Information Notice 2002-02, Recent Experience with Plugged Steam Generator Tubes

From kanterella
(Redirected from Information Notice 2002-02)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Recent Experience with Plugged Steam Generator Tubes
ML013480327
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/08/2002
From: Freeman M
Operational Experience and Non-Power Reactors Branch
To:
References
TAC MB3376 IN-02-002
Download: ML013480327 (11)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

January 8, 2002

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2002-02:

RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH PLUGGED STEAM

GENERATOR TUBES

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform

addressees about findings from recent inspections and examinations of steam generator tubes

at Three Mile Island Unit 1 (TMI-1). The NRC anticipates that recipients will review the

information for applicability to their facilities and consider taking actions, as appropriate, to

avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice do not

constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

On October 8, 2001, TMI-1 was shut down for a refueling outage. While inspecting the tubes in

the B Steam Generator, the licensee (AmerGen Energy Company, LLC) identified signs of wear

near the upper tubesheet on the outer surface of four tubes on the periphery of the tube bundle.

These wear indications did not appear to have been present during the prior steam generator

tube inspections, which were performed approximately 2 years earlier. Given the pattern and

location of the wear signs, the licensee suspected that a neighboring plugged tube had caused

the wear. The licensee removed the upper plug in the suspected tube and performed a video

inspection. The video inspection revealed that the tube was severed near the secondary face

of the upper tubesheet and in physical contact with the drilled hole where the tube passed

through the 15th support plate. Neighboring tubes were not in contact with the drilled holes at

the point where they passed through the 15th support plate.

The licensee removed the lower portion of the fractured surface of the severed tube to assess

the root cause. The preliminary laboratory investigation of the severed tube indicated signs of

high cycle fatigue, ductile failure, and outside diameter initiated intergranular attack (IGA).

In addition, the tube diameter was greater than the nominal tube diameter, indicating that the

severed tube had swollen.

The licensee determined that the most likely cause of failure was fatigue caused by flow- induced vibration of the swollen and restrained tube. The licensee attributed the swelling to

water leaking into the tube around the plugs while the unit was shut down, followed by

subsequent expansion of that water during plant startup. As the plant was heated, the water in

the tube expanded at a rate greater than that which could escape past the tube plugs, thereby

resulting in a pressure buildup and subsequent swelling of the tube. The effect is referred to as

the diode effect. The swelling caused the tube to become clamped at the drilled hole in the

15th tube support plate and at the upper tubesheet. Under the high-flow conditions that existed

in the area of the upper tubesheet, this clamping made the restrained tube more susceptible to

fatigue caused by flow-induced vibration. The licensee also concluded that the IGA on the

outside of the tube may have made it more susceptible to this phenomenon.

To address the concern that other plugged tubes might impact active tubes in future cycles, the

licensee embarked on a tube deplugging and inspection program. This program indicated that

some plugged tubes contained water, some were swollen, and some exhibited evidence of tube

degradation that was not present when they were originally plugged. The tubes that contained

water or were swollen were located throughout the tube bundle, not just on the periphery as

was the severed tube. The program also revealed that water or swelling only occurred in tubes

that were, or had been in the past, plugged with an Alloy 600 mechanical plug. In 1991, the

licensee began plugging tubes with a newer type of mechanical plug made of Alloy 690. Some

of the tubes that contained water or were swollen were plugged with an Alloy 690 mechanical

plug, but these were replacements for original Alloy 600 mechanical plugs. No tubes with

originally installed Alloy 690 mechanical plugs in the both upper and lower tubesheet showed

any signs of water or swelling.

In addition to the above findings, the tube deplugging and inspection program indicated that

one additional tube had circumferentially severed and one plugged tube had failed axially. The

circumferential sever occurred at the 15th tube support plate. Apparently, the tube was captured

within the tube support plate as there was no wear on any adjacent tubes. The axial failure

occurred in the freespan between the 15th tube support plate and the upper tubesheet.

Adjacent tubes were not impacted. Both tubes were swollen and were, or had been in the past, plugged with an alloy 600 mechanical plug.

To prevent plugged tubes that might sever in the future from impacting other tubes, the

licensee planned to either stabilize each plugged tube or surround it with stabilized tubes to

cage the non-stabilized plugged tube. This stabilizing would generally be achieved by

inserting cables into the tubes from the upper tubesheet through at least the 14th tube support

plate. Most of the tubes that exhibited swelling would be stabilized the full length of the tube.

