IR 05000483/1981015
| ML20009C547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1981 |
| From: | Hansen W, Konklin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009C542 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-81-15, NUDOCS 8107210218 | |
| Download: ML20009C547 (4) | |
Text
3
'
i
.'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-483/81-15 Docket No. 50-483 License No. CPPR-139 Licensee:
Union Electric Company P. O. Box 14 9 St. Louis, MO 63166 Facility: Callaway, Unit 1
-
Inspection At:
Callaway Site, Callaway County, MO I
Inspection Conducted:' June 1-30, 1981 l'
I.
en
-
Inspector: W
p Accompanied B :
C. Feierabend
,
Approved By:
J. E. Konklin 7/d 7/,
Projects Sect' n A I
r -
Inspection Summary Inspection on June 1-30, 1981 (Report No. 50-483/81-15)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector (RI) of safety-related construction activities including protection of the reactor vessel and other components of the nuclear steam system supplier, (NSSS); tour of storage and lay down areas; welding of safety related piping systems; post tensioning work on the containment bu'ilding; and review of selected nuclear conrtruction administrative instructions. This inspection involved 57 inspectc hours onsite by one NRC inspector including 7 inspector hours onsite during ff-shifts.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
0107210218 810707 PDR ADOCK 05000483 C
g.
'
.
s DETAILS Persons Contacted Union Electric Company (UE).
W. H. Weber, Manager Nuclear Construction M. E. Doyne, General Superintendent, Callaway Construction R. L. Powers, Superintendent of Site Quality Assurance
- J. Laux, Supervisory Engineer Quality Assurance Construction
- S. M. Hogan, Assistant Quality Assurance Engineer W. H. Stahl, Test Program Coordinator J. N. Kaelin, Superintendent Start-Up J. L. Marden, Quality Assurance Consultant Daniel International Corporation (Daniel)
H. J. Starr, Project Manager-The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and con-tractor personnel, including craftsmen, QA/QC, technical and engineering staff members.
Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Plant Tours One or more plant areas were toured several times d' iring the re-porting period to observe general conatruction practices; area cleanliness and storage condition of equipment, piping, and elec-
.-
trical cable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
-2-
,
.
-
-
.
-
. _ - - -.
i
'
o 2.
Fabrications of Safety-Related Piping Systems During the reporting period, the inspector observed work including a.
handling, protecting, inspection, and welding of a safety-related piping system.
(1) Component Cooling Water System J04-?G-23/FW-1 J04-EG-23/FW-?
For each of these welds one or more of the following fabrication activities was observed, liandling and protection of piping and partially completed welds was satisfactory. Purge gas was cor-rectly used. The weld area was free of any grease or particles.
The joint fit-up dimensions were within procedural requirements and the welders were certified as qualified for the procedure specified to be used for welding the pipe joint.
.
No' items of noncompliance or deviat!ons were observed.
3.
Nuclear Steam Supplier (NSSS) Equipment The inspector observed the inplace storage and protection of NSSS components and piping. The piping assemblies, reactor vessel internals, and reactor vessel head were properly stored and protected.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Construction Administrative Instruction Review During the reporting period the inspector assisted C. Feierabend in a review of Nuclear Construction Admiristrative Instructions.
In particular NCAI-2, Construction Test Phase Program Organization and Responsibilities was reviewed.
It was noted as it has in previous reports that the responsibility for Quality Control during this phase of work has not been defined. The review of other procedures for general familiarization did not result in comment.
i I
5.
Material Lay Down and Storage Area.
Daring the reporting period the inspector toured several material lay down areas including the area where post tensioning tendons are tem-porarily stored.
In each area the piping assemblies or other material was placed on cribbing to keep the material off the ground. The areas appeared in good order.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-3-
,
_ _ - - - -.
.. -
_ - _ - - - _,
.
-
.
.
_.... -,. _..
,.
_
-
-
. <....
li
\\
. Exit Meetings
- The _. inspector met with Licensee representatives (denoted under Persons contacted).on. June.30, 1981, and other occasions throughout the month.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of.the inspection performed. The Licensee representatives acknowledged the findings reported in-previous paragraphs.
-4-L