Information Notice 1991-41, Potential Problems with the Use of Freeze Seals

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Potential Problems with the Use of Freeze Seals
ML031190499
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/1991
From: Rossi C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
IN-91-041, NUDOCS 9106210168
Download: ML031190499 (7)


ak .

'la1

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555

June 27, 1991

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 91-41: POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH

THE USE OF FREEZE SEALS

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power

reactors.

Purpose

This information notice is intended to alert addressees to the potential

consequences associated with failure of freeze seals used to perform mainte- nance in piping systems. Of particular concern would be a failure when used

in a portion of the reactor coolant system pressure boundary where failure

could lead to core uncovery. It is expected that recipients will review the

information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in-this

information notice do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific

action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

On April 19, 1989, at the River Bend Station, a freeze seal failed on a 6-inch

service water line. The freeze seal was used to allow inspection and repair of

manual isolation valves to a safety-related auxiliary building cooler. The

bonnet of one manually operated valve was off the valve and the service water

system was in operation at the time'-of the event. The failure of the freeze

seal resulted in the flooding of portions of the auxiliary building. Approxi- mately 15,000 gallons of service water were discharged through the disassembled

isolation valve, covering portions of the floor at the 141-foot level of the

auxiliary building. A portion of the water flowed through holes in the floor

under safety-related 480-Vac motor control centers onto nonsafety-related

cabinets on the 114-foot level containing disconnect links and a

13.8-kV/480-Vac transformer. As the cabinets were not designed to shed water, they allowed the water to enter, shorting circuits and causing a fire that

damaged one cabinet and its components. A 13.8-kY supply breaker opened and

deenergized the cabinet and two others, causing the loss of the operating

residual heat removal (RHR) system, nqrmal spent fuel cooling, and normal

lighting in the auxiliary building, the control building, and the reactor

building. The operators isolated the service water system in 15 minutes and

restarted the RHR system in 17 minutes. Further details may be found in NRC

Augmented Inspection Team Inspection Report No. 50-458/89-20 and Licensee Event

Report 50-458/89-020.

ii I

9106210168 U

__

,

ipal

4

(,

jjL

  • f

, /I

L__'

fU_/ 1 V

&,r%

^

,n

VI) fS

2 E

1040

9 I-04't

IN 91-41

-

June 27, 1991 While the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1, was shut down for a refueling outage

in 1987, the licensee used a freeze seal to enable plant personnel to replace a

3-inch-diameter section of low-pressure injection piping because no valves were

available to isolate the affected piping. The freeze seal was in a line

connected to the borated water storage tank, which supplies borated water for

the low-pressure injection system.

The freeze seal failed, and approximately

30,000 gallons of slightly radioactively contaminated water leaked into various

areas of the auxiliary building. A portion of the water from the borated water

storage tank drained through the station yard drainage system and flowed past

the site boundary before the leak was brought under control 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> after the

freeze seal failed. Further information may be found in NRC Inspection Report

No. 50-269/87-51.

Discussion:

Freeze seals are used to isolate components (such as inboard isolation valves)

for maintenance in locations that cannot otherwise be isolated. The seal is

created and maintained by applying a cooling agent such as liquid nitrogen to

the exterior of the pipe.

The cooling agent freezes the water within the pipe

section, thus sealing the pipe. When used in the reactor coolant system (RCS)

pressure boundary, these freeze seals become a temporary part of the pressure

boundary. Therefore, if a freeze seal fails, it can result in an immediate

loss of primary coolant.

Of particular concern would be a failure of a freeze

seal in a system connecting to the vessels lower plenum region, such as the

reactor water cleanup (RWCU) system at boiling water reactor (BWR) facilities.

The staff has estimated that the reactor core could be uncovered in less than

1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> if the freeze seal failed completely in the RWCU system.

Freeze seal failures in secondary systems can also be significant because of

the potential for consequential failures, such as the loss of decay heat

removal in the River Bend event. The licensee for the River Bend Station

attributed the causes of the event to procedural inadequacies that resulted in

a failure to install and monitor a temperature detection device, and to a lack

of personnel training in the use of freeze seals.

Some licensees have used piping mockups to thoroughly evaluate freeze seal

applications prior to their use on reactor system piping.

Important considera- tions include examining training, procedures, and contingency plans associated

with the use of freeze seals, and evaluating the need for and availability of

additional water makeup systems and their associated support systems.

-IN

91-41 June 27, 1991 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the

technical contact listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.

