ML13003A252

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 11 of 20
ML13003A252
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A252 (45)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 1-k.S1taltus:

Y U, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (swC)EqqiprnentID N. b'e Q~,t.47 Equip. Class, 2 2 4 //r, ~~EquipfeitDesciription A4^1,44_A( ' , i--T " ,, L_ /N4P4 .7 Location:

Bldg. '.. Foofr El. 2Z20'. Room, Area ,'/O/Mahufacturem; Model, Etc. (,6tional bibrrecommended)

Instructionsifor Completing Checklist This 1checklist may be used to. document thexresults of the Seismic Waikdown of aný.item of equipment on the SWEL, The spacebelow each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judginents and space is provided anthe end of this checklist for documentirigother comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YJX ND 2. "IS the of bent, broken, missingbor loose hardware?3 Isl he antchoiage free of corrosion that is more than Mild surface oxidation?th&eIaiehorage flee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.?YVT NEI UE N/AIl YA NEI UE] N/AC Yo~ NO UE3 N/AE1 5. Is the ,achoran-h Ifi ..ation consistent with plant documentation?

YEc] N,[ UE; N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item.ris one~ofth&

50% for: which an anchorage configuration (nificati6n is required.)

6. Based on the'above anchoragej evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N4 UNE p'ýotntially adverse seismic conditions:?

2Eatier thc~equipmenrits dnafne fror'n .ppeniiKixB:

Cla~scs of Equipmnent.

PAGE 375 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment"ID No.'- ) 47 Equip. Class'2' /1'KI/'.rsR11'7/6 7 OM. JAd/175, Equipment Description iae, tsWC/ 1 f-e pist ý /,A1n .p,4' " InteractibonEffects

7. Arcsoft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution, systems, ceilinhg t Ies"ad ligh.ting,ý and .masonry block wails not likely to collapse onto equipment?

.9. Do attached lines have adeqtiate flecibility to avoid damage?10. ]Based on abov seismic interaction .elvUatiohs, is equipment free of potentially adyerse seismic interaction effe&ds?Y%1q0'U0 ýN/AC3 Y.0 N[) MC N/A[]Y$] NE U[] N/Al]Y. NE U Other Adverse Condii~orns 11.,ý Have youjlboked for and foundno.other seismic conditions'thai could YO NE UOl adv-0rsbly avfffect the safety frnctions of tie-equipment?

Comments (Addifional pages may, be added as necessary) 5~ 1- 2~1o3- ~4- L~e~3 AR 4P Ct/,f-4-£ i6ctA'7 Dat0? Z- ýý<C-4>PAGE 376 of 668

-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 377 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 378 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2'$Stati: N Q Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)'E~l~ii'pmenat ID No.

Equip.. Class!I9~Equipm&nt DescfiptiOni-n L , , 'Location:1w a." Ekg Room.-Area f10z.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional buttreconmmended) instructions for COnmpleting Checklist This hccklist may be used todocument the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item.of equipmenton the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be usedto~record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of checklist tfor documenting other comments.1. is .te anchorage configuration required (iLe. i's the item one: YE-D ND ofthe 5,0%) ofSEWELitems requirilng such verificatioin)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing otrloose hardware?3. Is the, anchorage free of corrosionjthat is morethan mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the. anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?.51 Is the afichorage coinfiguration cofhsistent'witliplant d6cufiientatio'n?9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one-of the 50% for which. an anchoratge configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the abbve anchorage.

evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismnic conditions?

YE] .ND U[i N/AD]" YO NDI UDO N/ADl YEI ND] U[]i N/AE]YEI NEI UD 12 Enter the equipmncht class name, fronm ppAendix B: Classes of Equipnmet">0 PAGE 379 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipm-ent I01No. I- g -Q~ 3 -L 4 1 Eqip Xjagss'ýH EquimetDecito 1-4.,A ~Interacti~n Effects .(Sec- Suoc.. dc4Ac W,..a/,i.'

