IR 05000445/1979022
| ML20198H932 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1979 |
| From: | Crossman W, Gilbert L, Randy Hall, Stewart R, Tapin J, Renee Taylor NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198H622 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 50-445-79-22-01, 50-445-79-22-1, 50-446-79-21, NUDOCS 8605300601 | |
| Download: ML20198H932 (34) | |
Text
l
-
,
.
,,
...
,
.
l
-
i U. S. NUC1. EAR REGULATORY COP. MISSION OTTICE OF INSPECTION Ah3 Eh* FORCE.ENT
REGION IV
Report No. 50-445/79-22; 50-446/79-21 i
Category A2 I
Docket No. 50-445; 50-446 Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201
-
l Facility Name:
Comanche Peak, Units 1 and 2 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Glen Rose, Texas Investigation at:
Investigation Conducted:
September 7 and 12; Octob r 11, 16, 18 and 20, 1979
!
/ f4/79 2,
o
__
' Da te'
!
Inspec. tors:
.
R/ C. Stewart, Erzttor Inspector Projects Sectida Oct$
U '2 dr ~ Y Date
.
J. I. Tapia,Niea'ctor Inspector, Engineering l
Support Section
}
h'A2c/79
'Date~
L. D. Gilbert, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Support Section r 4 /-
/ Date R."G. Taylo @ sident E.clor Inspector Projects Section Approved:
(/
J fr4
// Zdf7f
/Da te/
W.'A. Crossma M bief, Projects Section l
//
b
/
' r'
yR. E! Mall, Chief, Enginee Su et e io
& ate /
8605300601 860513 DE
\\
.-
.
-
s.
.
-
.
.
Investfeation Su=.arv:
Investication durinr the periods Sentember 7 and 12; October 11, 16, 18 and 20, 1979 (Report No. 50-445/79-22: 50-446/79-21)
'
Areas Investicated:
Special investigation of allegations concerning the quality of construction at the Comanche Peak facility, Units 1 and 2, by a former Quality Assurance inspector, whose comments are contained in the r
a
,
University of Texas at Arlington " Shorthorn" newspaper, dated July 18,1979$]
/?
p
,
,
e investigation involved thirty-eight inspector-hours by four NRC inspec-tors.
-
Results: The allegations either have no merit, or could not be substantiated.
No items of nonco=pliance or deviations were identified.
.
D
-
\\
.
.
..
..
.
.
IhTRODUCTION Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 and 2, are under
-
construction in Somervell County, Texas, near the town of Glen Rose, Texas. Texas Utilities Generating Company is the Construction Permit holder with Brown and Root, Inc. as the Constructor and Gibbs and Hill, Inc.
as the Architect / Engineer.
REASON FOR INVESTIGATION As a result of allegations in regard to the quality of construction at the CPSES facility by a former Quality Assurance inspector, whose connents are contained in thehniversity of Texas at Arlington (UTA) " Shorthorn" newspaper 6 70.
dated July 18,1979) an investigation was initiated in order to assess their validity and impact on safety-related components and systems.
SUMMARY OF FACTS
,
1.
Allegation No.1
~
On b'ednesday, July 18, 1979, the UTA " Shorthorn" contained a front page article entitled, " Peak Construction called ' Sloppy,' Former Inspector Cites
Defects.') The article, by Mike Hinshaw, a UTA staff writer, contained the results of an interview held by the writer with a former Brown and Root Q
employee and currently a (student at UTA] In the article, the former employee alluded to examples of the lack of job site coordiriation, shoddy I
workmanship, poor supervision, and a vaste of construction materials.
In addition,One] indicated that hundreds of defects have not been identified
-
during construction of the facility.
Allegation No. 2:
'
During the course of an interview by the IE inspectors with the former employee,One'] alleged that[he]vas told by an individual (unidentified)
.,G that a radioactive material / source (nondescript) was dumped into the Comanche Peak cooling lake.
-
Allegation No. 3:
The alleger also stated that010 as told that improper welds were made on Primary Coolant System, Field Velds FW-19 and W-20.
Allegation No. 4:
-
,
Inaddition,he]statedthat(he']wastoldthata6"checkvalveweld deficiency had been repaired without correct procedural instructions.
%
-
.__
!
.
.
..
.
~ CONCLUSIONS 1.
Allegation No. 1:
Matters Identified in Newspaper Article
'
Although the alleger related to instances of what[pe] termed " shoddy" workmanship, poor supervision and poor job site coordination,(he]could not provide any additional information, beyond conjecture and hearsay, that would supportfbis] allegations of undetected defects in the con-struction activities at the Comanche Peak facilities.
2.
Allegation No. 2: Allegation that Radioactive Material / Source was Dumped into the Comanche Peak Lake Although the alleger was requested to have his unidentified source contact the NRC Regional office, no such person has done so.
Sources whose partial identity met the descriptions given by the alleger were interviewed. They had no knowledge of such an event, nor could they imagine such an event happening without their being aware of it.
_
This allegation appears to have no merit.
3.
Allegation No. 3: Alleged Improper Welds on Primary Coolant System
."
The reference made to Field Velds FW-19 and 20 by the alleger regarding improper repair appears to be hearsay. The allegation has no merit in that witnesses and records of the repairs do not substantiate improper repair.
,
4.
Allegation No. 4: Four or Six Inch Check Valves - Disassembly Without Proper Procedure The witness identified by the alleger was interviewed. The witness stated that the valve in question was a 6" check valve and that pro-per repair and resolution of the initial discrepancy was complete and documented. Furthermore, there is no evidence that would suggest that the procedure discrepancy cited by the alleger would have a
.
potential detrimental impact on the health and safety of the public.
Since.the witness, who had first hand knowledge of the valve repair, refuted the allegation, the IE inspector concluded that the allegation could not be substantiated.
.
.
..
,
_
_
-
,
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
.
Principal Licensee Employees R. G. Tolson, Site QA Supervisor J. V. Hawkins, Product Assurance QA Supervisor R. V. Fleck, Startup QA Supervisor Former Brown & Root /TUGC0 Employee The Alleger, Former Brown and Root (B&R)
Brown & Root Employees Individuals "A" through "C"
.
Other Personnel
_
Two members of Citizens for Fair Utility Rates 2.
