ML13003A259

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 16 of 20
ML13003A259
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A259 (42)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of Statusi:~

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment1D.

No, 1-1501-A7-004-000 Equip. Class 1 10 -Air Handlers Equipment Description CTB Cooling Unit'& Motor Location:

Bldg. CTB .Floor El. 2S ' Room, Area A-ar 604, f-, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

CVI Cotoration Instructions for Completing Checklist This chedklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the folloWing questions may be uied to,iecord the results of judgmentsand' findings.

Additional space is provided at die end of this checklist for documenting other corrunents.

Anchorage.

1. Is the anhorage configuration verificaItion required.(i.e.,is the item one YJ.Nf of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free: of bent, broken, missing.or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free ofcornosion that is more thanivmild surface oxidation?

YOcI"NnUO N/AC.YO NO Ur N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concretenear.

the anchors? YO NO UO N/A[-L 3'a~e re 'A!~ f 4 r~ -ti / d 5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note:.This question only applies if the item is one of the,50% for.which an) anchorage con figuration yverification is rnquired.)

Y&N[1 UC N/AC 6. Based on the~ab.0v atichorage evaluations, is the anchorage free OF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter theUcquipmenti cass,name from AppendixB:

Ciasses.of E'quipmente PAGE 588 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2: Status::O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (sWC)_: EquipmentID No.

400O .Equip. ClassW 10- Air Handlers Equiptmenrt:

Desc'pion

.. CTB Coling Unit & MOtor Tnteraction Effects 7., Are soft targets free fromn impact by nearbyzequipment or structures?

[Nf1 UC N/AC 8. Aremoverhead equipment, distribution-systems, ceiling tiles and ighting, Yo'NC TIC N/AC1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto:the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibiIlity to avoid damage? YM"NC UE1 N/AC 0. Based on the above seismic inteiaction evaluationS, isequipment free :Yn INC UET of poientiallyadverse,:seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse. Contditions.

/S.11. Hav&, you: looked for and f6und~ no ozhefi seis~mi c condi tions that coul Id Y" NC POC aversl affet the safetyfunctionsof the equipment9 ,ad I rse p~fef.i P#e&t a Commnenits (A~dditiorfal'pages mayý be "A4dded asn00eces~sary1q Not, AýEvluaed y'.Date:ý T/_Date: 44__4d__c____

PAGE 589 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONR PAGE 590 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO I 66 PAGE 591 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 2 Status:fo N U Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC), Equipmnent ID No. 1.WHV-O442B

-Equip, Class' 8 -MotorOperated and Solenoid'Operated Valves EquipmerintDescription'.

Reactor Head Letdown Line Control SOY Location-Bldg. CTB FloorEl. 184'-". Roomn, Area Near Column .. Manufacturer, Model, Etc..(optionaf but reconmcndeed)

Tar.et Rock Corp.Instructions for Completing Checklist:

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below~each of the folloWing questions may be used to:rec6rd 1theresults of judgments and findings.

Additional space is providedat the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora e 1. Is thei anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] j of thle 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or looe hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anliors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the itemi is 65ne of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificdtion is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Y] NEI U-- N/A YE] NE] UE]I N/A[/YE] NE] UE] N/A2-"/YE] NEI UE]Y ZNE]3UE]Enter the equiplient clas nahebfrin Appendix : Classes of EquNip)ent.

PAGE 592 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Status:. N' U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 1-HV-0442B EquiP. Class, 8 -Motor-Oneraied and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipmient Description Reactor HeadLetdown Line Control SOV Interaction Effects: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y¥ N UC[L N/AU 8. Arcoverhead equipment, distribution.system;, ceiling tiles and.iighting, Y NCU U N/AUJ and masonry block walls not likely tocollapse' onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y N[ UC N/AU 10. Based on the above seiSmic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y N UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions if.. Have you.looked for and found no ot!herseismic conditions.htat could *Y01NE] Un adverse ly affeci:the safety functions of the equipment?
  1. , 'e ..?J- ~7 ~ra h~ -b4~______~~~-ý 4,Q / ýrJ / :C ___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatcd by: 0.'1 , 6Y/pn Date: ,'./J+/-4 AtoDate: I PAGE 593 of 668

' ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOON.PAGE 594 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONR PAGE 595 of 668 9 AT CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO4 PAGE 596 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 ofi Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist

.(SWC)Equipment.!D No. 1-HV-0780 Equip. ClasSI 7 -Pneumatic-Oper'ated Valves Equipment.Dcscriptibn.

