The .-'.toxic Sa.etv And L".cen in Board have been served on the folio>rin~~ by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this ll day of December, 1979.
t Ccz;ni sioners: Dr. Joseph Ecndrie, James M. Cutchin, IV, Esquire James F. Ahearne, Peter A. Bradford, Office of the Executive Legal Victor 9ilinsky, Richa rd T. Kennedy, Director U.S.."nuclear Reculatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'rfa shington, D. C. 20555 Washington, D. C. 20555 1
Charles Bechhoefer, Esq., Chairman Atomi c Sa fe ty and Licen s ing Jay Silberg, Esq.
Board Panel Shaw, Pittman, Potts and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trowbridge Washington, D.C. 20555 1800 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 Hr. Glenn 0. Bright Atomic Safety and Licensing Dr. Judith H. Johnsrud Board Panel Co-Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission Environmental Coalition on Washington, D.C. 20555 Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue Dr. Oscar H. Paris State College, PA 16801 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Hr. Thomas H. Gerusky, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bureau of Radiation Protection Washington, D.C. 20555 Department of Environmental Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Atomic Safety and Licensing P.O. Box 2063
~
Board Panel Harrisburg, PA 17120 U.S. Nuclear R gulatory Commission Washing ton, D. C .. 20555 Hs. Colleen Harsh Box 538A, RD84 Docketing and Service Section Houqtain Top, PA 18707 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates Atomic Safety and Licensing c/o Gerald Schultz, Esq.
Appeal Board Panel 500 South River Street V.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702
.Washington, D.C. 20555 Ho. oraole Richard S. Schweizer Honoralbe John Heinz United States Senate
~Fa shin;.:ton, D. C.
/
Thomas J. ha libyan Co espond e n