Division of Operational Events Assessment

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Amy E. Almond, NRR

(301) 492-0875 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NMt Information Notices

Attachmnt I

IN 91-41

June 27, 1991

Page I of 1

LIST OF RECEItMY ISSUED

NRC INFORIIATION

NOTICES

Information

Date of

Notice no.

Subject

Issuance

Issved to

8W43.

H1gh fladiatiom Huaards

06/2/91

All holders of DLs or CPo

Supp. 7 from hrrdiated ltacore

or nuclear power reactors, Detectors and Cables

research reactorse and

test reactors.

91-40

Containeti'on ot How-

06/19/91

All holder, of DLs or CPs

radioactive system and

for nuclear Power reactors.

Resulting Possibility for

Urmonitoredt

Uncoetrolled

Release to the EG'iroumeat

Rl-3f

Coapliaace with 10 CFt

06/17/91

All Nuclear Regulatory

Part 21.

RepertIng of

Comission eNRC! matneral

Defects and

bsocopliansce.

license$.

91-3S

Thermal Stratification In

06/13/91

All holders of OLs or Cps

feedwetar System Piping

for nuclear pamr reactors.

91-37 CcrPressad Gas Cylinder

06/10/91

All holders of OLs or CPs

Rissile Hazards

for nuclear power reactors.

91-35 Nuclear Pleat Staff

06/10/91

All holder, of OLC or CPs

Working Howrs

for nuclear powr reactors.

91-35 Labeling R uiremets for

06/07/91

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Treeiporting Halti-Hazard

Coomissios (RRCs 1 icenses.

Radioactive materials

91-34 Potartial

"r eob ins

06/03/91

All holders of OLs or CPs

Identifyine Causes of

for auc'ear power reactors.

Energescy Diesel Generator

Mafunctionis

1-33 Reactor Safety Information

05/31/91

All holder, of OLs or CPs

er States During Exercise$

for nuclear power reactors.

and Emergencies

91-37 Possible Flows is Certais

05/15/91 All holders of OL% or CPs

Piping Systems Fabricated

for nuclear powr reactor,.

by Associated Piping and

Engiineering

OL

  • Operating License

CP

Coestruction Permit

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. $300

FIRST CLASS MAI

IPOSA03 & FERS PAID

u8FIRC

PEMI m a

IN 91-41 June 27, 1991 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the

technical contact listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.

dgjrS1igned by

-hartes E.

Rossi

Charles E. Rossi, Director

Division of Operational Events Assessment

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Ary E. Almond, NRR

(301) 492-0875 Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

DDAlER7sNF

  • C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR

ERg

CHBerlinger

DE72 91

06/14/91

  • OGCB:DOEA:NRR*SRXB:DST:NRR *SC/SRXB:DST:NRR

PCWen

AEAlmond

TECollins

06/07/91

06/11/91

06/11/91

  • RPB:ADM

TechEd

06/14/91

  • C/SRXB:DST:NRR

RCJones

06/11/91

  • C/RII

DMVerrelli

06/14/91

  • D/DST:NRR

AThadani

06/14/91 DOCUMENT NAME: IN 91-41

-

IN 91-XX

June xx, 1991 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the

technical contact listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.

Charles E. Rossi, Director

Division of Operational Events Assessment

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Amy E. Almond, NRR

(301) 492-0875 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

Document Name:

FREEZE SEAL FAILURE

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

/ gE N

D/DOEA:NDD

C/ WbDOEA:NRR

CERossi W¶1 . HBe linger

06/ /91

06/ f191

  • OGCB:DOEA:NRR*SRXB:DST:NRR *SC/SRXB:DST:NRR

PCWen

AEAlmond

TECollins

06/07/91

06/11/91

06/11/91

  • RPB:ADM

TechEd

06/14/91

  • C/SRXB:DST:NRR

RCJones

06/11/91

  • C/RII

DMVerrell1

06/14/91

  • D/DST:NRR

AThadani

06/14/91

their use,,on reactor system piping.. Licensees may wish to consider the use of

such training.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If

you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the

technical contact listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.

Charles E. Rossi, Director

Division of Operational Events Assessment

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Amy E. Almond, NRR

(301) 492-0875 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

Document Name:

FREEZE SEAL FAILURE

OGCB:DOEA:NRR

PCWen

06/-7/91 D/DOEA:NRR

CERossi

06/ /91 SRXB:DST-NRR

AEAlmonD

06/11/91"

C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR

CHBerlinger

06/ /91 SC/SRXB:DS,T:NRR

TEColli RS¶7Z)

06/(1/91 RPB:ADM

TechEd 7uno

V pA

VWf;JM.6

'C/RII

> DM Verrell1

06/14/91 D/DST:NR

IB

I

AThadan

06/ 7 91