IR 05000483/1980018
| ML19344A546 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1980 |
| From: | Hansen W, Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344A542 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-80-18, NUDOCS 8008210134 | |
| Download: ML19344A546 (8) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.. . ,, - - . .. -
,l ! '
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
, l Report'No. 50-483/80-18 Docket No.~ 50-483 License No. CPPR-139 Licensee: Union Electric Company P. O. Box 149 St. Louis, MO 63166 Facility: Callaway, Unit 1 Inspection At: Callaway Site, Unit 1, Callaway County, M0 Inspection Conducted: June 2-30, 1980 /l 7//4/ /d Inspector: W. A. Hansen v 8C b . bb Approved.By: R. C. Knop, Chief Projects Section 1 Inspection Summary Inspection on June 2-30, 1980 (Report No. 50-483/80-18) Areas Inspected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector (RI) of safety-related construction activities including protection of the reactor vessel and other components of the nuclear steam system supplier; (NSSS), material lay down and storage areas; electrical work and welding of safety-related fluid system piping and containment piping penetrations.
This inspection involved 68 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'%; el 80082$0154 . . - . . . .
- ,' . DETAILS Persons Contacted - Union Electric Company (UE)
- W. H. Weber, Manager Nuclear Construction
- M. E. Doyne, General Superintendent, Callaway Construction
- R. L. Powers, Site Quality Assurance Group Leader
- T. H. McFarland, Supervisor Engineer Construction
- J. V. Laux, Quality Assurance Assistant Engineer
- *J. R. Veatch, Quality Assurance Engineer 'S. Hogan,-Quality Assurance Assistant Engineer P. W. Godt, Quality Assurance Engineer
- J. L. Harden, Quality Assurance Engineer Daniel International Corporation (Daniel)
- H. J. Starr, Project Manager
- W. L. Sykora, Assistant Project Manager
- E. D. McFarland, Construction Engineering Manage.
J. A. Holland, Project Quality Assurance Managcr J. R. Cook, Quality Control Manager M. Smith, Audit Response Coordinator The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contrac-tor personnel, including craftsten, QA/QC, technical and engineering staff members.
- Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Plant Tours One or more plant areas were toured several times each week during the reporting period to observe general construction practices; area cleanliness and storage condition of equipment, piping, and cable.
Three tours were made on back shifts of work.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
2.
Electrical Cable Installation During the reporting period, the inspector observed work in-a.
-cluding installation, handling, and protection of electrical cables. Specifically, work associated with these electrical cable pulls was observed: -2-
- ... (1) Cable pull 0674 Cables 4NER11AC 4KJR04AE - 4KJR04AD (2) Cable Pull 0258 Cables 1EGR12CA 1EGR11EA 1ENG04AE 1EFG05AD 1EFG05AE 1EFG04AE 1EFG05AC IENG04AC 1EJG04AC (3) Cable Pull 1014 Cable 1GGQ2AB (s) Cable Pull 1492 Cables 1 EGG 07AA 1 EGG 07AB (5) Cables Pull 0065 Cable 4EMB01BA b.
For each of the pulls some or all of the following activities were observed: (1) Pull cards were in use, (2) the cables were identified, (4) pulling compound was used, (4) pulling tension was monitored,_(5) Quality Control inspections were performed and Quality Control personnel witnessed the pull, (6) cable previously pulled was protected.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Fabrication of Safety-Related Piping Systems During the reporting period, the inspector observed work including handling, protection, inspection, and welding of safety-related ' piping systems. Specifically, work associated with these joints was observed; a.
Reactor Makup Water System BL-03-FW13A-3-
r a
b.
Chemical and Volume Control System 2BG-02-FWO26 , c.
Accumulator Safety Injection System 2EP-02-F015 2EP-02-F016 d.
Residual-Heat Removal 2EJ-02-FW99A For each of these welds, one or more of the following fabrication activities was observed. Handling and protection of piping and partially completed welds was satisfactory. Purge gas was cor-rectly used. The joint fit-up dimensions were within procedural requirements and the weld area was free of any grease or particles.
Welders were certified as qualified for the procedure specified to be used for welding the pipe joint.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Nuclear Steam System Supplier (NSSS) Equipment The inspector observed the inplace storage and protection of a.
NSSS components and piping. The piping assemblies, reactor vessel internals, and reactor vessel head is properly stored and protected.
b.
The inspector cbserved the hydrostatic test of three ccatrol rod drive mechanisms: Mechanism: 11 (Field Weld 11) 39 (Field Weld 39) ' 44 (Field Weld 44) The procedure.was followed; calibrated pressure gauges were in use and the testing was monitored by Quality Control personnel.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Fluid System Penetration Installation The inspector observed the fit-up and welding of penetration weld 2BG-23-F001A. The fit-up dimensions were correct, the weld area-free of foreign material and welders were certified as qualified for the procedure specified.
ENo items'of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-4- , . . _ _ _ --- .
. Exit Meetings The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Persons ~ Contacted) on June 6, 19 and 30, 1980. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection performed.
' Attachment: Preliminary _ Inspection Findings . -5- -. .. .. _.. _... _ - _.. _.,
. PRELIMIN.13Y 'n:n-:CS ..
a ,- . . 1.
LICENSEE . - 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE __ I - / VI / , _._ . 3.
DOCKET NUMBERS
4.
LICENSE NUMBERS ' - 0-k DATE OF INSPECTION 5.
,- ~~ k G' % (C ~ I] 6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no ite=s .. . ~ were found.
of noncompliance or deviation .. 7.
The following matters are preliminary inspection fi di ,_ n ngs: , . . T
- t
! [4,.
- j
< - .,., _ ..
. - - , . , . . ' '. ,./ ~ , . . ~ $ . S.
These preliminary inspection findings vill be revi " Management at the Region III Office and they will coewed by NRC Supervisio concerning any enforcement action.
r espond with you .' " ' , _ [[[( ,' ' Nuclear" Regulatory Commission Inspector
,4- . . . .
., , s , S "**W +m m webwo - ~ ^ -w e WW - L - , , yJ _, - -
7.
..... - .. . .
1.
LICENSEE l' j 2.
>NAL OFFICE . ! 3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUM3ERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION
0-k Y k, h $n-00 7,r - h f]-0 - -., f 6.
- Within the scope of the inspection, no items of noncompliance or deviation " were found.
7.
The following r.atters are preliminary inspection findings: , S . ' '
. / .. . C 8.
These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision / ~ Management at the Region III Office and they will correspond with you concerning any enforcenent_ action.
/ ~ M Tuclear Regulatcry Commission Inspector ' "{f# b . ' " " " * '*
- ,
y g
- wen w*'
L-o, e ' ,'s pKELIMINARY I.'.... . .GS .. . ,. .' . l* 1.
LICENSEE , 2.
..li 0?FICE ... , lb l . e 3.
DOCKET NUMBERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION '
A72-slAR (A/A-di9 G-zo & G-So /98i / 'G 6.
Within the scope of the inspection, no ite=s of noncompliance or deviation '- were found.
7.
The following matters are prelir.inary inspection findings: . . - , P002 GR!Gl#AL '
.
. e
/ <* , . . _.
8.
These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision / '- Management at the Region III Office and they vi 1 correspond with u concerning any enforcement action.
_ /E5 W - ' ' Nuclear Regu'latory Commission Inspector. ' ' ' , < ' ' , i ^I I 1 n . -~~- - -.. - - }}