NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13211A261)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14
ML13211A261
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A261 (57)
v • d • e


Text

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2'-24o3 -74T 00. Equip. Class"2 /,4A//( - ez6L4$ 2/

Equipment Description z9/'.:,'- Pu 4 71 0/f D0,4y 7-,q ,,<i Location: Bldg. 9 r'7 Floor El. ZZO " Room, Area &?elý A/i2o Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 'T<-7 ?/,/ 1,.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YP NC UC N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NCI UC N/AC-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y* N- UC N/AX U' 64.be~o covvSer~od To Rk'f77~
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YPQ NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A/ __

_ __- o7A 00: ' 14R. 2.0 7/ r//7,6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJX NCI UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

" Enter the equipmcnt class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 243 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment [D No. 2- 04o9- - .O;:?Equip. Class" 7"A,4-K - C4A, £ Z z/

Equipment Description P1I9E el54 F'/e' O/f- - 4 11)0 7,,4

' /k Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y/ NEI UCI N/Al]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y;9 N] UEC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 N i]U0 N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YJNO NCU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;K No U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NVO AlE Evaluated by: 7767-04 v 1`01P/fRS Date: t5,2 Z~-Frn-k

< C-4>

PAGE 244 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 I1 I

PAGE 245 of 433

qACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

° I Uro__ _

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 246 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: c) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. A-d' 6; Equip. Class" *, e , -. ,W V *t,-

Equipment Description AJ $CT - LCvJ*hA )5c /)C'V' Location: Bldg. /*) . (. T Floor El. 06 Room, Area 9 40C2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) r.s 4 C-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NUj of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

/

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[I NO UO N/A-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y*/NO UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y@/?ND UM N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UD N/A,//

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YLVND UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,

<KC-3 >

PAGE 247 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. a2-C -J446 Equip. Class' 2 7- T .- .. C.6 i vlN Equipment Description IV5 CT 13 t I*oJIA c A1*

I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIN- UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM//N" U" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YWNO- Ur N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y06/ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YMS'Nn U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/i. p_ V<

Evaluated by: F Y" Date:

"" ' ýC" 4 C4 >

PAGE 248 of 433

ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 249 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 or A

PAGE 250 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No. 2 -'-S -'0 6/ Equip. Class'2 fXe Equipment Description kIa A N'M/ A FiQ Th I-LA,-Z-X.z,0J V-44'VL:

Location: Bldg. A 0, Floor El. I I '-3 Room, Area D /13 1

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 54,4 TOA/

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraize

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YK NE UE- N/AE
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yto'NE U- N/A0 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y1NE1 UE- NIAE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE: NEI UEr N/Ak (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

S,7 y

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YVrNED U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3*>

PAGE 251 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 - Fr5- o Equip. Class'_ (01, Equipment Description RAI', iPOAVA T ,o2 to /AevijAZ.o V.-Lt/I Interaction Effects

7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YY*N' UQ N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO UF] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NEI U- N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YW"N- U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could '"NO U'-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.I W.. WI mA Evaluated by: Date: . L l 29 7~oI?

< C-4 >

PAGE 252 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2P A

-(205) 0 PAGE 253 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 254 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 4 - Psj-lt -t 5 Equip. Class"2 I2- In4taoue.,. (a.cis Equipment Description "LJ,,ht StlJ,.,

St.rh Cpft4r.l,I rdhw, Location: Bldg. C 4rgl Floor El. 190L-0" Room, Area IL&.PO p Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yg NEI UE N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[J NEI UE N/AFE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YUQ NE UE N/AE[
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YW NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-( C-3 )ý PAGE 255 OF 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2--F5L-I2.05 Equip. Class"2 19- 7ns*um#^a n.ni EquipmentDescription E,.lv..Iock Flo,. Sk.mih CoA4taiJ fu;lcii, Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIN NEI UE- N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEN NEI UC] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YfM NOI UtC N/A
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI N[I- UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[O NCI UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) okN.Vj 0401 :  ;.oec o-1q-53-10y 4"or 5 LC.

No~e 02.: Thi5 -tvC w,,ot#a*4 n Sp*,~r5ZazJui ~...

Evaluated by: S"s. S/e/..-- P" 1#. 2, Date: 6/_______ _3

( ,I /

< C-4 0 PAGE 256 OF 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V PAGE 257 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.1110 PAGE 258 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-- FiT- O/3p Equip. Class12 _ f ý -[ý'5 ý/";Wl ell ( 94k TPnlimnmpnt f"pe~erintinn Cc? 4 PIoi~J Location: Bldg. 4 X FloorEl. I4J"" Room, Area 4. C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 13."Iy" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N/

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y6 NE UE] N/AE]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y-j- U-- N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y*N-E] UE] N/AE]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/ADY (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y~ 4E]-NE UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )

PAGE 259 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z - FT-- I6P Equip. Class' 2 I Y /l f X. ( kr Equipment Descrintion C-CP '4 -O Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YONCUIOU N/A[C
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEj U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[*N- U['] N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yg`NUEC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NC UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • ý5 - -- Wq2 l u4dt (IA rofZ ,* C Evaluated by Date: C'5/'/f J/ 2

