IR 05000424/2020010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Design Basis Assurance Inspection (Programs) Inspection Report 05000424/2020010 and 05000425/2020010
ML20310A385
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  
Issue date: 11/05/2020
From: James Baptist
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1
To: Gayheart C
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR 2020010
Download: ML20310A385 (14)


Text

November 5, 2020

SUBJECT:

VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 - DESIGN BASIS ASSURANCE INSPECTION (PROGRAMS) INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2020010 AND 05000425/2020010

Dear Ms. Gayheart:

On October 28, 2020, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 & 2 and discussed the results of this inspection with Drayton Pitts and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.

One finding of very low safety significance (Green) is documented in this report. This finding involved a violation of NRC requirements. We are treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

If you contest the violation or the significance or severity of the violation documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 & 2. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

James B. Baptist, Chief Engineering Br 1 Div of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 05000424 and 05000425 License Nos. NPF-68 and NPF-81

Enclosure:

As stated

Inspection Report

Docket Numbers:

05000424 and 05000425

License Numbers:

NPF-68 and NPF-81

Report Numbers:

05000424/2020010 and 05000425/2020010

Enterprise Identifier: I-2020-010-0043

Licensee:

Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Inc.

Facility:

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 & 2

Location:

Waynesboro, GA

Inspection Dates:

July 27, 2020 to August 14, 2020

Inspectors:

T. Fanelli, Sr. Construction Inspector

N. Morgan, Reactor Inspector

M. Riley, Senior Reactor Inspector

Approved By:

James B. Baptist, Chief

Engineering Br 1

Div of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees performance by conducting a design basis assurance inspection (programs) inspection at Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 & 2, in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.

List of Findings and Violations

Use of JOG Threshold Values in Design Bases Calculations Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000424,05000425/2020010-01 Open/Closed None (NPP)71111.21N.

The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated Non-Cited Violation (NCV) of 10 CFR Part 50.55a(b)(3)(ii), Motor-Operated Valve Testing, when the licensee failed to verify that Westinghouse 3 and 4 gate valves discussed in calculation X4C1000U07, "Evaluation of Power Operated Safety Related Gate Valves for Susceptibility to Pressure Locking and Thermal Binding (PL/TB) Effects," Version 15, continued to be capable of performing their design basis safety functions. Specifically, the licensee improperly used coefficient of friction (COF) values from industry-wide Joint Owner's Group (JOG) research instead of their own more limiting COF values identified during original plant diagnostic testing and approved by NRC.

Additional Tracking Items

None.

INSPECTION SCOPES

Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.

Starting on March 20, 2020, in response to the National Emergency declared by the President of the United States on the public health risks of the coronavirus (COVID-19), inspectors were directed to begin telework. In addition, regional baseline inspections were evaluated to determine if all or portion of the objectives and requirements stated in the IP could be performed remotely. If the inspections could be performed remotely, they were conducted per the applicable IP. In some cases, portions of an IP were completed remotely and on site. The inspection documented below met the objectives and requirements for completion of the IP.

REACTOR SAFETY

71111.21N.02 - Design-Basis Capability of Power-Operated Valves Under 10 CFR 50.55a Requirements POV Review (IP Section 03)

The inspectors:

a. Determined whether the sampled POVs are being tested and maintained in accordance with NRC regulations along with the licensees commitments and/or licensing bases.

Specific Guidance b. Determined whether the sampled POVs are capable of performing their design-basis functions.

c. Determined whether testing of the sampled POVs is adequate to demonstrate the capability of the POVs to perform their safety functions under design-basis conditions.

d. Evaluate maintenance activities including a walkdown of the sampled POVs (if accessible).

(1)1-HV-8000A, Pressurizer Power-Operated Relief Valve Block Valve (2)2-HV-8821A, Safety Injection Pump Cold Leg Discharge Stop Valve (3)1-HV-15197, Main Feedwater Bypass Isolation Valve (4)1-HV-11600, Nuclear Service Cooling Water - NSCW Pmp Disch Vlv (5)1-HV-5137, Auxiliary Feedwater - AFW Pmp Disch Hdr Iso Vlv (6)2-HV-8804B, Residual Heat Removal - RHR Pmp "B" Disch To SI Pmp "B" Iso Vlv

(7) HV-8702B, RHR Pmp Sup Iso From RCS Loops (8)2-FV-530, Condensate and Feedwater - Main FW Reg Vlv

INSPECTION RESULTS

Use of JOG Threshold Values in Design Bases Calculations Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems

Green NCV 05000424,05000425/2020010-01 Open/Closed

None (NPP)71111.21N.0 The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated Non-Cited Violation (NCV) of 10 CFR Part 50.55a(b)(3)(ii), Motor-Operated Valve Testing, when the licensee failed to verify that Westinghouse 3 and 4 gate valves discussed in calculation X4C1000U07, "Evaluation of Power Operated Safety Related Gate Valves for Susceptibility to Pressure Locking and Thermal Binding (PL/TB) Effects," Version 15, continued to be capable of performing their design basis safety functions. Specifically, the licensee improperly used coefficient of friction (COF) values from industry-wide Joint Owner's Group (JOG) research instead of their own more limiting COF values identified during original plant diagnostic testing and approved by NRC.