7. Are soft taigets free from impact-by nearby equipmentorstructres?
8. Ar6e:oerhead ecquipmet, diIstr ib utiopn systemsý,c.diling tiles and lightihg, ,and masonry block walls not likely'to collapse onto the.equipment?
9. Do attached lines have to avoiid damaige?10. ýBased on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentfree of potentially adverse seismic!.interaction effects?XY1 NEI UI-- N/AO YElNO UO N/AC YC NC] UCJ N/AC1 YI NEI UCL Other Adverse Conditions
n. 'Ihave you looked fort ad found no other seismic conditions that could YA, NC] UC1D adversely affect the safety functions of, the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated, by: 102'r, výDate: f 6 PAGE 380 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 381 of 668 07ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 382 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1. of 2 Status:j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmenptID No. .//786-O.

r3, /45 Equip. Class"'4 Equipment D. scripti I r6el /S ZO47 p FAe Locatiorvý -Bldg. .Floor El. 220 oo, re/A~B /3,&,'i Manufacturer, Model, Etc; (optional but recommended)

InstruCtions for Com'pleting Checklist This checklist maybe'used to document tlikesults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each. of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmbents.and findings.

Additional spac'is provided at the end of this checklistifot dbcumnenting other comments.AnChorage i. Is thie, anchorage cnfiguration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring suchiverification)?

2. ls the anehorage free of bent broken, missing or loose hardware?'3; Is ,he anchorage'freeof.:cbTosiohi that is more than iild surface oxidation?
4. Is the 'v vsible ciack§ in the concrete near the anchors?5....:Is the a~ichorag~n~.igutation consistent with plant doctimentation?(Note: ThA question only applies if the item-riis one of the 50% for which an anchorage nfigratien3Vgrficatith;iS requiied.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the'anchorage
fre- of potentially ,a'dvqrse serismic conditiohis?

YNEI UE .N/AE3 SNIE U[E, N/A[]YA NEI L[ N/AE]YFV Nn UE1 N/ IAD YX'NEjUE1 12Enftei t~he i\izei lass e fi-arncirAppendix-.B:'Classes of Equipmnent, PAGE 383 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shieet 2 of 2 Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC)-Equipment ID No. P ]8 r F-/'5 Equip; CIass" 2 14 E~quipment, Description i Yi/~6A ~ Xý6 A'Pk'Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by.nearby equipmerntor struciures?

Y NO. U: N/AE]8 Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling'tiles and ightfing, Y cEl UE1 N/AE1 and masonry likity to cflapse the 9.. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avdid. damage?10. Based onthelabove seismic imeraction evaluations, is equipment free of poteniiklly adverse seismic interaction effects?YNl NEI N./AEl YMNOl U0j Other Conditions I]. Have...yofi jookcd for aid found nii otiei, setstric coihdifions'that could NM UE adversely affectbtlesafetyf..unctions of the equipment?:

Comments (Aditifional pages may be added as :neessary)

--hu S 1//7' "% .... b r ..EXTEA/T.~ 'it~ o E ... .... ..... ... .DRLj C tU/ /%AA8X.5WeCr rH-' 6 4Wv 6/At v7S. *4-.4 7-b,9E ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~V me5 T/4PfdAc~~~50C7?C~ui

~6,'x~e Evaluated by: ......A411A W'9104LIVyor Date:_( C4>)PAGE 384 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO I PAGE 385 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 386 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0,N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmrentl-Y- -o. Equip,. Class 1 2 1.Equipment Description dt.f4 M t 3 8coiie.x AU- { eq,( 'OYI.° ... ... .Location:

Bldg. ________ Floor El. ___0_ Room, Area. i£ Gt Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (6ptional but recommended)

Instructiong for Completing Checkli:t This checklistmay be used to.documentthe results of the Seismic Walkddwniof anitem of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record theresults ofju,,dgments and fmnings>-Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for d cumehting, othef comments.Anchorage i. is the anchorage configikation:

verificationiýequired Q.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requrjingasutch--verifiatio~n)?

YWNF 2. Is the anchorage free-of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage freeof corrosion that is more than: tmild. brface oxidation?

4ý Is the fr"e of viible con-crete near the anchors?5. Isj he',n.chorage with:pant doc I umentati6h?ý(Note- This question only applies if~the itemis one of the:50%for which -an anchorage configuration verifi.ation isreduiited.)

