L-12-283, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B, Seismic Walk-Down Checklists, Sheet 364 of 461 Through Appendix C, Area Walk-By Checklists, Sheet 20 of 139

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B, Seismic Walk-Down Checklists, Sheet 364 of 461 Through Appendix C, Area Walk-By Checklists, Sheet 20 of 139

ML13008A065
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/10/2012
From:	Lucarelli B, Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-12-283
Download: ML13008A065 (119)

Text

Q jPaul C. Rizzo Associates, ENGINEERS& VONSULTA1TS Inc.

Sheet 364 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S001 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK-1I-A I Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

LIE I Section in a 19-section MCC (IR24-SO18). 7 sections of this line up are on 3/8" shims. This configurationwas addressed adequately in calculationSQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0. Nofurther action was required Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x __::I Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? I I IIx I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions?

~YŽ Pa"l C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 365 of 461 I N(AN~ELR& L'ONSUITANI Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S0016 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK-1-A1 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, X and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedpiping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free xI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012

( A.

Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Sheet 366 of 461 Set36o 6 "I'Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& A'ONSULTAN,",

Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR25S0016 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- 1-AI orting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-8-4-06.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-8-4-06.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

LQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic W.Rko CheckLisTA (SW Sheet 367 of 461 Status: (R) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25SOO Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK-1-A I File Name: 2 -6 3 4-06.jpeg

Description:

Inside view of component File Name: 2 8-4-06.jpeg

Description:

Base connection detail of component

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(NINEERS

& CON'SULtTLV1S Sheet 368 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S001 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Instrument Panel EB-l-B13 Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

19 sections MCC. Each section welded to perimeter concrete pad angles with at least 3 - 2 1/2 "fillet weld of 1/4" throat. Firstsection is only on 3/8" shims that are plug welded to perimeter angle. This configurationwas addressedadequately in calculationSQ-O1 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0. No further actionwas required Component locatedinside MCC EFID07.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

hI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

111,1111111 IOONIL:ITANTI Sheet 369 of 461 Status: W1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S001 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Instrument Panel EB-lI-B I Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12

XY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CON*ULTANMS Sheet 370 of 461 Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S0018 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Instrument Panel EB-1-B1 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-5-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-4-22.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

---

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, ENG;tNIUR If*C ONIL ITANI I

c. Sheet 371 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S0018 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Instrument Panel EB-I-B I File Name: 2-63-5-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail rue jName: L-o,+-i-,4-zz.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 372 of 461

& CO.N'ULTANTS EN.GINEERS Status: © N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S0018 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Instrument Panel EB- 1-B 1 File Name: 2-73-5-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of side panel connection

F '- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 373 of 461 i MANlkdRI& LeONst (LTS%

W )

Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S00, Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I -B I Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line with 14 section MCC EFIC07. 14 section MCC with combination ofdirect weld to perimeter concrete pad angles and plug-welded 3/8" shims configuration is used for anchorage. This configurationwas addressedadequately in calculationSQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0. No frther action was required Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X - -T potentially adverse seismic conditions?

• QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 374 of 461 ENGINEERS& CONSULTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S0020 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I1-B I Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

! I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

L[ 4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 375 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR25S00 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I-B I photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-6-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-4-22.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

X--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEE.RS

& CONSULTAN'TS Sheet 376 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S002 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I-B I File Name: 2-63-6-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-6-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

SNGIem lkd W Sn&

Check IsAt( C Sheet 377 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S00, Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I-C I Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one II x of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line with 8 section MCC IR24S0029. 8 section MCC with combination of direct weld to perimeter concrete pad angles andplug-welded 3/8" shims configurationis usedfor anchorage. This configurationwas addressedadequately in calculationSQ-0178 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0. No further action was required Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

M Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 378 of 461 ENGINEERS& O*NSULTAIVIS Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S0022 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK-1-CI Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Hanging lights near the component identified with spring-typefixtures. Judgednot an interactionconcern.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedandattachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

_ .. /K***

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Patul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 379 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR25S0022 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK-I-CI Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-7-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID i W File Name: 2-62-7-4-22.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULT.'NTS Sheet 380 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S00: Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution Panel EK- I1-ClI File Name: 2-63-7-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-7-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

`Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 381 of 461 SNsINcERSW&

k ONSI ciTAN( )

Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S00, Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB- I-A I Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEII of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on C5 channels. Bolted with 6 - 1/2" diam machine bolts to channelflange.

