IR 05000461/1980026
| ML19340E505 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1980 |
| From: | Knop R, Livermore H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340E504 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-80-26, NUDOCS 8101140772 | |
| Download: ML19340E505 (8) | |
Text
.
L U.S. NUCl2AR REUIAERY C0!GIISSION
.
OFFICE OF DISPECTION AND EIMRCDIEiT O
R MION III Report No-50-461/80-26 Docket No. 50-k61 Iicense No. CPPR-137 Iicensee: T11 hois Power Company 500 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 Facility Name: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: Clinton Site, Clinton, IL Inspection Conducted: U p ber 3-26, 1980 Inspector:
H. H.1$ more
- 1/f /dc)
,
sc gy I
C O
Approved By:
R.G. Knop, Chief Projects Section 1 Insoection Su=ary Insnection on November 3-26. 1980 (Recort No. So L61/8N26)
Areas Inscected: Routine inspection by the IE Regional Resident Inspector (SRI) of safety related construction activities including material laydown and storage areas, fire prevention / protection, handling and installation-of Power Generation Control Consoles (PGCC),. welding of recirculation system spool pieces, handling and installation of the top sections of the containment dome liner, riggi.ng of safety related pipe, and the radiographic-testing of pipe by U.S. Testing Co. This inspection involved 78 inspector hours by one NRC resident inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
.
1
810114 0W
.
.
Y
.,..
-,-,-----s.
,,, -,..,,
.
.-- -- ----.- -
,
.,
- - -
,
DETAILS
,
Persons Contacted Princioal Licensee Encloyees
- G.M. Brashear, Site Manager, Clinton
- R.J. Canfield, Director.-Construction
- A.J. Budnick, Directon-QA
- E.E. Connon, Assistant Di. rector-Construction
- L.W. Dozier, Assistant Director-Construction
- D.E. Korneman, Construction
- J.F. Hampton, Supervisor-QA R.W. Folck, QA Specialist
- J.S. Spencer, Directo& Engineering R. Backen, QA Specialist R. Weber, QA Engineer R. Becker, QA Consultant J.M. King, Assistant Director-Construction
- L.J. Koch, Vice President
- J. McHood, Vice President
- J. Geier, Manager-General Engineering W.L. Calhoun-Electrical Construction R. Campbell-QA Consultant B. Spicer, QA Consultant W.M. Berry-Supervisor Construction
- F. Schwarz-Civil Engineer
-
- M.C. Hollen, Supervisor-QA
- W.C. Gerstner, Executive Vice President
- T.F. Plunkett, Plant Manager
- E. Panganiban, Piping Supervisor
- T.L. Stromberski, Construction Engineer R. Morgenstern, QA Engineer J. Karr, QA Engineer Baldwin Associates
- J.W. Smart, QA Manager
- T. Selva, Manager, Quality and Technical Services
- J. Linehan, QC Manager
- W.H. Harrington, Project Manager l
- J.E. Findley, Project Engineer
- R.D. Bennett, Manager, Technical Services
- G. Lane, Electrical, QC
-@
- T.G. Yearick, Assistant to Manager
.
- C.E. Winfrey, QC Civil
,-
- W. O'Brien, QC Piping
- H.R. Swift, Assistant Project Engineer
- D.U. Smither, Assistant Project Manager
- L.A. Gelbert, QC Supervisor
!
- D.F. Stephens, Sr. Electrical Engineer
- G.B. Browne, Manager, Subcontracts
- T. Morrow, QC Inspector
- Re
-
-
- -
-
- -
- - -
-.
. - - - -
.
- - -
- -
- - - - - -.
..
- -. -.
- -
. -
-
-
.
-. -
-. - - - -
-
- - - - -
.
General Electric Comoany
,
- S.G. Hall, Quality Control
- J.L. Dempster, Site Manager ANI M.J. King U.S. Testing Co.
- J.A. Grimm, Site Project Supervisor RCI
- G.S. Guarneri, QC Supervisor Other staff and personnel were contacted during the reporting period.
Denotes those attending at least one of the exit meetings.
- Ftmetional or Procram Areas Insnected 1.
Site Tours At periodic intervals during the report period, tours of areas of the site were perfomed. These tours were intended to assess the cleanli-ness of the site; storage conditions of equipment and piping being used in site construction; the potential for fire or other hazards which might have a deleterious effect on personnel and equipment, and to witness construction activities in progress.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
2.
