ML051100004
| ML051100004 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/2005 |
| From: | Rice J Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML051100002 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML051100004 (20) | |
Text
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT NRC PRESENTATION APRIL 18, 2005 Terry Jones Site Vice President Enclosure 2
NUCLEAR FLEET STRATEGIC PLAN 1
TURKEY POINT MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE 2
2005 NUCLEAR FLEET PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR TURKEY POINT Business Unit Measure Goal YTD Performance No entry into white NRC Performance Indicators (Regulatory & s takeholder confidence) @ YE, all in GREEN AND 75% > All green. 75% > mid point GREEN @ Midpoint WANO Overall Performance (Regulatory & s takeholder confidence) > 92.5% 89.55%
$333K under YTD. Projected over budget at year end due to O&M Budget Compliance (Cost effective operations) < budget outage & Equipment Reliability is sues
$1.4M under YTD. 2004 carry over Capital Budget Compliance (Cos t effective operations ) < budget is sues and 4C RCP seal work are potential year end iss ues Refueling Outage Duration (Cost effective operations ) < 62 days N/A OSHA Recordables (Safety) <4 1 Net Generation (Cos t effective operations) > 11,081,421 MWH -113,739 YTD No cross cutting letters Corrective Action Effectiveness (Regulatory & s takeholder confidence) identified in s emi-annual N/A ass es sment letters Stretch Measures Work Management Process (Operational excellence)
No on-line RED work orders exis t at year-end 0 Frozen s cope online YELLOW work orders (58) reduced by 40% (23) at year-end. Total of 35 at year-end 43 All RFO RED and YELLOW PWO's pres ent at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage Scheduled Non-outage leak lis t. Daily rolling average < 17 for each of the 12 months. 8 All Leak list items pres ent at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage Scheduled Non-outage Control Room Deficiencies. Daily rolling average < 17 for each of the 12 months . 7 All Control Room Deficiencies pres ent at day one of the outage completed by the end of outage Scheduled Operator Work Arounds < 5 by year-end 4 All sys tems in A1 as of 12/31/2004 (11) in A2 by year end except QSPDS and RHR 10 Green On track or exceeding current target. No known challenges exist to meet target Yellow On track or falling short of current target. Potential challenges exist to meet target Red Significantly falling short of currrent target. Significant risks and/or challenges exist ot meet target 3
TURKEY POINT ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS (2003 - CURRENT)
- Performance Improvement Department
- Strategic Managers Hired (10)
- Improved Oversight
- Operations
- Maintenance
- Project Management
- Industrial / Radiological Safety
- Corrective Action Program
- Human Performance Program 4
CONDITION REPORTS INITIATED Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Path March 2005 STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA -
(Monthly)
REGULATORY and STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE Performance Indicator Name A-1. NUMBER OF CONDITION REPORTS INITIATED SITE-WIDE Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
Cumulative number of Condition Reports (CR) generated for 2003, 2004 Analysis: The number of condition reports initiated in and 2005. In addition, CRs generated monthly. Indicator is used to January-March 2005 is 43 percent greater than in January-monitor participation in the Corrective Action Program.
March 2004. This data is a positive indication of increased sensitivity towards generating condition reports for identified Meets: N/A Exceeds: N/A Actual: 869 problems and opportunities for improvement.
Action(s): Continue to monitor.
Owner: Mark Moore / PID Preparer: Rob Earl / Corrective Actions Group 7644 8000
- CRs Generated 6000 4373 4000 2129 2000 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 CRs Generated Monthly 2004 CRs Generated Monthly 2005 CRs Generated Monthly 2003 Cumulative Total 2004 Cumulative Total 2005 Cumulative Total 5
CONDITION REPORT QUALITY OF CAUSE ANALYSIS Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Path Picture March 2005 STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA - Meets (Monthly)
REGULATORY and STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE Performance Indicator Name Doesn't Meet Exceeds C-1. QUALITY OF CAUSE ANALYSIS / INVESTIGATION STATION AVERAGE Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
Percentage of Root Cause and Apparent Cause evaluations that met established Analysis: Fifteen (15) ACEs and RCEs were reviewed in March.
grading criteria as determined by CAPCOs, CROG or PID. Sample of 25% of The percent of condition reports that met established grading closed evaluations will be reviewed to the criteria specified in the CAP Handbook. The percent of reviewed accepted is a 3-month rolling average.
criteria is 83% (3-month rolling average). This value meets the Three consecutive data points (starting in April 2004) below the station goal will station goal of 80%. During the month of March, 1 Turbine Team result in an increased sample size to 50%. RCE evaluation, 1 Engineering ACE evaluation and 1 NMM RCE evaluation were returned for additional comment and review.