< C-4>

PAGE 260 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 ItinU ". t PAGE 261 of 433

9 A!ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONID 2,0 PAGE 262 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- T O 1

  • Equip. Class12 _ a( 1145TR41MC-Afr R-44jtS)

Eouinment Description r-HP, A F-ý01'j Location: Bldg. ,=U4 FloorEl. /12 - Room, Area RlD 11.3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yý'NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YX'NE UE- N/AE-
3. Is the anchorage frec of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y4dNEI UI- N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YVJNO U- N/A-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YiNEI U0 N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

CYS -DPMRO17 jvýLo Cx 5-IP P O)9J VI r.3.o

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/ý`NEI U13 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 263 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-' FT - 0/o6 $ Equip. Class 12_

Equipment Description 4/-h& A- raeko Interaction Effects 1

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y' N[" U0 N/AC-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y* NO UC N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? ¥* NC:] U'I N/AC-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y('N[- UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Otber Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NCI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: _ #V Ik, l'. 1 Date: 0L2-.

-< C-4 >-

PAGE 264 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P PAGE 265 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 266 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-FT- - L quip. Class" Equipment Description 5i P /I F.10,,

Location: Bldg. kJ,_) Floor El. j 3o Roo. m, Area /A- //. /

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) & 0Aa.o'A,-/"l 4 d,,41."

//

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N211 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YX NE UE3 N/AE
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y% NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y5 NE- UE- N/AE-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/A["/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

NoT /AS, -5o7.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX4 NEIUE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

,#7 t, I.EL,, fT'P"/* AT T"/"7 "Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >,

PAGE 267 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. o &

2 - F'7"- 0/Q Equip. Class 12 Equipment Description Sift0 '4Lrtto Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YK NDI U[] N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y;* ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,Fritnk Ytic rl~/ Date: bL/y-91 /

lzW1P V~~:-y A~" ~ (

PAGE 268 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 269 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (b ,U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. FT- 1T Equip. Class1- ( Zrwj & lZ*-i~ts)

Equipment Description .(.W F io0 TTrcsN4+-t1 - rC*'veX A Location: Bldg. A'0K Floor El. 19_" Room, Area ______

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YK'N' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y 'NEI UC1 N/A-1
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yý'ND U0 N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YWN- U0 N/A-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y4NEI UEJ N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

CK ppyP M027 s ,er. 9.0 1,6,,l~(kol To0 I, MG 9, vtr, 3.O 30YVM Lac',4

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YK NEIUC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 270 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic-Walkdown Checklist (SWCj .

12 Equipment ID No. FT- I37 Equip.Class Equipment Description (l(. FIoy Trant ,1r, - T ,i tA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by neoby equipmentor structures? YWNC UC] N/AC]

. Areov eq C i

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NCI UC] N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YA/N"] UC] N/AC]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NO] UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could yA NC U"]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-FOIL A. &W',*WjA-t5-Yg CW 1r)5 '--0if'-01qoA.

Evaluated by "/ý' /M'A'j W1,111 (%got\ Date: ' -1 a~74 i-'O/~o~~9,q$Ay

< C-4 >

PAGE 271 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.lq PAGE 272 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 273 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. *- 'T-SV Equip. Class' 2 19 (L,$ste, /0k(d5)

Eauioment Descriotion A"J(X FI 1NOW J o 'O 5,6e Go

. I - FNovir4onas(/r Location: Bldg. AI]X Floor El. 119" Room, Area P 10Z Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ?WtMdIt+A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraue I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y1INc of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y4NEI U0] N/AE-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface 4 NEI U(( N/AE3 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? 4 NE[1 UII N/AI]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE[ N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

k0AI' V 5O' so > ,l .

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNE] UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter tlhe equipment viass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 274 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K- 5"5- Equip. Class' Equipment Description /Ak/b r-WF 0 1v 5Ih4,1 Gen. L -. Fl*tv. Tirmahre "

Interaction Effects

7. Are
8. soft targetsqimndsrbtotyses Aresovehaf free from impact by nearby equipment eln or ie structures?

n ihig YK NEI U[:] N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YV NDI UD' N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NDI UD' N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y4 ND:] UD]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NO COYA"jf Evaluated by:4~ 1~I1Ak~~ik~~' Date: ý3 ý.oij

ý<C-4 >"

PAGE 275 of 433

9 0 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 276 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 277 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2 FV 06 10 Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description Kk?~ P'~OW A /1i4,lcA oi0 le Location: Bldg. , V-kQFloorEl. /L-9I1; Room, Area OE-C P.s Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) .

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NV of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NE] UE] N/Ao
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI UE N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE] N/A2 "//
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/Amý-ý (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NE] UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

PAGE 278 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. I- r-V a 10: Equip. Class' 3-Pniuinmen t fl,'egcrrntinn It/tg. P 4P A A4tjr-fC/* H', 1.."