N6rma4 CTB Sump Pumrp DischarQe AOV Location:

Bldg. CTB Floor EI Roonm,Area Near .Column 112 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Anchor/DarlingValve Co.Instructions for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may beused to document the resultsof the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below cach of the following questionsmay be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided att the end of this checklist:

for documenting othercominents.

Anchorage I1. Is the anchorage configuration.-verificaion required (i.e., is the item one YEn N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring uch verification)?

2. Is ttieanchorage free of bentbroken, missing or loose hardware?

YB I41 riE] N/AI]3. Is the anichorIage free ofco-rrosionp that ismorethan mild surface oxidation?

YO~-`<[6 E] N/AE]4. IS the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near'the' anchors. YE] NnE] uIrNE A 5. Is thewanchbrage cofifiguration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This q Uestiin only applies if the item isone of the 50% for.which an anchorage configuration yerification isrequired,).

6. Based on"the above anchofage evdluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seisrmic coInditions?

YE] Nn UE] NIAlaP<--YBINE]UE]I Enter thfeequipmenit class nare: from Appenidix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 597 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of:2N U Seismic Walkdown ,Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1-HV-0780 .Equip. C.assL 7- Pneý hatic-Operated Valves EquipmenttDescription Normal CTB Sump Pump DischariegA0V Interaction Effecis 7. Are soft targets free from impact by. nearby equipment or structures?

YEIN] U1] N/At]8. Are overhead equi'prment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,Y U]C NIAC]and masonry bloc.klý etik to collapse into ,the equipmenft?

It , OP Ah-/ e 4 *ft

  • GA.T.9. Do attached lin'eha* e adequateflexibility to avoid damnage? Y[g"Nr] Ut] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations;jis equipment free YUt].of pdtentially adyers"eseismic interactionbeffects?

Other Adverse Conditions, 11. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions, that could Ya-T] N U[t],adversely affeci the safety. functions of dthe equipment?

~1 C~ fl e/ v1(.C d6 A Ijp, -Comments .(Additionial pages.nmay' bepaddted:as-necessary)

Evaluated by: Y4____0__Date: Y/k j'Date:'._PAGE 598 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1*0 PAGE 599 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 I PAGE 600 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I.HV-10943 A Equip. Class'" e Equipment Description N Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, eeiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to :collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO UO N/AD Yo, NO UO N/AO YN NO UO N/AO Y0NO UO Other AdversefConditions

1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Commeitts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N6 meA ~Evaluated by: CA %- 6 Date: too /1 z<0C4 )>PAGE 601 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I-H Equip. Class's EquipmentDescription M N itr 10Qe I/SWT Interaction Effeef.7. Are softtargets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling. tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely'to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 Nn Un N/Ao Yo, NO UO N/AO Y] NO UODN/AD Yo NO, U Other AdverSe Cond tiofs 11. Have you looked for and found no-othei seismic coiditions that could YXI ND Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages:may be added as necessary)

Nowt Evaluated by: ,A.tO Date: .... o i t<C-4>PAGE 602 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 30 PAGE 603 of 668

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 604 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 2 Status:: nN U Seismic Walkdown.Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No,, 1-HV-1974 Equip. Class' 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Oerated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCW Retum From .RCP Coolers MOV ....Location:

Bldg. CTB -floor El. 198'-0" Room, Area R4& :(M"-

I Manufacturer,,Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Fisher Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown, of an'item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each bf the following questions inay be,used to record thl results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided ,at the end of this chiecklist for documenting other comrmnents.