Meets: > 80% Exceeds: > 90% Actual 3-Mo 83%
Avg: Action(s): Continue to share this information with all departments and CR dispositioners by using CAPCOs to Owner: Mark Moore / PID train / reinforce expectations. Continue to monitor.
Preparer: Rob Earl / Corrective Actions Group 100 100 STATION GOAL > 80% 89 85 83 80 80 Percent Accept 60 60 Number 40 40 20 20 0 0 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05
- Closed # Reviewed # Rejected % of Reviewed Accepted GOAL 6
TURKEY POINT CORRECTIVE ACTION JOURNEY
- Improve Recognition of Potential Risk of Identified Items
- Continue Improvements in Problem Solving Skills
- Enhance Station Trending Practices (CRs and System Health) 7
TURKEY POINT NRC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1st Quarter 2005 Indicator Unit 3 Unit 4 Green Trend U3/U4 White Unplanned Scrams Per 7000 Critical Hours 2 2.4 </= 3 >3 or </= 6 Scrams w/Loss of Normal Heat Removal 0 0 </=2 >2 or </= 10 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours 4 1.6 </= 6 >6 Safety System Unavailability - Emergency AC Power 0.2% 0.5% </= 2.5% >2.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Unavailability - HP Injection 0.4% 0.2% </= 1.5% >1.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Unavailability - Aux Feedwater 0.4% 0.6% </= 2% >2% or </= 6%
Safety System Unavailability - Residual Heat Removal 0.5% 0.5% </= 1.5% >1.5% or </= 5%
Safety System Functional Failures 1 1 </= 5 >5 RCS Specific Activity (RCSA) - Monthly 0.1 0.2 </= 50% > 50% or </= 100%
RCS Identified Leak Rate - Monthly 0.7 1.2 </= 50% > 50% or </= 100%
ERO Drill/Exercise Performance 96.7% 96.7% >/= 90% < 90% or >/=70%
ERO Key Personnel Participation 100.0% 100.0% >/= 80% < 80% or >/= 60%
Alert & Notification System Reliability 99.9% 99.9% >/= 94% < 94% or >/= 90%
Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness 0 0 </= 2 > 2 or </= 5 RETS - ODCM Effluent Occurrences 0 0 </= 1 > 1 or </= 3 Protected Area Security Equip. Performance Index 0.007 0.007 </= 0.080 >0.080 Personnel Screening Program Performance 0 0 </= 2 > 2 or </= 5 FFD/Personnel Reliability Program Performance 0 0 </= 2 > 2 or </= 5 Legend
> Median of Green
</= Median of Green 8
2004 RED & YELLOW FROZEN SCOPE CURVE Turkey Point Work Control Department January 03, 2005 Path Picture (Weekly) M e e ts Supporting Organizational Excellence Performance Indicator Name Doesn't Meet Exceeds ER 1.1 Red & Yellow Frozen Population (KM)
Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
The original CNO target of red and yellow w ork orders and the Analysis: Resource availability challenges station capability burn down curve to rea ch 81 by 12/31/04 to maintain downward slope to Total Population.
Meets: 81 Exceeds: 63 Actual: 19 (Red -0 )
Responsible Manager / Owner Wendell Prevatt / Work Control Action(s): Continue to monitor progress 20 200 18 180 16 160 14 140 Work Orders Work Order Backlog 12 120 10 100 8 80 6 60 4 40 2 20 0 0 1/
1/19 2/
2/165/
2/20
/2 20 04 004 04 3/
3/
3/15 29 /2 1/20
/2
/2 00 00 004 04 4
4/
4/
5/
5/12 26 10 24 /2
/2
/2 00 00 004 4
4 4
6/
6/21 7/ /2 7/2
/2 5/2 00 00 00 004 4
4 7/
8/
8/19 8/
16 30 /2 2/2
/2 00 00 004 4
4 4
9/
9/
10 13 27
/1 1/2
/2
/2
/200 00 00 004 4
4 10 11/2 11
/2 12 5/
/8 2/220
/2 04 00 0044 4
12/2/6 0/2
/200 0044 Scheduled Complete WOs Target Burn Curve 9
2004 RED & YELLOW TOTAL SCOPE CURVE Turkey Point Work Control Department January 03, 2005 Path Picture (Weekly) M e e ts Supporting Organizational Excellence Performance Indicator Name ER 1.2 Red & Yellow Current Status (SG) Doesn't Meet Exceeds Definition / Goal Analysis and Action(s)
The total target of red and yellow work orders currently in the system. Analysis: Expected drop in total population due to outage plan.
