ML051100004
| ML051100004 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/2005 |
| From: | Rice J Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML051100002 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML051100004 (20) | |
Text
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT NRC PRESENTATION APRIL 18, 2005 Terry Jones Site Vice President
1 NUCLEAR FLEET STRATEGIC PLAN
2 TURKEY POINT MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE
3 2005 NUCLEAR FLEET PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR TURKEY POINT Green Yellow Red On track or exceeding current target. No known challenges exist to meet target On track or falling short of current target. Potential challenges exist to meet target Significantly falling short of currrent target. Significant risks and/or challenges exist ot meet target Business Unit Measure Goal YTD Performance No entry into white
@ YE, all in GREEN AND 75% >
GREEN @ Midpoint WANO Overall Performance (Regulatory & stakeholder confidence)
> 92.5%
89.55%
O&M Budget Compliance (Cost effective operations)
< budget
$333K under YTD. Projected over budget at year end due to outage & Equipment Reliability issues Capital Budget Compliance (Cost effective operations)
< budget
$1.4M under YTD. 2004 carry over issues and 4C RCP seal work are potential year end issues Refueling Outage Duration (Cost effective operations)
< 62 days N/A OSHA Recordables (Safety)
< 4 1
Net Generation (Cost effective operations)
> 11,081,421 MWH
-113,739 YTD Corrective Action Effectiveness (Regulatory & stakeholder confidence)
No cross cutting letters identified in semi-annual assessment letters N/A 0
43 Scheduled Non-outage leak list. Daily rolling average < 17 for each of the 12 months.
8 Scheduled Non-outage Control Room Deficiencies. Daily rolling average < 17 for each of the 12 months.
7 Scheduled 4
10 All systems in A1 as of 12/31/2004 (11) in A2 by year end except QSPDS and RHR All Leak list items present at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage All Control Room Deficiencies present at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage No on-line RED work orders exist at year-end Frozen scope online YELLOW work orders (58) reduced by 40% (23) at year-end. Total of 35 at year-end All RFO RED and YELLOW PWO's present at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage Operator Work Arounds < 5 by year-end Stretch Measures Work Management Process (Operational excellence)
NRC Performance Indicators (Regulatory & stakeholder confidence)
All green. 75% > mid point
4 TURKEY POINT ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS (2003 - CURRENT)
- Performance Improvement Department
- Strategic Managers Hired (10)
- Improved Oversight
- Operations
- Maintenance
- Project Management
- Industrial / Radiological Safety
- Corrective Action Program
- Human Performance Program
5 CONDITION REPORTS INITIATED Definition / Goal Performance Indicator Name Meets:
N/A Exceeds:
N/A Actual:
869 A-1. NUMBER OF CONDITION REPORTS INITIATED SITE-WIDE Path March 2005 (Monthly)
Analysis: The number of condition reports initiated in January-March 2005 is 43 percent greater than in January-March 2004. This data is a positive indication of increased sensitivity towards generating condition reports for identified problems and opportunities for improvement.
Action(s): Continue to monitor.
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA -
REGULATORY and STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE Cumulative number of Condition Reports (CR) generated for 2003, 2004 and 2005. In addition, CRs generated monthly. Indicator is used to monitor participation in the Corrective Action Program.
Owner: Mark Moore / PID Preparer: Rob Earl / Corrective Actions Group Analysis and Action(s) 2129 4373 7644 0
2000 4000 6000 8000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- CRs Generated 2003 CRs Generated Monthly 2004 CRs Generated Monthly 2005 CRs Generated Monthly 2003 Cumulative Total 2004 Cumulative Total 2005 Cumulative Total
6 CONDITION REPORT QUALITY OF CAUSE ANALYSIS Path Turkey Point Nuclear Plant STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA -
REGULATORY and STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE Picture March 2005 (Monthly)
Analysis and Action(s)
Definition / Goal Performance Indicator Name C-1. QUALITY OF CAUSE ANALYSIS / INVESTIGATION STATION AVERAGE Owner: Mark Moore / PID Preparer: Rob Earl / Corrective Actions Group Percentage of Root Cause and Apparent Cause evaluations that met established grading criteria as determined by CAPCOs, CROG or PID. Sample of 25% of closed evaluations will be reviewed to the criteria specified in the CAP Handbook. The percent of reviewed accepted is a 3-month rolling average.