Insnection of Material /Comuonent Storace Areas The resident inspector toured storage areas in the outside laydown yard and within the power block several times during the month. Tho areas were randomly selected. The inspection was in relation to the requirements of ANSI N45 2.2; material protected and stored off the ground, caps on pipe ends, and segregation of safety and non-safety material. Storage and maintenance were adequate.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
3.
Recirculation System Pining The resident inspector perfomed two surveillance inspections on the fit up and partially completed welding of the reactor recirculation pump discharge piping at five vertical spools and horizontal manifold pipe interfaces. The inspector observed the fit up and subsequent Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) inspection. The weld areas were clean and free of foreign material. Fit up dimensions were correct.
.
- -
.
- -
... - -
..
.
_ _
.
___
r
'
The inspector later viewed the partially completed welds. Bead
>
widths were within specifications and the welds appeared visually sound.
!
)
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
4.
Ricine from Safety Related Picing During a surveillance to.ir of contairment, the inspector noted that a steam line pipe installation was in progress using rigging attached to
,
an installed residual heat re= oval. system pipe (safety related). This practice is prohibited by Baldwin Project Procedure BAP 2.11 Section 5 1.1 unless specifically approved in writing beforehand. No written approval had been granted. The inspector determined through discussions with the journeymen and foreman involved, that the incident was an
isolated case and caused by inadequate indoctrination. A nonconfomance
'
report was processed and dispositioned satisfactorily on the involved
,
applied pipe loads. The Contractor has reinstructed a'.1 containment personnel on correct rigging procedure (signature lists) and will so
'
instruct all new personnel. Personnel in other piping areas will be l
rebriefed through their superintendents. The inspector has no further concerns in this area.
No items of nonco=pliance or deviation were identified.
<
5.
Radiocrachic Surveillance
..
The inspector perfomed a surveillance of two radiographic shots of a recirculation system pipe weld perfomed by U.S. Testing Company personnel.
The radiograph was performed in contairment during noon lunch hour using a
.
52 curies radiation source of iridium 192. The exposure source was cranked
(driven) through a port in the bioshield wall at approximately the 750'
level. The perheter of the personnel restricted area was posted at the 737' entrances (1) to the dry well.' The inspector determined that six workmen and a ga ni had been inside the restricted area during the radia-tion source expoure (radiograph). The workmen were at the 720' level between the biosha. eld and dry well walls and were unaware that radiograph exposures had taken place.
U.S. Testing Company procedures specifically state that personnel not adequately monitored or aware cf the radiation field shall not be allowed to enter a restricted area. Preliminary investi-gation indicates that the personnel involved were approximately 100 away from the exposure and were shielded by the bioshield wall. Calculations would indicate that no one was exposed to radiation approaching 2 mrem.
This matter is still under investigation.
6.
Installation of containment Iiner The resident inspectar.perfomed a surveillance of the rigging, lifting, and installation of the containment liner roof hip and dollar sections.
The lifts were perfomed per procedure (M001) and were adequately covered:
by Baldwin and Chicego Bridge & Iron inspection personnel. The crane
,
inspection record JV279 and the monthly wire rope inspection log JV280 were complete and signed off.
Inspection Checklists were followed and
t l.-
,
- Gm
. ws
,-m-c p-
,-+y-
+-
-e r.3.--
.--
1.-,-m--
,
,.w-*,-re
-
,yy-y
--,.o
,------,.-.g
.,., -, -
.,,i--,9--w-
.r, v w -
,re,rt-
.
signed off by QC, Construction, and CBLI in chronological onier. Baldwin QC copleted a mechanical inspection report (JV 188) indicating that all operations were satisfactory.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
Installation of Power Generation Control Consoles (PGCC)
The inspector perfomed a cleanliness surveillance on the 800' level of the Control Bd1 ding prior to PGCC installation. The Contractor performed additional mopping and cleanliness activities. Temination cabinet openings were covered to prevent air flow from the floor below. Construction equip-ment was moved and segregated to one end of the room. Access control was established. The inspector monitored the uncrating, handling, loading, transportation, lifting, and installation (all or in part) of PGCC U706, 709, and 714. QC personnel were sufficient in number and followed the operation step by step. Lifting lugs MP test results were confimed by signature, and the Lift Test Checklists were completed on both lift rigs.
