Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
EPID:L-2017-LLA-0442, License Amendment Request for Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP-15376, Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation Test Times and Completion Times (Approved, Closed) |
|
|
Similar Documents at Salem |
---|
Category:Letter type:LR
MONTHYEARLR-N23-0079, Special Report 23-02-00 Pursuant to the Requirements of Salem Unit 1 Technical Specification 3.3.3.7, Action 10, for the Unit 1 Main Steam Line Rad Monitor Inoperable for Greater than Seven Days2023-12-0707 December 2023 Special Report 23-02-00 Pursuant to the Requirements of Salem Unit 1 Technical Specification 3.3.3.7, Action 10, for the Unit 1 Main Steam Line Rad Monitor Inoperable for Greater than Seven Days LR-N23-0077, Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 2023 & 30 Day Report for Salem Unit 1 Upflow Conversion2023-11-29029 November 2023 Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 2023 & 30 Day Report for Salem Unit 1 Upflow Conversion LR-N23-0072, Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 302023-11-0101 November 2023 Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 30 LR-N23-0045, and Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Notice of Proposed Amendment to Decommissioning Trust Agreement2023-09-0808 September 2023 and Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Notice of Proposed Amendment to Decommissioning Trust Agreement LR-N23-0055, Special Report 272/23-01-00, Pursuant to the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.3.3.1, Action 23, for the Vent Noble Gas Rad Monitor Inoperable for Greater than Seven Days2023-08-0303 August 2023 Special Report 272/23-01-00, Pursuant to the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.3.3.1, Action 23, for the Vent Noble Gas Rad Monitor Inoperable for Greater than Seven Days LR-N23-0054, In-Service Inspection Activities2023-07-26026 July 2023 In-Service Inspection Activities LR-N23-0046, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented June 28, 20232023-07-10010 July 2023 Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented June 28, 2023 LR-N23-0005, License Amendment Request to Amend Technical Specifications (TS) 6.8.4.f for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies2023-06-23023 June 2023 License Amendment Request to Amend Technical Specifications (TS) 6.8.4.f for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies LR-N23-0035, 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR)2023-04-27027 April 2023 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) LR-N23-0034, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) - Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 and Hope Creek Generating Station2023-04-27027 April 2023 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) - Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 and Hope Creek Generating Station LR-N23-0033, Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 272023-04-26026 April 2023 Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 27 LR-N23-0010, License Amendment Request Revision of Technical Specification (TS) to Delete TS Section 5.5 - Meteorological Tower Location2023-04-21021 April 2023 License Amendment Request Revision of Technical Specification (TS) to Delete TS Section 5.5 - Meteorological Tower Location LR-N23-0006, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2023-03-24024 March 2023 Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations LR-N23-0019, and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums2023-03-21021 March 2023 and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums LR-N23-0016, and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Report of Changes, Tests, and Experiments2023-02-28028 February 2023 and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Report of Changes, Tests, and Experiments LR-N23-0012, Annual Property Insurance Status Report2023-02-24024 February 2023 Annual Property Insurance Status Report LR-N23-0014, Stations Submittal of 2022 Annual Report of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Per 10 CFR 26.203(e) and 10 CFR 26.7172023-02-23023 February 2023 Stations Submittal of 2022 Annual Report of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Per 10 CFR 26.203(e) and 10 CFR 26.717 LR-N23-0003, Response to Requests for Additional Information Salem Unit 2 Relief Request S2-I4R-2112023-02-0101 February 2023 Response to Requests for Additional Information Salem Unit 2 Relief Request S2-I4R-211 LR-N22-0096, and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Threshold Determination2023-01-0505 January 2023 and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Threshold Determination LR-N22-0095, Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 20222022-12-20020 December 2022 Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 2022 LR-N22-0094, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November 21, 20222022-12-14014 December 2022 Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November 21, 2022 LR-N22-0092, Response to Final Iolb Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG2022-12-0909 December 2022 Response to Final Iolb Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG LR-N22-0091, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Report of 10 CFR 72.48 Changes, Tests, and Experiments2022-12-0202 December 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Report of 10 CFR 72.48 Changes, Tests, and Experiments LR-N22-0084, Response to Final Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG (EPID L- 2022-LLA-0095)2022-11-17017 November 2022 Response to Final Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG (EPID L- 2022-LLA-0095) LR-N22-0090, Supplement to Submittal of Salem Generating Station Updated FSAR, Revision 33, 10 CFR 71.106 Review Results and 10 CFR 54.37(b) Review Results for Salem2022-11-10010 November 2022 Supplement to Submittal of Salem Generating Station Updated FSAR, Revision 33, 10 CFR 71.106 Review Results and 10 CFR 54.37(b) Review Results for Salem LR-N22-0065, Submittal of Relief Request Associated with the Fourth Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Limited Examinations2022-09-27027 September 2022 Submittal of Relief Request Associated with the Fourth Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Limited Examinations LR-N22-0074, Emergency