P-11inment Descrintion Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZINEIU0 N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ffN ýU EIN/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YDN0 ON/E

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y2[' ] IUE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S~~~O /ar-~eq4 h2 Evaluated by: ~ ~ 4 p  % {j/ Date: 0, 1- t7 01 f /

< C-4 >-

PAGE 279 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONV PAGE 280 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 281 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-RV- OIqO Equip.Class'__

Equipment Description Ccf, A SGft* Gn, k chaQ;ng Soeho,'j of Va.vt Location: Bldg. PI)( FloorEl.. IqS Room,Area RA'W03 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) A',d c Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE] N/AE:Tý
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/A <"

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/AD"*
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 4 YO-E UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipmenl class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3>

PAGE 282 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .2 liv-0 t9O P Equip. Class'2" Equipment Description -CC-P A- Scfe~f G(V-oi 506~f0;j, Ofp \oVaC.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ"N- UO N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ýNEI UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO/N[ UE- N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/N rU-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO/NC UC1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Oo~~~p ('%Loo.51w ivn rlwf weta (e5elv[A m~omjrv+ oý 4 15CGIWI~ L7' orýO foa-a, S6zc concf1.

5e 2-H4V-315"2 4rc &%-C.

Date: -et-i/7 4 /2.

1 Evaluated by:

PAGE 283 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONV S

  • p~4 , ~

S PAGE 284 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-4V '-/2 'i'S" Equip. Class 1 2 0 "pýe~"

Equipment Description Pu* A eF-hi

,Aj L 1 i26*t-*-'

Location: Bldg4-/ --re-_Floor El. 2-141 Room, Area _/ 02...

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) L ,

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y['] N*d of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I C a-f-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEr NEI UE] N/A93'
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UE N/AIF' oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UIE N/Ag'
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/Az/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[/N- UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equiipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 285 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- I14V - / ?-Oc S'" Equip. Class' 2

0 AL Equipment Description 11-T) &T kiaj e p&.*-V e-Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y*I]UD' N/AD Yj"/ND UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y[2"NO U- N/AD

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[!R/NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y D/N[-

U"i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

, IV-o V

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4&

Evaluated by:. Clyjc. -ý F-,k Date: of/Ll,/4 PAGE 286 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.llý PAGE 287 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status.: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- tAV"*,U27 G Equip. Class 2 O(*fO4ft)

Equipment Description G- ý " Orz-ý-t=.. _ 'x-y oac- rx*,j\ ý- O Location: Bldg. SU. 3 FloorEl. 27-.' RoomArea (Z (z S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N*,K of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? A NE U' N/A"
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface . NO UE N/AA oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE-- N/Aj
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UO N/AX (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of It NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 288 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. - - 7 Equip. Class' 0(0 ,kr)

Equipment Description " o _ Ac Z'*L-( G*C- M * )

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y NEI UFI N/AE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI Ul" N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? X
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NO" Ul- N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free I* NO- UO-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Yý Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

< C-4 >

PAGE 289 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONq2 PAGE 290 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2- I+V 1300SA Equip. Class02 7 Equipment Description 5V 8yýaz KWo.4 V-5G I Location: Bldg. AVX Floor El. __-0_ 1 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ný of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y- NEI U- N/Ax
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U[- N/A; oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U- N/Ar
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UC N/Av (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YVN- UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L19- UMED VtAl ,

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 291 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. 2- N+V- 13005-A Equip. Classu Equipment Description L4'hOG( (515V ýyms '40 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[) NEI UQ N/AM
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yq NLE U- N/AQl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Ye NE U- N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YodND U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y!VNEI LT adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N~ONE.

Evaluated by: r~,"16~ irki Date: , 3'!201 913 /Zo/Z

< C-4 >

PAGE 292 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 293 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 294 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y (N, U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. * /T(q6

- Equip. Classt l2 ( (Ml 1"*-J4/-W i /.

Equipment Description 4Fv t/ r,79 S6-7 Location: Bldg. 4&"-SAeCV Floor El. (qf_____f Room, Area <A"/.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) /AA(_, ]mf/O //,/A1LAAJg,-

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one 7 YO Nrix of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UF N/A
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NE UE- N/Ae oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete nea- the anchors? YO NE UE N/1A
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE U[:E N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y% NFE U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >-

PAGE 295 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 2- -It-1(-q1 1 Equip. CIassU  ;(Mb, /- 4 ,hJ*'AJ O,-/,J -

Equipment Description 6 FY l/ F-OA" S(' I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NX UOI N/AD c~c...wo.*,.* 1.*-* ,,-,4-,. * .>". (':A0 5-ozqq3),
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N- Uti- N/AD-and masonry block waUs not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI)(N- U[ N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free V§NO U' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý ND Ut'l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-*- _-I14 -1/- 5z- Z7 Evaluated by: KC e Date: '5 2x

< C4 >"

PAGE 296 of 433

9 AAACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 297 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 298 of 433

9 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION PAGE 299 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_6_of_14&oldid=2636381"