Meets: N/A Exceeds: N/A Actual: 116 (Red 1 ) Action(s): Continue current path during remainder of outage.
Responsible Manager / Owner Wendell Prevatt / Work Control 45 260 240 40 220 35 200 Work Orders Work Order Backlog 180 30 160 25 140 116 20 120 100 15 80 10 60 40 5
20 0 0 1/
1/19 2/
2/165/
2/20
/2 20 04 004 04 3/
3/
3/15 29 /2 1/2
/2
/2 00 00 00 004 4
4 4/
4/
5/
5/12 26 10 24 /2
/2
/2 00 00 004 4
4 4
6/
6/21 7/ /2 7/20
/2 5/2 00 00 004 04 4
7/
8/
8/19 8/
16 30 /2 2/2
/2 00 00 004 4
4 4
9/
9/
10 13 27
/1 1/2
/2
/2
/200 00 00 004 4
4 10 11/2 11
/2 12 5
/8 /2
/2 2/ 00 00 20 4 044 4
12/2/6/2 0/ 00 20 4 04 Scheduled Complete Incoming WOs 10
TURKEY POINT SYSTEM HEALTH CHANGES IN 2004 Declining (9):
- Yellow to Red 2
- White to Red 1
- White to Yellow 2
- Green to White 4 Improving (31):
- Red to Green 1
- Red to White 1
- Red to Yellow 3
- White to Green 10
- Yellow to White 14
- Yellow to Green 2 11
TURKEY POINT MAINTENANCE RULE a(1) ITEMS a(1) Item Status:
- Number of Items on 1/1/04 17
- Number of items removed through 2004 10
- Number of items added in 2004 5
- Number of items remaining 12/31/04 11
- Number of recurring MR a(1) items since 2003 0 12
TURKEY POINT MAINTENANCE RULE a(1)
ACTION PLAN TIMELINE 13
MAJOR EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTS (2003 - CURRENT)
CORPORATE SUPPORT
- Startup Transformers
- New Circulating Water Pumps w/ O/H Motors
- Charging Pumps
- Rx Vessel Closure Heads, Cables & Connectors
- Turbine Plant Cooling Water System
- Security
- AFW Pumps
- Screen Wash Pumps
- Polar Crane Upgrades
- Turbine Control
- Reactor Coolant Pump Motor Monitoring
- Main Generator Discharge Monitoring
- Secondary Side Valves
- Condensate and Heater Drain Pumps 14
TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Scope:
- Review the 2003 and 2004 forced loss events to ensure each evaluation is sufficient in depth to understand the underlying causes and corrective actions are appropriate for the identified cause
- Review the events in the aggregate and identify any common causal factors
- Utilized an evaluation team comprised of executive and senior management level expertise from INPO, FPL Corporate, peer utility and an industry events consultant 15
TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Analysis:
- 19 events resulted in forced capacity loss during 2003 and 2004
- 84% (16) of the events were a result of issues on the secondary side of the plant
- The major secondary side components affecting the FLR:
- Main Turbine Generator = 37.5% (6)
- Main Condenser = 18.75% (3)
- Secondary Control Valves = 18.75% (3)
- Main Feed Pump = 12.5% (2)
- Other = 12.5% (2) 16
TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Results:
- Individual CR review showed some had less than effective corrective actions due to insufficient depth of analysis of the event.
- Collective CR review concluded that the assessment of risk regarding some non-safety related secondary equipment needs improvement (oversight, vendor control, procedures, procurement) 17
TURKEY POINT FORCED CAPACITY LOSS COMMON CAUSE ASSESSMENT Actions:
- Performance improvement targeted towards:
- accurate initial problem identification
- thorough evaluation, including risk and consequences
- appropriate interim and permanent corrective action
- Interim actions in place to support Unit 4 Refueling outage
- Enhanced work package instructions and specified oversight for critical activities
- Enhanced procurement controls for commercial grade but critical components and vendors
- Long term actions confirmed to be driven by existing PM Optimization, Equipment Reliability and Corrective Action Program initiatives currently underway 18
TURKEY POINT CHALLENGES
- Staffing - All Groups
- Organizational Capacity
- Corrective Action Journey
- Equipment Reliability Journey 19