Plan Evacuation Time Estimate2022-09-15015 September 2022 Emergency Plan Evacuation Time Estimate LR-N22-0066, License Amendment Request (LAR) to Relocate Technical Specifications (TS) Requirements for Reactor Head Vents to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM)2022-08-31031 August 2022 License Amendment Request (LAR) to Relocate Technical Specifications (TS) Requirements for Reactor Head Vents to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) LR-N22-0063, Spent Fuel Cask Registration2022-08-10010 August 2022 Spent Fuel Cask Registration LR-N22-0068, In-Service Inspection Activities - 90-Day Report2022-08-10010 August 2022 In-Service Inspection Activities - 90-Day Report LR-N22-0012, License Amendment Request to Amend the Technical Specifications to Revise and Relocate the Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Limits and Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System Limits to a Pressure and Temperature2022-08-0707 August 2022 License Amendment Request to Amend the Technical Specifications to Revise and Relocate the Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Limits and Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System Limits to a Pressure and Temperature LR-N22-0062, Spent Fuel Cask Registration2022-07-21021 July 2022 Spent Fuel Cask Registration LR-N22-0006, License Amendment Request (LAR) to Amend Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications (TS) to Extend the Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator from 72 Hours to 14 Days2022-06-29029 June 2022 License Amendment Request (LAR) to Amend Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications (TS) to Extend the Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator from 72 Hours to 14 Days LR-N22-0051, License Amendment Request to Relocate Technical Specification Facility/Unit Staff Qualification Requirements to Quality Assurance Topical Report2022-06-22022 June 2022 License Amendment Request to Relocate Technical Specification Facility/Unit Staff Qualification Requirements to Quality Assurance Topical Report LR-N22-0044, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 20212022-05-19019 May 2022 Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 2021 LR-N22-0043, Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 292022-05-0909 May 2022 Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 29 LR-N22-0041, 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (Rerr)2022-04-28028 April 2022 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (Rerr) LR-N22-0040, 2021 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2022-04-28028 April 2022 2021 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report LR-N22-0039, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented March 24, 20222022-04-21021 April 2022 Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented March 24, 2022 LR-N21-0052, Request for Relief from ASME Code Defect Removal for Service Water Buried Piping2022-04-0707 April 2022 Request for Relief from ASME Code Defect Removal for Service Water Buried Piping LR-N22-0023, Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums2022-03-21021 March 2022 Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums LR-N22-0022, Response to Request for Additional Information Relief Request S1-14R-210, Alternative Examination of Welds2022-03-21021 March 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Relief Request S1-14R-210, Alternative Examination of Welds LR-N22-0017, Submittal of 2021 Annual Report of Fitness for Duty (FFD) Performance Data2022-02-25025 February 2022 Submittal of 2021 Annual Report of Fitness for Duty (FFD) Performance Data LR-N22-0016, Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility2022-02-24024 February 2022 Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility LR-N22-0013, In-Service Inspection Activities - 90-Day Report2022-02-10010 February 2022 In-Service Inspection Activities - 90-Day Report LR-N22-0007, Request for Exemption from Specific Requirements of 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness for Duty Programs2022-01-0505 January 2022 Request for Exemption from Specific Requirements of 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness for Duty Programs LR-N21-0061, Annual Report of Specific Activity Analysis - TS 6.9.1.5c2021-12-0909 December 2021 Annual Report of Specific Activity Analysis - TS 6.9.1.5c LR-N21-0083, Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 2021 & 30 Day Report for Salem Unit 2 Upflow Conversion2021-11-24024 November 2021 Loss of Coolant Accident Peak Cladding Temperature Margin Tracking - Annual Report 2021 & 30 Day Report for Salem Unit 2 Upflow Conversion LR-N21-0078, Hope and Creek Generating Station, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Delete Definitions Found in 10 CFR Part 20 and Delete Figures of the Site and Surrounding Areas from TS2021-11-18018 November 2021 Hope and Creek Generating Station, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Delete Definitions Found in 10 CFR Part 20 and Delete Figures of the Site and Surrounding Areas from TS LR-N21-0066, Submittal of Relief Request Associated with the Fourth Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Limited Examinations2021-11-10010 November 2021 Submittal of Relief Request Associated with the Fourth Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Limited Examinations 2023-09-08
[Table view] Category:Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARLR-N23-0003, Response to Requests for Additional Information Salem Unit 2 Relief Request S2-I4R-2112023-02-0101 February 2023 Response to Requests for Additional Information Salem Unit 2 Relief Request S2-I4R-211 LR-N22-0092, Response to Final Iolb Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG2022-12-0909 December 2022 Response to Final Iolb Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG LR-N22-0084, Response to Final Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG (EPID L- 2022-LLA-0095)2022-11-17017 November 2022 Response to Final Request for Additional Information for Salem LAR to Revise TS to Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDG (EPID L- 2022-LLA-0095) LR-N22-0022, Response to Request for Additional Information Relief Request S1-14R-210, Alternative Examination of Welds2022-03-21021 March 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Relief