Information Notice 1993-47, Unrecognized Loss of Control Room Annunciators

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unrecognized Loss of Control Room Annunciators
ML031070477
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1993
From: Grimes B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
IN-93-047, NUDOCS 9306150062
Download: ML031070477 (8)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555

June 18, 1993

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 93-47: UNRECOGNIZED LOSS OF CONTROL

ROOM ANNUNCIATORS

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power

reactors.

PurDose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information

notice to alert addressees to the potential problem of unrecognized loss of

control room annunciators.

It is expected that recipients will review the

information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in

this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific

action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

Callaway

On October 16, 1992, while the Callaway Plant was operating at 100 percent

power, approximately 75 annunciators on the main control board illuminated.

After verifying that the annunciators were not valid, the shift supervisor

(SS) notified the plant manager and the engineering duty officer of the

condition and requested instrumentation and control (I&C) technicians to begin

repairs. The I&C technicians found that one of four field power supplies for

the annunciators had failed. The failed power supply was replaced and the

annunciators appeared to return to normal.

Two minutes later, while removing

jumper cables installed during the replacement, an electrical short occurred.

In the control. room, 371 of the 463 main control board annunciators

illuminated and remained lit. The I&C technicians inspected the power

supplies and determined that the output fuses for all four field power

supplies had blown.

The blown fuses resulted in the loss of all main control

board annunciators.

This was not recognized by the plant staff.

Callaway procedure EIP-ZZ-00101, "Classification of Emergencies," describes

those conditions which constitute entry into established emergency action

levels (EALs). The procedure states that, for an initiating condition of

"Most or All Alarms (Annunciators) Lost," the proper emergency classification

is an Alert.

9306150062 eb9q

LX.

i

Q

9 _

le°

A

IN 93-47 June 18, 1993 Approximately one hour after the loss of all annunciators, the blown output

fuses were replaced and power was restored to the annunciator system.

Plant

personnel verified that power was available to the annunciators by depressing

test switches in the control room.

However, this did not test the annunciator

logic circuitry and, as a result, the operating crew was unaware that

164 annunciators with re-flash capability were completely inoperable.

Apparently, the short that blew the output fuses in the field power supplies

also blew fuses in eight annunciator logic power supplies. Later, while

investigating problems with the annunciators, the I&C engineer found and

replaced the blown fuses in the eight logic power supplies and an appropriate

test was performed.

However, there was not an approved procedure for this

test nor was it properly documented.

By 7:37 p.m. on October 17 the main

control board annunciators had been restored to fully operable status.

Because the SS failed to recognize that all of the main control board

annunciators were inoperable after the four field power supply output fuses

had blown, an Alert was not declared on October 17, 1992.

On October 19, the

licensee determined that an Alert should have been declared and notified State

and local authorities and the NRC of the event.

Inspection of this event by an NRC Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) found the

following weaknesses: (1) insufficient knowledge of the annunciator system by

the plant staff, (2) poor communications and inadequate teamwork, (3) lack of

a questioning attitude, and (4) inadequate work performance. Contributing to

the insufficient- knawledge--of-the--annuncl-ator- system wa-rthbefattir

e6td-Vhave

an off-normal operating procedure or other procedure that addressed loss of

annunciators.

Salem Unit 2

On December 13, 1992, control room operators at Salem Unit 2 Nuclear Station

discovered that the overhead annunciators had been inoperable for about

90 minutes.

The inoperable condition was detected when an alarm printer

printed a change in alarm status which was not reflected by the overhead

annunciators.

The operators reset the annunciator system and restored it to

operable status within two minutes.

Subsequent inspection of the event by an

NRC AIT identified several weaknesses that contributed to the problem. The

operators were not adequately trained to verify proper operation of a recently

installed micro-processor based annunciator system.

The new system was not

designed with annunciation as a priority task and therefore it did not

indicate a critical mispositioned switch.

Attempts by the operators to enter

files, despite a procedure caution, contributed to locking up the system.

The

plant staff delayed in notifying plant management and the NRC.