Three consecutive data points (starting in April 2004) below the station goal will result in an increased sample size to 50%.
Analysis: Fifteen (15) ACEs and RCEs were reviewed in March.
The percent of condition reports that met established grading criteria is 83% (3-month rolling average). This value meets the station goal of 80%. During the month of March, 1 Turbine Team RCE evaluation, 1 Engineering ACE evaluation and 1 NMM RCE evaluation were returned for additional comment and review.
Action(s): Continue to share this information with all departments and CR dispositioners by using CAPCOs to train / reinforce expectations. Continue to monitor.
Meets:
> 80%
Exceeds:
> 90%
83%
Actual 3-Mo Avg:
89 85 83 0
20 40 60 80 100 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Number 0
20 40 60 80 100 Percent Accept
- Closed
- Reviewed
- Rejected
% of Reviewed Accepted GOAL STATION GOAL > 80%
Meets Doesn't Meet Exceeds
7 TURKEY POINT CORRECTIVE ACTION JOURNEY
- Improve Recognition of Potential Risk of Identified Items
- Continue Improvements in Problem Solving Skills
- Enhance Station Trending Practices (CRs and System Health)
8 TURKEY POINT NRC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1st Quarter 2005 Indicator Unit 3 Unit 4 Green White Unplanned Scrams Per 7000 Critical Hours 2
2.4
</= 3
>3 or </= 6 Scrams w/Loss of Normal Heat Removal 0
0
</=2
>2 or </= 10 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours 4
1.6
</= 6
> 6 Safety System Unavailability - Emergency AC Power 0.2%
0.5%
</= 2.5%
>2.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Unavailability - HP Injection 0.4%
0.2%
</= 1.5%
>1.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Unavailability - Aux Feedwater 0.4%
0.6%
</= 2%
>2% or </= 6%
Safety System Unavailability - Residual Heat Removal 0.5%
0.5%
</= 1.5%
>1.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Functional Failures 1
1
</= 5
> 5 RCS Specific Activity (RCSA) - Monthly 0.1 0.2
</= 50%
> 50% or </= 100%
RCS Identified Leak Rate - Monthly 0.7 1.2
</= 50%
> 50% or </= 100%
ERO Drill/Exercise Performance 96.7%
96.7%
>/= 90%
< 90% or >/=70%
ERO Key Personnel Participation 100.0%
100.0%
>/= 80%
< 80% or >/= 60%
Alert & Notification System Reliability 99.9%
99.9%
>/= 94%
< 94% or >/= 90%
Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness 0
0
</= 2
> 2 or </= 5 RETS - ODCM Effluent Occurrences 0
0
</= 1
> 1 or </= 3 Protected Area Security Equip. Performance Index 0.007 0.007
</= 0.080
>0.080 Personnel Screening Program Performance 0
0
</= 2
> 2 or </= 5 FFD/Personnel Reliability Program Performance 0
0
</= 2
> 2 or </= 5
> Median of Green
</= Median of Green Legend Trend U3/U4
9 2004 RED & YELLOW FROZEN SCOPE CURVE Turkey Point Work Control Department Supporting Organizational Excellence Meets:
81 Exceeds:
63 Actual:
19 (Red -0 )
January 03, 2005 Path Picture (Weekly)
Performance Indicator Name ER 1.1 Red & Yellow Frozen Population (KM)
Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
The original CNO target of red and yellow work orders and the burn down curve to reach 81 by 12/31/04 Responsible Manager / Owner Wendell Prevatt / Work Control Analysis: Resource availability challenges station capability to maintain downward slope to Total Population.
Action(s): Continue to monitor progress Meets Doesn't Meet Exceeds 0
2 4
6 8
10 12 14 16 18 20 1/5/2004 1/19/2004 2/2/2004 2/16/2004 3/1/2004 3/15/2004 3/29/2004 4/12/2004 4/26/2004 5/10/2004 5/24/2004 6/7/2004 6/21/2004 7/5/2004 7/19/2004 8/2/2004 8/16/2004 8/30/2004 9/13/2004 9/27/2004 10/11/2004 10/25/2004 11/8/2004 11/22/2004 12/6/2004 12/20/2004 0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Scheduled Complete WOs Target Burn Curve Work Orders Work Order Backlog
10 2004 RED & YELLOW TOTAL SCOPE CURVE Turkey Point Work Control Department Supporting Organizational Excellence Meets:
N/A Exceeds:
N/A Actual:
116 (Red 1 )
January 03, 2005 Path Picture (Weekly)
Performance Indicator Name ER 1.2 Red & Yellow Current Status (SG)
Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
The total target of red and yellow work orders currently in the system.