Request S1-14R-210, Alternative Examination of Welds JAFP-21-0087, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments2021-09-16016 September 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments JAFP-21-0044, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments2021-06-11011 June 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments LR-N21-0024, Response to Request for Additional Information for Proposed Alternative for Examination of ASME Section XI, Examination Category 8-8, Item Number 82.11 and 82.122021-04-12012 April 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information for Proposed Alternative for Examination of ASME Section XI, Examination Category 8-8, Item Number 82.11 and 82.12 LR-N21-0031, Response to Request for Additional Information, Revise and Relocate Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System Limits to Pressure and Temperature Limits Report2021-04-0101 April 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information, Revise and Relocate Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System Limits to Pressure and Temperature Limits Report LR-N21-0019, Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report (ML20261 H589)2021-02-25025 February 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report (ML20261 H589) LR-N20-0058, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Re Application of Leak-Before-Break for Accumulator, Residual Heat Removal, Safety Injection and Pressurizer Surge Lines2020-09-16016 September 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Re Application of Leak-Before-Break for Accumulator, Residual Heat Removal, Safety Injection and Pressurizer Surge Lines ML19308A5952019-11-0404 November 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request for Approval of Changes to Emergency Plan Staffing Requirements ML19280A0002019-10-0303 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 - Final RAI Emergency Plan Staffing Requirements (L-2019-LLA-0145) LR-N19-0066, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements.2019-06-11011 June 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements. LR-N18-0116, Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2018-10-30030 October 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension LR-N18-0112, Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2018-10-20020 October 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension LR-N18-0108, Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2018-10-18018 October 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request: Inverter Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension LR-N18-0070, Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP~15376 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation System Instrumentation Test Times and ..2018-07-17017 July 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP~15376 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation System Instrumentation Test Times and ... RS-18-061, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Decommissioning Funding Plans for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (Isfsis)2018-05-0202 May 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Decommissioning Funding Plans for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (Isfsis) LR-N17-0140, Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Technical Specifications (CACs MF8859 and MF8860)2017-10-18018 October 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Technical Specifications (CACs MF8859 and MF8860) LR-N17-0263, Response to Request for Additional Information, Salem Units 1 and 2 - Containment Fan Coil Unit Allowed Outage Time Extension Amendment Request2017-09-14014 September 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information, Salem Units 1 and 2 - Containment Fan Coil Unit Allowed Outage Time Extension Amendment Request LR-N17-0125, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors2017-08-11011 August 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors LR-N17-0115, Response to RAI Re Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2017-08-0707 August 2017 Response to RAI Re Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report LR-N17-0118, Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Technical Specifications2017-08-0707 August 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information (Rai), Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Technical Specifications LR-N17-0102, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request SC-14R-171, Use of Code Cases N-695-1 and N-696-12017-06-0505 June 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request SC-14R-171, Use of Code Cases N-695-1 and N-696-1 LR-N17-0091, Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Containment Fan Cooler Unit (Cfcu) Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2017-05-0404 May 2017 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Containment Fan Cooler Unit (Cfcu) Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension LR-N17-0079, Supplemental Information for Response to Request for Additional Information, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals2017-05-0303 May 2017 Supplemental Information for Response to Request for Additional Information, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals LR-N17-0001, Supplemental Information for Response to Request for Additional Information, RAI-8- RAI-11, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals2017-01-13013 January 2017 Supplemental Information for Response to Request for Additional Information, RAI-8- RAI-11, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals LR-N16-0226, Response to Request for Additional Information, Regarding Removing Certain Training Requirements2016-12-19019 December 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information, Regarding Removing Certain Training Requirements LR-N16-0094, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-12-0606 December 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident ML16305A2412016-10-31031 October 2016 Response to NRC Generic Letter 2016-01, Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools. LR-N16-0127, Response to Request for Additional Information, RAI-8- RAI-11, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals2016-10-0505 October 