..... ...... .. .. .Anchorage L Is the:anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemone o Y NYE /of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verificati6n)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hard~ware?
3. Is the anchorage free of coirosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the aichorage free of visible cricks in the concrete near the anchors?i5. s the anchorage configuration consiStent with plant docuiriditation?(Note: Tlhis queistion only applies:if theitem is, on6 ofthe,50%

for whichan anchorage confiuoration verification.is required.).

6. Basedon the above anchorage evaluations:

is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NEl UE N/A j YE NE UE YE N.E UE N!A[/Y[E NO UE WAR/YKe/ UE'-E~acr die equipment class name. frqm Appendix B:,C lasses of Ekluipia nt.PAGE 605 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-HV-1974.

Equip. Class, 8 -Motor-Operated and.Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description, ACOW IReturn From RCP Coolers.MOV Interietion Effects'7.,, Are soft targets free from impact by nearby, equipmen.Ior structures?

Y"N[ U] N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, .distribution systems, cei!ing tiles and lighting; Y[(NE UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely, to collapse onto the equipment?

0 / J#r 'd 6;t~e:dsq,~

4,/t~9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismicý interaction:evaluations, is equipment free of potentially addverse seismic interaction effects?YE'NEJ UO NAD Y ND uD Other. Adverse Conditions adeseyafet he s~ifetyfui~ctionls of the equ~iip , ni?41- OZ/ Cý )% jj%"44/e YW/ND U5]Cornments (Additional pages inay be. added~as hecessary)

Evaluated by;Date. ./Date:&IýAA/ o7s/ /7 L PAGE 606 of 668 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION PAGE 607 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Seismic- Walkdown Checklist (SWc)ý Status 3 N U Eqiuipment D No. 1:H V-8t154 Equip. Classi 7 -Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmenttDescription' Excess Letdown. isolation AOV Location:-

Bldg. CT8 Bo l. 8!O Room, Area, N~ar Oolumn # K'I'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended):

..Copes Instructions f'or Completing CheCklist This checklist may be used to docume.nt~the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment:on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage:

1. Is'thb anchorage configuration verification required (i e., is, the item one: YEI N of the 501% of 'SWEL items requiring such verification