Investigation
-lMatters Identified in Newspaper Article a.
Allegation No. 1:
On September 7 1979, two IE inspectors met with the alleger at (UTA)[]
[his] apartment /$n the campus at the University of Texas The interview was prearranged through a tele-Arlington, Texas.
phone conversation with the alleger on September 5, 1979.
In attendance during the interview were guests of the alleger who were introduced as members of an organization known as Citizens q[. Jg,.
_
for Fair Utility Rates.
The alleger and(his] guests requested that the interview be tape recorded, utilizing a cas'sette tape recorder and operated by the There were no objections to the request as presented.
- guests.
The IE inspectors identified the{" Shorthorn) article as the specific area of concern to the IE RegionaT Staff. Particular reference was made to the last few paragraphs which state:
l
" Asked if there's a possibility defects in Comanche Peak construction have not been caught, the alleger said yes.
1-(
l r
!
_
_.
.
-
-.
e
,
'.
.
.
.
How likely is that possibility?
"'How likely? It's a 100 per cent.'
" Asked if he knew for sure that there are defects that will go into the plant, he again said yes.
The dialogue went:
-
"Do you know how many such cases there are like that?
- yo,e
"More than 107
.
"'Yes.'
"More than 1007
"'Sure.*
'
-
"More than 5007
,
"Long pause. 'Possibly.'
"Would they be in critical areas'? Could it be in the cooling system?
"'It goes all the way acros.s the board,' he said', ' from piping systems to electrical systems to electronic systems.'"
.
Findings The IE inspectors asked the alleger if(he] cou'1d be more specific in identifying the defects [he]vas alluding to in the article. [He) responded with an affirmative statement and proceeded in relating, quite emphat-ically,numerousincidentsthatinvolved,in@irjopinion,workactivi-Subjects ties being done by unqualified and unconcerned workmen.
alluded to by the alleger included ' rigging, protection of installed setting of diesel generator components, control room panel equipment, g\\ y However, aside from material wastes in each of discrepancies, etc.
the incidents related by the alleger [heJacknowledaed that, in every
,hy case involving safety-related components, corrective action and/or
>
satisfaction and that what()c)may have measuresweretakento(his]dnotgouncorrected.(He]furtheracknow-considered as " defects" di ledged, that despiteQais] frustrations in accomplishing 61s] assign-
.
ments,[he]vas functioning as the job description dictates as a Quality Assurance inspector.
b.
Allegation No. 2: Radioactive Material / Source was Dumped into the Comanche Peak Lake Reservoir O
In addition to the matter identified in paragraph 3 above, the
- ky alleger stated that an Equipment Dispatcher (whom[be] knew ~ personally,
'
'
.
s'
.
.
'
but refused to identify) told him that, sometime between the period September 1978 and November 1978, the dispatcher had
,
received an urgent telephone call from the warehouse area, possibly Westinghouse, "to dispatch a truck and cherry picker ASAP."
The dispatcher responded accordingly. After some unspecified time lapse, the equipment operators returned and told the dispatcher that they had just dumped nondescript containers or objects marked
,
" Radioactive" into the lake.
Theallegercouldbenomoresp]ecificthanthatstatedabov insistedonnotidentifying[hissourceofinformation,but01c]
did agree to contacting the person and attempting to encourage the person to contact the NRC Regional office.
.
Findings (1) Interview with Individual "B"
,-)
b g
Individual "B" was interviewed by telephone September IS, 1979.
MS Individual "B" acknowledged being one of the h M uring the period September 1978 through November 1978.
Individual "B" stated that the incident, related to by the
,
alleger was unidentifiable to Individual "B", however, Indivi-
-
dual
"C", also an Equipment Dispatcher during the same time s
t,3 span, may have some knowledge concerning the alleged event.
L
'
(2) Interview with Individual "C" - Equipment Dispatcher On September 20, 1979, through information provided by Individual
"B", Individual "C" was interviewed telephonically.
Individual "C" acknowledged employment as an' Equipment
,
-
Dispatcher during the time frame' indicated by the alleger.
Individual "C" could not recall such an incident or event alluded to by the alleger.
Individual "C" indicated that such an incident would be remembered and would have been known to Individuals "B" and "C".
Furthermore, given the situation described,no other individuals would be dispatching the equipment involved other than individuals "B" and "C".
The allegation appears to have no merit.
c.
Allegation No. 3:
Improper Welding / Repair Process The alleger was asked by the IE inspectors if he had knowledge
'
of any " defects" in other areas that he was aware of that went He stated that a welder (whom he would not identify)
uncorrected.
told him that he, the welder, improperly repaired a Steam Genera-tor-to-Reactor Coolant Pump weld during a field weld repair.
The alleger stated that the field weld was either W-19 or FW-20.
-
-
-
-
- - - -
,
..
.
. - _ _
.
.-.-. - -
--
.._ -_
.-
.
.
-
.-
--.
.
...
..
.
.
..
,.
,;.
.
,
.
.i
.
Asked if he could be more specific concerning t!e defective repair, the alleger stated that he was not that familiar with the welding
,
.
process, but that the matter involved grinding through the stain-less material into the carbon steel, thereby contaminating the
.
"
stainless with carbon. The IE inspectors informed the alleger a
that follow up would be performed in regard to the matter.
,
!
The alleger further stated that Individual "A" would be a knowledgeable witness concerning this matter.
-
a
Findings y
Interview with Individual'"A" d'
During the interview with Individual "A" on September 12, 1979, he
stated that with reference to field welds W-19 and W-20, he had d
monitored the repair activities of the specific welds on a daily
basis. To his knowledge, there was no area of repairs that would j
have penetrated into the carbon steel material. The work was j
completely controlled by the on-site Westinghouse Representatives
who worked closely with each repair. Repair procedures were i
developed by the Westinghouse, Pittsburgh office. All work was
done properly and all defects were properly removed and properly i
documented. Individual "A" stated that he could not agree with
-
the alleger.
'
In addition, during a routine on-site inspection conducted October 11, 1979,1/ the IE Resident inspector reviewed the record documents and radiographs of the two field welds, W-19 and W-20 during his review of the piping installation
.
activities. There were no discrepancies observed.
.
This allegation could not bF substa'ntiated. -
j
d.