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information, RAI-8- RAI-11, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals LR-N16-0159, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications2016-08-30030 August 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications LR-N16-0153, Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning Request for an Extension to Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 12-0012016-08-18018 August 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning Request for an Extension to Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 12-001 LR-N16-0134, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications2016-08-12012 August 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications LR-N16-0130, Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2016-08-0202 August 2016 Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations LR-N16-0109, and Hope Creek Generating Stations - Cover Letter for Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Review of Security Plan, Revision 172016-06-15015 June 2016 and Hope Creek Generating Stations - Cover Letter for Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Review of Security Plan, Revision 17 LR-N16-0055, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications2016-03-31031 March 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Chilled Water System Modifications ML16083A1942016-03-23023 March 2016 Transmittal of Response to Request for Additional Information, RAI-4, Aging Management Program Plan for Reactor Vessel Internals LR-N16-0012, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding Replacement of Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitoring Systems2016-02-10010 February 2016 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding Replacement of Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitoring Systems LR-N15-0239, Compliance with March 12, 2012 NRC Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) and Responses to Requests for Additional Information2016-01-25025 January 2016 Compliance with March 12, 2012 NRC Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) and Responses to Requests for Additional Information LR-N15-0255, High Frequency Supplement to Seismic Hazard Screening Report, Response to NRC Request for Information, Per 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi..2015-12-23023 December 2015 High Frequency Supplement to Seismic Hazard Screening Report, Response to NRC Request for Information, Per 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi.. LR-N15-0235, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding Replacement of Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitoring Systems (CAC Nos. MF6065 and MF6066)2015-11-27027 November 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding Replacement of Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitoring Systems (CAC Nos. MF6065 and MF6066) LR-N15-0224, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Isolate Unborated Water Sources and Use Gamma-Metrics Post-Accident Neutron Monitors During Mode 6 (Refueling)2015-11-25025 November 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Isolate Unborated Water Sources and Use Gamma-Metrics Post-Accident Neutron Monitors During Mode 6 (Refueling) ML19031A6581997-03-30030 March 1997 03/30/1997 Letter Response to Request for Evaluation Re Refueling Accident Inside Containment ML19031A5031979-03-23023 March 1979 Generation Station, Unit 2 - Responses to Requests for Additional Information. Provides 60 Copies of Additional Seismic Qualification Information as Identified During 02/26-28/1979 Meeting ML19031A3811979-01-18018 January 1979 Response to Request for Additional Information on Quality Assurance & Subcompartment Analysis, Which Will Be Incorporated Into Fasr in Amendment to Application ML19030A6551978-08-22022 August 1978 08/22/1978 Response to Request for Additional Information Increased Capacity Spent Fuel Racks ML19031C3721978-08-0707 August 1978 08/07/1978 Letter Response to IE Bulletin No. 78-08 on Radiation Levels from Fuel Element Transfer Tubes ML19030A6651978-08-0202 August 1978 08/02/1978 Response to Request for Additional Information Diesel Generators ML19030A6601978-07-31031 July 1978 07/31/1978 Response to Request for Additional Information Increased Capacity Spent Fuel Racks 2023-02-01
[Table view] |
Text
PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0PSEG NuclearLLC 10 CFR 50.90 LR-N 18-0070 JULI 7 2018 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
Subject:
Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI), Re: Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP~15376 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation System Instrumentation Test Times and Completion Times
References:
- 1. NRC email to PSEG, "Salem 1 and 2 - Final RAI RE: Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-411 and 418" dated June 20, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18171A321)
- 2. PSEG letter to NRC, "License Amendment Request for Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP-1376 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation System Instrumentation Test Times and Completion Times," dated December 18, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17352A502)
- 3. NRC letter to PSEG, "Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 -
Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP-15376 (EPID L-2017-LLA-0442)," dated Ja*nuary 31, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML180258916)
- 4. PSEG letter to NRC, "Supplemental Information to License Amendment Request for Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP-15376, Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation Test Times and Completion Times," dated February 9, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18040A319)
In Reference 1, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requested PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG) to provide additional information in order to complete the review of the license amendment request (LAR) to implement changes to the Technical Specification (TS) requirements for Reactor Trip System and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System instrumentation test and completion times per TSTF 411 and TSTF 418. Attachment 1 provides a response to the request for additional information.
