IR 05000424/1989009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-424/89-09 on 890202-03 (Ref 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21).Violations Noted:Badges of Terminated Employees Not Removed from Badge Issue Area.Major Areas Inspected:Badge Access Areas
ML20236B905
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/1989
From: Mcguire D, Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236B895 List:
References
50-424-89-09, 50-424-89-9, NUDOCS 8903210364
Download: ML20236B905 (1)


Text

.. . SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

,'

.

'

' UNITED STATES

..

'

, cf. j ua n oog'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ *

$ REoloN il g

gj 101 MARIETTA STREET. 'e ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

/

.....

' Report No.: 50-424/89-09 l

Licensee: Georgia Power Company l P. O. Box 1295 i i

Birmingham, AL 35201 LDocket No.: 50-424 License N NPF.-68 Facility Name: Vogtle 1  !

,

Inspection.Cond ted: February 2-3, 1989 Inspector- , /, J!llb- YJfAh .?/// V D. f . Th M Physical Sicurity Inspector Dhte Sigried Approved b :4 / f//0/IM DW McGuire, Chief D6te ' Signed

'

PhysicalSecuritySection 1 Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Branch .

'

Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards i

SUMMARY ,

-!

Scope: This special announced inspection was conducted concerning an allega-tion that when personnel terminated employment, access badges were not being removed frcm the access control facility in a timely manne Results: The inspector determined during his review of the allegation that the licensee first became aware in August 1987, that in all cases badges of personnel who were terminating employment were not being expedi-tiously removed from the badge issue area. Although the licensee had attempted since August 1987, to correct the deficiency the inspector noted that as of February 3,1989, an effective system to preclude the event from re-occuring had not been established. The inspector also determined that there had not been adequate coordination between Construction Management for Unit 2, Quality Concerns, Human Resources, Badging and Security, to ensure the scope of the concern was i properly assessed. It further appears there was no focal point to N monitor the out processing program to ensure badges were removed in a

' timely fashion from the badge issue area. A possible contributing factor to the continuing failure of the licensee to correct the ok@ deficiency appears to be management's failure to follow up on E54

$$ previously established corrective measures to ensure employees were L mo complying with newly established procedures. While reviewing the

'

p above allegation the inspector noted that the licensee in April, 4oc June, and November 1988, had failed to review, update and reapprove  ;

access authorization lists. Therefore in the areas inspected there were two violations identifie [

"gg L " wQQ _ n n ; j,, b SAFEGU ARDS INFORMATION

_ _ _. _ _ - - -- _ __ -_ _ -_-___ -