C5 to perimeter concretepad angles with wrap aroundwelds at ends of C5 base (- 7 1/2" of 1/4" welds).

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LXŽQj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COtNSKLTANIS Sheet 382 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S0025 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB-1I-A1I Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidlysupported and attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12

L*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seimi WakIdnER

& (Cekst L (SWC Sheet 383 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S0025 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB-1I-A I and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61 4-U6jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-13-4-06.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Asso'iates, Inc.

ENGINEE~RS

& CON'S1:TANTa, Sheet 384 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR25S0025 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB-I-AI File Name: 2-63-13-4-06.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-13-4-06.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 385 of 461 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S0025 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB- I-A 1 File Name: 2-73-13-4-06.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

L IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGIN\EERS& N)L*AITN-r'S Sheet 386 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S00. Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB-1I-A2 Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I YX I N I

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on C5 channels. Bolted with 6 - 1/2" diam machine bolts to channelflange.

C5 to perimeterconcrete pad angles with wrap aroundwelds at ends of C5 base (-7 1/2" of 1/4" welds).

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Welding configurationconfirmed per Document 1-6-7, page 186-187.

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

KY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

M4INI11RS

& "ANL iI*ANII Sheet 387 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S0033 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB- I-A2 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Hanging lights in the areajudged not a concern due to end tube spring type connections.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Corner is welded to shims. Shims are welded to base.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

& CONSLLTANTS ENC(INEERS Sheet 388 of 461 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R25S0033 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB-1-A2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-10-1-06.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-10-1-06.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 389 of 461 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R25S0033 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 4:80V to 120V XFMR EFI3- I-A2 File Name: 2-63-10-1-06.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-I0-1-06.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 390 of 461 ENGINEERS& (XONSULTANTS Status:

• N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR25S0033 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V to 120V XFMR EFB- I-A2 File Name: 2-73-10-1-06.jpeg

Description:

View of mounting base configuration

'qlr Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 391 of 461 I W (lkd URI&Ch ekIIIT (SWI Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0002 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description U nit I Div I Battery Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Two single racks. Each rack has two rows andhas three bays. The racks arefully braced Each bay is welded to embeds with -16" of l/4"fillet welds. Battety cells divided by I inchfoam pad Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

F lQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 392 of 461 INE[RS &

ENG'< CONSULTNV'1S Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. I R42S0002 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description U nit I Div I Battery Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescenttube fixturesfound with protective covering.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x I I I I Attachedpiping is rigidlysupported andattachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Vv Q Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 393 of 461 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0002 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description Unit I Div I Battery and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

Sheet 394 of 461 L[YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTA'TS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0002 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description Unit I Div 1 Battery File Name: 2-63-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of component base detail File Name: 2-64-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of rack base detail

L ------ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 395 of 461 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0002 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description -Unit I Div I Battery File Name: 2-73-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of attached line File Name: 2-94-4-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of battery cells separation

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EPNINEERS & COML LTANI-S Sheet 396 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0008 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD-I-B Battery Charger Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Chargermounted on channel base welded with 3 - 4" stitch welds at 12" oc to embedment. Concrete padaround 5" thick. Charger is attachedto flanges of base channels with 3-1/2" diam. bolts on each side.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

II I I N/Ax I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 397 of 461 I NO UER'& O'N.[A1"A'N1S Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S00C Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD- I1-B Battery Charger Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x 7T77777 Attachedpiping is rigidlysupportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra /

Date: 8/26/2012 S.;

Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

t%(,INURS & CONSITtANTS Sheet 398 of 461 Status: W1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0008 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD- 1-B Battery Charger and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-2-4-02.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID Hile Name: 2-02-2-4-UL.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L '41r- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

PVANtINIRS6 C.ON't LTNNI1 Sheet 399 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0008 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD-I-B Battery Charger File Name: 2-63-2-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of component base File Name: 2-64-2-4-02.jpeg

Description:

View of attached top lines

I'-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 400 of 461 ENGINEERS& CONS ULTATS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0012 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution panel EDIA06 Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yz Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Distributionpanel ED1A 06. 8ft tall panel on invertedchannels at base. C4 welded to perimeter concrete. Padangles at 4 cornerswith -4" of 5/16" weld Panel attachedto web ofchannels with 4 - 1/2" diam machine bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Fv Q Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 401 of 461 Status: (S N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0012 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution panel EDIA06 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

LŽCY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEER . O)NSULTANTS Sheet 402 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0012 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution panel ED I A06

,uments and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-6l-8-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID rile Name: L-az-5-4-zz.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

LX-Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 403 of461 INONt I R. & .UO.'tLIT %M Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0012 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution panel ED] A06 File Name: 2-63-8-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of anchor bolts at base File Name: 2-64-8-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 404 of 461 ENGINEERS& CONS1LI"ANTý Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0012 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description Distribution panel ED 1A06 File Name: 2-73-8-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

L qiyŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 405 of 461 S NeimIc o EWRa Ch eckl IIN\ I Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42SO01 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED IB06 Distribution Panel Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one II x I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Distributionpanel EDI B06. 8ft tall panel on invertedchannels at base. C4 welded to perimeter concrete. Padangles at 4 corners with -4" of 5/16" weld Panelattachedto web of channels with 4 - 1/2" diam machine bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? II I I N/A x

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

rLwY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 406 of 461 ENGINEEIR,& CONSU L.TA'1S Status: (9) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0013 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED I1B06 Distribution Panel Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidlysupportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Fl' Patti C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IN

• (INUERS, & C'ONSI 1ITANIS Sheet 407 of 461 Status: S) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0013 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED 1B06 Distribution Panel Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-9-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-9-4-22.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 408 of 461 "IC-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUI TATS Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S00113 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED I B06 Distribution Panel File Name: 2-63-9-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of anchor bolts at base File Name: 2-64-9-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail

L*-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, nc.

ENO;NE RS & W..St ITA*lI Sheet 409 of 461 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0013 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED IB06 Distribution Panel File Name: 2-73-9-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

Q1Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 410 of 461 SiGINEcR. & COhSeLi (AWC)

Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0014 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description EDIB08 Distribution Panel Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y Nz of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Distributionpanel ED1A08. 8ft tall panel on invertedchannels at base. C4 welded to perimeter concrete. Padangles at 4 corners with -4" of 5/16" weld Panelattachedto web of channels with 4 - 1/2" diam machine bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

[I I I N/Ax (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x F ] I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ilk Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 411 of 461 INRS & AJ'(,t I TA'.]'.

ENINFE Status: T) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S0014 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED IB08 Distribution Panel Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attachedpiping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduitswere found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 412 of 461 ENGINEERS& CO.NSULTAV'*'S Status: 1*) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0014 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED 1B08 Distribution Panel Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-10-4-22.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-10-4-22.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Q Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I SGI[NtfR% & t O\'ttILT %\-Is Sheet 413 of 461 Status: (S) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S00 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description EDI B08 Distribution Panel File Name: 2-63-10-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-10-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of anchor bolts at base

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 414 of 461 ENGINEERS& O)NSLULTANTS Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1DNo. 1R42S0014 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description ED1B08 Distribution Panel File Name: 2-73-10-4-22.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines

'4C- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 415 of 461 S NGINWldRo

& LOCS IT(NTSW Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S0024 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description E D-1I-A 125 VDC Bus Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one x I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is a three section switchgear. It is welded to embeds with an average of at least 6" long, 3/16" welds (F&B). Adjacent panels are boltedtogether.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Welds to basefound in adequate condition.

Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Base found in adequate condition Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Welding configurationconfirmed per Document 1-6-7, page 92-96.

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ž Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& (ONSULTATS Sheet 416 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S0024 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED-I-A 125 V DC Bus Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attachedpipingis rigidlysupportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Overhead attached trolly restrained per IPEEE resolution which is to park the trolly at center of rail (signage added) and restrain the hook from banging, Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 417 of 461

&ChecklIstNI (W, Si(smNcWak Status: W* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0024 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED- I-A 125 V DC Bus s and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-3-4-02jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID lHle Name: 2-62-3-4-02.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 418 of 461 ENGINEERS& CONSLLTAMIS Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0024 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED-I-A 125 V DC Bus File Name: 2-63-3-4-02.jpeg

Description:

Inside view of component

q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 419 of 461 SeisNmiERS &a ko ONstl.T I W C Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED-I-C 125 V DC Bus Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y Nz of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panelon 4" concrete pad anchoredwith 48 - 3/8" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X N 7U N/A Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

[*--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 420 of 461 SesmC ENGINaRS& ChONSUlistAN(S Status: W* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ElD-1-C 125 V DC Bus Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

vQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 421 of 461 SeNisiEWlRSk& LdONSULT (NSWC Status: W* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED- I-C 125 V DC Bus and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-IJ-4-U8jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-10-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

L~IYŽPaul C. Rizzo As~ociatcs, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUL[TNNTS Sheet 422 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED-I-C 125 V DC Bus rue *Name: z-ou.)-iU-t-uo.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached lines File Name: 2-64-10-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines

LVY _ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ESiIsNmRS &

C WOakocANIs Sheet 423 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description E D-I-C 125 V DC Bus File Name: 2-73-10-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of concrete base File Name: 2-94-l0-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage from inside of cabinet

F ---- rPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 424 of 461 ENGINEERSL

&, CONSU.LTANTIS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description ED-I-C 125 V DC Bus rlue Iqame: L-YJ-Iu-,f-uo.jpeg

Description:

Typical detail for anchorage configuration File Name: 2-96-10-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage detail from inside of cabinet

LQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 425 of 461 Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42S0038 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description DIV 2, MCC ED IB09 Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 638 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y Nz I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is a two section MCC on heavy steel base members. The base members are anchoredwith 6-1" diam. anchors. The MCC base channel is welded to base members with an average of at least 5" of weld (F&B) per section.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSLLTAN TS Sheet 426 of 461 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR42S0038 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description DIV 2, MCC EDIB09 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IN(AMEIN(( & t ONS1: ITANIS Sheet 427 of 461 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42S0038 Equip. Class I. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description DIV 2, MCC EDI B09 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-64-1-4-02.jpeg

Description:

Component ID Plate File Name: 2-62-l-4-02.jpeg

Description:

Inside view of component

L'NC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONs ULTA,'.TS Sheet 428 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43SO001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one XI I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchored with 22 - 2" diam anchorsalong long side of DG. Motor and generatoron the same pedestal.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Several hairline cracks identified near anchorbolts andjudged acceptable.

Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationconfirmed by Drawing417-0066, FoundationPlan "A ".

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I TI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L*--Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 429 of 461 ESeismi W&lkdwONSL ci TA (S Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR43SO001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diviision 2 Emergency Diesel Generator Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? X Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedandattached conduitswere found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free X _ _ T I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 8/26/20 12 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANTS Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R43S0001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-17-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-17-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, I NI INtLI 1,. INS L)'.IANT Inc. Sheet 431 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR43S0001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator File Name: 2-63-17-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of component base detail File Name: 2 -6 4 4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

PNGINEERS& CONSILTANIS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR43S0001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator File Name: 2-73-17-4-0g.jpeg

Description:

General view of component File Name: 2-94-17-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage detail

'qr Pati C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 433 of 461 ENGIXURS*& (ONSUI I]ANIS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR43S0001B Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator File Name: 2-95-I/-4-U01.jpeg