Page 2
- LR-N 18-0070 PSEG has determined that the information provided in this submittal does not alter the conclusions reached in the 10 CFR 50.92 no significant hazards determination previously submitted. In addition, the information provided in this submittal does not affect the bases for concluding that neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment.
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.
Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Michael Wiwel at 856-339-7907.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on (Date)
Sincerely, Charles V. McFeaters Site Vice President Salem Generating Station Attachments:
- 1. Response to Request for Additional Information cc: Mr. D. Dorman, Administrator, Region I, NRC Mr. R. Ennis, Project Manager, NRC NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Salem Mr. P. Mulligan, Chief, NJBNE Saleni Commitment Tracking Coordinator Corporate Commitment Tracking Coordinator
LR-N18-0070 Attachment 1 Response to Request for Additional Information 1
LR-N 18-0070 Request for Additional Information (RAI)
Regarding Implementation of WCAP-14333 and WCAP-15376 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation Test Times and Completion Times Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 By letter dated December 18, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
[ADAMS] Accession No. ML17352A502), as supplemented by letter dated February 9, 201.8 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18040A319), Public Service Enterprise Group Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) submitted a risk-informed license amendment request to revise Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.3.1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation" and TS 3/4.3.2, "Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation" to implement the allowed surveillance test intervals (STls),
completion times (CT), and bypass test times at Salem Generating Station (Salem) Units 1 and
- 2. In order to complete its review, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff requests a response to the questions below Request for Additional Information (RAil 01 - Deviations to WCAP-14333 and 15376 Insert 5 of Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) 411, Revision 1 (ADAMS Accession No. ML022470164), states, "In order to apply the WCAP-10271, as supplemented, and WCAP-15376 TS relaxations to plant specific Functions not evaluated generically, licensees must submit plant specific evaluations for NRC review and approval." Insert 4 of TSTF-418, Revision 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML012530049), states, "In order to apply the various relaxations justified in WCAP-10271, WCAP-14333-P-A and WCAP-15376 to plant specific Functions not evaluated generically, a plant specific evaluation of those Functions must be performed."
In TS Table 3.3-1 of the LAR, Reactor Trip System (RTS) Function 20 (Reactor Coolant Pump Breaker Position Trip (above P-7)) was not generically evaluated as described above. In TS Table 3.3-3 of the LAR, the following Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) functions were not generically evaluated as described above: Function 3.c.2 (Containment Ventilation Isolation, Automatic Actuation Logic), Function 6 (Safeguards Equipment Control System), Function 7.a (Vital Bus Undervoltage, Loss of Voltage), Function 7.b (Vital Bus Undervoltage, Sustained Degraded Voltage), Function 9.a (Semiautomatic Transfer to Recirculation, RWST Level Low), and Function 9.b (Semiautomatic Transfer to Recirculation, Automatic Isolation Logic). The LAR provides a plant-specific evaluation for RTS Function 20 to justify an extended completion time. The LAR also provides a plant-specific evaluation for ESFAS Functions 7a, 7b, 9a, and 9b that justifies an allowed outage time and test bypass extension. However, it is unclear to NRC staff how the unavailabilities (UA) listed in Table 4-22 of the LAR were calculated for Functions 3.c.2 and 6. For the plant-specific evaluation for ESFAS Functions 3.c.2 and 6, describe how UA values provided in Table 4-22 of the LAR were calculated.
