ML031330147

Plant Performance Update Meeting for McGuire Nuclear Station

ML031330147
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire, Mcguire
Issue date:	04/29/2003
From:	Duke Energy Corp
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML031330134	List: ML031330138 ML031330147
References
Download: ML031330147 (31)

Text

Plant Performance Update Meeting 2

I

.0 C.. G SX.........

I 2~~~~~

IE7Sf0

\\ ~E E

I 3I

-. I I00S Pi.,

Is ;Z:.Et April 29, 2003 ft -,,IA<,jr6?

O&-

Agenda EEE

I

- 7=1 "77,77 -- -7-7-7-7777 e Generation Trending Status -

Dhiaa Jamil e Nuclear Excellence Review Board

- Dhiaa Jamil e Equipment Reliability /

o Human Performance -

Plant Health Teams - Jack Peele Tom Harrall e Security-Bryan Dolan 2

_W I

t;:

Generation Trending Status 3

Unit 1 Power History Curve I

r r

r r

v

--- I 1111011110bo 100%

-J C:

L-m t_

M C) 0 0

o

-r

.C CU 4

181 FW Heater roblerns (0.S7 days) 75%

50%

1EOCI5 (26.25 days)

Main Gen. Volt. Reg. Replaced No SfG Work 199 Ice Baskets Seviced 355 Valves Worked RXVS Head inspected HP Turbine Inspected DIG Governors Replaced I B NC Pump Motor Replaced ID RCP Seals Replaced No Midloop Drain Replace FWPT Solenoids (0.49 days) 25% H I

I 0%

_I._

I I N N N

N N

N N

N N

N g

N 0 0 0

0 0

0 00 0

7-0 ON CCD 3O tfl Nt~ -r O

CO N,:

0 0

0 0

0 00 r-r-

N N N

n on e

o n

0 000 0

0 0

en o

x 0

N B

r

_-(

Q Q

IN N

-t N

en M

T

_I r

O O

00 4

Unit 2 Power History Curve 100%

0-75

~C7 z

2B FWPT Reduced (I)

Power to 50%

0Replaced Solenoid t 50 A,Valve (0.13 FPD) 050%

2AFVwrr Trip O

U2 Runback to 50%

o 2A Main Generator (0.89 EFIPD) cu Breaker Air Leak a1)

(0.66 EFPD)

=125%-

r25%Hydrogen leak and fire (2.1 EFPD) 0%

4

.4 ee r

r4 n

n n

n C

n 0O ON O ~.O O

I

(

ON CON O

f IR O

0 GO ON OC o

T-oR Q

_r-Q Po

£ Q

-4

-q

-4

.. I

-3

.3

• 3

%3

-1

-1 3

-1 3

IT39 In n

1O N

00 00O O

OM 7

T.

n en 3T 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

00 0

0 5

L~A Nuclear Excellence Review Board 6

Nuclear Excellence Review Board

= 7-7--

-77 o Identify and oversee key drivers for successful operation Members Dhiaa Jamil Tom Harrall

- Jack Peele Key Drivers Self assessment Corrective action Emergency planning Security Environmental Regulatory health Industrial safety Radiological safety Equipment reliability

- Jack Boyle Bryan Dolan External member Configuration management Budget Human performance Training Work management

- Outage Supervisory/management development Workforce planning Community relations 7

Nuclear Excellence Review Board 1,

=,

rvA

=

. ; 7._

I area1

!J8 m-.-

=N o 2003 Initiative Determine for each one of the key drivers the answer to two questions:

How do you know you're know the health of program/process? (How do you looking at the right stuff?)

• What is the health?

8

Iri ~~

X: IfA If If fX I.,

I

"" a I;9 R:i>

.fin-lS~d Xa f ' C 0fIe l,

{ {:I

A :

00100

Izr Equipment Reliability /

Plant Health Teams 9

Challenge m.r

@ Equipment performance was not meeting our expectations during 2002 and early 2003:

Upward trend in actual generation losses Frequent unplanned challenges to generation Resources often pulled from prevention to reactive duties 10

Response

.-. t

@ Create a short-term recovery strategy e Promote shared site-wide focus like a refueling outage e Charter team leaders via formal pre-job briefing 0 Enlist entire workforce via written "time-out"

@ Maintain a sense of urgency, "something is different"

@ Identify equipment reliability unit trip or power reduction concerns that could lead to n During the recovery strategy, preserve and continue the established equipment reliability program 11

Structure

'<hi, ~

-1111 ii:;n M

_tia

,wA,.

7 iFN

.elZ2...

Plant Health committee (existing)

Equipment Reliability Programs (on-going)

Plant Health Teams DXLI DL IF L I DF IE DF Implementation Team LI Common Cause Team LI 12

Plant Health Teams (8) vrr=7jr 1r

'rryV.""

Each co-chaired by engineering and station division managers, staffed by subject matter experts Reviewed known open challenges such as significant corrective actions, corrective maintenance tasks, tech spec items, operator workarounds, single point vulnerabilities, recurring plant action register items, etc.