Allegation No. 4: Disassembly of 4" (or 6) Check Valve Without
"
!
a Procedure An additional matter, specifically identified by the alleger,
.
involved a repair to a weld that required, as he stated, "The
valve body disassembly in order to accomplish the proper repair."
He related that a 4" or a 6" stainless steel check valve, located in the borated water system, in the area of the component cooling
,
'
system, had a Nonconformance Report (NCR) written against the weld. The NCR indicated that the inside surface of the weld had not been properly purged during welding and there was evidence
,
of oxide on the inside surface.
The alleger further stated that, although the inside surface of the weld was correctly repaired
!,
by grinding, there was no evidence that a written procedure was used in dismantling the valve:
A repair that he contends could only have been accomplished by dismantling the valve body.
The alleger specifically identified Individual "A" as the QC inspector
,
i l
with first hand knowledge of the specific uncorrected " defect."
1/ IE Inspection Report 50-445/79-24; 50-446/79-23
i
.
,
k'
..
., -.. -
-
-r
. -, _
, -. _ -
. -
-._.,.-.,r.:--..-..__-.__.L:LLL---_---.
'
.
.
.
.
..
.
- .
.
.
..
,
Findines Interview with Individual "A"
.
On September 12, 1979, by a prior arrangement made by the IE Resident Reactor inspector, Individual "A" was interviewed at his home by two IE inspectors.
Individual "A" acknowledged his inspection involvement during the repair of the 6" stainless steel check valve identified by the alleger.
Individual "A" stated that, "although there was no evidence to assume that the valve was disassembled, the repair was correctly made and l
I personally closed out the NCR, which received the proper engineering approval."
.
.
.
ec
- 8
9 e
,.
.
.
.
_
_
_ _ _.
.
.. _ _
. _.
._
_
_
_
l'
l
.
.
.
FOLDER NO.
,
_,
Draft No.
Date j
,
COMANCHE PEAK ALLEGATION WORK PACKAGE
,
I MISCELLANEOUS Category 5 - Radioactive Material Release i
.
t Allegation Numbers: AM-5 f
,
.i j
Statement of Allegation: Radioactive material disposed of in the lake.
lq l
.
Reference Documents:
}
See source documents marked on attached pages from allegation list.
A
, + '
Source of Allegation:
Individual - see enclosed allegation list.
Date Received: 7/18/79 The above information prepared by D. M. Hunnicutt 6/5/84 Name Date n
Group Leader
,
Name Date Assigned
'
Jl Team Members j
Date Assigned
<
.
Date Assigned t-
Date Assigned v
.
Date Assigned
"
,
i h
a
- !
[
-
-
,
.
'
.
.
'
.
CCMANCHE PEAK OPEN ISSUE ACTION PLAN
,
,
.
Task:
Improper disposition of tritium in the lake (assume it is the CPSES cooling pond)
.
Ref. No.: AM-5 Characterization:
Initial disposition of this allegation IR 79-22.
Initial Assessment of Siontficance: Licensee had no import / export licensee for radioactive material nor NRC materials licensee for tritium. Allegation somewhat specific. May warrant followup.
Source:
Aporoach to Resolution:
,
I j
1.
Review IR 79-22 to determine if documentation adequately supports findings i.
for AM-5; if not, take appropriate action to close allegation.
'
2.
Review procedures and materials licenses to verify if licensee possessed any radioactive materials or performed testing with radioactive gases.
'
3.
Review procedures, in question, for adequacy at time work was performed; were codes / standards, FSAR commitments met?
4.
Discuss adequacy of procedures with persunnel invol..&.rf th radioactive materials. Examine materials licenses that are as.
'>:ed with any i
inadequate proceduras identified during interviews.
5.
Review sample of materials licenses and related procedures for adequacy.
6.
Refer any examples of wrongdoing or significant deficiencies to TRT manager.
7.
Evaluate allegations for generic / safety implications.
-
8.
Report on results of review / evaluation of allegations.
Related Open Issues
.
,
i 1.
Using system codes, pull open items, previous inspection findings, etc.,
i from the tracking system open item list. (Region IV, identify and add
to this work package.)
(
2.
Review activities necessary to close or partially close related items, either based on inspection conducted above or reasonable additional
'
inspection while the inspector is familiar with the areas.
.
'
!
.
i
!
!
!
!
l
.
.
i h
i
-
-
,
.
~
'
~ ' _
~
- - - -
. - _.
-..
.._ _
_
_. -
_
...
-...- -. -_._
...
.
.
.
-
-
,
,
-
.
,
,
-2-
.
,
Status:
-
Review lead:
Support:
Estimated Resources:
i Estimated Completion:
CLOSURE:
.
I Reviewed by:
.
e
0
l
-
a
.
J f
,
.
l.
-
'
i
e 9-*4't=
--v1-w-
+*-2
- -
--re
+ - - -- -- - - - - < - - - - -'-
-
.T
. 9m p
ew-w
--- -
r-----
=
,----rw
--+--
w--'
- --- -- - - * - - - - *
_..
._
... - _.
- - _ _
~. _. _
-
. _ _ __ _ __..._._. - _._,.._... _.
..._. _ -
...._,_ _
-
.
,
.
,.
.
MISCELLANEOUS ALLEGATION REVIEW CATEGORIES
-
.
.'
.
~
Category Est. Mandays Allegation Package Assigned Schedule I;o.
Subject.
to Complete Nos.
Prepared to Open Close Remarks I
1.
Hearing - 19 issues AM-1
,
2.
Reactor fuel AM-2
,
.
3.
Reactor pressure AM-3, AM-23 vessel e
4.
-
(10.2-11 & 12)
5.
Radioactive material AM-5 release
..
~
6.
,
7.
Pressurizer AM-7 8.
Reactor / fuel bldg.
AM-ll liners 10.
Pumps - Hayward Tyler AM-13 12.
Diesel generator
.AM-14 13.
Polar crane -
AM-15 AH-16 5 shiming
Containment doors AM-17
'
.
-
.
15.
Safeguards tunnel AM-18
'
,
i 16.
HRC form posting AM-19
.
'
.
.
.
_..
~ ~ ~ ~
--
--
-
- -
-.
,
-
.-
...__._........._.z..
- - - -..
. _ _...
