IR 05000461/1980024
| ML19340E361 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1980 |
| From: | Gardner R, Hayes D, Richard Lee NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340E356 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-80-24, NUDOCS 8101140151 | |
| Download: ML19340E361 (7) | |
Text
.
.-.
._.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-461/80-24 Docket No. 50-461 License No. CPPR-137 Licensee:
Illinois Power Company 500 South 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 Facility Name:
Clinton, Unit 1 Inspection At: Dewitt, IL Inspection Conducted: November 5 - 7, 1980 R. L.' f $ n Y
Lee
// 2(hO Inspectors:
A'.n.dt*tA I'b(~!8[
R. N. Gardner Accompanying Person 1:
D. W. Hayes Approved By:
D.
.H s Ci
//
'll.
Engineering Support Section 1
/
' '
Inspection Summary Inspection on November 5-7, 1980 (Report No. 50-461/80-24)
Areas Inspected:
Routine unannounced inspection; electrical conduit support work activities, electrical conduit work activities, electrical component work activities, electrical QA records, electrical component procurement procedures,
'
electrical component receiving procedures, electrical component maintenance procedures, electrical component status. The inspection involved 33 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.
!
(
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified during this inspection.
i
,
(
8101140\\&.
I
,. _ _ -,.
_
-
-
_
.
,
DETAILS i
Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees
- L. J. Koch, Vice President
- J. Geier, Manager - General Engineer
- G. M. Brashear, Site Manager, Clinton
- A. J. Budnick, Director - QA
- E. E. Connon, Assistant Director - Construction
- L. W. Dozier, Assistant Director - Construction
- D. E. Korneman, Construction
- J. F. Hampton, Supervisor of Construction, QA
- J.
M. King, Assistant Director of Construction
- J. S. Spencer, Director of Engineering B. L. Spicer, Senior Service Engineer R. Becker, Senior Service Engineer Baldwin Associates
- W. H. Harrington, Project Manager
- J.
E. Findley, Project Engineer
- G. R. Lane, Electrical QC
- J. Linehan, Manager QC
- J. Smart, QA Manager
- D. E. Stephens, Senior Electrical Engineer
- W. O. O'Brien, QC Piping
- D. H. Snither, Assistant Project Manager
- G. T. Browne, Manager, Subcontracts
- H. Livermore, Resident Inspector
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
The inspector also contacted other licensee and contractor personnel including members of the quality, technical, and engineering staffs.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected
.
1.
Observation of Class IE Conduit Support Installations and Installation Records The RIII inspector examined the installation and inspection work activi-ties of selected Class 1E seismic conduit supports for conformance to
.
f 2-
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
- - -
.
applicable installation drawings, specifications, procedures, work instructions and standards.
Installation records were reviewed for completeness and adherence to procedural requirements. The specific conduit supports inspected during this inspection were conduit hanger Nos. E30-1004-01A-CC9, CC-11, CC-20, CC-32, and CSLI-1B, TH1 and TH2.
QC Conduit Hanger Travelers, form JV-667 approved October 1980, and QC Support Fabrication / Installation Checklists form JV-668 approved September 1980, noted that the above conduit hangers had been fabricated, welded, installed, and inspected in accordance with the following observed docu-ments:
Sargent and Lundy Conduit Hanger Installation drawing E30-1004-01A-E1H, a.
revision D and electrical installation specification K-2999.
b.
QC Raceway Installation Procedure BAP 3.3.1 dated March 26, 1980 as modified for hanger details by QC Procedures Change Request PCR-118A-80, approved October 8, 1980.
QC Raceway / Hanger Installation Inspection Instruction dated May 7, c.
1980, d.
QC Cable Tray / Hanger Installation Job Instruction E-003 dated August 29, 1980.
e.
QC Visual Weld Inspection Procedure BTS 405.
f.
Baldwin Associates Hanger Detail drawings E30-1004-01A-CC9, CC11, CC20 CC32, CSLI-1B, TH1 and TH2, all revision 00.
g.