The inspector confimed that torque wrench QC169 was within caHbration (12/10/80). Procedure E005 and traveler H13-030 was followed and signed off by Construction and QC in chronological order with one exception.
Construction bypassed one QC holdpoint when loading PGCC 709 on the flat-bed truck. The inspector notes that the incident seemed unintentional, an isolated case, and probably due to lack of coordination during a lunch hour. The Constructor took immediate action by reinstructing personnel involved in the importance of QC holdpoints and reassigning personnel to specific areas to insure continuous QC coverage. The inspector has no further concerns in this area.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
8.
Meetings / Site Visits During this reporting period, the Resident Inspector was a member of the NRC Caseload Panel of November 12-14, 1980. The Clinton site was examined in detail in order to formulate a realistic fuel load date.
On November 18, 1980, Mr. D. Ross of NRC Nuclear Reactor Regulation visited the CHnton site. The resident inspector accompanied Mr. Ross on an exten-sive plant tour and attended discussions with T11inois Power Generation Engi.-
neering on the future licensing process.
Exit Meetincts The resident inspector attended exit meetings conducted by Region III inspectors D. Hayes, R.Gardner, R. Lee on November 7,1980 and by C. Erb on November 21, 1980.
The resident inspector met wi.th licensee representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) on November 7, 17, 21 and 26, 1980. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspections perfomed.
,
e y
y myw
+
p, s
x-4--s m-
-s-
-~
!
+4-
-m-
.
..
A' '. E' rca.;E :t.;-
.,.
y eny apphm g
,
am wMa PRELIMINAEY INSPECTION Fl',' DINGS l'
2.
REC 10NAL OFFICE 1.
LICENEEE C
,
3.
DOCKET NW.BERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION 11ftO-19[&C-DC'
b/
.
,
.
s_ f 6.
k'ithin the scope of the inspection, no ite=s of nonco=pliance or deviation ph were found.
The f ollowing cat.ters are prelicinary inspection findi-ngs.:
7.
.
.
These preliminary inspection findings will be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
B.
the Region III Office and they will correspo d with you Manage =ent at concerning any en'-rce=ent action.
,
j f JG f' 141 f //t L Nuclear %egulatory Co==ission Inspecto
. _. __tl
/7 YO
.
eskfji--
'
I H P 'T C' ' ^'
'T
'C '?'E '
'fyh IE D~* * D P D 9 N i
-
oc.
b a
a PREll".INAPY INSPECTION FINDINGS
-
l 1.
LICENSEE 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE
'
---
// /
/J, / / n cr s 5
,
/g L5i/3.sv (
(/%MA 3.
DOCKET NLMSERS 4.
LICENSE NLHEERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION b Q "& I Ul/ ) ~
2. /
fr O
~
i 76.
k'ithin the scope of the inspection, no itees of noncompliance or deviation vere found.
- 7.
The f ollowing catters are preliminary inspection findings:
t k
These preliminary inspection findings vill be reviewed by URC Supervision /
_.
8.
the Region. III Office and they will correspoud,with you
-
Management at concerning any enforcement action.
/
/ o ' %'( {.% *?
(,,,,d
. //-
,
,
Nuclcar Regulatory Commission Inspector i
_
.
- en
-,,
-,-
-
v--
-w
-, --,
,-
rm-,
.; C
.
,
FRELIMINARY INSFECTION TINDINGS
.
I 2.
REGIONAL OFFICE 1.
LICENSEE
~
_I f I v '
VAM
_
s LD k D DlQ[
DOCrlT N1HEERS 4.
LICENSE NUMBERS 5.
DATE OF INSPECTION t I/u - 26lw Ea - 1 G, t
_
' 6.
k'ithin the scope of the inspection, no items of nonco=pliance or deviation were found.
$
j The following catters are preliminary inspection finding _s,:
7.
,
i f
I
l l
[
I l
!
These preliminary inspection findings vill be reviewed by NRC Supervision /
-
i
_.
8.
the Region III Office and they will correspond with you Management at
~
concerning any enforcement action.
/
l UE DK/&2. Ir --
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspectt
~ ~ ~
-ll - 7 4
- @
,
- en