IR 05000424/1989023

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-424/89-23 & 50-425/89-27 on 890731-0803 (Ref 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21).Violation Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Security Program Plans & Procedures,Protected & Vital Area Barriers & Testing
ML20247M195
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1989
From: Mcguire D, Tillman A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247M193 List:
References
50-424-89-23, 50-425-89-27, NUDOCS 8909250151
Download: ML20247M195 (2)


Text

'

'

. . p sisto UNITED STATES

  • o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

! ~

[ '

p REGION il y 101 MARIETTA STREET, * I[t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

%...../

Report Nos.: 50-424/89-23 and 50-425/89-27 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201 Docket Nos.: 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted: July 31 - August 3, 1989 Inspector:3 w tyu v A. Tillman, Aafeguards Inspector ILb Date Signed Accompanying Personnel: . Thompson, Safeguards Inspector Approved by: , t

'D. R. McGuire, Section Chief

,

9 /C h

'jrateS'1gn6d Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials Safety Safeguards Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of Management Support, Security Program Plans and Procedures; Protected and Vital Area Barriers; Testing and Maintenance; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Records and Reports; Communications; Personnel Training and Qualiff cation - General Requirements, and Physical Protection Safeguards Informatio Results:

Inspection results indicate improvement in several areas of security operations and the licensee continues to pursue efforts to improve and enhance security program effectiveness. It was noted, however, that in the course of implemen-ting corrective actions, additional violations of access control and protection of safeguards information were identified by the licensee. These violations were primarily attributable to personnel error rather than equipment and security program failure In the areas inspected one cited violation of regulatory requirements and three licensee-identified non-cited violations were identified as follows:

Docurnent tranwMed hWwith contains semm+ unc r.hd

i h h'.$ ,"t's O' ,.

'-

, , , information When sepamitd from 8909250151 890912 s

-

5 .. l :

( > :N J r creasures, tnis omiment is dreateo"ed PDR ADOCK 05000424 g FDC L________ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

___.____;

-- - - - - -

~

.c'~ .

2 failure of security personnel to satisfy medical requalification requirements (paragraph 3.f), failure to control . access to the protected area (licensee-identified non-cited violation)(paragraph 3.e),. failure to comply with procedural requirements for security escort of emergency response personnel (licensee-identified non-cited violation)(paragraph 3.e), and failure to comply with procedural requirements for conducting security checks of vital area doors (licensee-identified non-cited violation)(paragraph 3.c).

nyon,ent tromnvuence i ss e e=*e S,AFEGUArc ,e em~m .

., o o' ' "

u., moen. mn senereenemn enclosures tNs document is deco

- - - - _ _ _