. _
.,,
-
G l
r-
~.
t
-
\\1
!
.
,
'
l
'
t
.
C
.
,
',
- !
-
.
,
-
-
-
-
. - -
\\
- ---
- as., 2:
<
g e.
--
-.
i i
=
2 - - e -3,
-
.
-
-
--
-
.: a.. c - - ['
-
,
-
ag
/
I
-
~:
.
2.
g: 3
,
a
.-:
-
,
,
. - -
.:: :I :. :
l
8.,
.
z',
- ;,.:
.
t a
-
l
'.
s
=
.
i
l
,
l U S t
fi..
'
-
MN Ih f5EN NN a
w
,
.
.
E.
-
.
g g
,
y esa
. M.
-.
<
IkE
',
-
I
- -a g ": '. :
u i
h_
,,
w t
,,
-
s,;:
r
.
I
!
i fF E
!.
.
a,p 1.
...
.
-
.
-
,
.
-
i
2 i
-
_3
.
,
.
,
,
-
.
j
'
.
l I
-
"
.
s
.s
.
.
i
- d '
!
'
~
- 1..
-2.
-
.
-
- :::= := t ::1; I
I 1: 3 53 1:= =
!
s-r i
'
,
-
.
!
-
r
-
.
[i
!
2
-
t
i f-l
! ift 3.
3..
-
-
,
> >
_
,..,
.i :
3
.
i
,
,
,-
.
-
.
l 2g, g 1'.
l' <'
-
.
t aY.-
s
- .*
-
l
o
,
a. z :
as ad..
a ol
.
.
.$
.
.e
- -
'
3l.
r a
4 I
lf
.
..
..
..
,
l l
'~
,
.
..
.
.
c. B. g J 5.
..
.
.
.
..
_ _.
- - -.
r
-
-q q
b
'd
.
-
e e.
-
- O 0,
=
n d
.
.
=1
- 4
?.:. :
-
H:.:
.
-
- e.
.42.
4:
2:
.
.-
- '
}-5
- 5 '. C ' - 4 C. 5 '.
'
.
..
'
fj
-
!:;
y-(
a ap
-
-;
-
a e
gA g.
g:
-
.-
.:33.
<
.:
-
-:.
a a
- .t
- J 243 t:..: :.:
.
s
-
-
.
.
.
2!
,
l E-t'
,
!
a
.
i
.L
_I ?
-
_
!
- .
s
.
.
.
,.
.
gg
_.. :
-
-
f
.
.
.=
l
.
'
i
!..h I j
-
l
'
m s,
-
&
+
i
.w:
=
,
!
-
-
g lh !
II j
.
-
sc
=
I j
??
El i
!
.
-
.-
et a si m
.i
-
~
.
.
.
.
,
,
.
Y2
'
.
.es.
-1-.
p
.
w
.
i
1 j
N
.
-
.
.
.
i g
.
k b
I l
.
-
_t
-::
_:
.:
-
I
$ $iti- $55 5h
!
!
x
- ts:
12 at I
I
!
r i
'
!
-s
.
e
-t
.
-
._.
,
-.'I 2-
!
..
_
..
l 2* i
!
i
~
ti
-
22
,
,3
.
- .
.!
-
-
-
,
i!
-= 3:-
it
- 3
-
.
,
r
-
p-
.
c-1*
3
.
-.
--
a
,
--
-
'
,.,
,
,
,
,
~
,
-
m-
-
-
.
~
_
..
..
.
%
.
-
i h kM N] '
'
.
-
..,
.g.
.
l )s 'u.
s
<
,
A
_
__
_
__
__
__ _
._.
_. _.
_
. _. _.
- - -
..
...
...
.w
_.
--
, *?
Q,f f*/-#9$ *.3/7 PY f E l ' E k I 'F Y9 'IYs I
-
ch Lord, let's see. I con't
.
~
'
know how far you want to get into this, you know, as a f
fine line.
Are you talking about extremely bad. Lixe the
condensers, for instance, we took air hammers and sledge
hammers and beat tubes.
That is a no-no. Anybody would
know.that. You taxe a copper-nickle tube about as thick as
~
your wedding band and you take a 16 pound sledge hammer
'
!
ano drive them.
We put ice on to shrink tnem and put enec j
<9 in the condenser.
That is a no-no. You are supposed to t
i
ease them in witn our hand so they can expand.
.
i
!
II
. MR. GRIFFIN:
Was that particular instance in
your testimony or in your affidavit?
No.
- I
MR. GRIFFIN:
That is new?
y No, it is all new. We split
{
tuoes, belling.the tubes and flaring them.
We split tuce 1*
sheets.
I reported a tube sneet split to Westinghouse.
,
They said on, my God, you know, yeah, yeah, yeah, and all
tnis stuff.
The next day we had a meeting and we all went
'
there ano enere must have been 45 or 50 people, r
MR. GRIFFIN:
Wnen was this?
y tej Y \\
This was a couple of years
'
D ago.
MR. GRIFFIh:
Where are these tube sheets?
ti:
They are in the condensers.
'
-
!
TAYLOS ASSOCIATES
.
1623 i sTatrT, N.W. - SUITI 1004
'
l W ASHfW GT O M. 0.C.
.0004 j
,
.......,0 i
_..
. _. - _ - -. - -. - - -, - _ -
. _ _ - - - _ _. -
,,, -. - _ - - _ _. _,,,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
,,,
,. _ _ _ _ -
-
.
-
---
-
_ _ - _
_
_
- --
-
.
-
.
.,
..
..
-
.
.
f i
,
'
. 4..
.e
.
.
,
But anywsy, we hac a problem.
So we got tnere with
hestningnease, and tney go snat is not a Kestinghouse
proolem, what proelem? See, the day before tney had a e
problem that a tune sheet was cracked.
Then all at once
they can't nave no more problem because.they called their home office and tney probably said you idiots, don't tell
$
enem.
So they said the only problem we have is the tubes
are not rolled up tight enough.
I sai6, we are cracking
tube sneers already and tney are rollec at a minimu=
tner q
.
.and not a maximum. I said we would be in trouble if we had
11 to roll them to the max, or if we had to roll them over
tne max, superroll tnem.,
p, 1y
>
...
(At,this point in the proceedings @
I3 14 OM is refepring to Exhibit 1.)