YX Nn Un N/A[l YNEI UO N/AFJ YI(NOE Un N/A[l ywN'E3 N/AE3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree ,of Y) "NE- TJ[potentially adyverse coniditionis?, 0 2 Enter the equipment class name' from Appendix 3: Classes c"f Equipment.

<"C-3 '>PAGE 387 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet -2of 2 Seismic .Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equ!ipmentID No. " 7 -3 ;qui. Ciass , , -Equipment Description

.fA.J iYmg jap~clgx 41-+ Pie, I oiIIP'I.nferaction Effects S.Are sofl target§ free from iimpact by niearby equipment or structures?

8. Are bverhead.

equipment, .distribtitibf systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached liriesbhave adequateflexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the. Aboveseisrhii interaction evaluations, is equipment free of p6tenfially adverse seismic interactibn effects?Yk NEI UD] N/AD Y"NDNE UDj N/AD3 Y¥(ND UD N/ADI¥YWNDI UD other Adverse Conditions 1,1, Have you'looked for and found no otherseismic conditions thvcould Y NEI U adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EV~lu t~ed by: V\d,4{Q WAsv~Date: 8 t~PAGE 388 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO S4 0 CON.... ... .... ..PAGE 389 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 390 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 afneet. .L. ot,2 St ttK: 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)t EquipnentiDNo. o7 -" Equip: Class" 2___Equipment Description

.-1... AT T sA .Location:

Bldg. W Flout0El.

9o Room, Area .Manufactfrer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconunended)

Instrutio ns for Completing Checklist This checklist, may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown..of an. item of equipment og the SWL, Thle-space below each of thelfollowinig questios may be used to record the results jfjudgmcnts and findings.

Additional space.is provided at the end of this checklist fdr- docunienting other conunents., Anchorage I., Is the; anchorg .coniguration ri hfic aNOtioi.i of the 50% of SWEL1 itcffis requiring such verificat (iit)0 2. Is the anchorage flee of bent, br6ken, niissing ofloose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is .nore than mild surface oxidation?'

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks intle concrete near the andlors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent withplpta documentation?(Note: Ths qui&rstidfnoy applies if the item is one of the 50%for which an anchorage configuration veriificatikn is repquired):
6. Based.on the dbove anchorage evaJluadions-is theanchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NO: VI NIAI]YýNI] UI] NTIAI]Ygf NEI] UI] N/AI]YX NEI] UI]N/I YNI I]E 12 Bntor the equipment class liame from A~peadix B: Classei of ~quipm ot.t03 >PAGE 391 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'Sheet2.b6f2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment.ID No. .LIc 7.Equip. Class1 2 4 Equipment Description Effects interactiOn Effe'cts 7. Are soft targets free from, impact by nearby equipment or structures?-Yd NR Uý N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiljhg tiles and Ilighting, Y NEI UE] N/AC3 and masonry block walls.not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9-. Do attached lines have.adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Bdsed onlthe above seismic interaction eva.luations, is equipment fiee of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV NE:. UEI1 .N/A[I: N1 IJF-Other Adverse Conditions U. Haietyou looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'i NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Commients (Additional pages may be added as' necessary)t 967 Y,3 .A , Evaluated by:-- Ac~' JZ. I-khn~ 4~s .Date:. " A a.<ý C,4 >PAGE 392 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOVO PAGE 393 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet: 1of 2 Starus:O'N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

0 U3017 Equip. Classf 2.c0(f !C Pcut5J Equipment Description A vx 4 1'ayW'1'/

P44?_______

Location:

Bldg. Conerti FloorEl 200 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recmnmended) f~qt44e~ cdsroA~ ~Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each oftrhe following questions maybe used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space'is provided at the end of this checklist fof documenting other comnments, Anch..ri...

1. Is-the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item Ione of the 50% of SWEL iteems requiring such verification)?

Y'NE]2 Is the anchorage free Qf bent, broken, missingodr loose hardware?3. Is the anchdrdge6free:,of corrosion that is morethanr mild surfiadee oxidation?