2
LR-N18-0070 PSEG Response to RAI 01 - Deviations to WCAP-14333 and 15376 As stated in Section 4.2.3 of the LAR when discussing Functions 3.c.2, 6, 7a, 7b, 9.a, & 9.b, "The acceptability of the proposed changes for the above functions was evaluated quantitatively using an application specific model as discussed in Sections 4.3.1.5 and 4.3.4." These plant-specific evaluations are discussed throughout Section 4.3 of the LAR, with the results presented in Table 4-30 of the LAR, including results for Function 3.c.2 (Containment Ventilation Isolation Automatic Actuation Logic, line "Cl" in Table 4-30) and Function 6 (Safeguards Equipment Control System, line "SEC" in Table 4-30).
The unavailability values in Table 4-22 represent important inputs into these plant-specific calculations. For Vital Bus Undervoltage (Functions 7.a/b) and Semiautomatic Transfer to Recirculation (Functions 9.a/b), modifications to the PRA were made as discussed in Section 4.3.1.5 of the LAR. For Containment Ventilation Isolation Automatic Actuation Logic (Function 3.c.2) and Safeguards Equipment Control System (Function 6), the required fault tree logic, basic events, and unavailability values for the PRA already existed, so they were not specifically discussed in the LAR.
For Containment Ventilation Isolation Automatic Isolation Logic (Function 3.c.2), the existing PRA model uses an unavailability event (RPS-LOG-TM-TRNA/8) that conservatively represents the unavailability of an entire train of RPS logic. The unavailability value for this event is based on a historical value in the Salem PRA because the most recent data update showed zero hours of applicable unavailability for these components. The impact of using this historical value is considered to be conservative and negligible based on the zero actual hours of unavailability.
This approach and impact are discussed in the DA-C1 Supporting Requirement in Table 4-13 of the LAR.
For Safeguards Equipment Control System (Function 6), the existing PRA model uses an unavailability event (ESF-LOG-TM-SEC-A/8/C) based on actual plant-specific data from the Maintenance Rule Manager that was collected and applied during the latest data analysis update. The plant-specific data included both Unit 1 and Unit 2.
3
LR-N18-0070 RAI 02- Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Mission Time The combined American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS) probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) standard (ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009) defines mission time as the time period that system or component is required to operate in order to successfully perform its function. Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200, Revision 2, states that licensees are to ensure mission times and their requirements are adequately discussed and documented per the ASME PRA Standard. The ASME PRA standard states, "use a minimum mission time of 24 hr.
Mission times for individual SSCs (systems, structures, and components] that function during the accident sequence may be less than 24 hr, as long as an appropriate set of SSCs and operator actions are modeled to support the full sequence mission time."
In Tables 4-9 and 4-11 of the LAR, the EOG mission time used by the licensee is 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in the disposition of Facts and Observations (F&Os) AS-AB, AS-87, SY-811. The justification for using 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> instead of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is provided in the Salem PRA Data Notebook SA-PRA-010, and the discussion of resolution for these F&Os is insufficient for the NRC staff to conclude that an appropriate set of SSCs and operator actions are modeled to justify using an EOG mission time of 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> instead of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. For F&O AS-87, the licensee states, "SBO scenarios are relatively insignificant risk contributors within the context of this risk evaluation." The disposition of F&O AS-87 is insufficient for the NRC staff to conclude that SBO scenarios are insignificant to risk using a 6.2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> mission time instead of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Provide one of the following to address using 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for EOG mission time:
- a. Provide the justification documented in Section 10.0 of Salem PRA Data Notebook SA-PRA-010 that allows using 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for F&Os AS-AB and SY-811, and provide justification that "SBO scenarios are relatively insignificant risk contributors within the context of this risk evaluation" given that a 6.2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> mission time was used for the EDGs instead of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, OR;
- b. Perform a sensitivity analysis using the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> mission time discussed in the ASME PRA Standard and* provide updated risk metrics for using the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> mission time.
Justify these updated risk metrics meet the guidance in RG 1.174, Revision 2, and RG 1.177, Revision 1.
PSEG Response to RAI 02 - Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Mission Time A surrogate emergency diesel generator (EOG) mission time was developed to quantify the risk of mitigating PRA scenarios for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The surrogate mission time was developed by calculating a time-averaged value for which the EOG would be required to run and supply AC power prior to recovery of an offsite power source. The estimation of this EOG surrogate mission time involved the convolution of EOG run-time success with non-recovery of offsite power over a time period ranging from 15 minutes to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the initial loss of offsite power (LOOP) event. This calculation was performed using the non-recovery curve for weather-related events taken from Table 4-1 of NUREG/CR-6B90, "Reevaluation of Station Blackout Risk at Nuclear Power Plants" [2]. The weather-related curve was chosen because its non-recovery probabilities are bounding compared to the plant-centered, switchyard and grid curves. This probabilistic treatment of power availability quantifies the probability of reaching a steady-state condition as discussed in AS-AB.