Responsible Manager / Owner Wendell Prevatt / Work Control Analysis: Expected drop in total population due to outage plan.
Action(s): Continue current path during remainder of outage.
Mee ts Doesn't Meet Exceeds 0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1/5/2004 1/19/2004 2/2/2004 2/16/2004 3/1/2004 3/15/2004 3/29/2004 4/12/2004 4/26/2004 5/10/2004 5/24/2004 6/7/2004 6/21/2004 7/5/2004 7/19/2004 8/2/2004 8/16/2004 8/30/2004 9/13/2004 9/27/2004 10/11/2004 10/25/2004 11/8/2004 11/22/2004 12/6/2004 12/20/2004 0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Scheduled Complete Incoming WOs Work Orders 116 Work Order Backlog
11 TURKEY POINT SYSTEM HEALTH CHANGES IN 2004 Declining (9):
- Yellow to Red 2
- White to Red 1
- White to Yellow 2
- Green to White 4
Improving (31):
- Red to Green 1
- Red to White 1
- Red to Yellow 3
- White to Green 10
- Yellow to White 14
- Yellow to Green 2
12 TURKEY POINT MAINTENANCE RULE a(1) ITEMS a(1) Item Status:
- Number of Items on 1/1/04 17
- Number of items removed through 2004 10
- Number of items added in 2004 5
- Number of items remaining 12/31/04 11
- Number of recurring MR a(1) items since 2003 0
13 TURKEY POINT MAINTENANCE RULE a(1)
ACTION PLAN TIMELINE
14 MAJOR EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTS (2003 - CURRENT)
CORPORATE SUPPORT
- Startup Transformers
- New Circulating Water Pumps w/ O/H Motors
- Charging Pumps
- Rx Vessel Closure Heads, Cables & Connectors
- Turbine Plant Cooling Water System
- Security
- AFW Pumps
- Screen Wash Pumps
- Polar Crane Upgrades
- Turbine Control
- Reactor Coolant Pump Motor Monitoring
- Main Generator Discharge Monitoring
- Secondary Side Valves
- Condensate and Heater Drain Pumps
15 TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Scope:
- Review the 2003 and 2004 forced loss events to ensure each evaluation is sufficient in depth to understand the underlying causes and corrective actions are appropriate for the identified cause
- Review the events in the aggregate and identify any common causal factors
- Utilized an evaluation team comprised of executive and senior management level expertise from INPO, FPL Corporate, peer utility and an industry events consultant
16 Analysis:
- 19 events resulted in forced capacity loss during 2003 and 2004
- 84% (16) of the events were a result of issues on the secondary side of the plant
- The major secondary side components affecting the FLR:
- Main Turbine Generator
= 37.5% (6)
= 18.75% (3)
- Secondary Control Valves
= 18.75% (3)
- Main Feed Pump
= 12.5% (2)
- Other
= 12.5% (2)
TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT
17 TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Results:
- Individual CR review showed some had less than effective corrective actions due to insufficient depth of analysis of the event.
- Collective CR review concluded that the assessment of risk regarding some non-safety related secondary equipment needs improvement (oversight, vendor control, procedures, procurement)
18 TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Actions:
- Performance improvement targeted towards:
- accurate initial problem identification
- thorough evaluation, including risk and consequences
- appropriate interim and permanent corrective action Interim actions in place to support Unit 4 Refueling outage
- Enhanced work package instructions and specified oversight for critical activities
- Enhanced procurement controls for commercial grade but critical components and vendors
- Long term actions confirmed to be driven by existing PM Optimization, Equipment Reliability and Corrective Action Program initiatives currently underway
19
- Staffing - All Groups
- Organizational Capacity
- Corrective Action Journey
- Equipment Reliability Journey TURKEY POINT CHALLENGES