4. Isthe horagefree fvis'b'ejaras lihe cbncrete near the anchors?5;, i's the anchorage con figuratioin consistentwith plani:d'outmentation?(Note: This question only applies if thejtqrn is one 6fth~e, 50% for whichisn anchorage todfigiration venifidaiion isrquired.)
6. Based on the above ancltdrage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially ad seismic condition.?UR N/AE YO NEI U0 N/ACa Ye Nn uoEN/AC]YX N11 UL.2 ther the cqUiplllellI class nalmieff CrI- Aopenldi'X
ClIass sý6f.E Iipmeni:lt.

<K'c -3 PAGE 394 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 S'eismicqWaIkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID.No. _"_,____________

Equip. Class '2 9 Equipment Description Aux!ba0y I e1M y -olref Intera:ctioh Effects 7. Are soft targets frce frbo irmpact.by nearbyzequipifnet or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distributi6nsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, andmasonry block walls not likely io collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines. ihave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Blased on the above seismic intdmraction Oahiati6ns, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YNNIUn N/AC]UE N/AC ,YKNNr lUor N,/AEC y 1 NFI UC1 Othe r Adverse Conditions It. Have you,looked for and found no other seismic conditions that cotld Yý(NCt adverselyaffect t6e saf6y finctions of, te Commenits (Addiiional:pages may~be added as necessary)

Noviq, Evaluated by- QW4 W'v_/~ U/7~st Date: ~i22~"< C-4.PAGE 395 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 396 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 397 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IIlI, -Oil Equip. Class"-2.. 0 Equipment Description Ld 9 oft I Location:

Bldg. c r Floor El. Lou- o" Room, Area a -A .5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmnents and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoranre 6s.C Swc.. Ab.L4.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NE] UII N/AO YE] NOI U' N/AU YE] NOI UE N/AU YO NOI UO N/AC YE] NO] Ur-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 )PAGE 398 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet,2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID:No. tvlt, 11 O EquiP'; Class1U Z'i P-nn1;renfl:,esrintinn

'-I Interacdion.Effects (SC..C._JA c.. cI A ek2- q h 11)7. Are soft targets free from, imp*act by nearby equipment strutures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighfiing,*and masonry block'walls

'nbt likoely to eollýseonto the'equipment?

9. Do atiached'lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage9 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potential.y adversepseismic interaction0 effects?!YO "NO UE NIAF-YO NE UE' YEI NEI UE N/AE, YE NE3 UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have'You looked fbor ahd found no other conditibns that.could YJ NEI UE1'adversely affect the safety finctions ofthe equipment,?

41 5vdvi 6:.a $ oraw 'I m, 1i' "D ,.om met c 'As , )c V%,4c (dd ev C i4fs m% d n4s Commnexts (Additional pages. may, be added~as necessaIY)-rWS N -i. c` rr. ~ 100._ Oc~a 4.o p 0 Evaluaied by:.Date: j ! ..PAGE 399 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO*PAGE 400 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 401 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 402 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:-DN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment'ID No. LL -O.. Equip. Class" ...... _,.__ ,...Equipment Description-

.... _Location:

  • B1dg. , Floor El. z e '-Romin, Area Manufacturer, MOdel, Etc. (optional but recommefnded)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistjmay be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdo.wn of an item of equipment onl the'SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist forndocumenting other comments, Ancorag~1. Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (i.e;, is the itenmione of th.e 500% of SWE'L items requiring such verification)?

YE(NEI:2. Is the anchorage, free of bent, broken; missing or loose hardware?'

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than:mild surface 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the. concrete near 5, Is the anchorage configuratnibn onsistent.with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the'item is one of the 50o foir.which ;an anchorage configurrmýatm Verificat!on is-required.)