Description:

During the review of calculation X4C1000U07, Evaluation of Power Operated Safety Related Gate Valves for Susceptibility to Pressure Locking and Thermal Binding (PL/TB) Effects, Version 15, dated December 2010, the team identified that several Westinghouse 3 and 4 gate valves inappropriately used industry-wide Joint Owner's Group (JOG) valve factors and threshold coefficient of frictions (COFs) to determine the design capability for these valves. The NRC staff position is that, unlike the EPRI MOV PPM program, the JOG program was not intended to be used in establishing the design-basis capability of MOVs. NRC Information Notice 2012-14, Motor-Operated Valve Inoperable Due to Stem-Disc Separation, dated July 24, 2012, states in part that:

During the implementation of GL 89-10, NRC staff accepted four methods the licensee could use to demonstrate the design-basis capability of safety-related MOVs. In descending order of acceptability, the four methods for demonstrating capability were:

1. Dynamic testing at or near design-basis conditions with diagnostics of each MOV where

practicable

2. Electric Power Research Institute MOV performance prediction methodology (PPM)

3. MOV valve grouping

4. The use of valve test data from other plants or research programs

As a result of improperly using JOG threshold values in determining the margins for the valves, the team determined there was reasonable doubt the affected MOVs could perform their intended safety function. On October 22, 2020, the licensee completed an operability evaluation to verify that the affected valves remained capable of performing their intended safety function. Licensee procedure NMP-ES-017-002, "Motor Operated Valve Design Basis Setpoint Documentation," Version 6.2, detailed how the licensee was to determine the minimum required thrust and design margin for the valves. The licensee determined that the valves maintained acceptable margin when taking into account actual packing friction loads demonstrated by test instead of the assumed loads required by the procedure. The inspectors noted that the licensee had to deviate from the assumptions in the procedural MOV program methodology to obtain a favorable result for five valves, and 76 calculations will need to be revised in total.

Corrective Actions: The licensee entered this issue into their corrective action program and performed an operability evaluation which determined that there was reasonable assurance that the affected Westinghouse gate valves could perform their intended safety function when taking into account actual packing friction loads demonstrated by test.

Corrective Action References: CR 10738957

Performance Assessment:

Performance Deficiency: The failure to verify that Westinghouse 3 and 4 gate valves discussed in calculation X4C1000U07 continued to be capable of performing their design basis safety functions in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50.55a(b)(3)(ii), Motor-Operated Valve Testing, was a PD. Specifically, the licensee improperly used COF values from JOG research instead of their own more limiting COF values identified during original plant diagnostic testing and approved by NRC.

Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the Design Control attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, the as-found condition was such that there was reasonable doubt with respect to the capability of MOVs to perform their safety function. In order to verify operability, the licensee had to change the assumptions from their procedural MOV program methodology to obtain a favorable result for five valves.

Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Att. 4, "Initial Characterization of Findings," issued October 7, 2016, for the Mitigating Systems cornerstone, and IMC 0609, App. A, "The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power," issued June 19, 2012, and determined the findings was of very low safety significance (Green) because the finding was a deficiency affecting the qualification of a mitigating structure, system, or component (SSC) and the SSC maintained its operability.

Cross-Cutting Aspect: Not Present Performance. No cross cutting aspect was assigned to this finding because the inspectors determined the finding did not reflect present licensee performance.

Enforcement:

Violation: 10 CFR Part 50.55a(b)(3)(ii), Motor-Operated Valve Testing, requires that licensees comply with the provisions for testing MOVs in ASME OM Code, ISTC 4.2, 1995 Edition with the 1996 and 1997 Addenda, or ISTC-3500, 1998 Edition through the latest edition and addenda incorporated by reference in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of 10 CFR 50.55a, and establish a program to ensure that MOVs continue to be capable of performing their design basis safety functions.

Contrary to the above, since December 2010, the licensee failed to establish a program to ensure that Westinghouse 3" and 4" gate valves continued to be capable of performing their design basis safety functions.

Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as an non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS

The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.

