ML13310A749

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Proprietary & Nonproprietary Review of Licensees Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11,B-60). Proprietary Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML13310A749
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/1982
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Dietch R
Southern California Edison Co
Shared Package
ML13310A750 List:
References
TAC-42516 821130, IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, LSO5-82-11-008, LSO5-82-11-8, NUDOCS 8212070310
Download: ML13310A749 (3)


Text

November 30, 1982 DISTRIBUTION1)

Docket'- w/encs. 1 & 2 Docket No. 50-206

1) NRC POR 11-088
1) Local PDR ORB Reading*
1) NSIC DCrutchfield*

Mr. R. Dietch HSmith*

Vice President WPaulson - w/encs. 1 & 2 Nuclear Engineering and Operations JCalvo*

Southern California Edison Company OELD*

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue ELJordan*

Post Office Box 800 JMTaylor*

Rosemead, California 91770 ACRS (10)*

SEPB*

Dear Mr. Dietch:

1) NTIS
1) Resident Inspector

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL 1hh?\\V RC)

SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1 This letter transmits the Safety Evaluation Report for the Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at your facility. This evaluation is based on your response to our previous Safety Evaluation Report, dated November 4, 1981 and subsequent submittals dated December 15, 1931, March 10, April 7, and June 7, 1982. This Safety Evaluation Report VY presents the results of the Environmental Qualification Review for Safety related electrical equipment, exposed to a harsh environment, in accordance with NRC requirements. We request that you provide your plans for qualifi cation or replacement of the equipment whose qualification has not been demonstrated and the schedule for accomplishing your proposed corrective actions to us within ninety (90) days of the receipt of this letter.

As indicated in the conclusion section of the Safety Evaluation report, we request that you reaffirm the justification for continued operation and 4, K within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, submit information for items in NRC categories I.B, II.A and II.B (presented in the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report) for which justification for continued operation was not previously submitted to the NRC. We suggest that the clarification set forth in item 8 of Generic Letter No. 82-09, "Clarification Questions and Answers on Environmental Qualification Requirements," should be considered in your justification for continued operation.

The Technical Evaluation Report (TER) contains certain identified information which you have previously claimed to be proprietary. We request that you t

inform us as indicated in the proprietary section of the Safety Evaluation Report whether any portions of the identified pages still require proprie C

tary protection.

We will withhold the TER from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b), until we hear from you.

OFFICE~ J..)... T.h.e...t.J winar.

J

~*v a noz

.e.........

of.......

oF IC )....

.9..

...0 9C iV 0 0- f t.....

"S 0n o En :........

... 2................

.SURNAME

...ather-s..listed..f rOam RC..P.DR..th~ral gh..SERB..rece, ved..Enc.....l...D1.-

DATE R.,,.DOCK RECORD NRC FORM 318 (10-80>

n PDR L.RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-980

Mr. November 30, 1982 At your option, the staff will be available to discuss the findings in the Safety Evaluation Report as augmented by the Techncial Evaluation Report.

Questions regarding this letter should be directed through the NRC Project Manager for your plant.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely, Original signed by/

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

1. Safety Evaluation Report
2. Technical Evaluation Report Proprietary Information (withheld from public disclosure)
3.

cc w/o TER:

See next page OFFICE R

5 D

5 DL:RAB SURAM

.K Y.50....

.. al a.....C De.

hfval-d.......................................

DATE ** * *

/.82.

....... /82.....

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981--33-960

Mr. November 30, 1982 cc Charles R. Kocher, Assistant General Counsel James Beoletto, Esquire Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 David R. Pigott Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600.Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94111 Harry B. Stoehr San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U. S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 California Department of Health ATTN:

Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit Radiological Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX;Office ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative

.215 Freemont Street San Francjsco, California 94111 Robert H. Engelken, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, California 94596