Information Notice 1993-44, Operational Challenges During a Dual-Unit Transient

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Operational Challenges During a Dual-Unit Transient
ML031070483
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000204, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1993
From: Grimes B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
IN-93-044, NUDOCS 9306080170
Download: ML031070483 (8)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20555

June 15, 1993 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 93-44: OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES DURING A DUAL-UNIT

TRANSIENT

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power

reactors.

PurDose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information

notice to inform addressees of an event during which an atypical shift

staffing level and lack of familiarity with the tasks to be performed in that

shift configuration affected the ability of the control room operating shift

to respond to the event. It is expected that recipients will review the

information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in

this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific

action or written response is required.

DescriDtion of Circumstances

On December 31, 1992, a dual-unit reactor trip initiated by an electrical

fault in the switchyard occurred at the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 at Sequoyah share a common control room.

At the time of the event the control

room reactor operator staffing was the minimum allowed by the plant Technical

Specifications (TS); shift staffing consisted of five licensed senior

operators (the shift operations supervisor, one assistant shift operations

supervisor for each unit, the shift technical advisor, and an additional

senior operator) and three reactor operators - two assigned to Unit 1 and one

assigned to Unit 2. The NRC inspection team investigating the event concluded

that the Unit 2 response to the event, with one reactor operator, was hampered

by lack of adherence to procedures, operator errors, and an unnecessary

cooldown of the reactor coolant system (RCS) after the reactor trip. The

Unit 1 response to the same event, with two reactor operators, was normal.

Discussion

An NRC inspection team reviewed the effects of the Unit 2 staffing level

during the event with regard to the crew's ability to stabilize the unit after

the reactor trip occurred. The inspection team concluded that the Unit 2 staffing level delayed the recovery of plant systems, contributed to erroneous

decisions made by the assistant shift operations supervisor (ASOS), and

93060801VO

f33o(JISo

t/r,0t

SIle-/

IN 93-44 June 15, 1993 overburdened and challenged the crew's ability to perform tasks in the manner

in which it was trained.

Control room simulator training scenarios had not

been conducted using only one reactor operator.

Although the normal shift staffing and training consisted of two

reactor operators for each unit, licensee operational staffing practices

resulted in the frequent use of one reactor operator for one of the units.

The licensee used this reduced staffing configuration 12 times in

December 1992. In this configuration, with the dual-unit transient, the

single reactor operator performed all of the recovery evolutions for the unit

as directed by the ASOS in charge of the unit.

Because of delays caused by the one reactor operator performing primary and

secondary system recovery evolutions, as required by the applicable recovery

procedures, an RCS cooldown resulted.

This was a direct result of the crew

not adequately controlling auxiliary feedwater after the reactor trip.

The

atypical staffing level also contributed to problems involving the decision of

the assistant shift operations supervisor to use the normal-batch borate

process in response to the cooldown rather than the emergency borate process

as required by the emergency procedure.

The decision not to use the emergency

borate process was made, in part, because of the reluctance of the assistant

shift operations supervisor to commit the one reactor operator to the

emergency borate process, which restricts the operator's attention to

monitoring only that activity.

As a corrective action to prevent recurrence, the licensee implemented revised

administrative controls to ensure that the control room staffing will be

maintained at two reactor operators for each operating unit. The need for

additional training at minimum staffing levels is being evaluated by the

licensee.

Related Generic Communications

1.

IN 85-80, "Timely Declaration of an Emergency Class, Implementation of

an Emergency Plan, and Emergency Notifications," dated October 15, 1985

2.

IN 91-77, "Shift Staffing at Nuclear Power Plants," dated November 26,

1991

IN 93-44 June 15, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response.

If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor-Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

S. M.

(615)

Shaeffer, RII

842-8001

D. R. Desaulniers, NRR

(301) 504-1043 Attachment:

a

dgtil0l5

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

LIST OF RECENTLY

ISSUED

\\_2 NRC INFORMATION

NOTICES

I '

a

Notice Ib.