Background

TMI-1 uses once-through steam generators, in which the primary reactor coolant enters the top

of the steam generator, passes through the upper tubesheet, flows down through approximately

15,500 tubes, passes through the lower tubesheet, and exits the steam generator at the

bottom. Secondary-side feedwater enters the steam generator in the center, flows downward in

the annular region between the tube bundle and the steam generator shell, turns upward and

flows around the outside of the tubes where it is converted to steam. The steam continues upward and then turns downward in the annular region between the tube bundle and the steam

generator shell and exits in the center. Secondary-side flow is characterized by counterflow

conditions in the tube bundle and crossflow conditions near the upper and lower tubesheets.

The highest flowrates on the secondary side of the tubes occur at the periphery of the upper

tubesheet as the steam flow changes from counterflow to crossflow and turns downward in the

annular region. Similar flowrates occur near the lower tubesheet, although the flow is mostly

liquid in this area.

The tubes are attached to an upper and lower tubesheet and supported by 15 tube support

plates, which have holes that permit the passage of the tubes. The holes in the tube support

plates are broached with three points of contact, with the exception of the holes in the periphery

of the 15th tube support plate which are round drilled holes. In accordance with the NRCs

requirements, usually in Technical Specifications, the licensee inspects the tubes during plant

outages to assess the structural and leakage integrity of the tubes. Tubes with degradation

above specified limits are plugged or repaired using methods approved by the NRC.

Plugging involves removing a tube from service by installing plugs in both ends of the tube to

prevent the flow of primary coolant through it. The tube plugs are typically either mechanically

expanded against the tube wall or welded to the tube. Once a tube is removed from service, it no longer requires inspection because it is no longer part of the reactor coolant pressure

boundary.

The tube that severed at TMI-1 and caused wearing of adjacent tubes was Tube 130, located in

the B Steam Generator at Row 66 (B66-130). This tube was plugged with an Alloy 600

mechanical plug in 1986 as a result of IGA near the fifth tube support plate. At the time it was

originally plugged, there was no observable degradation at the point where the tube eventually

severed. The original plug was replaced in 1997 with the newer Alloy 690 mechanical plug as

part of a program to replace many of the Alloy 600 plugs in the upper tubesheet.

Eddy current testing of the four adjacent tubes affected by severed tube B66-130 indicated that

the tube walls had worn through 37 percent of the wall thickness for the least affected tube, to

92 percent of the wall thickness for the most affected tube. The overall length of the wear scars

ranged from approximately 2.8 inches to 8.3 inches. Typically the bobbin coil probe, which is

the eddy current probe most relied upon by industry to detect wear indications, is expected to

detect flaws of this range. However, the licensee determined that those analysts reviewing

bobbin coil data did not detect the wear indication on the least affected tube. Only those

analysts reviewing rotating pancake coil data were able to identify the wear on the least

affected tube at TMI-1.

The licensee also pressure-tested the four affected tubes to determine the margin to failure.

Specifically, the licensee increased pressure until either the tube failed or pressure reached

three times the differential pressure encountered during normal operating conditions. The most

affected tube failed at a point near the design differential pressure for a main steamline break.

One other tube failed above the main steamline break design pressure, but very near three

times the normal operating differential pressure. These two tubes challenged the steam

generator tube structural performance criteria discussed by the Nuclear Energy Institute in NEI 97-06, Steam Generator Program Guidelines. The remaining two tubes had no leakage

when held at three times normal operating differential pressure for 2 minutes.

Discussion

Licensees have plugged tubes using a variety of different plug types and materials since steam

generators were placed in service. The industry has experienced leaking plugs for at least

20 years, and probably back to the initial use of mechanical plugs. If the phenomenon at TMI-1 were widespread, numerous instances of freespan wear scars adjacent to plugged tubes

should have been observed throughout the years. Although this is not believed to be the case, indicating that the phenomenon is not widespread, the potential for plugged tubes to affect the

integrity of adjacent tubes may increase with time. If isolated occurrences of this phenomenon

were to occur, they might be risk-significant.

Known experience suggests that the most likely consequence is an axial failure of the plugged

tube unless a circumferential flaw or high crossflow velocities are present. Although the long- term potential for axial failures to cause a plugged tube to sever is unknown, such tubes are

probably a lesser contributor to risk than plugged tubes that contain circumferential flaws

resulting from corrosion or fatigue. Tubes with detected circumferential flaws are normally

stabilized when plugged; however, undetected circumferential flaws, typically less than

40 percent of the wall thickness, will sometimes be present in tubes that are plugged for other

causes. In addition, the potential for the development of corrosion-related circumferential flaws

in plugged tubes is not clearly known, since the cooler tube temperatures may reduce the

potential for corrosion, while higher axial loads in plugged tubes may work to increase the

potential for circumferential stress corrosion cracking.

