|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML25008A0582025-01-16016 January 2025 Comment (27) of Connor Poggemann on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML25008A0572024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (26) of Jonathan Scott on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML25008A0562024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (25) of Yue Jiang and Adam Stein on Behalf of Breakthrough Institute on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML25008A0542024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (24) of Henry Sommer on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML25008A0532024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (23) of Robert Sarvey on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24351A2382024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (50) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0612024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (29) of Julie Mansfield-Wells on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24351A1902024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (44) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2332024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (46) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2352024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (47) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0522024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (22) of Carole Hisasue on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24351A2372024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (49) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2492024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (52) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2432024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (51) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24352A1022024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (56) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2362024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (48) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2532024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (55) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2042024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (45) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2512024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (53) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A2522024-12-16016 December 2024 Comment (54) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24351A0382024-12-15015 December 2024 Comment (43) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0502024-12-15015 December 2024 Comment (21) of Lucy Jane Swanson on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24350A0022024-12-14014 December 2024 Comment (42) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0492024-12-14014 December 2024 Comment (20) of Francene Mcclintock on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24350A0012024-12-14014 December 2024 Comment (41) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24348A2442024-12-13013 December 2024 Comment (40) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0482024-12-13013 December 2024 Comment (19) of Tori Gibbons on Behalf of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger Llp, on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24348A2432024-12-13013 December 2024 Comment (39) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML25008A0362024-12-12012 December 2024 Comment (17) of Lucinda Calvo on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24347A2452024-12-12012 December 2024 Comment (37) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24346A0092024-12-10010 December 2024 Comment (36) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24346A0082024-12-0909 December 2024 Comment (35) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24346A0072024-12-0909 December 2024 Comment (34) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24345A2152024-12-0909 December 2024 Comment (16) of Steve Hucik on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24345A2072024-12-0909 December 2024 Comment (15) of Ted Miller on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24334A0192024-11-26026 November 2024 Comment (13) of John Bailey on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24334A0202024-11-26026 November 2024 Comment (14) of Eric Meyer on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24347A2462024-11-22022 November 2024 Comment (38) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24329A0022024-11-21021 November 2024 Comment (33) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0432024-11-21021 November 2024 Comment (32) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0392024-11-20020 November 2024 Comment (30) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0412024-11-20020 November 2024 Comment (31) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0332024-11-20020 November 2024 Comment (12) of Capitol Weekly on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML24326A0352024-11-19019 November 2024 Comment (26) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0362024-11-19019 November 2024 Comment (27) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0382024-11-19019 November 2024 Comment (29) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24324A0522024-11-19019 November 2024 Comment (25) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24326A0372024-11-19019 November 2024 Comment (28) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24324A0502024-11-18018 November 2024 Comment (23) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS ML24324A0492024-11-18018 November 2024 Comment (22) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Draft EIS 2025-01-16
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
,&c*./---
.3 J';* 4;/
7 "-,.
J I,
FT:,
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03
DIABLO CANYON IS NOT A SOLUTION TO REDUCING ATMOSPHERIC CARBON Diablo Canyon will prevent California from succeeding in its goal to achieve carbon-free energy of 33% by 2020. Energy analyst Mark Cooper makes the case that, "Nuclear reactors old and new are far from a necessary part ofra low-carbon solution. Nuclear power, with its war against the transformation of the electricity system, is part of the problem, not the solution."
DIABLO CANYON IS NOT NEEDED TO FILL CALIFORNIA'S ENERGY DEMANDS The California Independent System Operator oversees energy distribution throughout California by managing the grid. CAISO has expressed concern that there may be times when there is so much variable wind, solar and other renewable energy being scheduled onto its system that the other generators, such as nuclear, who will have to adjust to accommodate it, will not have the flexibility needed to do so.
NUCLEAR IS OUTMODED "PG&E's focus on "standalone" energy sources is outmoded and unrealistic. First, PG&E focuses on "baseload" generation by a single source. Second, PG&E is not recognizing the increase, flexibility, and resilience of distributed power generation and is promoting outdated, inflexible "utility-scale" generation. PG&E's assumptions are outdated because of the ongoing transformation of the electric utility sector. As one prominent financial firm that specializes in analysis of the electricity sector, UBS, put it, "Large-scale power generation.., will be the dinosaur of the future energy system." They are:
"Too big, too inflexible, not even relevant for backup power in the long run." While UBS ties the shift to the spread of battery technology, other major firms see the shift being driven by the development of technologies including solar, wind, efficiency, and the increasing ability to actively integrate and manage supply and demand."
SEISMIC DANGERS Diablo Canyon is built adjacent to 13 known earthquake faults, and it may actually be built directly over the Shoreline Fault. No one - not PG&E, not the US Geological Survey, not the Independent Peer Review Panel - no one actually knows how far east the Shoreline Fault extends. For PG&E to claim that it does is both dangerous and fatuous.
TERRORISM Almost 15 years have come and gone since the events of September 2001, and America's civilian nuclear facilities remuain unprotected against a terrorist attack of that scale. Instead, our civilian reactors prepare only against a much smaller-scale attack, known as the "design basis threat,"
while the NRC fails to provide supplementary protection against a realistic 9/11-type attack at Diablo Canyon.
PLUTONIUM Plutonium is the most toxic substance in the world. It is only produced through a nuclear reaction. Its half-life is 24,000 years. Plutonium can be transported in the atmosphere usually when it is attached to particles in the air. It can be deposited on land or water by settling or by rain. Plutonium can stick to particles in soil, sediment, and water.
FORCE-ON-FORCE DRILLS Because of industry complaints, the NRC already has reduced the number of Force-On-Force exercises per inspection cycle from three to two, and is proposing to reduce it to only one by 2017.
In exchange, the NRC will give more credit to licensee-run security drills and will observe one drill in each inspection cycle. This is a slippery slope toward the industry's ultimate goal: to take control of the process and eliminate the potentially embarrassing FOF exercises altogether. Even worse, the i:,
with an apparent eye toward weakening it even further.
DRY CASK STORAGE The dry casks selected for use at Diablo Canyon are just 5/8 inch thick stainless steel. Lower quality canisters are being used, choosing profits over our safety. NRC documents provide data that indicate thin storage containers can fail 16 years after a crack initiates.
LEAKY CASKETS ONCE-THtROUGHt COOLING SACRIFICES MARINE LIFE PG&E, for many years, provided state water authorities with skewed data on Diablo Canyon. The data showed that the plant's intake of billions of gallons of water a day did very little harm to surrounding marine life. PG&E's conclusions were based on the unscientific formula that the amount of sea life drawn into the system at the intake port could be accurately measured by the amount of small fish and other organisms at the outflow of the cooling system.
EMBRITTLED.
Diablo Canyon's Unit 1 is on the NRC's list of the most embrittled pressurized water reactors in the U.S.
Embrittlement happens over time as the steel in the reactor pressure vessel becomes weakened by intense long-term neutron bombardment from the radioactive fuel inside.
As the reactors age, they become increasingly vulnerable to "pressurized thermal shock risks." Rapid severe cooling plus sudden re-pressurization could shatter the weakened reactor vessel and allow intense radioactivity to escape.h