  • On October 28, 2020, the inspectors presented the design basis assurance inspection (programs) inspection results to Drayton Pitts and other members of the licensee staff.
  • On August 14, 2020, the inspectors presented the Original Exit inspection results to Mr.

Drayton Pitts and other members of the licensee staff.

  • On October 5, 2020, the inspectors presented the De-brief for Re-exit inspection results to Mr. Mathew Horn and other members of the licensee staff.
  • On October 28, 2020, the inspectors presented the RE-exit inspection results to Mr.

Drayton Pitts and other members of the licensee staff.

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

71111.21N.02 Calculations

AX5AC03-05191

Motor Operated Valve Thrust / Torque Allowable

Rev. 2

AX5C03-00722-1

Fisher Weak Link Analysis and Calculation Procedure for

280 Series Butterfly

Rev. B

AX6AA15-00002

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit No. 1/2 Pump and

Valve Operability Report

Rev. 16

AX6AA15-00002

Pump and Valve Operability Report

Rev. 16

VNP-1HV11600

Thrust and Torque Calculation HV11600 (VNPS-1) AC

Motor Operated GL96-05 Butterfly1 Valve

Rev. 3

VNP-1HV5137

Thrust and Torque Calculation 1HV5137 (VNPS-1)

Rev. 3

VNP-1HV8000A

Thrust and Torque Calculation, 1HV8000A (VNPS-1), AC

Motor Operated GL96-05 Gate Valve

Rev. 3

VNP-2HV8702B

Thrust and Torque Calculation 2HV8702B (VNPS-2)

Rev. 1

VNP-2HV8804B

Thrust and Torque Calculation 2HV8804B (VNPs-2)

Rev. 1

VNP-2HV8821A

THRUST AND TORQUE CALCULATION 2HV8821A

(VNPS-2) AC MOTOR OPERATED GL96-05 GATE

VALVE

Rev. 2

X3CA18

Unit 1 Load Study

Rev. 18

X3CA22

Unit 2 Load Study

Rev. 13

X4C1000U01

Differential Pressure Calculations for REA VG-9049

Rev. 18

X4C1000U01

Differential Pressure Calculations for REA VG-9049

(Generic Letter 89-10)

Rev. 19

X4C1000U02

Valve Required Thrust/Torque and Operator Capabilities

and Limitations for GL 89-10

Scope Motor Operated Valves

Rev. 23

X4C1000U07

Evaluation of Power Operated Safety Related Gate

Valves for Susceptibility to Pressure Locking and Thermal

Binding (PL/TB) Effects

Rev. 15

X4C1000U41

AOV Setpoint Review for 1 HV8152

X4C1000U42

AOV Setpoint Review of 1/2HV-15196 to 15199

Rev. 2

X4CPS.0075.402

Stress Analysis, Qualification of Valves for GL 89-10

Rev. 0

X4CPS.0075.520

Qualified Life EXT for Limitorque MTR OPER VLV

Rev. 12

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

Actuator

X4CPS.0075.520

Qualified Life Ext for Limitorque Mtr Oper Vlv Actuator

Rev. 12

Drawings

1X3D-BD-B02A

Elementary Diagram Reactor Coolant System 1HV-8000A Rev. 7

1X4DB114

P&I Diagram Chemical & Volume Control System

Rev. 41

1X4DB133-1

P&I Diagram Nuclear Service Cooling Water System No.

