IR 05000498/1989020

Insp Rept 50-498/89-20 & 50-499/89-20 on 890710-14.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Records & Document Control Programs

ML20247L745
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	07/24/1989
From:	Barnes I, Mcneill W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247L743	List: IR 05000498/1989020 ML20247L739
References
50-498-89-20, 50-499-89-20, NUDOCS 8908010341
Download: ML20247L745 (7)

Text

_--

~'

'

,

,

-

a I

I APPENDIX

{1

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-498/89-20 Operating Licenses: NPF-76 50-499/89-20 HPF-80 Dockets: 50-498 50-499 1 Licensee: Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) , I P.O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility Name: South Texas Project (STP), Baits 1 and 2 Inspection At: STP, Matagorda, Texas Inspection Conducted: July 10-14, 1989 Inspector: , [ 8ce?c7 ~7 - h - E7

~

g,k W. M. McNeill, Reactor Inspector. Materials Date and Quality Programs Section, Division of Reactor Safety Approved: I 8-> 7 - h -P7 I. Barnes, Chief, Materials ano Quality Date Programs Section, Division of Reactor Safety Inspection Summary

Inspection Conducted July 10-14, 1989 (Report 50-498/89-20)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the records and document control program Pesults: The records prograr.t was found to be satisfactory. The retrieval of records, both in-process and archive status, was accomplished in a timely l manner. The record storage facility was found to meet the established {

requirements. The document centrol program was found to be satisfar+ory. Th '

documents found in use for various work activities were the current .evision )

i I

l I

8908010341 89072'J l PDR ADOCK 05000498 1 0 PDC L_ _ _ _ .

r i

~. .,

-2-Inspection Conducted July 10-14, 1989 (Report 50-499/89-20)

>

' Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the records and document'

control program Results: . The records program was found.to be satisfactory. The retrieval of records, both in-process and archive status, was accomplished in a tinely manner. The record storage facility was found to meet the established requirements. The document control program was found to be satisfactory. The docunents found in use for various work activities were the current revision ,

i

_ _ -_ _ a

_. _

( ..,

-3-DETAILS Persons Contacted HL&P J. W. Adams, Electrical Maintenance Foreman

• C. A. Ayala, Licensing Supervisor

• W. S. Blair, Maintenance Support Manager

• M. H. Carnley, Instrument and Control Manager

• R. W. Chewning, Nuclear Assurance Vice President P. J. Christiansen, Surveillance Coordinator

• S. M. Dew, Nuclear Purchasing and Materials Management Manager P. D. Gaines, Procedure Analyst C. R. Garrett, Mechanical Maintenance Foremen

• J. E. Geiger, Nuclear Assurance General Manager

.P. A. Glace, Records Analyst M. M. Harris, Pecords Analyst

'

• T. J. Jordan, Plant Engineering Manager

• A. K.'Khosla, Licensing Engineer

• W. H. Kinsey, Plant Manager

% A. McBurnett, Licensing Manager B. J. Mower, Technical Supervisor M. Munoz, Record Analyst J. M. Pinzon, Associate Engi.iaer T. L. Quirk, Technical Service Manager i C. M. Ravad, Records Management and Document Control Manager -

• V. A. Simonis, Plant Operations Support Manager  :

L. T. Smith, Supervisor j D. S. Sorensen, Technical Supervisor  ;

• M. R. Wisenburg, Plant Superintendent j a

NRC  !

R. J. Evans, Resident Inspector D. L. Garrison, Resident Inspector

• J. I. Tapia, Senior Resident Inspector

• Denotes those persons that attended the exit interview on July 14, 198 The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel during the !

inspectio . Records Program (39701)

The objective of this inspection was to ascertain that the licensee is implementing a records program in conformance with regulatory requirements, Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) commitments, and i

j

- _ , - . . _ - -- __ - - - __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - - - _ - _ - - _ _ - - - _

.,

,

w ,

o -4-

-,

~ industry guides and standards, in this regard, the inspector reviewed the current revision of the quality assurance program description, Chapter 17.2 of the FSAR, and the following implementing procedures:

' *

" Records Management,".IP-01.02Q, Revision 1, dated November 21, 1988

"STPEGS Document Type List," IP-01.31Q, Revision 3. dated July 5.-

1989

" Records Management and Document Control Storage and Access Control,"

RMSP 1.09, Revision 3, dated May 1, 1988

" Archived Records-Processing," RMSP 3.16, Revision 13, dated March 31, 1989

" Document / Record Retention Media," RMSP 1.21, Revision 2, dated March 22, 1989

" Optical Disk Processing," RMSP 1.22. Revision 1, dated March 22, 1989 The inspector found from this review that a program was established which defined types of records to be maintained, retention requirements, and assigned responsibilities to maintain records. The program also establishe controls for review, transmittal and filing of records, access to the storage facility, and requirements for a storage facilit The inspector requested retrieval of a sample'of 12 records. The sample consisted of two each of the following types of records: surveillance, inservice tests, nonconformance reports, plant modifications, reportable occurrences, and procurement documents. The sample was:

Surveillance

" Standby Diesel Fuel Oil Surveillance," OPSP07-ZC-0002, dated July 12, 1988

" Gaseous Waste Processing Oxygen," 1 PSP 02-WG-4655, dated February 8, 1989

Inservice Tests

" Chemical and Volume Control System Valve Operability Test,"

1 PSP 03-CV-0012, dated March 27, 1989

" Reactor Coolant System Primary Sampling Outboard Containment Isolation Value Test," 1 PSP 03-PS-0001, dated Parch 3, 1989

!-

'

.-. - _ _

- - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _

.