6, Bas.d.,nthe above ichora g.cvaluatiJon, is-the:anchorage'free-of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[L/NE0 U0 N/Ai/YE NOEUE N/AE YE'fNE1 UE N/AE: Y NNE] UE1 N/AE YEf1 NE VE1'.Enter th equipmenmdclass name from Appendix B: -'Equiprmunt

<C-3 )PAGE 403 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetr2 of 2 Seismic-Walkdpwn Checklist (SWWC)Equipment IDNo. I:i' , (J 2 Equip.. class' .Equipment Descriptionm S- -.er. /Interaction Effects 7. Ard s6ffttargets-free.fdrm impact by nearby equipmeri'tor structures?

8. Are overhead equipment,, distribution systems,-

ceiling tiles~and lighting, and masonry block walls notlikely to collapse onto the equipiment?

9 .Do attached lines have adequate flexibility4o avoid damage?, 10.. Based on tb&above'seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effecs?YO'NL] UF2 N/AZJ/: Y7'NEj Un N/AD: Y/NIUD N/AD YEBKlE:J UD Other Adverse Conditions R t Ive you .looked for and found no other seismicconditions that could.advcrs~ly.

affihctt4e safe~ functions 6fthd equipmient?:

YN -DQ Comments (Additional pages.may.

be added as necessary)

Evalate.by:..~ /: Da te: _ _ _ _ _ _K> ,-... j ' r I ~ ~,< C-4 >PAGE 404 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOVO PAGE 405 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 S8tatus: CNy U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. '~1'I\--Oe.

Equip.Class.'

20O Equipment Description

5F S6 ý... 7 .- A I'Location:

Bldg. FloorEl. 2. o '-6o R"dir, Area At m!a-Maniufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown of an item of equipment-on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the'results ofjudgments andc findings.

Additional space is provided at the, end of thischeeklist for documenting other comments.Anch0brage .-:or. ca-ked j , Z-1. Is the anchorage conifiguration verificafion required (i.e., is the item;one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NFE 2. Is the arichorage'free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?:

31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatissmore thanminld surface oxidation?

4., Is theanchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note:This questiononly applies if the item is one-of the 50% for which an anchlorage configuration verification is required..)

6. Based on the above anchorage, evaluations, is the anchorage free&of p6tentially advetse §etsmic:conditions?

YE NEI UE, N/AE, YE- NEI UE1 N/AE-1 YE[ NEI UEJ]" NIAE YE NE UE N/AE YnENN. UEJ 11 Enter thb equipment class name from'Alp'p'endix)

B:,Classes of E'_quipmnct.

< Cm3 >PAGE 406 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismiic WalkdOwn Checklist (SWC),Eqluipmenit .IDNo. \\ Equip. Class'" 2O EquipmentDescription 5~ F Noe~d A ToAd vQ Interaction Effets. (S-icc- 5WJG. dolei: /'1iz7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby eqquipnqent or 8&. Are~overhead eqUipme-nt, distribution systems, ceiling, tiles and lighting, and masonry block wallsynogt likely to collapse onlto theequipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on0the above seismic interactibn evalua.tions, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction:effects?

YE NE UE N/AE YD NE UE N/AE YO NEI UE1 Ný/AEI IYL Nn UE1 Other.Adverse Conditions

11. Have-you looked for and found no other seismic conditionsi that could Y;j NEI UL1 a yaffect the safety functions of the equipment?

4 4 4 VV.e 1ý ~L~f%I 0M 4' i + 'W 64. b ý 14' C ' c Comments, (Additional pages may:be added as necessary)

Date: 1O0ai< C;4...PAGE 407 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 408 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 7<PAGE 409 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 410 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Slhe-# 1 of 2..Status: n N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. o p6-oO Equip, Class ..1e,.,;+j Equipment Description

__£/.) t 6 " 4 Locati6n:

Bldg. Floor E1. 7a Room, Area AVO10,5 054AIAX-V4

?ZG651rvAU CAVC.Manofacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but:recommended) lInstructions for Complaing Checklist This checklist may be used to documentthe results of tlie Seismic Wakdownof an, item.of equipment on the SWEL. The space~be.iow each of the, following questions may be used to record, the results ofjudgments and'findings.

Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for dmcumrntingo.thercoiiments.

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,,is the itenione NE o the -.-E- h50%ofSWL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage fire of bent, býoken, missing or l6ose hardw'are?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaice 6xidation?