[
Bere is your water boxes right here and your
'
condensers.
All rignt, in condenser A on the inlet end on
II
. the west box and it is in three sections.
You have got
,
some cracxed tube sheets in here.
Back there you have got
,
some cracked tube sheets. You have got overrolled tubes or
'
barely overrolled.
They are supposed to be rolled 069*
tnousand is a perfect roll inside reading.
They allow us e-
to go to 071 tnousano.
We went up 90-some enousands.
I nad one hand come tell me and say my
expander run out.
Manually ne rolled it so tight the
expander and motor jumped off.
They just pop them just TAYLOE ASSOCIATES 1625 i STMIT. M.W.
SUITI 1004
-
WA5HINGToN. 04. 20006 (202) 293 3950
.
_
_-
__
.
.
.
.
.
'
'
.o
,
.
j
-
line popcorn.
i
!
It is tne wrong type of condenser for the
wrong type steam generator to start off with. It was a $10
million goof-up.
Westinghouse said wait a minute, I thics t
l
we can straight this proolem out since'it is air f
condensers, which they went bankrupt and are no more in I
J.he concenser business. They decided they had to
_
intergroove a tube sneet.
They tocs an inch anc a coar:e
'
tube sheet and they cut it in half.
Tney should have used
two tube sheets if they were going to do that and maae it
,
'll twice as strong and not half.
U MR. GRIFFIN:
Are tnese things still tnere?
h They are still there, yes. All
.
you got to do is go in'tnere.
It jl'E really terrible. What
-
I would suggest d. sing is on the big ones lixe 90-some
,
tncusand is cutting the tuce out and look at your sheet.
b l.
There is a spider wed crack.
I showed the people the*
'
,
crack, and that is when I first starting getting the
pressure, this is about three years ago, af ter I reported
this stuff.
I kept on insi ng on tnis crack, and then l
everybody would go cop, and
, he would go, you
"
know, g, I am not for sure they are cracked.
I would
go I am not. You know, you can throw a cat tnrough it, and
!
!
he goes no, no, no.
i i
kell, undoubted TUGCO told nim to back off.
I TAYLOE ASSOCIATES i,
g 1623 i STRUT. M.W. = SUITI 1004 WASHINGTON. D.C.
20004 G C21 2f > 3fSO
_... _ _ _
-
- *.
.
-
,
i
.
,
~
Tney were talkir.g about several years or rework and
'
milliens of collars.
So they are talxing accu: time and
.
tney oon't want nothing to stop this plant.
M)
These tubes are titanium tubes and tnere
should be twice as many support sheets in tnere and all
that stuff.
So they intergrooved the tube sheet and they I
still have got leaks over there on this section here and
we are not supposed to have no leaks at all.
!
MR. HERR:
Sne can't see "rignt tnere" --
(Indicating the reporter).
so when you say section one, II identify wnat you are pointing to.
h okay. Condenser B, Unit 1,
.
west disenarge,.w.at.er.h.exiand you have got a cracxed tube
.a.
.
.
-
sneet.
Also, tne tuoes are overrolled severely.
on the east water box, condenser B, dis =harge N
'
nd, you are heavily overrolled and you undoubtedly nave
.
, got quite a few cracks in it.
I can swear to that. I know
you do because it swelled up so big.
Overroll on the West box, condenser A, Unit 1,
discharge end.
,
t
East water box, discharge end, condenser A,
you are..still leaning, and overrolled.
Tne more you roll, tne more they leak.
They
more they leak, the more you roll, and the more your roll,
ene more damage you are doing.
They just went nuts with
~
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
-
is2s I sunT. w.w. - sum tou
~
'
WASHINGTON. D4 200N
!
.
.
_.. _..
_
. _ _ _.
-__
,
.
..... _ _ _ _ _. _....
.. _...... _
..
.. _.
_
.
.
-
.
.
-
'
'
-
.
it.
-
Condenser
, Unit 1, intake box, tne west box,
have got cracxed tube sne
-
It is very simple to checx because 1 put
.
j
little plugs in tnere. You can just take a wrench and just l
screw vour two nuts loose and pull the plug out and look l
at it and put it right back in.
It wouldn't take five
.
I
minutes, to look.
-
-
,
-l
)
ust referred to
!
follows.)
-
.
.
.
U 9"
P
'
,
.
,
.
-
1
.
'!
o
,
!
1ti li
t
21
.
.
l
- 2 l
,
I-
l l
25
!
.
'
TAYl.OE ASSOCIATES
,
1625 i STit!!T, N.W. - SUITI 1004
,
WA$MINGTON. DA 20004 (202) 293 3950
__ __.
. _ _ _ _..... - -.
.
-
--- - -
- - -
- - ----- -
-
-
,
..---.-..--,v.-u..,#
-
-
_p,.-
.p,
,
,,, -
,,.. -,,, - - - -,.
-
.
.
~.
- - ( r
>..- u.. i....
~
-
.-
.
.m
.
.
e g%
-
),.g
~
N
'
2 }.g
.
..
.
,
.
.........
Q'N
$
.4
.
- n..
....
.
-
.g
.
x
%
4 D
-
e N
(
A.
%
.
~
=og,~%
-
e m
Qm
~&%
r
..
A
.
..
...
.....
u
- k W _
.
N; w(ej
'
!
.
.
.
i m-y
-
q Q.....
...
..
.
.
s..
..
%a
%%
.
-
Q
%a
.
i
-
w
.
<a
.
..-
.
....
__.
~ - - - -, _
_
. -.,
-, -.. -,,, _..
_ - -.. -., -.... - -, - _. - -,,, -,, -,,,,,, -.
-
-
__.
_.
_.
-.:.-..*
}
p
,
<
..
.g&
'
.-
did anybocy intimidate you I
P.R. GRIFFIt;:
into overrolling snese tnings?
'
h We had an engineer there from
TUGCC saying get it a little more, get it a little more t:
my people. I went and told @ I said they are killing Nobody had ever did the tube work before
'
that water oox.
I and noue6y knew.
They are experimenting with an item.
In the first place, the condenser wasn't a very good cesigned condenser, in my opinion. I have werne=
'
on them since I was 15 years old.
These was I woula say II between 1 and 10 about a 6, you know, a so-so condenser.