Nonetheless, the events at TMI-1 illustrate an effect in which a plugged tube can sever and

affect adjacent tubes. For two of the tubes adjacent to the severed tube, the extent of wear

was such that the structural performance criteria were challenged. The degradation of the

active tubes appeared to occur during one cycle. The three circumstances that apparently

contributed to the severed tube include tube swelling, flow-induced vibration, and tube

degradation from IGA. The results at TMI-1 indicate the importance of either evaluating

plugged tubes or stabilizing plugged tubes to ensure that they do not compromise the integrity

of adjacent active tubes, i.e., the reactor coolant pressure boundary.

High cycle fatigue was the dominant, and perhaps sufficient, cause of the severed tube at

TMI-1. Fatigue was also involved in the severed tube in the original steam generators at the

R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in 1982. In addition, all known circumferential failures of

active tubes have also involved high cycle fatigue (e.g., Oconee 2, Rancho Seco, North Anna 1, Mahomet). These high cycle fatigue failures involved flow-induced vibration associated with

high crossflow velocities, although repeated impacts from a loose part may also have

contributed to severing the plugged tube at Ginna. Nominally, plugged and active tubes are not

expected to experience fatigue under flow-induced vibration; however, off-nominal conditions

may enhance the potential for excessive vibration and, thus, fatigue. Such off-nominal

conditions could include swelling of tubes, denting, localized flow peaking effects, or adjacent

loose parts. The licensee did not determine if only a specific population of plugged tubes was susceptible to

this phenomenon and stabilize or cage only these tubes, rather they elected to stabilize or cage

all plugged tubes, as discussed above. Nonetheless, the licensee did attempt to address the

flow velocities and stability ratios of concern, the extent to which tubes were clamped as a result

of swelling, denting, and/or other phenomena, whether the plug type (e.g., welded, mechanical)

played a role in determining which tubes swell, and the effects that degradation (e.g., an axial

crack, a fishmouth rupture, a circumferential crack, etc.) in a plugged tube may have on the

flow induced vibration analysis.

In response to the eddy current findings at TMI-1, the NRC independently reviewed some of the

bobbin coil data. For the tube least affected by the severed tube, the NRC determined that the

differential channel showed a very small flaw signal and the absolute channel showed evidence

of signal drift. The NRC concluded that the wear indication may have been missed because of

the relatively small voltage and atypical signal behavior. The absolute drift signal rotated in the

clockwise direction as channel frequencies were decreased whereas a typical flaw signal would

be expected to rotate in the counter-clockwise direction.

The staff is continuing to evaluate the generic implications of the TMI-1 occurrence.

This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have

any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR).

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

Emmett L. Murphy, NRR

M. Scott Freeman, RII

301-415-2710

864-882-6927 E-mail: elm@nrc.gov

E-mail: msf1@nrc.gov

Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR

Michael C. Modes, RI

301-415-2752

610-337-5198 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov

E-mail: mcm@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

ML013480327

  • See previous concurrence

OFFICE

REXB

Tech Editor

EMCB

C:EMCB

NAME

MSFreeman*

PGarrity*

LALund*

WHBateman*

DATE

12/20/2001

12/20/2001

12/21/2001

01/04/2002 OFFICE

RORP

PD:RORP

NAME

TKoshy*

WDBeckner*

DATE

01/07/2002

01/08/2002

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2002-01

Metalclad Switchgear Failures

and Consequent Losses of

Offsite Power

01/08/2002

All holders of Licenses for nuclear

power reactor.

2001-19

Improper Maintenance and

Reassembly of Automatic Oil

Bubblers

12/17/2001

All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor vessel.

2001-18

Degraded or Failed Automated

Electronic Monitoring, Control,

Alarming, Response, and

Communications Needed for

Safety and/or Safeguards

12/14/2001 All uranium fuel conversion, enrichment, and fabrication

licensees and certificate holders

authorized to receive safeguards

information. Information notice is

not available to the public

because it contains safeguards

information.

2001-17

Degraded and Failed

Performance of Essential

Utilities Needed for Safety and

Safeguards

12/14/2001 All uranium fuel conversion, enrichment, and fabrication

licensees and certificate holders

authorized to receive safeguards

information. Information notice is

not available to the public

because it contains safeguards

information.

2001-08, Sup. 2

Update on Radiation Therapy

Overexposures in Panama

11/20/2001 All medical licensees.

2001-16

Recent Foreign and Domestic

Experience with Degradation of

steam Generator Tubes and

Internals

10/31/2001

All holders of operating licenses

for pressurized-water reactors

(PWR), except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.