Subject

93-43 Use of Inappro

te

Lubrication OI s in

Sefety-Rolat d Applications

93-42 Failure of Anti-Rotation

Keys in Motor-Operated

FVaTes Manufactured by

93-41

One Hour Fire Endurance

Test Results for Thermal

Ceramics Kaowool 3M

Ctany FS-195 and

311 Company Intern E-SO

Barrier Systoes

93-40

Fire Endurance Test

Results for Thereal

Ceramics FP-60 Fire

Barrier Material

93-39

Radiation Beas from

Power Reactor Dialog-

1csl Shields

93-38

Imedequote Testing of

Engineered Safety

Featurs Actuation

Systmn

93-31 Eyobolts with Indeter- Minote Properties In- stalled In tleitorque

Valve Operator Housing

Covers

93-36

Nortifications, Reports

and Records of Nisd1ni- istrations

93-3S

Insights from Comon-

Cause Failure Events


--

Issua

ssued to

06/10/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

06/09/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear Power reactors.

05/28/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

0O/26/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

09/25/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

05/24/3

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nucleur power reactors.

I

05/19/93

All holders of OLs or CPi

for nuclear power reactors.

OS/07/93

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Cosmission Medical

licensees.

OS/12/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power plants

(UPP )'.

OL

  • Oper

LIog

Lcense

tP -

Construction Per1it

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300

FIRST CLASS MAIL

POSTAGE AND FEES PAID

USNRC

PERMIT NO. G-67

PFUNTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

IN 93-44 June 15, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response.

If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Original Isgned by

Brian K. Grime§

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

S. M.

(615)

Shaeffer, RII

842-8001 D. R.

(301)

Desaulniers, NRR

504-1043 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
  • DD:DRCH
  • D:DRCH

RGallo

BBoger

05/21/93

05/21/93

  • PD2-4:DRPE

FHebdon

06/02/93

  • OGCB:DORS

GMarcus

06/04/93

  • DRP:RII RVC

for

EMerschoff

05/28/93

'9

06// o/93

  • OGCB:DORS

TJKim

05/28/93

  • TechEd

MMejac

05/24/93 DOCUMENT NAME: 93-44.IN

IN 93-XX

June XX, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

S. M.

(615)

Shaeffer, Region II

842-8001 D. R.

(301)

Desaulniers, NRR

504-1043 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
  • DD:DRCH
  • D:DRCH

RGallo

BBoger

05/21/93

05/21/93

  • PD2-4:DRPE

FHebdon

06/02/93

  • DRP:RII RVC

for

EMerschoff

05/28/93

  • OGCB:DORS

TJKim

05/28/93

  • TechEd

MMejac

05/24/93 OGCB:DORS

GMarcus qW4

06/+ /93--

DORS:NRR

BGrimes

06/ /93 DOCUMENT NAME: SEQUOYAH.INF

IN 93-XX

May XX, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contact:

S. M.

(615)

Shaeffer, Region II

842-8001

D. R. Desaulniers, NRR

(301) 504-1043 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

File Name: SEJWOYAH.INF

ConcurentU

eu'2~4 iip

o~fiO 9 PD

z:DRPE

FHegion

/5 7L493 DRP: RII ARC,

$ EMerschoff

05/ae/93 OGCB:DQjRS

TJKim'

J

O5/;?S/9 TechEd

05p

//93 OGCB:DORS

GMarcus

05/ /93 DORS:NRR

BGrimes

05/ /93

From:

To:

Date:

Subject:

Richard V. Crlenjak

(RVC)

TJK3 Friday, May 28, 1993

1:01 pm

RII CONCURRENCE OF PROPOSED IN

Region II has completed a review of the proposed Information

Notice, OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES DURING A DUAL-UNIT TRANSIENT.

We

have no further comments and concur with the proposed IN.

Should you need any additional info let

me know.

Thanks, Jack

cc:

WEH,

PJK1, SMS,

AFG, JRJ, TAP,

EWM