202

Rev 56

1X4DB168-3

P & I Diagram Condensate & Feedwater System, System

No. 1305

Rev. 36

1X5AC01-00210

Certified Dimensional Drawing for Item 6, 7, 8, and 9

05/21/1981

1X5AC03-05138

Valve and Actuator Drawing 18" Butterfly Valves Spare

Part List

Rev 2

1X5DN150-4

Control Logic Diagram Main Feedwater System

Rev. 2

1X6AA06-00445

Air Operated Control Valve

Rev. 11

1X6AA06-10019-

Motor Operated Gate Valve Model 03003GM99FNHCOG

3-2035 ASME CL.: GPO ASSY

Rev. 3

2X3D-BD-D02M

Elementary Diagram Safety Injection System 2HV-8804B

Rev. 6

2X3D-BD-DD3D

Elementary Diagram Safety Injection System 2HV-8821A

Rev. 4

2X3D-BD-E02K

Elementary Diagram Residual Heat Removal System

2HV-8702B

Rev. 12

2X4DB121

P&I Diagram Safety Injection System, System No. 1204

Rev. 50

2X4DB122

P & I Diagram Residual Heat Removal System No. 1205

Rev. 54

2X6AA06-00378-

Motor OP Operated Valve MOD 04002GM87FHB000 4-

900 ASME CL.I GPO ASSY

Rev. 4

2X6AA06-00411

Motor OP Gate Valve MOD 08002GM84FEB010

Rev. 5

2X6AA06-00659

Motor OP Gate Valve MOD 12001GM88SEH000

04/03/1995

AX4AR01-00450

Pneumatic Actuators for Valve Tags

AX4AR01-00451

Pneumatic Actuators for Valve Tags

Engineering

Evaluations

AX5AC03-05169

Qualification Report for Group XI Control Valves

9/4/1992

Miscellaneous

1X6AA06-00639

Valve Specification Sheets

Rev. 7

207-D-

1HV8152

Air Operated Valve Program Package

Rev. 2.1

AQR-67368

ASCO Solenoid Valve Qualification Test Report

Rev. 2

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

AX4AR01-567

Seismic Analysis Report - Generic Valve

Rev. 5

AX5AC01-365

Weak Link Analysis for 1HV-5137

09/03/1987

AX6AA15-00002

Pump and Valve Operability Report

Rev. 16

AX6AA15-00002

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit No. 1 / 2 Pump

and Valve Operability Report

Rev. 16

DC-1201

Reactor Coolant System

Rev. 5

DC-1202

VEGP Design Criteria Nuclear Service Cooling Water

(NSCW) System

Rev 13

DC-1204

Safety Injection System

Rev. 6

DC-1208

Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS) and Boron

Recycle System (BRS)

Rev 11

DC-1305

Condensate and Feedwater System

Rev. 10

GP-17105

Weak Link Analysis for Valves 8804 A & B

05/11/2000

GP-18568

Summary of Seismic and Weak Link Evaluation of the

Westinghouse 3GM88FHN (Vogtle Locations 1/2 HV

8000A, B) and the Westinghouse 4GM77FH (Vogtle

Locations 1/2 HV 8821A, B) at Vogtle Units 1 and 2

10/8/2009

Valve-1HV11600

Full Test Curves SNC576875

7/31/2017

VNP-1HV11600

JOG MOV Evaluation Report

Rev. 3

VNP-1HV5137

JOG MOV Evaluation Report 1HV5137 (VNPS-1)

Rev. 3

VNP-1HV8000A

JOG MOV Evaluation Report 1HV8000A (VNPS-1) AC

Motor Operated GL96-05 Gate Valve

Rev. 3

VNP-2HV8702B

JOG MOV evaluation Report 2HV8702B (VNPS-2)

Rev. 1

VNP-2HV8821A

JOG MOV Evaluation Report 2HV8821A (VNPS-2) AC

Motor Operated GL96-05 Gate Valve

Rev. 2

WCAP-8687

Equipment Qualification Test Report

Rev. 59

X5AC01

Electric Motor Operator Equipment Qualification Data

Package

Rev. 1

X5AC03

Specification for Small Butterfly Valves for the GIORGIA

Power Company, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Burke

County

Rev 15

X6AA15

Motor Operator-Group A Equipment Qualification Data

Package

Rev. 1

X6AA15

Environmental Qualification Data Package

Rev. 1.0

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

Procedures

14825-1

Quarterly lnservice Valve Test

Rev. 106

14850-1

Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test

Rev. 59

207-D-

1HV15197

Air Operated Valve Program Package

Rev. 2

NMP-ES-014-001

Air Operated Valve (AOV) Scoping and Categorization

Rev. 3.2

NMP-ES-014-002

Air Operated Valve (AOV) Design Basis Review and

Setpoint Control

Rev. 4.2

NMP-ES-014-003

Air Operated Valve (AOV) Datasheet Preparation and

Testing

Rev. 4.1

NMP-ES-014-004

Air Operated Valve (AOV) Tracking and Trending

Rev. 4.1

NMP-ES-014-010

AOV Diagnostic Testing and Signature Evaluation

Rev. 6

NMP-ES-017-001

Motor Operated Valve (MOV) Regulatory Scoping

Process

Rev. 6.2

NMP-ES-017-002

Motor Operated Valve Design Basis Setpoint

Determination

Rev. 6.2

NMP-ES-017-003

Motor Operated Valve Performance Trending and Margin

Management

Rev. 5.2

NMP-ES-017-004

MOV Diagnostic Procedure for Gate & Globe Valves

Rev. 7.0

NMP-ES-017-005

MOV Diagnostic Procedure for Butterfly Valves

Rev. 6.0

NMP-ES-017-008

MOV Mechanical and Electrical Inspections

Rev. 11.2

Work Orders

SNC1056611

SNC1060711

SNC358552

SNC392558

SNC407132

SNC513205-22

SNC532510-30

SNC576875

SNC635430

SNC672979

SNC832046

SNC891268

SNC898207

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

SNC972592