Wnen tney intergrooved tneir sheet, they macc the sheet I3 real, real thin.
I
MR. GRIFFIN:
But did anybody tell you or
instruct you to do that?
'
8 I was instructed,not to stop
.
leaxs, for instance.
I was rolling tubes and I was
stopping the water box from leaking.
I have got a water
box over here leasing and it is still leaking.
I go tell
[Tanley,andTanley ays how does that box lo,ck, and I said
o
\\
'
it loons good but the otner one started leaking again, and
I have got to get it.
!!a goes goddamn, @, I can go
tnere any day and maxe things better than they are.
I
don't want you to do tnat.
I go I am just trying to stop
One lea,ts, you,cnow.
You ain't supposed to have leans.
~
.-
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES 1625 i $TR1!T KW.- SUITI 1004
- * *
WASMMGTOW. OL 20004 (202) 193 3950
.
_
.
_. _... _ _.
... _ _. _..
_. _.. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _. _. _
.
...
.
_.____ ___
_ _ _ _
-
.-
.
.
')
as
,
.
.
'
I Your river wa hr*' leads into, you know, snat pe ste generator and you can't allow no river water inside, lage
water.
So it is.still leaxing. My problem was I of course
8 couldn't do a good joo.
MR. GRIFFIN:
You are saying it is still i
,
,
j
leaking today or it was still leaking when you left?
was still leaking wnen I j
i
left and it is still leaking tocay because they didn't
it.
(rework
_
,
.
MR. HERR:
Who was th ngineer?
'
!
II j
MR. HERR Let me cet one thing straight.
Excuse me for a secon and were 14 e wiwymfour supervisors?
was my f
i
supervisor.
1 '-
2..
l
MR. dERR:
hhat was his title?
,
.
was the superintendent of
tne millwrignt department.
j
MR. HERR:
Who was the.other guy, What
,
was nis job title?
@
ewasatnrYestriper.1
don't know where he come from.
he don't know anything. He
'
is supposd to be a millwright tnree striper.
M Mh. df.RR:
What is a three striper?
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES 16231 STRi!T. M.W. - SUIT! 1004
.
WASHINGTON, D4. 20004 (202) 293 3930
..
...
..
-w--.~
- - - - -
- - -
_ _ _ - _
.
i
-
S
.
~
.
.
,,
T:.en ne come down snere and told c.y men if tney didn't
-
pusn a snocsand by the next day tneir ass was going out
'
ene gate, and he is on the radio every five zr.inutes all
tne.next day.
I pushed to lunchtime and we got a hur. dred.
MR. GRIFFIN: This is @
@
and he cussed and
'
,
raised hell anl he,said their ass is going out the gate.
6 s
He says you can stand here and tell me a hundred reasons
way eney won't go, out he saic if them sons of bitenes
ain't in there and you don't put a thousand of tnem in
there tomorrow your goddamn ass is going out that gate.
,
Tnat is wnat he told them.
So ne sledge hammers and he beat them and he
.%
gotairgunsanddebeatthem.
He put ice on them. He
15 knows nothing about condensers.
You don't do that stuff..
.
s t.
16 MR. HERR:
Who did he tell?
Joe Snookhouse and Johnnie
Kinham.
,
MR. EERR:
Anybody else?
Well, they was working a bunch
of laborers.
PJt. EERR: These two men that he told, did they
do wnat he said to do?
h Tney tried to. I was down
25 tnere witn them and we tried to push a thousand in or else
.-
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES ists i sfuzT. N.W.= sum 1004
,
WASHINGToH. D.C.
20004
.
.... _
.
,..
...
_.
......--,. _..
_.
3930... _. -.. -.. - - -
(202) 293
. - - -.
_ _---
-
. - -.
- _ _ -. - - - - - -,
.-,----,--- - ---- - - - - - - _ _ - -
-
- - - -
--
-
---,
..
'
.
.
.
"
'
'
g
,
-
g, you didn't discuss tnis
.v.R. GRIFFIK:
.
particular problam in your previous afficavits?
h
-
No, I didn't discuss it witt-
anybody because it seemed lir.e when you bring up a proble
,
it is covered up.
In my opinion,E it'is not corrected at l
.
all., That is the reason I wanted to bring it out and I t
would like to snow people.
They stuff here coulon't have been covered up except by pacerwork because you can g=
9 cown enere any day of the week and read the inside
'
diameter of your tube and you know you are overrolled.
.
Everytning that I could actually put my finge
on, like the letter, they automatically agree, just lixe
tne lignt poles, you xnow.
That is a 15 cent item,I
-
brought up.
Well, they jumped en that with both hands ani 1'
both feet and made a big deal out of it.
They really
cleaned tnat up.
dell, you M ve got som spray pipes 1so dcun
in there. Kell, it is going to be a bigger job to cut ther e/
loose to do it.
They haven't even mentioned that, see. I
think I mentioned that one in my affidavit.
Tnat goes in
tne fuel pools. you have got four spray pipes tnat go doy l
,
in there.
The holes of it was undersizeo and tne pipe
%
~
i
department went in there and redrilled them and they used
cutting material, luce oil or some type of cutting oil and
ney just pulled it off and tnere it was.
%
_.
-
_
.,
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
.-(-
taas a stam N.W. ~ $Um 1004 WASHINGTON. 04. 20006 (202: 293 393 w
'
,.
.
. - - - - _ - - _ -
_ -.
.-.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _. _ - _ _ _ _ -
. _ _ _ _ _ _.
___
_
_ _ _
.
. -. _ _
_
_
,
,
_
... _. _ _ _ _ _.
..
- - -
-
-
,
.
e
'
'
I I
.
i
[1 concerns us, and one of the, things that concerns ut aoout
'
~
,
any follow-up of tnis.
We woulo much prefer that somebec
other than sne,, Region..I inspectors go out and follow-up
on this.
'
'
^
s
~
on your inlet tube sheets.
They are 1/32nd flush, the tubes, and they are flared.
I
,
,
i
they are sticking out, you get a builo-up between your
'
tubes.
So when we flared these we busted a lot of tucer,
or quite a few of them as a matter of fact.
10 Now tnis chart, and it sticks out, but we cut
,
them down like a half inch so it would look nalf way
decent.