Description:

View of base mounting configuration

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 434 of 461 I NGIN LRS& CON1SLATA%-1S Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR45A0003A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV 1 EDG Fuel Oil Day Tank Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N~

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Heavy bracedframing system identified. Support system is insulatedand its details can not be inspected Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

II I I N/Ax (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 435 of 461 ESsGINEmicRS&

d WOIa [Ce ltANSI Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR45A0003A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV I EDG Fuel Oil Day Tank Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attachedpiping is rigidly supportedandattachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free I X I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

!1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) f- ~AC Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 B'i Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

I*----* Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& JLNSULTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR45A0003A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV I EDG Fuel Oil Day Tank Other spporig or relevant documents and photos (if any):

lile Name: L-oI-a-4-U5.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component rue i1ame: Z-OZ-J-'+-uo.jpeg

Description:

View of Lateral Bracing for Component

Siý

Ž smi Patul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

N kd Ow CheckNL IS (C Sheet 437 of 461 Status

W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR45C0002B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small pump+motor mounted on 8" concretepedestal. Skid anchoredwith 4 - 5/8" diam anchor.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationconfirmed by Drawing417-0069, FoundationPlan "M".

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L[ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAVM Sheet 438 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1DNo. IR45C0002B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Patti C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 439 of 461 ENGINEERS/& CONSAtI IAV'1 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R45CO002B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Fuel Oil Transfer Pump and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-16-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-16-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 440 of 461 ENGINEERS& ('%OSULTAI\S Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R45C0002B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Fuel Oil Transfer Pump File Name: 2-63-16-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines

[*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 441 of 461 o

SNGINeismRc CekNst IT(CTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR45C0003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description DIV 1 FO Booster PMP Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one EIZIEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very small pump on skid bolted to a much largerskid with 4 - 3/4" diam machine bolts. The largerskid anchoragewith 16 - 3/4" diam anchor bolts. Larger skid identified with low aspect ratio.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 442 of 461 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

INGINE ER-S& CONSULTANTIS Status: T1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R45C0003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description DIV I FO Booster PMP Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 A

Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 8/26/20 12 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

L*--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENMINER' ,&k ONSL ITA".1' Sheet 443 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1R45C0003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description DIV I FO Booster PMP and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-6-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

L ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

[fNINEERS & CONISULTA'N.S Sheet 444 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R45N0140A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Div I EDG Day Tank Level Switch Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one II x of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small switch mounted at top of Day Tank. Pipe lines attachedbelow the tank are in adequatecondition.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x - I I Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

No signs of corrosionidentified in the area.

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

[*Q Parl C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 445 of 461 S iNGINica Rl & ChONelITA(SWC)

Status: W1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR45N0140A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Div I EDG Day Tank Level Switch Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits werefound with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/20 12

/ W....

Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

L -- ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COSULITANTS Sheet 446 of 461 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR45N0140A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Div 1 EDG Day Tank Level Switch Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-4-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component vile Name: 2-02-4-4-U5.jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines below tank

• QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 447 of 461 ENGINE ER' & C ONSI LTANTJ Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR45N0140A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Div I EDG Day Tank Level Switch File Name: 2-63-4-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of bracing arrangement File Name: 2-64-4-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Overall view of top of component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 448 of 461 ENGINEER',& CONSULTMNIS Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R45NO140A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Div I EDG Day Tank Level Switch File Name: 2-73-4-4-0U.jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines from top File Name: 2-94-4-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of wall mounted supports

-01% IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 449 of 461 L\(INOUR. & toN*OWl] NIS Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46BOO01A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV I JW/LO Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I YX I N I

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small diameter HX on three saddles. Connectedto short saddle supportswith 4 - I" diam bolts. Saddle supportedto concrete with 4 - I" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 57 -0009-00000 004 confirms anchorageconfiguration.