QC Traveler Nos. E30-1004-01A-CC9, CC11, CC20, CC32, CSLI-1B,~TH1 and TH2, all revision 00.
QC hanger installation checklists, form JV-668, and hanger travelers. form JV-667, were observed to contain initials and dates of installing and in-specting personnel attesting to the quality of itemized craft and inspection results including hanger assembly, location, elevation, welds, weld coatings, dimensions, bolt torquing, and torque wrench details. Conduit supports observed were installed in the Main Control Room area as shown on applicable drawings. QC Installation Checklists, form JV-668, were signed by the QC inspector and dated from October 28 to November 6, 1980 for future review by QC engineering and management.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
2.
Observation of Class 1E Conduit Installations and Installation Records
.The RIII inspector examined the installation of selected Class IE rigid steel conduit'for conformance to applicable ~ installation drawings, speci-fications, procedures, work instructions, and standards.
Installation
- 3-
.
k
-
.
.
m.
..--
.- -.
.
m m..
m
-.m m.
m.m.-
-
..m.-...
a
.
... -
.
d records were reviewed for completeness and adherence to procedural re-quirements. The specific conduit inspected during this inspection were C0 925-K1 and CO 926-K1 identified as safety division one, CO 933-K2 identified as division two, and CO 945-K2 identified as non-safety-related.
Conduits, except as noted below, were installed in the Main Control Room area in accordance with Sargent and Lundy Conduit Installation drawing E30-1004-01A-E1, revision D, and Electrical Installation Specification K-2999, AMD 3; QC Raceway Installation Procedure BAP 3.3.1 dated March 26, 1980; QC Raceway Marking Job Instruction E-004 dated June 13, 1979; and Raceway Cards, form JV 3o9.
The examination of quality control inspection records was not inclu led in the scope of this inspection.
Conduits C0 933-K2 and C0 945-K2 were observed to enter and exit over-head supported pull box IPB09. Sargent and Lundy installation drawing E30-1004-01A-E1, revision D shows safety related conduit CO 933-K2 and non-safety-related conduit C0 945-K2 to be separated and does not show pull box 1PB09. The licensee stated that pull box IPB09, connecting these conduits, was added by a field change request which was site approved for construction on September 22, 1980. This possible viola-tion of safety related separation criteria is unresolved pending further reveiw to verify that engineering consideration was given to maintain separation within the pull box or to identify the non class IE cable as an associated cable in accordance with PSAR commitments.
(50-461/80-24-01)
No items of noncomplicrce or deviations were identified in this area.
3.
Observation of Electrical Component Work Activities The RIII inspector examined the safety-related electrical installa-a.
tion and inspection work activities for the General Electric supplied NSSS Power Generation Control Complex (PGCC) Termination Cabinet, MPL No. H13-P701, installed in the Main Control Room.
Installation and inspection work was observed to be accomplished in accordance with Sargent and Lundy installation drawing E30-1004-00A-E1, revision A; General Electric installation drawing 851E938, revision 7, sheets 1 and 2; S&L specification K-2999, AMD 3; G.E. PGCC install-ation instruction 22A4185; and Baldwin QC Equipment Installation Pro-cedure 2.10 dated June 23, 1980.
Installation and inspection work activity documentation, observed on QC Equipment Installation Traveler H13-001, included initials and dates of each completed installation and inspection work item, equipment identification, applicable drawings and specifications, procedures and instruction numbers, nonconformance report and field change request numbers, and itemized installation and inspection work details, b.
The RIII inspector observed a test of material handling equipment and QC procedures for the future grade level rigging, hoisting and-4-i
..
-
-
.
-
-
.
-
.
.
_
_
-=
,
.
handling of safety related G.E. supplied NSSS PGCC electrical com-ponents.
During this test to simulate an 8 ton PGCC component, a
15 ton mobile hydraulic crane was observed to satisfactorily hoist and transfer a 91/2 ton concrete slab in accordance with QC job instruction E-005, PGCC Panel / Module Lifting, dated November 6, 1980; QC Procedure B.A.P. 2.11, Rigging, Hoisting, Handling, dated
'
June 27, 1980; and QC Procedure B.A.P. 2.10, Equipment Installation, dated June 23, 1980.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
.
4.
Review of Electrical Component Quality Documentation The RIII inspector reviewed selected receipt documents for the G.E.
supplied NSSS PGCC Termination Cabinet, MPL No. H13-P701, installed in the main control room. Receipt documents appeared to be in accordance with applicable QC procedures and included the following records:
QC Receiving Inspection Report, RIR No. S-8664 dated January 3, a.
1980, noted IPC purchase order C-05090; S&L equipment specification K-2801, receipt of G.E. PQC No. NN 273, and assigned a disposition of " Conditional Accept" pending clearances of G.E. DDR nonconformances.
b.
QC Documentation Checklist dated June 5, 1980 indicated that the required receipt documen'ntion was stored at the site.
General Electric Co. Product Quality Certification, PQC No. NN 273, c.
signed and dated December 21, 1979, certified product quality in con-formance with procurement quality requirements with the exceptions of five General Electric Deviation Disposition Request nonconformances and a conditional release stating that this equipment cannot be in-stalled in an operating plant.
i d.
QC Nonconformance Report (NCR) No. 2968 dated February 5,1980 stated that the swing barrier, within termination cabinet H13-P701, was de-fective and required replacement.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
5.
Procedures for Assuring Purchased Electrical Equipment Meets Requirements The-inspectors examined records, procedures, inspection reports, and held discussions with cognizant personnel to evaluate the licensee program for assuring that purchased equipment conforms to procurement specifications.
The inspectors determined that although there existed several paths for
"
assuring conformance, the overall method was fragmented and required a positive system for the identification of equipment as'to its status of-5-
_.
-
_. - -
--
-
.
-
-
-.
.
'
acceptability. Work was in progress by the licensee and his contractor to implement such a system. This item will be examined during subsequent routine inspections.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
6.
Electrical Component Receipt Inspection, Storage, and Tagging Procedures The inspectors toured warehouse facilities to determine if received equipment was properly identified, to check for tagging and segregation of nonconforming equipment and to determine if equipment storage was in accordance with specified requirements. Warehouse personnel were inter-viewed and documentation examined to ensure compliance with established procedures.
The inspectors discussed the problem areas uncovered during their inspection with both licensee and contractor representatives.
These problem areas included:
tagging of equipment for which nonconformance reports have been written; segregation of nonconforming equipment; dust control in Level 'B'
storage areas. This item will be examined during subsequent routine inspections.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
7.
Electrical Component Maintenance Procedures The inspectors examined maintenance records for received equipment to determine if required maintenance was being performed on purchased equipment. The inspectors toured various areas of the plant and inter-viewed contractor representatives concerning implementation of mainten-ance procedures.
The inspectors noted that the maintenance of turned over equipment and the maintenance of operating equipment was in the process of review due to a recent QA audit.
In examining the maintenance record for a High Pressure Core Spray Pump Motor, a single QC signoff (out of approxi-mately 50 such signoffs) was noted to be missing. This was immediately corrected.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Turnover of Purchased Electrical Equipment The inspectors examined a turnover package, turnover procedures, and interviewed licensee and contractor representatives. The inspectors examined procurement documents, manufacturer's documents, Q surveill-ance reports, receipt inspection reports, and examined the equipment turned over to detennine if the exact status of the purchased equipment-6-
-
.
e e
was detailed in the turnover package for review by the licensee prior to acceptance for use.
The inspectors determined that the punchlist for the turnover package did not completely reflect the status of the equipment. This problem area is undergoing review by the licensee and contractor. Followup routine inspections will be conducted in this area.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of the inspection.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on November 7, 1980. The inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
L he T
licensee acknowledged the findings.
,
-7-
.
..
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
m.m.
.m.
.
-
.-
.
.
.m m..
.
..
.
.
..
2