)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, brokenimissing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more:than mild surface oxidation?

~~~~EB C4t49f 690 +/--~t W Y940 UOI N/AO Y UD N/AD 4. Is the.anchorage free, of' visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEA UD1 NI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documei/tation?

,(Note: This question only applies if the item is.one of the 50% for which: an anchorage configuration verification.

is required.)

6. .Based.on the above anchorage evaluations; iS the anchorage'free of potentijlly adverse seismic conditions?

SEnrther ih:quipamnti cli~sS name -f'irom Apperlii~x B: Claisses of Equipmfent.

YEI NEI U0 A,-Y2-eiUCE hor "~9~?~PAGE 608 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a of 2 Stat Us:&(i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmenft D No. 1-HHV-8154 Equiip. Class';7 -Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Excess Letdown Isolation AOV Interaction EffeCtS 7. Are, soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8, Are o.verhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not l ikely to. collapse onto the equipment?

9; Do lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on theabove seismic interaction equipment free of potentially:adverse seismic, interaction, effects?YVONO UED N/AD Y3"E)U0 N/AD]N UD N/ADOiher Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could. UPDEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Coinments (Additional pagesimay be added as necessary)

Evaluate~d by: lift, 1 C Date: PAGE 609 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO cvcs TDW EXCE S LTON SOLAllON IC~ ~PAGE 610 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I PAGE 611 of 668 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 612 of 668 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 613 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet iOf 2 ,,Status-MN u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) a Equipment ID No.. 1-H V-8875D Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment.Description Accuimulator:4 Nitrogen Vent-Solnhold Operated ValVe Location:

Bldg. CTB .Floor El. 184'A' Room, Area Near Column# /#Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Taroet Rock Corp.: Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may b~e used to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown of an item Of equipment on the.SWEL. The space beloW each of the fo1owiiig 1 questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is proVided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorate 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required.(i.e., is the item one YE] N[MI*of the 50%'of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchoragelfree.

of bent, broken, missing or loose, hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatis more than mild surface oxidation?

Y-I NEI UIO YEI NO UFO N/Af;4. Is thd-atihorage free of visibie.tracks in the concrete near the anchors? YOI NO1 Un N/ACO 5. Is the anchorage configuration:.consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question onlyaapplies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage-configuration:

verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations,.isthe anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO l NO U3 N/AO yel1o TCO'Etrthe equipmeat~dass name fromn Append4ix B: Clas:ýes of Equi Ipmenr., PAGE 614 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Status:0 N U seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlID N. 1-HV-88,75

... Equip, Class' 8- Motor-Operated And: Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Accumulator4 Nitrogen Vent-Solenoid operated Valve.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft-targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribuiion systems, ceiling tiles~and lighting, and masonry-block walls, not likely tocollapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid darnage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations; is equipment free of potentially adverse~seismiic intefaction effects?Y 2/o UnNArn YdflfF UC N/AOI M ULJ N/Afl YI[/ND UO NiAD Y[VNF-J Un',Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked forand found no other seismicconditionstdat could Y/NQI- U-I adversely affect the safety fuhctiolns of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedy:by:

Date: Date: PAGE 615 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOON1.0 PAGE 616 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 Of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmeti.DP No. t-LT-O4590R Equip. Class' '18 -Instrument Racks Location:

Bldg. CTB Floor El. 184'"-0 Room, Area 4490205 V-2/z¶"/_

t, 2'Manufactureri Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Rosemount_

_fustructions for Cornpleting Checklist T-his, checklist mayhbe used to document theiresults" of. the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The, space below each of.the fotlowing ptiestion's.ay baused to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additionalspace is provided it the end of this checklist.Ifor documentinrg:other comments.Anchoraee

/'1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i e., is the item one Y[ f-N of.the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missingor loose hardývare?
3. Is the.anchorage free of corrosion that is moriethan mild surface oxidatiion?
4. Is the an'chorage freeof visiblecracks in the concretenearthe anchors?5, isthe anchorage configuration consistent with. plant docutnentatioh?(Note: This' uestion only applies if theiterm is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)!

PA VIIW'(r.S.'

IX 5Py-PO QS-5,_,4ý t p .o' cXSOPM927 goo.q9 6. Based on the above anchorage'evaluations, is the'anchorage free~of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y-N'Nc UD N/Ar Y['Nr UD N/AD Y ND UD N/A j/Y[92(Nn Q N/AD Yr/ND U 1 Enter thc quipmenct class narna fromn Appbndix 13: Clases of EquiipienCr PAGE 617 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment

11) No. 1-LT-0459Rý Equip. CIass 1.8- .nstrument Racks Equipment Description Pressurizer Level'Interaction Effects:7, Ate soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment orstructures?

& Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely tocollapse onto the equipment?

.9. Do attached, lines have. adequate flexibiIity to avoid damage?1"0. Based on the above sefsmic interaction evaluationsjis equipmentfree of potentially, adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4 NO, UEI N/A Y[/NC UC N/AO Y¥"Nn Uo N/AO Y[41 UN Other Adverse Conditions Ii. Haveyou looked for and fotd.,no other seismic conditions that.ould adversely affect the safety functions of the' equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

Evaluated b~: K~-/'4-~ //r ~1~- 4S/0-Date. __/_'Date: PAGE 618 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 619 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I 6f 2 Status: &Y) N U Seismic'Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD N0. 1-151 1E7-002-000 Equjip.,Class!

10- AfirHandlers Equipmient Description CTB Reactor Cavity Cooling Coil Location:

Bldg. CTB F-l*oo El. RoomAra A 14A1 _Manufacturer; Model, Etc: (optional but recommended)

Corp.Instructions for Comping Checklist This checklist may be.used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of cquipment on the SWEL. The space'below.dach of the following questionis may be used to.r~c6rd die results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided atlthe end o'f this checkli~tfor:ddocumenting uther comments.Anch6rage 1. Is the..anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e.,js he ietem one oftihe.50%

of.SWEL.iteimisrequiring-such vectification))?

2. Is the anichorage fre of bnt4, broken, missing 'i l'ose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatis mnore than::mild Surfae, oxidation?

-:4. is'thie nchorag( freeo of visible cracks inthe concrete nearthe anchors?5. Is iheanchorage configuration consistent, With planitdocurnentation?(Note: ,This question only applies if the: itdm1isrin of the 50% for which ananhchorage configuration Verifiiaion is required.)

OtA~.vc~r /i K Oqg~ .. 4 fr','4 ,fe T -t Z3-.:z,!6. Based on the aboye anchorage evaluations, .is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic cbnditibns?;

Y R"NC UC1 N/AO Y NINUO NiAX/A0 Y NC UC N/AC YRtNiU ýN/AC I'Entcr dif. equi nicasnm rm Appepndix B: ICIasses ofjLquipq~ntr.

PAGE 620 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a of z Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-1511-E7-002-006 Equip. Cla~ss 10-Air Handlers Equipment Description CTB Reactor Cavity Cooling Coi....... ....Interaction EffeCts 7.. Are softftargets free from itnpadt by niearby'equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution sys(ems, ceilling itiles and lighting, and mar0iihryblock walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?0,. Eased on the above seismic interaction, evaluations, is equipment free of potehtially adverse seismic. interactilon effects?liD' U N/AD YEKN UC N/ADI Y.DINJ: UE N/ADI zuD Other Adverse Conditions ti. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions thai could Y[ND U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmnit?

Comments (Additional:

pages may be added as-necessary)

.r , o57 c~+ ~ ofe&, Evaluated by: 06 6 Date: Date: -, b z PAGE 621 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 622 of 668
  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 623 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO.00 PAGE 624 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet. I of 2 S tatuls: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment.!D No. /-iJW--F 0/ -0"'Equip.

Class' / c A ..> /-4ý /"Equipment Description (27[: C ,,_,8 C.17av \,. ..Location:

Bldg. (-F, FloorElj ,d 1 P t RoomArea ./4 /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconimended)

Instructilons for Completing Checklist This~checklist may be used to document~the results of the Seismic Walkdown-of an itemi ofcquipment on the SWEL. The spaced below each of the following qfestion's may be used torecord the: results ofj'udgments and findings.

Additional -space is provided attherend ofthis checklist for documenting other commenfs.Anchornec 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (iie., is the itemone YC Ng'of thel 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

21 Is'the anchorage free of bent, boken, missing or loose hardware?Y93'NC3 UC? N /AC 3. is the anch'orage free of corrosion that ismore than mild surface Yff NCT (in NhA0C oxidation?

4 -Is the:anchorage free of visiblecracks in the concrete near the anchors, Yt"NC UC NIAC-5., IIs the vilchoragje cifiguration consistent yitt platt d~cumentation?"*(Note: Thi's questionl oply apphe$s if the item is one of the 56% fat which, an anchorage.configuration verificationijS required.)

6. Based on the above.A.corage cVyluaiions, is the anchorage free of.potentiaJly adverse seismic conditions?

YC0 NCEl, UC N/Af_"K Y212NO tUEC Entet thc qtiipmwnt class nam:k froisp App~DmBiR Ckissc 6f E~quipment.

PAGE 625 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet:2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)E .Si -v-e v&,'CEquip.

Class'/Equipment Description

CFG'/x / ,(?u. /Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.-Ae overhead cquipment, dstribution systemis, ceiling tiles aMd lighting-and masonry blockmwalls not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?

9, Do attached lines, have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free ,f potentially adverse seismicinteractioa eff6ects?YIjiNE] UEL N/AQE YO'NQ: UL WN/AD Y[3'NL Ur N/ArL YEi'Nn UEL*Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have youlooke.d forand fouind'no other seismic conditions thatcould YIDINO:] UL3'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Co mmernts (Additional pages.may be added as necessary)

Al Evaluated by-:i" C 7,< >PAGE 626 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 627 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 628 of 668

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0........PAGE 629 of 668
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A259&oldid=1544970"