4, Is te anchorage free of visible cracks in the.'* onIrete nnear the'.a.ichors?.

5. Is the. anchorage configturation consisteniwith plant documeniationp?(Note; This question only applies if ttheiitem.isone of the 50% foranichorage configuration verification is required.)

iNE3 ULI N/AEI YNEI UE N/ALZ YgNE] UL- N/AE7'YVNIE UE NI.AE fl~<~V #Avfl~ i'~/Z , ~ I"-' -~ )4 Q -A 6. Basednoh the.above anchdrage evaluatiois, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic: conditions?

UFJ1 V`,Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Class6ý bfoEquipdncnt.

<.0C3 >PAGE 411 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2 Seissmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID NO. *Zq- : ' Equip. Classu I / /y Equipment DeScniption Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free. from impact by nearby equipmentor.

structures?

Y 0 UD7 NA 8. Are overhead.

equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, ON UD N/Ar and masonry block walls not likelyto c 6lapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentffree of potentially adverse scismic interaction effects?YV' NEI UDi N/A KNDI UD Other AdverSeCon ditions, 11. Have you looked for and found nn' other seismic conditidns that could NDO UD adveirely aftectthe safety functibois ofth'e equipment?

Comments Additionai pages may be addedias l~ cessary)Evaluated by, * .. -A 4 / " jý'Date: __________

< C-14 >PAGE 412 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1*0 I PAGE 413 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet Iof2 Status:0.N::

U Seismic Walkdown:

Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I- -Eti.. ClassC 2 ___________

EquipmentDescription V L Vt- R 4tx 1=uWR Location:

Bldg. _ D Floor El. "2S" Room, Area .Mahtifacrurer Model, Etc.. (optional but recormnended)

A JCaj'tP r4,K; , L'Instructions for Ccornpleting Checklist This checklist may-be used to document the results ofttie Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documnentingother comments.l; Is the anchorage con-iguratin vtification required (i.e., is the item one YX ND of the 50% ofSWEL items requiring such :verification)?

2. Is the anchorage frce of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y)<NCI UD1 N/IAD 57,C 1 4c4t, 3. Is, tlhe anchorage free of oiroioniht is inore than rnuldi surface oxidation?
4. IS the anchorage

!Ure of visiblexcacks in 'the concrete near the anWdhrs?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent withkplant documentation?'(Note: This 6iffofnly.

applies, if.the it is onv ofthe 50% thr which an anchorage configuratiOn verfication is-requited.)

6. Based on the above ancdhr:age
Yaiuations, is the anchorage froee of potentially adverse seismic conditions?i Y9 NDE UD1 N/AD]YX ND UDj lADr-Y>% NDI UD N/AD_YX NDI _UD , nter the e~jivnneil class name froni Appendix.T D
CIasses ofF Euiprhfnt.I

< C-3 >PAGE 414 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2.S'eismic.Walkdown.Checklist (SWC)Equipment I.iDNo.i-

! I Equip. Class'2 .Equipment.Desriptioh:ý .. ........ .Interactiii Effects 7. .Afe so targetS'fr from by nearby. eqUipment oi trducqturts?

8. Axr equipment, distributionsysthi&s, ceiling'tiles and lighting, and masonry block' Walls riot likely to collapse onto the equippment?
9. Do attached lies hiave adequate flexibility' to avoid ddmage?10.-Based on thb, aboye seismic interaction egvlbatidhS,.:Js equipment free ,of potentially, adverse seiginic interaction effe&ts?YVNI UJ N/AC YýNCI UC] N/AC1-4 NEI- UC] N/AC-YNO U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and .found no other seismic conditions that co0id NC UC adversely affectvthe safety functions of the equipment?

Conmmen ts (,Additional pages maybe:iýddcedas necessary)

E-Vaua~ted by',4.~~ ~~ ~ .. ... ..... .r )K ~ _ _ _Date' 2--q~2.'~-<C--4 >PAGE 415 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 416 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION*PAGE 417 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOVWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONR PAGE 418 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO*PAGE 419 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A252&oldid=1544980"