IR 05000483/1979005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-483/79-05 & 50-486/79-02 on 790430-0501.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Re Control of Design & Procurement & Overall Conducts of Audit Program & Document Control
ML19259C759
Person / Time
Site: Callaway  Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 06/21/1979
From: Hansen W, Knop R, Schweibinz E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19259C753 List:
References
50-483-79-05, 50-483-79-5, 50-486-79-02, 50-486-79-2, NUDOCS 7908150130
Download: ML19259C759 (6)


Text

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,.

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report No. 50-483/79-05; 50-486/79-02 Docket No. 50-483; 50-486 License No. CPPR-139; CPPR-140 Licensee:

Union Electric Company P. O. Box 149 St. Louis, MO 63166 Facility Name:

Callaway, Units I and 2 Inspection At:

ShTPPS, Home Of fice, Gai thersburg, Maryland Inspection Conducted: April 30-May 1, 1979

.

.

v b,

b~~ 2 f Inspectors:

E. R. Schweibinz

'

(

A g p W. A. Hansen vs)

b_p g )f

.

,

C lk+-3.C.Mattia g_)6_

e L.

(Region I)

fa C

'or.4. R. Oberg 6 - ) ( ~> [-

m v.

.

,

(Region IV)

' ' ?.yy]'Y, jf.

Approved By:

Knop, Chie

>/ ' O-Projects Section Inspection Summary Inspection on April 30-May 1, 1979 (Report No. 50-483/79-05; 50-486/79-02)

Areas Inspected:

The aspects of the quality assurance program relating to the control of design and procurement, overall conduct of the audit program and document control. The inspection involved a total of 56 inspector-hours in the SNUPPS Gaithersburg office by four hPC inspectors.

Results:

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

bb7e3 7 79081506o

,

.

DETAILS

1.

Individuals Contacted SNUPPS Organization

.

  • Mr. W. W. Baldwin, Administrative Manager
  • Mr. D. Ba rre tt, Correspondence Control Manager
  • Mr. J. P. Burn, Lead A/E Director
  • Mr. C. A. Hultman, Mechanical Manager
  • Mr. N. A. Petrick, Executive Director
  • Mr. F. Schwoefer, Technical Director
  • Mr. S. J. Seiken, Quality Assurance Manager
  • Mr. R. L. S1right, Licensing Manager
  • Denotes those present at the exit interview.

2.

Management Review The IE inspector determined through a review of documentation and through discussions with SNUPPS staff personnel that management reviews of the QA program have been conducted as required by SNUPPS Administrative Control Procedure (ACP) 2.5, " Management Reviews of the Quality Assurance Program,"

Revision 2, October 20, 1975.

All changes to ACPs are initialed by the Executive Director. Responses to outside audits by the QA Comm ttee are signed by hich The appropriate records for QA program activities are

,,

maintained in controlled files.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Issuance and Control of QA Program Manuals The general area of QA program manual issuance and control was examined by the IE inspector.

The Manual Holder's Distribution List was observed to be correct and in accordance with ACP 2.6, " Issuance and Control of QA Program Manuals," Revision 2, April 1, 1978. Records indicate that manual issuance, distribution, and follow up are also in accordance with ACP 2.6.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

4.

Stop Work The IE inspector reviewed.ACP 2.4, "Stop Work,' Revision 2, March 18, 1977.

No stop-work orders have been issued by the SNUPPS staff in the past two The ACP is in conformance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, years.

Appendix B and ANSI N45.2.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

-2-6[5M50

.

5.

Audit Program The IE inspector reviewed the SNUPPS staff audit activities to verify compliaace with ACP 13.1, Revision 4, January 13, 1977, " Audit Program."

The ACP conforms to the requirements of ANSI N45.2.12 as related to staff audit functions. The following documents were reviewed:

a.

Audit Schedules dated April 18, 1979, September 25, 1978, and February 15, 1977. This included audit schedules for ACP coverage, lead AE (Bechtel) audits, and SKUPPS contractor audits.

b.

SNUPPS Internal Audit, Report SLS 79-35, File: 0491.8.1 (ACP 3.6, 3.7, and 9.1), and responses.

SNUPPS Audit and Bechtel and Procedure Control, dated February 15, c.

1979 (and response) SLBM 79-48, File: 0492.4.2.

d.

SNUPPS/QA Committee Audit of Bechtel, dated November 15, 1978, SLBM 78-410, File: 0492.13.3.

The following were verified to be complete and correct in the audit reports:

a.

Description of scope of audit.

b.

Auditors identified.

c.

Organization and activities audited.

d.

Date(s) of audit.

Summary of Audit findings.

e.

f.

Current status of unresolved deficiencies.

g.

Conclusion of the auditor concerning the subject being audited.

The IE inspector observed that the timeliness of audit responses from Bechtel did not meet the ACP 13.1 requirements, i.e.,

responses were in excess of 30 days.