Surveyed site teammates to probe for challenges not previously documented

• Sorted the challenges into five action item categories (1 = most urgent)

Reported weekly to Plant Health Committee and to each other 13

Implementation Team Y,

frf f]

77-*

e Staffed by managers of work execution processes e Collected input from Plant Health Teams e Confirmed priorities of action items and performed review for consistency e Entered the most urgent action items into the appropriate work process and began tracking to completion

© Reported results to Plant Health Committee 14

Cause Analysis Team

T' '"T r"

e Staffed by Safety Review Group and Outage Manager e Searched problem reports for events on highest risk category systems (Apr 02 - Feb 03), selecting approximately 200 for trending e Screened 11 of 200 events for more comprehensive review 0 Performed common cause analysis O Presented results to Plant Health Committee and CARB 15

Timeline

'.

t t

i i

i t

t 1-27 Strategy Drafted 1-30 Site Mgmt Approval 2-4 Pre Job Brief 2-7 2-14 2-21 2-28 Plant Health Team Updates Implementation Team report to PHC Common Cause Team report to PHC / CARB 4-9 To 16

Action Category 1 Activities 7p,.-

Aa.

.7,7 C

S 7

=

7 e Main feedwater pump trip solenoid valves e Control Room chiller refrigerant low temperature switch e Auxiliary Feedwater System limit and torque switches isolation valve operator

@ SG Blowdown demineralizer resin loading area, threat to main generator stator cooling control panel 0 ECCS motor start time extensions o Turbine valve movement test difficulties 17

Cause Analysis Team Areas for Improvement Comprehensiveness of health reports need improvement Over-reliance on equip failures to effect changes rather than proactive efforts Input from plant-side groups could more effectively be utilized o Programs may be too rigid to effect timely resolutions Over-reliance on programmatic structure vs. mentoring /

experience Declining vendor support 18

Long-Term Transition

.-F, o PHT's will be part of the trimester system health reporting cycles e Will provide cross-organizational input concerning reliability concerns and system health "color" e Plant Health Committee will provide oversight 19

Additional Comments 71' a

r17r,-r-77:7 e Nuclear Safety System availability has remained high HPI RHR Aux Feed Emergency AC e For fourth quarter 2002, all these systems on both units were in second quartile e Emergency Diesel / Generator system performance 1995-2002 was subject of special NRC inspection in December 2002, with no findings of significance identified 20

,i~.tJ mmmmmm

t
.

4-FIT, M I I,

qcw Bs Human Performance 21

McGuire Nuclear Station Human Performance

______.,._________________7__

X--"

r A

de McGuire continues to focus on human performance o Foundation is "6 Tools for Event Free Human I EVENT FREE HUMAN PERFORMANCE I

/\\&

Pemonol Satty Asssmlent\\Oh 4'

l Self-Clt&k (STAR) l

/

-Questionbi Afutinde (QV&V)

/ l UderUse & Ad l

/ -Cler Co.nunenrlon Techniques

-STOP... \\lnUnsueIn Performance" SUPERVISORS

-Work Ppamtpon

-Task Asigten

-Clear Ascutltabnity PmV-Job Brief / Post-Job Brile Field lmbe ment 1Jb Observatioen

-Cornnumatlon & Inrinnutilon I

a I

MANAGERS S

T Mti.

Isa M

fle Fo.soda Bysil ep.ti 5en

MdSo, ann-es. FIn HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL 22

McGuire Nuclear Station Human Performance I I Iet l

f n

r D Created a structure to manage/oversee site human performance

• HPRB

• HPRC

- senior site management oversight

- each group chaired by group management

• HPRC Lead - each group represented by a group coordinator

• OPI Manager-site lead 23

Human Performance Site Focus Initial Training (1993 - current)

- Human error reduction training for workers and supervisors (8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />)

Continuing Training

- Bhopal - 1998/99 - "6 tools reinforced"

- Titanic - 2000/01 - the 5 INPO principles

- Communications Competence - 2001/02 - site trend

- Summit Fever - 2001/02 - reinforce conservative decision making

- Bringing Out the Best in People - 2002 - reinforcing correct behaviors 24

Human Performance Group Focus

__g~jr~

_vmsem~zmyon U~rX~tt -f:-t;tt$'ai D Each group develops focus trends/issues/events o Examples areas based on

- MNT

- OPS

- correct component verification (CCV)

- supervisory involvement/oversight

- CHEM - removing distractions 25

Success Stories Correct Component Verification (CCV)

- MNT CCV focus - prior to implementation (July 2000 to February 2002)

• 5 events (including a reactor trip)

- MNT CCV Focus - following implementation (February 2002 to current)

• Two minor incidents 26

Successes - CCV/Mispositionings W-7,

7

rl I--

I

11 I 27

2003 Focus for McGuire

__ _ _TT__

5_________

=__

e Formality in human performance

- Improve rigor in execution of processes 28

Human Performance Measures

-7"-

o Human performance error rate (new in 2003)

- Currently 5.12 errors per 10000 work-hours o Average number of days between human performance events

- Currently 30.4 days 29

X tIL0:L.

.;i:~g6 Cl,

MR Visa Security 30

F I

An:

Questions 31