Information Notice 1993-10, Dose Calibrator Quality Control

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dose Calibrator Quality Control
ML031080166
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/02/1993
From: Cunningham R
NRC/NMSS/IMNS
To:
References
IN-93-010, NUDOCS 9301270077
Download: ML031080166 (7)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555

February 2, 1993

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 93-10: DOSE CALIBRATOR QUALITY CONTROL

Addressees

All Nuclear Regulatory Commission medical licensees.

Purpose

This notice is provided to alert recipients to problems concerning dose

calibrator quality control tests, identified by NRC inspectors during

inspections of medical programs, and also to emphasize the importance of

quality control procedures for equipment used to assay patient doses. It is

expected that-licensees will:

review this information for applicability to

their programs; distribute this notice to those responsible for radiation

safety and medical quality assurance, including technologists; and consider

actions to preclude similar situations from occurring at their facilities.

However, the suggestions contained in this notice do not constitute any new

NRC requirements, and no written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

During recent NRC inspections of medical facilities, inspectors found

deficiencies and irregularities in the performance and recording of dose

calibrator quality control tests. The most frequently occurring deficiencies

involve the constancy checks and linearity tests.

However, there have also

been citations for failure to perform accuracy tests and determine geometric

independence. In some instances, the licensee did identify a malfunctioning

dose calibrator, but no corrective action was taken even though the error or

deviation exceeded allowable limits.

Other problems included:

failure to

instruct supervised individuals in the proper use of the dose calibrator;

failure to perform constancy checks when emergencies required the dose

calibrator to be used during non-routine periods such as weekends and

holidays; and failure to analyze the data, as required.

Discussion

Quality control checks of dose calibrators used to assay patient dosages are

essential to ensure that the dosage administered to a patient is the same as

the prescribed dosage. Medical personnel administering dosages should be

aware of the applicable NRC regulations (10 CFR 35.50) and any specific

related license conditions.

Licensees are encouraged in Regulatory Guide

10.8, Rev. 2, to develop procedures that provide an even higher level of

confidence that the correct dosage is administered. For example, Regulatory

Guide 10.8, provides a model procedure for meeting the requirement. The guide

proposes a smaller percent deviation as a trigger level, so the licensee can

9301270077 S

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 take action before the regulatory limit is reached.

However, if it committed

to the regulatory guide procedures as part of a license application, the

licensee must comply with the more restrictive requirement.

Licensees are

responsible for the instruction and supervision of individuals to ensure that

they know and follow the proper procedures for dose calibrator checks.

1. Constancy Checks

Constancy means reproducibility in measuring the activity of a known source

over a long period of time.

The dose calibrator is required

(10 CFR 35.50(b)(1)) to be checked for constancy with a dedicated check source

at the beginning of each day of use.

This includes weekends and holidays, if

radiopharmaceuticals are administered to a patient. During recent NRC

inspections, inspectors determined that licensees had failed to perform these

required checks because part-time technologists who worked only on weekends or

staff technologists called in on weekends had not been properly instructed by

the licensee and did not know that these checks were to be performed on

weekends.

The reference source used for the constancy check must be assayed at a

frequently used setting.

Regulatory Guide 10.8 suggests using two or more

sources with different photon energies and activities, although one source

meets the requirement. The rule requires that the licensee determine the

constancy of the dose calibrator under an actual condition of use.

Since most

medical licensees use technetium-99m for patient-dosage administrations more

frequently than any other isotope, such licensees should check the technetium-

99m setting, on each day of use, with a dedicated check source.

It is

recommended that dose calibrators having both pre-adjusted controls (i.e.,

push buttons) and variable potentiometers be tested on both the variable

potentiometer technetium-99m (or other frequently used isotope) setting and

the pre-adjusted control.

Discrepancies or fluctuations between the two

controls, when tested for constancy with the same check source, may be

indicative of equipment malfunction. Licensees must plot or log (10 CFR

35.50(e)(1)) the measured activity of each source and compare it to the

calculated activity, based on decay of the dedicated check source. If the

error between the two values exceeds 10 percent, the dose calibrator must be

repaired or replaced (10 CFR 35.50(d)).

2. Accuracy Test

The accuracy test ensures that the activity is within 10 percent of a given

calibrated reference source whose activity has been determined by the

manufacturer to be within 5 percent of the activity stated by the National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or by the supplier who has

compared that source to a source that was calibrated by NIST. At least two

sealed sources with different principal photon energies, one of which has a

principal energy between 100 keY and 500 keY, must be used to determine

accuracy upon installation, and at least annually thereafter

(10 CFR 35.50(b)(2)).

The regulations require that the activity is at least

10 uCi for Ra-226 and 50 ACi for any other photon-emitting radionuclide.

For

best accuracy, the lower energy reference standards should be in vials of

similar thickness to those for actual samples. As with the. constancy check

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 and linearity tests, Regulatory Guide 10.8 suggests a trigger level of

5 percent difference but the requirement states that if the error exceeds

10 percent then the dose calibrator must be repaired or replaced.

3. Linearity Tests

The linearity test ensures that the dose calibrator can indicate the correct

activity over the range of use between the highest dose that will be

administered to a patient and 10 microcuries. The dose calibrator is to be

tested for linearity upon installation and at least quarterly thereafter

(10 CFR 35.50(b)(3)).

Licensees have frequently not determined linearity over

the entire range of use. Technetium-99m is most frequently used for the

linearity test because of its availability and short half-life, and it is

relatively inexpensive.