But when we was flaring these tubes,tney was
.
busting pretty cad, and the reason they was bustan so cad
.
i
,,.
in this one area is because tne counterbore in your tube
'-
sheet where it allows the flare to flare out was way l
overboard.
So in crder for us to flare it nicht enough w
busted'a tube, and the ones tnat aion't bust we hadn't
flared it tignt enough.
When you don't flare tnem tight
?
enough you get a build-up between your sheet and your
.
tuces and it sats the tube off.
.+
!
Just 11xe une joD in North Carolina, we hac
holes in all the tuces before we ever got tne fuel in
tnere. The first twc weeks it was eat up. So insteaa of u.
repairing it, we had several months before the fuel came
.
in, they went anesa and poxied it in and used it as is an.
!
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
.-' *
-
1625 stauT. M.W. = $UM 1004
,
%..
WASHICTON. D.C.
2C301 (202: 293 3930
~
,_
_.
---
,
-
.
t__
- -
.
_
'
'
...
... - -
.
,.
.
.
.
,
.
,,
..
.
,,. ;
-
.*..
l
,
I I would call ne Feoeral Government.
You call Government,
..
TUGCo.
I go well, I said I tried to call you guys first E
.
.
and you all weren't there.
Do you think we are going to
-
it by this goddamn phone and wait on you to call?
,.
.s..
.
.
.
..
Well, I guess you Are trying to discourage me
.
.
'
to make me quit.
He said well, maybe you are finally
.
,
getting the icea.
I said, well, I will tell you, as long
as you sen cf a citen pay me general foreman'.s wages, I
.
e
_
will sit in tnis little tool room forever. He saic we will
'
'
i
'
see aoout tnat.. So that next Monday morning they g ve me a i
.
.
II cncice.
.
MR. GRIFFI8:
So is it fair to cnaracterize den that wnen you first raised our concerns, tnat that is
i
'
l
.~
ene harassment started?
,
h The pressure started. The
f
,..,
~
first deal they thougnt tney had me controlled was the
'16 II I wouldn't admit tnat tne tube sneer was not cenoensers.
Everyoocy xept on saying that is a s=raten, and'
I cracxec.
I said, no, it is a crack. I
you x.now it is a scratch. _
I took a flashlight and shined it in e y an LP on it.
one nele anc you coula see througn it, tne spider web. But U
I never did admit snat it wasn't a crack.
So I star ed to
~
get kind of a little pressure then.
I guess told
them well, he is oxay,'you know.
5 MR. GRIFFIK: Am I right in cnaracterizing your
,
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
-
1623 i STMT. M.W.= SUITE 1004
'* *
,..
WASHINCToN. D4 20004
- ( -
'"
- .;
.
a012 2n.m0
.
.,
_
o-
-..
. - - -
...,.
_
k(bf f
hY# N$
/fl$- *
- YO
,.
,
,
l
t*. GE1FFIN:
I Ininn cur people will l
.
2
unoerstand it.
-
.
h somewhere down here tney nad a j
4 nice thick tune sheet to start off.
h is leafing through his
!
6 noteboos.)
This is a real good example.
These tube a
support sheets came in.
We laid them on top of each other
and we put dewel pins in them.
Scme of sne noles was
three-eigntns of an inch f fr6ai* the otners, you know.
- 5o I called M' and I told him, I said we
are going to have a problem here. These holes are way off.
Well, he calls Westinghou and Westinchouse says ch,
tnere is nothing to it, says,
, they are just.
,
three-eighths of an inch off.
I said well, you have got
three foot from the c' enter of one sheet to the other, and
wnen you start off with three-eighths of an inch off you
are off quite a ways when you get to tne other eno, you
know, tne three foot.
If you go tnree-eighths of an inch off, over
here you signe be an inco and a half off, and cy sne time
you turn it mack in then automatically you are going te
head the otner way.
So you are binding every sheet. You
are cutting into the tubes.
,
Tnese tube support sheets are =ade t:ith 4
.
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES 162s i sTarn, N.W.- SUM 1004 WASHINGToH, D.C.
20004
.,
(2C2! 29J 2P30
.
_ _.. _,
.... _. _. _..... - - -..
-.
- - - -
, - ---
--
-
-
-
- -..,. -.. - - - -..,... -
- -..-,,.-,,--- -. _,
- -.,,,.---.-- - -
m
.
__
-
'
' \\
N ng ' fl7lVf
- p(
!
-
.
AW 10 g yy yf yg n
' '
l.-
-
'
I j
MR. GRIFFIN:
I think we,havd gd[t enough
,
-
,
l
\\ b
on that wnere our people chn probaoly go out and look at i
these.
Okay. We was welding the
-
j
condenser to the turbine.
Again, I hate to bring up experd.ence, but when you are bringing this condenser up,
'
ji
you set tne condenser igw, but when you set the turbine in
they can set it on the right elevation and not be in tne
'
way of tne condenser.
'
,,,
l When you get your turbine perfect within so
11 many thousandths, you bring your condenser up to meet. You
,
don't make a contact with your turbine. You come up like a
-
.
.
j quarter.of an inch or an eighth of an inch with your l
I4 J
~
expansion joints.
You have an expansion joint in De
.
.
,
is
~
it.
Then you tie them together.
-
L l'
well, the condenser was -so heavy when you' load i
I II it with tubes and ever~ything. It pronably weighs 600 tons.
li
_
1.
well, we toon all our jacks and put tnem.on one end so we
-
had to rack it up.
Of course, woen you ja=k at one end it
tnrows it way in and then you pick tne other side up and f
it enrows it way in.
so I told unis general foreman, and I was just l
foreman then, but I told the other foreman don't tie
-
!
l
anything to tne turbine to tne condenser.
I said we are
going to go up cud it is going to fall down, but when we
,
TAYLCE ASSOCATES
-
-
was a stanT. x.w.- sum iood
!
%-
WASHINGTON. D4 20006 (2c2) 293 3950
...
.... _ -
.
-..
-.
- - -..
..
-.. - - - - - - - - -
a
- .. *
<
)
-
-
.
, v
.
a
.
.
'
'
.
.
,.
.
cra.ng the otner side up it will straignten back out and we I
'
'
)
.
will Keep w=rxing it until we bring it up.