4
LR-N18-0070 Some of the assumptions and limitations used in this convolution exercise include the following:
- The mathematical convolution models the conditional probability for failure to supply AC power with either a diesel generator or offsite AC power source between 15 minutes and 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the LOOP event.
- EOG recovery is not credited.
- This evaluation only considers the operation of a single EOG. Consideration of a second EOG would add complexity to the evaluation, but is not judged to alter the conclusions. The single EOG case is conservative because one or the other EOG has a likelihood of continuing to run.
- The dominant contributor to risk during a given LOOP is the diesel failing to run.
Any EOG or any offsite power source provides enough power to safely shutdown and maintain a steady-state condition. The probabilistic model simulates the availability of adequate power to support the plant for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and beyond per SY-811. The EOG surrogate run-time convolution resulted in a surrogate mission time of 6.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. The integrals were solved using the commercially available Mathcad [1] code.
Section 4.3.4.8 of the LAR identifies that the primary contributors to the small increases in average COF and LERF that is still well below the acceptance criteria are due to:
- Main steam line break inside containment followed by failure of SI signal in combination with failure of operators to manually recover.
These contributors are based on the quantitative results of the internal events model (with internal flooding). While some-of the accident sequences that contribute to the small risk increase are related to LOOP and SBO, the EOG failures of concern are fail-to-start due to the increased unavailability of the UV relays. Since an EOG is required after a LOOP, and none of the changes proposed in this application would increase the frequency of a LOOP, there is no increase to the number of EOG demands. Additionally, the Salem PRA credits the ability to manually start EOGs from the control room when and if they fail to automatically start. The probabilistic credit (i.e., the human error probability) varies for different scenarios, but is significant because manually starting an EOG is in Salem procedures and training.
The changes proposed in this application could impact the ability of the EOG to start, as identified in these results, but the changes would have no direct impact on the ability of the EOG to run. Sequences with only one EOG failure that is fail-to-run would not be impacted by the changes. Sequences are possible with more than one EOG failure, where one EOG failure was a fail-to-start due to signal failures (such as UV relays), but such combinations do not appear in the delete-term cutsets for this application. In fact, the delete-term cutsets that represent the small risk increases show no occurrences of the EOG fail-to-run events with a 6.2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> mission time, so that approximation has a negligible impact on the conclusions, confirming this reasoning.
For external events discussed in the LAR and Supplement, the qualitative analysis provides a bounding calculation that does not depend on the mission time of the EOGs for the same reasons as discussed above. Given the conclusions of the qualitative evaluations that determined that conservative estimates for external event ~COF and ~LERF are all well below 5
LR-N18-0070 the acceptance guidelines for all of the signals that could be impacted by this application, the impact of a different EOG mission time would be negligible for external events.
In conclusion, the analysis in the LAR provides reasonable risk and ti risk values and insights for the scenarios analyzed.
RAI 03 - Common Cause Failure Data According to the ASME PRA Standard, the High Level Requirement for Systems Analysis requires the systems analysis to provide a reasonably complete treatment of common cause failures (CCF) and intersystem and intra-system dependencies.
In Table 4-11 of the LAR, the licensee's disposition of F&O SY-83 states, "A few CCF events were determined using sources other than the NRC/INL data." The licensee does not provide additional information as to what the source of the CCF is or why it was used. In order for the NRC staff to conclude the licensee's treatment of CCF is reasonable, provide which CCF events used data sources other than NRC/INL data, and provide justification as to why this data is reasonable to treat CCF at Salem Units 1 and 2.
PSEG Response to RAI 03 - Common Cause Failure Data A review of the PRA Data Notebook (SA-PRA-010) [3] revealed that CCF events were indeed derived using alpha factors developed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) [4] that were used in conjunction with the independent failure rates, as well as other factors to account for mission times and the number of intermediate combinations that were modeled. For Westinghouse Reactor Protection System common cause failures, values were obtained from Table 3 of NUREG/CR-5500 [5] for the following components:
- Channel bistable relay failures
- Solid State Protection System (SSPS) undervoltage driver card failures NUREG/CR-5500 is commonly used in nuclear plant PRAs and it contains a more detailed explanation of the basis for the above common-cause failure component groups (SY-83).
