IR 05000424/1989030
| ML19332D331 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1989 |
| From: | Mcguire D, Tillman A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332D329 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-89-30, 50-425-89-35, NUDOCS 8912010022 | |
| Download: ML19332D331 (2) | |
Text
-- * pa nse UNitto STATIS
,
' -p
'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N
-[
$
REGION 11
'
g ll 101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.
- ATLANTA, GEORGI A 3a323
- %.
/
....
"
Report Nos.:
5,n-424/89-30 and 50-425/89-35-Licensee: Georgia Power Campany P. O. Box 1295-
'
Birmingham, AL 35201
y Docket Nos.:
50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.:
NPF-68 an-JPPR-109-Facility Name:
Vogtle 1 and 2 Inspection Cenducted:
October 23-27, 1989
- )Tillman, Saf 4uards Inspector ll/ldIi d
Inspect a
y.
.
Date Signed Accompany *;ng Personnel:
D. Thomspon, Safeguards Inspector
.
Approved by:
)
'
/
D. R. McGuire, Chief Dt gned Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inrpection was conducted in'the areas of Management Support, Security Program Plans and Audits; Protected Area Barriers; Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Testir.g Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Lighting: Personnel Training and Qualification -
' Gener$1 Requirements; Physical Protection _ Safeguards Information. In addition,
'
review of security force management and operational activities was conducted to determine the substance and validity of anonymous allegations submitted to the Region II Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff.
'Results:
In the areas inspected, violations were identified.
Inspection results indicate that the licensee continues to experience difficulties in the management and effectiveness of the Security Program.
Repeat violations were identified in the protection of Safeguards Information and Assessment capability for the Unit 1 protected area perimeter.
In addition, another violation was identified in the Security Training Program.
The violation relat:ing to the protection of safeguards material is another in a 891201002{ h h 424 [
wnnranunitted hae'*
curans maeuw*
, =L"?*,"3%L**
x(
.
,
i.
!
.. -
4 /.I - l
,
.,
!
7;.
series of violations'that have occurred within the previous two years, most of i
which have been attributed to personnel error in the handling and control of
.,
safeguards material by personnel other than members of the security force.
,W
,
-Observations and assessment during the course of the inspection did indicate, l
however, that the ' security shif ts were performing at ~ an - acceptable -level,-
i although morale appeared to be.at a low level and there was an obvious ~ lack of
!
communication L between the shift personnel and security management.-
The-fol_ lowing violations were identif'ad during the inspection.and are addressed in
'
. appropriate-sections of this repori, l
r 1.
Failure to provide adequate assessment capability for.the Unit 1 protected-
,
-
' area perimeter (Repeat Violation).
,
_
_2.-
Failure to protected 6nd account for Safeguards Information (Repeat'
!
-
. Violation).
!
.i 3.
Failure of security personnel to qualify with assigned weapons.
i
!!
3
,
!
i r
>
-
.!
!
.
.
.
.
!
?l
'f
!
.
?
Dxument trammRted herewith
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATl0
- " ' ' " " * " ' " " '
'
info'matiert Wnen separated from
'
en:lD$ures, tNs 00cument is decontroued.
e f
..;._.._...._..,.-... -.
.,
-
.
, _,. _... _...
. -, _...
,
.-
,
i