The licensee

did not have a procedure to deal with the loss of annunciators. The AIT

concluded that the overall knowledge of the system was inappropriate for a

system that, if lost, required the declaration of an Alert.

IN 93-47

June 18, 1993 Discussion

Although plant annunciators are not considered safety related, they are

important for the safe operation of a nuclear power plant.

Further, an

unrecognized loss of annunciators may increase the difficulty of diagnosing

problems in plant operations and equipment. In order for plant operators to

recognize and respond properly to a loss of annunciators, it is important to

have clear procedures, appropriate training, and effective communications

between operators and plant support personnel.

For the events described

above, an off-normal operating procedure that clearly stated required actions

would have significantly aided the operators to diagnose the extent of the

problem, take necessary response actions, and make required notifications.

Loss of annunciator events were covered by the emergency classification

procedures of both licensees, premised upon guidance of Appendix 1 of

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of.

Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nucleae

Power Plants," (November 1980).

The NRC recently issued Revision 3 to

Regulatory Guide 1.101,

"Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Nuclear Power

Reactors" (August 1992).

That revision endorsed NUMARC/NESP-007, Revision 2,

"Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels," (January 1992), as

an acceptable alternative.

With respect to loss of annunciators, the

NUMARC/NESP-007 guidance provides an alternative delineation of thresholds for

declaring an Unusual-Event, Alert or-Site Area Emergency.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response.

If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

Bruce L. Bartlett, RIII

(314) 676-3181

Rolf A. Westberg, RIII

(708) 790-5776

Scott A. Boynton, NRR

(301) 504-2926 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

It '

J.

s

t

Attachment

IN 93-47

June 18, 1993

Page I of 1

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC IHFORMATION NOTICES

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

93-46 Potential Problem with

6/10/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Westinghouse Rod Control

for Westinghouse (W)-

System and Inadvertent

designed nuclear power

Withdrawal of A Single

reactors.

Rod Control Cluster Assembly

93-45 Degradation of Shutdown

06/16/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Cooling System Performance

for nuclear power reactors.

93-44 Operational Challenges

06/15/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

During A Dual-Unit

for nuclear power reactors.

Transient

93-43 Use of Inappropriate

06/10/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Lubrication Oils In

for nuclear power reactors.

Safety-Related Applications

93-42 Failure of Anti-Rotation

06/09/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Keys in Motor-Operated

for nuclear power reactors.

Valves Manufactured by

Velan

93-41 One Hour Fire Endurance

05/28/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Test Results for Thermal

for nuclear power reactors.

Ceramics Kaowool, 3N

Company FS-195 and

3M Company Interam E-50

Barrier Systems

93-40

Fire Endurance Test

05/26/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Results for Thermal

for nuclear power reactors.

Ceramics FP-60 Fire

Barrier Material

93-39 Radiation Beams from

05/25/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

Power Reactor Biolog- for nuclear power reactors.

ical Shields

oL - Operating License

CP - Construction Permit

22 (n

(n0 too

0 o- o

_ U,

z

z

00

IN0 )

'hi

49a.

IN 93-XX

May xx, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

Bruce L. Bartlett, Region III

(314) 676-3181

Rolf A. Westberg, Region III

(708) 790-5776

Scott A. Boynton, NRR

(301) 504-2926 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
  • RPB:ADM

RSanders

03/17/93

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

JBirmingham

05/06/93 C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GHMarcusgil

0

5/.2'7/93 D/DORS/NRR

BKGrimes

/

05/

/93 tW

  • R/RIII

BBartlett

04/21/93

  • RIII

RWestberg

04/22/93

  • PEPB:DRSS:NRR

SABoynton

05/04/93

  • OEAB:DORS:NRR

TKoshy

05/05/93 DOCUMENT NAME: ANNUNCEB.JLB

IN 93-XX

May xx, 1993 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

Bruce L. Bartlett, Region III

(314) 676-3181

Rolf A. Westberg, Region III

(708) 790-5776 Scott

,,n1n

% A. Boynton, NRR

CAA _nnn

Lt

Rcl I

d

NUR-CT

i

N

e

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices PA

A

/4

4)

Attachment:

  • RPB:ADM

RSanders

03/17/93

  • R/RIII

BBartlett

04/21/93 OGCB:DORS:NRR

JBirmingham.