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LKŽ~Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

LiiE PNINFEEW & UONSIITA!.TS Sheet 450 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46BOO01A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV 1 JW/LO Heat Exchanger Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attachedpiping is rigidly supportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x F- 7 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 451 of 461 FN MNFERS & LONSWLTAN'T' Status: WI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46B0001A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV I JW/LO Heat Exchanger Other sup or relevant documents and photos (if any):

MORIý , 111110ah File Name: 2-61-7-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID rue Name: Z-O2-/-4-Ub.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

I '--Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S ENGINEERS& CONSULTAN-S Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46BOO01A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DIV I JW/LO Heat Exchanger File Name: 2-63-7-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of anchorage File Name: 2-64-7-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of top conduit

LPatti I C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

NGINURS & .ONSPI ITANIS Sheet 453 of 461 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR46B0002B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description He*it Exchanger Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

X I I Small diameter HX on three saddles. Connected to short saddle supports with 4 - I" diam bolts. Saddle supported to concrete with 4 - I" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing57_-0009-00000004 confirms anchorage configuration.

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x - - T potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN.INEERS. COUNSULTAN.T, Sheet 454 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. IR46B0002B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Heat Exchanger Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidlysupportedand attachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

[lZ-V-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 455 of 461 IN UANE-tR,&

L'ON'$LITAi *.

Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46B0002B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Heat Exchanger Otherspp ing or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-9-4-08.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-9-4-08.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 456 of 461 ENGINEER & VCYNSU[TANTS Status: (9) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R46B0002B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Heat Exchanger File Name: 2-63-9-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of typical anchorage configuration viie Name: /-O4-'Y-4-UZS.jpeg

Description:

General view of component supports

L *Y Pauil C. Rizzo Associatcs, I1c.

[M(;lIIRý & k ONýL LT.';]'

Sheet 457 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR46B0002B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Heat Exchanger File Name: 2-73-9-4-08.jpeg

Description:

View of lateral wall-mounted support

LVYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAN'TS Sheet 458 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 125 V Bus ED-2-C Location: Bldg. CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small panel (-26x26x6") wall mounted with 4 - 3/8" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y II I I N/A x

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I TI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ql-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 459 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 125 V Bus ED-2-C Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x 77I777 I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescentlightsfound to be twist-on type fixture butjudged not a concern since they are out of the zone of influence.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping is rigidly supportedandattachedconduits were found with adequate Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

...**_iJ Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/20 12 Brian A_ l.ucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

LKYŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 460 of 461 Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 125 V Bus ED-2-C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-1-4-U7/Jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-4-07.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component

[XY PauI C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 461 of 461 EN*(,INUHý6& ICONSLLTAN\rS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 2R42S0037 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 125 V Bus ED-2-C File Name: 2-63-1-4-07.jpeg

Description:

View of top attached line

APPENDIX C: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)

C-1

Sheet I of 139 DC%"? Paul C. RiZzo Associates, Inc.

PNI<N(IFFAS& CONS1I TAI Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-Ia Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping in the area was identified to be rigidly supported Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

IE21CO001 IE21FOOOI IM39B0006

Sheet 2 of 139 L Y Paul C. Rizzo As.ociatcs, Inc.

ENGINFERS& CONSULTAN'S Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area 1AB-la Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concernsidentifiedregardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder tied off. Temporary scaffoldingjudged to be adequately restrained Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could x I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

rlK Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINI fRI.6, C.OXýI:I TANI!

I Sheet 3 of 139 Status: (Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-Ila Floor El. 574 Bldg. / AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rite Name: I-3Y-4-1-1a.Jpeg

Description:

General view liie Name: I-00-4-1-1i .jpeg

Description:

General view

Sheet 4 of 139 QýY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EMANE[RS & t1NLLYT Status: W N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area lAB-Ic Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion of skids judged to be acceptable.