6
LR-N18-0070 RAI 04 - Data Analysis The supporting requirement DA-C5 for HLR-DA-C in the ASME PRA standard states, "Count repeated plant-specific component failures occurring within a short time interval as a single failure if there is a single, repetitive problem that causes the failures."
In Table 4-13 of the LAR, for the disposition of F&O DA-C5, the licensee states, "the Data notebook was updated to clarify failures occurring within a short time interval can be excluded so as not to skew the data for any one SSC modeled in the PRA." Based on the ASME PRA standard, the disposition of F&O DA-C5 by the licensee is different than the requirements in the ASME PRA Standard, in that failures occurring within a short time interval should not be excluded, but rather counted as a single failure.
Provide justification for this discrepancy. Alternatively, perform a sensitivity evaluation using a single failure instead of excluding the failure, and provide and justify the updated risk metrics meet the guidance in RG 1.174, Revision 2, and RG 1.177, Revision 1.
PSEG Response to RAI 04 - Data Analysis The original wording for this Supporting Requirement (SR) is misleading and should be restated as follows:
During the 2015 update, the Data notebook was updated to clarify that repetitive failures occurring within a short time interval were only counted as a single failure so as not to skew the data for any one SSC modeled in the PRA that experienced multiple failures that were related to a single fault.
7
LR-N18-0070 RAI 05 - External Hazards When a licensee requests an amendment to its license that involves a risk-informed change to technical specifications, RG 1.177, Revision 1, states that when the risk associated with a particular hazard group or operating mode would affect the decision being made, it is the Commission's policy that, if a staff-endorsed PRA standard exists for that hazard group or operating mode, then the risk will be assessed using a PRA that meets that standard.
Regulatory Guide 1.174, Revision 2, adds that a qualitative treatment of the missing modes and hazard groups may be sufficient when the licensee can demonstrate that those risk contributions will not affect the decision; that is, they do not alter the results of the comparison with the acceptance guidelines.
According to the LAR and the LAR supplement, hazards applicable to Salem Units 1 and 2 include internal events, internal fires, external floods, and seismic events. For internal events and external floods, the licensee provides separate change in risk values for each operating unit, as there are differences between the two units. In the LAR supplement, the qualitative bounding assessment for internal fires and seismic events provides change in risk values, but does not specify to which operating unit(s) the change in risk values are applicable. For the change in risk due to internal fires and seismic events, provide the follow information:
- a. Clarify to which operating unit(s) the change in risk is applicable;
- b. If the change in risk is only applicable to one operating unit, provide the change in risk for internal fires and seismic events for the other unit.
PSEG Response to RAI 05 - External Hazards In the LAR supplement, the qualitative bounding assessments for internal fires and seismic events provide values for changes in risk that apply to both units. The bases for the qualitative evaluations described in the supplement rely in part on the Salem Full Power Internal Events PRA Model of Record [6]. All inputs from the PRA used in the supplement apply equally to both Salem Units. For example, the seismic evaluation in the LAR uses a human error probability for failure to start ECCS drawn from the PRA model, which would be the same for both Unit 1 and Unit 2. The one difference identified in the LAR that is a relevant unit-to-unit difference is the existence of the semiautomatic switchover to recirculation in Unit 2. This difference does not impact the conclusions of the qualitative evaluations that determine that conservative estimates for external events ~CDF and ~LERF are all well below the acceptance guidelines for all of the signals that could be impacted by this application.
8
LR-N18-0070 REFERENCES
- 1. "User's Guide with Reference Manual - Mathcad 2001 Professional", Mathsoft, Inc., Cambridge, MA, Copyright 1986-2001.
- 2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Reevaluation of Station Blackout Risk at Nuclear Power Plants", NUREG/CR-6890, December 2005.
- 3. PSEG, Salem Generating Station PRA Data Notebook, SA-PRA-010, Rev. 2, December 2016.
- 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "CCF Parameter Estimations, 2012 Update",http://nrcoe.inl.gov/results/CCF/ParamEst2012/ccfparamest.htm, November 2013.
- 5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Reliability Study: Westinghouse Reactor Protection System, 1984-1995", NUREG/CR-5500, Volume 2, April 1999.
- 6. Salem Generating Station, Quantification Notebook, SA-PRA-014, Revision 1, December 2016.
9