05/ a /93

/:

C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GHMarcus

05/ /93 D/DORS/NRR

BKGrimes

05/ /93 RI I J})M'

RWestbeVg

ANNUNCE8.JLB

P

4NRR

05/& /93 OEAB:DO :NRR

TKoshydi

05/5 /9 DOCUMENT NAME:

..... .....I

3 have clear procedures, appropriate training, and effective communications

between operators and plant support personnel.

For the events described

above, an off-normal operating procedure that clearly stated required actions

would have significantly aided the operators to diagnose the extent of the

problem, take necessary response actions, and make required notifications.

The NRC recently issued Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.101,

"Emergency

Planning and Preparedness for Nuclear Power Reactors."

That revision

endorsed NUMARC/NESP-007, Revision 2, "Methodology for Development of

Emergency Action Levels," as an acceptable alternative to the method described

in Appendix 1 of NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1, "Criteria for Preparation and

Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in

Support of Nuclear Power Plants." NUMARC/NESP-007 provides guidance that more

clearly delineates the thresholds for declaration of an Unusual Event, Alert

and Site Area Emergency.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Brian K. Grimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts: Bruce L. Bartlett, Region III

(314) 676-3181

Rolf A. Westberg, Region III

(708) 790-5776

Scott A. Boynton, NRR

(301) 504-2926 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • RPB:ADM

OGCB:DORS:NRR

C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

D/DORS/NRR

RSanders

JBirmingham

GHMarcus

BKGrimes

03/17/93

04/

/93

04/

/93

04/ /93

  • R/RI II / 4 RlIl

m

PEPB:DRSS:NRR

OEAB:DORS:NRR

BBartlett

RWest erg

SABoynton

TKoshy

04/21/93

04/XR./93

04/ /93

04/ /93 DOCUMENT NAME:

ANNUNCE8.JLB

IN 93-47

-~

~

June 18, 1993 Discussion

Although plant annunciators are not considered safety related, they are

important for the safe operation of a nuclear power plant.

Further, an

unrecognized loss of annunciators may increase the difficulty of diagnosing

problems in plant operations and equipment.

In order for plant operators to

recognize and respond properly to a loss of annunciators, it is important to

have clear procedures, appropriate training, and effective communications

between operators and plant support personnel.

For the events described

above, an off-normal operating procedure that clearly stated required actions

would have significantly aided the operators to diagnose the extent of the

problem, take necessary response actions, and make required notifications.

Loss of annunciator events were covered by the emergency classification

procedures of both licensees, premised upon guidance of Appendix 1 of

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of

Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear

Power Plants," (November 1980).

The NRC recently issued Revision 3 to

Regulatory Guide 1.101,

"Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Nuclear Power

Reactors" (August 1992).

That revision endorsed NUMARC/NESP-007, Revision 2,

"Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels," (January 1992), as

an acceptable alternative. With respect to loss of annunciators, the

NUMARC/NESP-007 guidance provides an alternative delineation of thresholds for

declaring an Unusual Event, Alert or Site Area Emergency.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response.

If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Original signed by

MI-(. 'rimes, Director

Division of Operating Reactor Support

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts:

Bruce L. Bartlett, RIII

(314) 676-3181

Rolf A. Westberg, RIII

(708) 790-5776

Scott A. Boynton, NRR

(301) 504-2926 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
  • RPB:ADM
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

RSanders

JBirmingham

GHMarcus

mes

03/17/93

05/06/93

05/27/93

05,/l 93

  • R/RIII
  • RIII
  • PEPB:DRSS:NRR
  • OEAB:DORS:NRR

BBartlett

RWestberg

SABoynton

TKoshy

04/21/93

04/22/93

05/04/93

05/05/93 DOCUMENT NAME:

93-47.IN