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidlysupported Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

IE51B0002 1E51F0045

FvlŽý Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 5 of 139 FN(.INFERS& CONSIL IN ISlS Status: (Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-lc Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concerns identifiedregardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Toolbox identified in the area but locatedfar awayfrom components. Scaffolding identifiedto be adequatelysupported Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could x I- I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Sheet 6 of 139 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAVIS Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area 1AB-Ic Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rDse riame: Ge-e-r-a-l .Jpeg

Description:

General view File Name: 1-60-2-1-18.jpeg

Description:

View of toolbox in the area

Sheet 7 of 139 V1Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Status: W N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area 1AB-Ic Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX File Name: 1-65-2-1-18.jpeg

Description:

View of mild surface corrosion on anchorage File Name: 1-66-2-1-18.jpeg

Description:

View of scaffolding in the area

Sheet 8 of 139 F Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANIS Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-Ie Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

1E12CO002B lE12FOO03B IE 12F0004B 1E12F0029B lM39BOO01B

Sheet 9 of 139

[*---j Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E*NGIMINFR3

& (,'NSL I-TANII Status: W N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-Ie Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concerns identifiedregardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

PotentialFireSources in the Area: RHR B LubricatingOil and RHR B Valve OperatingGrease. No concerns identifiedregardingfiresources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold found properly restrained Ladders are unrestrainedbutjudged not likely to impact components.

Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could x - - T I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

F-W'-ý<_ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet10of139 ENGINEERS& CONSULTAN.TS Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area 1AB-1 e Floor El. 574 Bldg. ALX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rDeipName: G-e-li-e-v.jpeg

Description:

General View of Room File Name: 1-60-1-1-19.jpeg

Description:

View of unrestrained ladders not likely to impact components

L[Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet II of 139 Status: (D N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-le Floor El. 599 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of X potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

ttVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

IEI2BOO01B IEI2BOOOID IE12F0048B

L~YŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FMCINEERIS& CONSUL.TANIS Sheet 12 of 139 Status: (Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-le Floor El. 599 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concerns identified regardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Top of scaffold clamped Ladder between heat exchangers restrainedLead shielding judged to be adequatelyrestrained Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could X I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

[* *1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

t N4 IN ELRI & LONSL IITAVI]I Status: (J N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-le Floor El. 599 Bldg. AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-1-20.jpeg

Description:

General view

VVX Y Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 14 of 139 ENONEERS &. CONStjTAN-FS Status: Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-lf Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC ducts andpiping in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

1E22C0001 IE22F0010 1E22F0024 1M39B0003

L~2YŽPatil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINE ENS&I.ON'. [TAN!I.

Sheet 15 of 139 Status: W N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-If Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concerns identifiedregardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

PotentialFire Sources in the Area: HPCS LubricatingOil and HPCS Valve Operator Grease. No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladders in area are either tied off or do not have credible interactiontargets.

Scaffolding in the areajudged acceptable.

Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could x T _ _r adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Sheet 16 of 139

[ -- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COMSUL[ANVTS Status: W N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-I f Floor El. 574 Bldg. AkX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-5-1-1.jpeg

Description:

General view File Name: 1-60-5-1-18.jpeg

Description:

View of ladder in the area

Sheet 17 of 139

--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

1%(11%1EP, & I O'tLlký],T*%T Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area lAB-If Floor El. 574 Bldg. AX File Name: 1-65-5-1-18.jpeg

Description:

View of piping in the area File Name: 1-66-5-1-18.jpeg

Description:

General view

Sheet 18 of 139

~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

F\AIEFER & CON'IS TAVTh Status: (2) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area lAB-If Floor El. 620 Bldg. AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x degraded conditions?

Y N U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

H VA C ducts andpiping in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y N U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

IE22F0004

FLŽ 1"-ý IY

'M Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FMNUEN~'RS&t ONSL LIANIS*

Sheet 19 of 139 Status: (Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area JAB-If Floor El. 620 Bldg. AX Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No concerns identified regardingflood sources.

Y N U N/A

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

Y N U N/A

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Tool box not latched,but no potentialsoft target identified in the area.

Y N U

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could x _ _ T adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

Sheet 20 of 139

'q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAIYS Status: (Y) N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Area IAB-I f Floor El. 620 Bldg. }kx Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

tlPe Name: i-YJ-i-i-iu.jpeg

Description:

General view