However, Bechtel has notified the SKUPPS staff that the reports would be late.

After discussion with the SNUPPS QA Manager, the IE inspector stated that the question of timeliness of QA audit responses is considered unresolved. The QA Manager states that this problem would be reviewed with the AE/Bechtel.

(483/79-05-01)

6.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (50-483/78-13-01): Corrective Action Reports.

The IE inspector determined, through review of SKUPPS QA Committee Meeting Minutes and discession with SNUPPS staff QA Manager, that for the utilities

- 3-liti c /> g

.

vu

'.

ACP 10.1, " Corrective Action System," Revision 1, January 2,1975, is an active procedure although of limited use to the SNUPPS staff.

The proce-dure and its use were reviewed by SNUPPS QA Committee during meetings No.

68 and 69.

The bulk of the reports by the SNUPPS sites are site specific.

Thus, only a limited number of reports are received by the SNUFPS staff, since their mission is directed toward specific technical and overall management system proble=s.

~

This item is considered resolved.

7.

Processing of Field Changes The control of Field Changes in accordance with ACP 3.6, " Field Change Control," Revision 0, April 5, 1976, was reviewed. Field Changes 2-0281-C, 2-2076-C, 2-0275-C and 2-0273-C were selected.

The review resulted in the determinstion that the field changes were being controlled as required by the Administrative Control Procedure.

No ite=s of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

8.

Processing of Construction Variances The control and processing of construction variances in accordance with ACP 3.7, " Construction Variance," Revision 2, April 1, 1978, was reviewed.

Construction Variance Requests 2-0062-C, 2-0004-C, 2-0057-C, 2-0060-C, 2-0044-C, and 2-0059-C were reviewed.

The review and disposition of these Variance Requests were performed as required by the Administrative Control Procedure.

-

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

9.

Follow Up on Previous Inspection Findings Information and documentation provided during a recent inspection at the Callaway site relative to an item of nonco=pliance (identified as item 50-483/79-02-02) were reviewed.

This item was in regard to the licensee's failure to control nonconforming safety-related equipment.

All of the documentation reviewed and information provided were in agreement with that provided at the site.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identiilied.

10.

Review of Control of Design Documents The control of design documents was reviewed in accordance ACP 3.4." Control of Design Documents," Revision 3, March 30,1979.

Review of audits of these activities indicated that some problems existed and that acceptable remedial action is being taken.

A request to change the surveillance

.

-4-657230

.

.

frequency that the Administrative Manager is to audit the SNUPPS files (in order to verify that the design documents on file agree with the release logs) was reviewed.

This change was from a monthly to a quarterly frequency.

'

The change was approved as Revision 3 to ACP 3.4.

No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.

11.

QA Program Review - Document and Procurement Control a.

Procurement Control The lE inspector reviewed various documents to verify compliance with the requirements of ACP 4.1, " Procurement of Services," Revision 3, September 19, 1977. The following procurement (services) contracts were reviewed:

--

Contract No. 750818 - 14ose Parts Monitoring System

--

Contract No. 780630 - Generic Component Test Progra=

The IE inspector also verified that the required semi-annual listing of procurenents was issued.

The current listing was issued on March 29, 1979.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

b.

Document Control The IE inspector reviewed various documents to verify compliance with ACP 5.1, " Correspondence and Committment Control," Revision 6, November 17, 1978. The following documents were reviewed:

--

SNUPPS Log for Outgoing Correspondence (1979)

--

SNUPPS Log for Incoming Correspondence (1979)

--

SNUPPS Log of Letters From Union Electric to SNUPPS Organizacion (1979)

The IE inspector also verified that a personnel co=mitment list existed in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 6.7 of ACP 5.1.

The listing was a computer printout and was dated April 27, 1979.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

12.

Indoctrination and Training The IE inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with ACP 7.1,

" Indoctrination and Training," Revision 3, February 16, 1976:

--

SNUPPS Surveillance Report (dated April 20, 1979) of Indoctrination and Training

--

SNUPPS QA Indoctrination and Training Log

- 5-

- ~ ~~ <, n *

U

$Yi

.

.

SNUPPS Indoctrination and Training Session (No. 27) Document

--

.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified-13.

Reporting of Significant Deficiencies The IE inspector reviewed the following documents to verify compliance with ACP 10.2, " Reporting of Significant Deficiencies," Revision 3,

.

December 5, 1977.

SNUPPS Log of Significant Deficiencies

--

--

Significant Deficiency Reports 1 and 2.

No items of nonccmpliance or deviations were identified.

14.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. One unresolved item disclosed during this inspection is dis-cussed in paragraph 5, Timeliness of QA Audit Repscases.

15.

Exit Interview The IE inspectors met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on May 1, 1979. The IE inspector summarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.

-

6572.9P-6-