-

t - , ,

"

..

,

., . z

. , ,

( l L .7

'

-5-

'

!

y

• dnconformanceReports

" Neutron Detector., Support," Nonconformance' Report 88-0057

" Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Shaft Sleeves Failure," Station Problrn Report 880086

Plant Modifications

" Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Modification," FCR HBN-1285

"

Cross Tie Addition From Excess Letdown to Normal Letdown Heat Exchanger," CCP-1-J-FST-0640

Reportable Occurrences

" Inadequate Procedure Review," Licensee Event Report 88-061-m<

" Construction Error of Deletion of a Door," Licensee Event Report 88-51

Procurement Documents Sulzer Bingham Pump Repair purchase orders BF-43372 and BF-44754 These records were found to be in various stages; i.e., in-process records, filed in vault as hard copies, archived on microfilm, archived on optical disk storage. All of the records sampled were retrieved in a timely manner. The filing, indexing, and retention periods were verified to be J

satisfactory for each of the sampled records. The storage facility was toured and found to meet the requirements established by the licensee's commitment The inspector noted that the Station Problem Report 880086 was archived on optical disk storage. This report had 1,112 pages on the optical disk storage. A review by the inspector noted that some extraneous documents and extensive duplication of documents were in this record. This record appeared to be, in fact, only about 200 pages. This record was unique in regard to amount of duplicatio No violations or deviations were identified in this area of the inspectio . Document Control Program (39702)

The objective of this inspection was to ascertain whether the licensee is implementing a QA program for document control that is in conformance with Technical Specifications (TS), regulatory requirements, commitments in the

'.

FSAR, and applicable industry guides and standards. In this regard, the inspector reviewed the' quality assurance program description in the FSAR and the following implementing procedures:

- =_-__- _ __-____--_-____-.

- -

,

a;7:p)-

-

-

Mc --3 u.fn ,

j l, .- : .

-6-

_'

e

" Document Control " IP-01.130. Revision 2, dated July 5, 1989

• Distribution of Controlled Documents r RMSP 2.15. Revision 4, dated- 1 July.5, 1989 The inspector found from review of the above documents that a document control program was established which controlled the issuing and 4

'

distributing of procedures and drawings. . Master revision lists were established as well as distribution list The inspector sampled work activities mainly occurring on July 11, 198 ,

The activities and the documents verified were:

Surveillance Documents 89025346-ST:88001444-8903 Procedure 2 PSP 06-RC-0006 89025392-ST:88001767-8903- Procedure 2 PSP 06-RC-0005

, 89025355-ST:87000350-8906 Procedure 'IPSP06-PK-0005

.

89025353-ST:87000348-8906 Procedure IPSP06-PK-0001

Work Reauests

.!

CH-114520- Procedure OPGP03-ZM-0021 Procedure OPMP05-CH-0001 Drawing 9-E-PKAC-01 Drawing 9-E-VFAB-01 Manual 4310-00180-DYD SI-81025 Procedure B2SI-P-0862 Drawing.7Z31-2-Z-47503 Drawing 5Z55-1-Z-47517 Dra ing 2D32333 Dravsng 9-E-SI31-01 Drawing 8820D11 11-1529 Procedure OPGP03-ZM-0006 Procedure OPGP03-ZM-0012 l

Preventive Maintenance; HM-2-t!E-89000566 (procedure has the same NM-2-HE-89000641 identification)

'r IC-1-AM-86004579 IC-2-AM 88003178 Procedure 2PMP08-RC-0057 10-1-11-88002358 IC-1-WC-86006613 Procedure OPMP08-WC-4902 '

10-1-5D-86006295 Procedure OPMP08-ZI-0203

,

i

- - _ _ - _ _ - - _ . ._ _ _ _. A

- ,. .. _ . _ . -

e '

9 . ,

<

, .,

• j 3,,a -

,

~7- >

.,

In addition-to th6 above sample, a sample ofil5 piping and instrumentation-

,

diagrams in the ' Unit I control ~ room were. inspected. The sample was:

L- 9P08-HF-0001 5V119-V-00020#1 L

'

'80110-F-00003 9Z329-Z-00041#1 60210-F-00007 5Z329-Z-00045#1 65159-F-00019#1 9Z329-2-00048#1 5R209-F-05020#1 8V329-Z-00023#1 5R219-F-05028#1 '6S180-F-10003-7V109-V-00011#1 90069-F-05036#1 i' SV149-V-00016#1 L Based on-the above samples, it appe.: red that the most current. revision of

_ procedures and. drawings were in use at ST l No violations or deviations were identified in this area of the inspectio ' Exit Meeting An exit meeting was held on July 14, 1989, with those individuals denoted in paragraph 1 of this report. At this meeting, the scope of the inspection and the findings were summarized. The licensee did not identify, as proprietary. any of the information provided to or reviewed by the inspecto i I

<

i i

i

]

I.

.*

,

i

!

.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

l