Well, this general foreman, he gets there and he starts welding all yind of stuff to nold it to keep
,
from coming past it.
Well, what we.did.was we jacked the
,
turoine,over.
We went ahead and got it up. Well, instead
'
of them macing a final check to see whetner they was in I
line or not, they just assumed tney were and they was three-eighths of an inen off.
So we welced it all
lo togetner.
II
- They took a reading and tney was three-eighths I2 of an inch off alignnent.
So they went up here and they
.
took' jacks and they started jacking and, coy, jacked it U
,
all toe way over to unere they want it and they release I4 it, that little old expansion joint, and pulled it back.
-
I'
The little expansion joint was "a one loop and it was an eignth of an inen tnick and it had one little fillet welo I
I on eacn sice of it, real weas.
Tney put several, several
cons on it.
I will show you what it looked like.
h Exnibit 5A and SB follows:)
22
24
- S TAYLOE ASSOCATES
-
u2s a smrr. x.W. - sum 2004
..
%
W A5MH4GToN.D A 20006 C2C2; 293 3950
_
_
._
__
._ _
_ _. _.
... _
..... - _..
.
-
-k..
~.
.
-
wm _,
.,,.9,.m
.
..
.
.
e I
e
- J~
t
'
e bo,id Si er
e
yPo Qoa n-n c
- -
%...
g
~
l
- -- --
,.
_
.
.
,
- * - *
..
-
-
.
...
.
'
.
.
.
t
.
- e
,,
O
-.
lY'
b'
(l '
e
,'
.
'
.
- /
/
..
-
o J
pp
.-
.,.
I r
,
i'
\\
O
-
.
..
- -
o
. -
.
'
i y
o
.
.'
,
<j
!..,
,,.
-.W
.
y
- /
<
>
t
- .
,. j
~
.
.l.
W
.
,ygg.
- - s ---
...
,
.
--
p
,
f ;-
--
--
..
....
. _
.
-*
-- -
...
,
~
-
/N i
j W? ff/ // //' / //////// /// -.
%
l
.
.
t f.
.
A
- -~
....
,
.-
a
..-
..I.
..
L -.!! } U
.
--
-
I
!
,
l
.
-
'
.
f
/
l
!
...
--
.
.
/
'
,,
y I
"
"
c.
.-
.
,,
~ ~ - - - - ~.. ~
_ _ _ _ _,
N6e
.
.,
- "*'we..
..
-. -.. - - -
)
- .
'
- -
.
- ,
'
1 MR. GRIFFIN:
where tnere engineers
~
.
involved in all tnis work?
No, a lot of it there weren't,
no.*~
,
MR. GRIFFIh Your crew was down there putting
'
this turbine on top of tnis condenser?
h Right.
I
MR. GRIFFIN:
Is tnis a non-Q area also?
,
'
Rignt, it is non-Q. We are
.
j
down here tnrowing tnat turbine back.
They started having
II
us jacx it.
We jacked it up and down putting all kind of U
,
stress on it, and well sideways.
You know, you can tsar
'l
'
)
cnnt little expansion joint out.
U
So I finn 11y told and tne general j
-
-
foreman over the turbine that I weren't going to jack it j
no more without them giving me written permission to do'it p
or telling me to do it in writing because I says I might
,
to worx another jon somewheres,. and I said I will want
never work for Brown and Root again if we rip it out, but p
p
I might want to worx anotner construction job, you know.
So finally tney quit jacking it then.
l l
Also, as we jacked the condenser up, tne pipe l
department was tied in with our pipe.
They was also
-
l
supposed to tage a pipe up with us, wnich they didn't do,
l
and we put a lo: of stress on the pipe.
!
.
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
1423 i STRET M.W. - SUITI 1004
'
WASH %* ton, DA 20006
- '
j (202) 293-3950
.
,
.. _.... _. _ _ _
_
._..._.__._...
,
-
..
.
,.
'.
.i
.
.
..
.
.
.
'
l This right hero is just snowing ID f tho
~
.
.
hole, tne CD of tne tune and OD of the tube and hat it is
supposed to ce 1ike after we get through rolling it to be
~
a perfect roll.
,
5 MR. GRIFFIN:
The condenser tubes?
.
.h Right, on the condenser. This
I is tne minimum we are supposed to roll them, the ID
reading.
MR. GRIFFIN:
Can we have tnis also so we can
give in to the inspectors?
-
II
Yes.
j I2 MR. GRIFFIN:
We would appreciate that because l'
if taese guys can go right to the stuff and look at it, it
will sure be neipful.
-
init 6 fallows:)
'
1"
.
l
.
-
)
-
.
ll2
,
24
l l
'
TAYLO! ASSOCIATES l
.,.
ta2s a sturr, u.w.- sum 2004
'
WASHINGTON. DA 20006 j
q (2C2) 293 3950 l
h
.
_._ _ _ _.
_ _ _.
. _ _.. _..
_
_..
.
.._
-- - - - - - - -
-
gy,'yp ~
1'n'...-
-
-
._m
. __
g
'
--
..
N, gj s
'
- - - -
..... _ _,
'
.
.
.
..
..
.
. _
.
-.
.. _..
..
.
.
.
N
.4x%-
r-
.
.
.
d M h \\t $
R
9
.
n
-<
V= I 5'
T
%
'
kg
u
~
[
-
{ jia 49.8 j
.
~
'
-
b, N
$ MD 6
$.........
..
'e Q
- %
%
N
.
.
.
.g.
.h.
.
_
.
,
x-
-
ve
.
A wgg
'
-
-
-
M 1 T'e
.
@
tv)
&
^
-
oU
.
'
2%
%
.
"
.
.
I
$H O4 x\\
t
.Ny
. -. -...
.
..
h
.
,
'
y'
-
i Q
N.
..
. _. _....
%
s (D....
' yts O
<
.
a
,
\\
!
k.%
.
g%
!
Q m
' g'
>
.
gD e4
!
s
~~~ %
Nk-
'
!
%
n
.
l
l
'
l
.
.
.
.
...
.
!
!
!
.
.
l.
-
-
.-
.,
.
.
% e.
.
.
.
=
+-
==-e-e ee e,e
-..w
..
.
,
,,,,n,,,,,,y,
, - -
-,, - -
,,
,,
,-
,