If the percent deviation exceeds 10 percent, dosage

readings must be mathematically corrected. Regulatory Guide 10.8 suggests a

trigger level of +5 percent but unless the licensee commits to this level in

the license application, the requirement allows for a 10 percent variation.

4. Geometry Dependence

Testing for geometry independence ensures that the indicated activity does not

change with volume or configuration. This test must be performed, upon

installation, over the range of volumes and volume configurations for which it

will be used (10 CFR 35.50(b)(4)) and, as suggested in Regulatory Guide 10.8, should be done using a syringe that is normally used for injections.

Licensees who use generators and radiopharmaceutical kits should also do the

test using a vial similar in size, shape, and construction to the

radiopharmaceutical kit vials normally used. Geometry testing performed by

the manufacturer may be acceptable, provided that the manufacturer has

included all volumes and volume configurations for which the dose calibrator'

will be used at the licensee's facility and the licensee keeps a record of

this test.

Licensees are also required (10 CFR 35.50(c)) to perform appropriate checks

and tests following adjustment (e.g., a constancy check after battery

replacement) or repair of the dose calibrator. Whereas it is not necessary-to

check geometry dependence if the dose calibrator is physically relocated

within the department or following minor repairs to the instrument panel, it

is appropriate to do the geometry check if repairs are done that might affect

the response of the chamber.

It is appropriate to conduct linearity and

accuracy tests following any repairs to the dose calibrator.

It is the responsibility of the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) and Radiation

Safety Committee (RSC) to ensure that these checks are performed.

Licensees

are reminded that 10 CFR 35.21 requires that an RSO be responsible for

implementing the radiation safety program and ensuring that radiation safety

activities are being performed in accordance with approved procedures and

regulatory requirements in the daily operation of the licensee's byproduct

material program.

In addition, 10 CFR 35.22 requires that an RSC perform

periodic reviews, to oversee the use of byproduct material.

/

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 No written response is required by this information notice.

questions about this matter, please contact the appropriate

office or this office.

If you have any

NRC regional

Richard E. Cunningham, Director

Division of Industrial and

Medical Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material

Safety and Safeguards

Technical contact:

Patricia K. Holahan, NMSS

(301) 504-2694 Attachments:

1. List of Recently Issued

NMSS Information Notices

2. List of Recently Issued

NRC Information Notices

g

-

z

r

Attachment 1

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NMSS INFORMATION NOTICES

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

93-07

93-05

93-04

93-03

92-84 Classification of Trans- portation Emergencies

Locking of Radiography

Exposure Devices

Investigation and Re- porting of Misadministra- tions by the Radiation

Safety Officer

Recent Revision to

10 CFR Part 20 and

Change of Implementa- tion Date to

January 1, 1994

Release of Patients

Treated with Temporary

Implants

Employee Training

and Shipper Registra- tion Requirements for

Transporting Radioactive

Materials

Emergency Response

Information Require- ments for Radioactive

Material Shipments

Uranium Hexafluoride

Cylinders - Deviations

in Coupling Welds

02/01/93

01/14/93

01/07/93

01/05/93

12/17/92

10/18/92

08/24/92

08/12/92

All Licensees required to

have an emergency plan.

All Nuclear Regulatory

Commission industrial

radiography licensees.

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission medical

licensees.

All byproduct, source, and

special nuclear material

licensees.

All Nuclear Regulatory Com- mission Medical Licensees.

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission Licensees.

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission Licensees.

All fuel cycle licensees.

92-72

92-62

92-58

1%J .

Attachment 2

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

93-09

93-08

93-07

93-06

93-05

Failure of Undervoltage

Trip Attachment on

Westinghouse Model DB-50

Reactor Trip Breaker

Failure of Residual

Heat Removal Pump

Bearings due to High

Thrust Loading

Classification of Trans- portation Emergencies

Potential Bypass Leak- age Paths Around Filters

Installed in Ventilation

Systems

Locking of Radiography

Exposure Devices

Investigation and Re- porting of Misadministra- tions by the Radiation

Safety Officer

Recent Revision to

10 CFR Part 20 and

Change of Implementa- tion Date to

January 1, 1994

Malfunction of A Pres- surizer Code Safety

Valve

Accuracy of Motor-

Operated Valve Diagnostic

Equipment Manufactures

.by Liberty Technologies

02/02/93

02/01/93

02/01/93

01/22/93

01/14/93

01/07/93

01/05/93

01/04/93

01/04/93

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

All Licensees required to

have an emergency plan.

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

All Nuclear Regulatory

Commission industrial

radiography licensees.

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission medical

licensees.

All byproduct, source, and

special nuclear material

licensees.

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

All holders of OLs or CPs

for nuclear power reactors.

93-04

93-03

93-02

93-01 OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

IN 93-10

February 2, 1993 No written response is required by this information notice.

If you have any

questions about this matter, please contact the appropriate NRC regional

office or this office.

Richard E. Cunningham, Director

Division of Industrial and

Medical Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material

Safety and Safeguards

Technical contact:

Patricia K. Holahan, NMSS

(301) 504-2694 Attachments:.

>

v

1. List of Recently Issued

NMSS Information Notices

2. List of Recently Issued

NRC Information Notices

DOCUMENT NAME:

93-10.IN

E. Kraus

TechEd

11/23/92

  • See previous concurrence

'4wlm--

OFC

IMAB
IMAB*
IMAB*
IMOB*
OGC*
DD/IMNS* :D/IMNS*

NAME :PHolahan:rj:LWCamper :JEGlenn

FCombs
STreby
JTGreeves:RECunningham

DATE :01/21/93

12/14/92 :12/17/92
12/18/92 :01/15/93 :01/25/93 :01/25/93 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY