IR 05000416/1986015

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-416/86-15 on 860505-09.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Safety Verification,Esf Sys Walkdown,Maint Observation,Surveillance Operation & Inspector Followup Item
ML20210V462
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/1986
From: Jape F, Mathis J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210V428 List:
References
50-416-86-15, NUDOCS 8606100636
Download: ML20210V462 (5)


Text

e UNITED STATES

[p KragD NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

@\\

' ', ^

REGION 11 h,,

)

101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.

  • '-

c ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30323

,/

$

tg

.....

Report No.:

50-416/86-15

.

Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, MS 39205 Docket No.:

50-416 License No.:

NPF-29 Facility Name: Grand Gulf Inspection onducted: May 5-9, 1986 Inspector:

.I. hd'ddt:p 5/22/86 J. E.'Mathis Date Signed Approved by:

A M/8d F. Jape,SectionChief(/

f Date Signed Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety

'

SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was on site in the areas of operational safety verification, ESF system walkdown, maintenance o'aservation, surveillance operation and followup on an Inspector Followup Item.

Results: No violations or deviations were identified.

8606100636 850528 DR ADOCK 05000416 PDR

.

'

,

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • C R. Hutchinson, General Manager
  • J.

E. Cross, Site Director

  • L. F. Daughtery, Compliance Superintendent
  • S. M. Feith, Director, Quality Assurance (QA)
  • W. E. Edge, Manager, Nuclear Site, QA
  • J. D. Bailey, Compliance Coordinator
  • W. C. Eiff, Prfaciple Quality Engineer
  • R. Fron, Manager, Plant Support Other licensee emoloyees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security office members and office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspectors

  • R. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector
  • J. Caldwell, Resident Inspector
  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 9, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspection.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.

'

t

. _ _ _ _

I

'

.

5.

Operational Safety Verification (71707)

By observations during the inspection period, the inspector verified that the control room manning requirements were being met.

In addition, the inspector observed shift turnover to verify that continuity of system status was maintained.

The inspector periodically questioned shift personnel relative to their awareness of plant conditions and found them knowledge-able.

Through log review and plant tours, the inspector verified compliance with selected Technical Specifications and Limiting Conditions for Operations.

During the course of the inspection, observations relative to protected and vital area security were made, including access controls, boundary integrity, search, escort and badging.

On a regular basis, radiation work permits (RWP) were reviewed and the specific work activity was monitored to assure that activities were being conducted per the RWPs.

Selected radiation protection instruments were periodically checked and equipment operability and calibration frequency was verified.

The inspector was kept informed, on a daily basis, of the overall status of Unit 1 and of any significant safety matter related to plant operations.

Discussions were held with plant management and various members of the operations staff on a regular basis.

Selected portions of operating logs and data sheets were reviewed daily.

The inspector conducted various plant tours and made frequent visits to the control room.

Observations included:

witnessing work activities in progress; verifying the status of operating and standby safety systems and equipment; confirming valve positions, instrument and recorder readings, annuciator alarms and housekeeping.

No violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Maintenance Observation (62703)

During the report period, the inspector observed selected maintenance activities.

The observations included a review of the work documents for adequacy, adherence to procedures, proper tagouts, adherence to Technical Specifications, radiological controls, observation of all or part of the actual work and/or retesting in progress, specified retest requirements and adherence to the appropriate quality controls.

In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie i

.

.

7.

Surveillance Testing Observation (61726)

The inspector observed the performance of selected surveillances.

The observations included a review of the procedure for technical adequacy, conformance to Technical Specifications, verification of test instrument calibration, observation of all or part of the actual surveillances, removal from service and return to service of the system or components affected, and review data for acceptability based upon the acceptance criteria.

In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

8.

ESF System Walkdown (71710)

A walkdown was conducted on the accessible portions of the Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator. The walkdown consisted of an inspection and verification, where possible, of the required system valve alignment, including valve power available and valve locking, where required; instrumentation valved in and functioning; electrical and instrumentation cabinets free from debris, loose materials, jumpers and evidence of rodents; and system free from other degrading conditions. The following observations were noted:

a.

The valve lineup sheet attachment 1F of System Operating Instruction (SOI) 04-1-01-P75-1, Revision 26, contains two valves with the same identification number of F112B.

This concern was identified as Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 50-416/85-45-12 to ensure proper resolution. Although four months have passed, the licensee has not implemented corrective action to resolve the discrepancy. The resident inspector monthly report will give a final disposition of this problem.

b.

Valve F060D, lube oil inlet strainer 0020A drain, contains no identification tag.

c.

Valve F070B, lube oil sump tank vent line drip leg drain, contains no crank handle.

d.

Valve FX118, PP-N4008 Isol, contains no crank handle.

The items above are considered minor discrepancies and their corrective action will be followed up by the resident inspectors.

9.

Inspector Followup Item (92701)

(Closed) IFI 50-416/82-39-04, Required inspection and NDE of special lifting

-

devices to be resolved. The inspector reviewed the licensee's corrective

actions and found them adequate. The following procedures were revised to implement the required inspection in accordance with ANSI N14.6-1978:

M5P-07-S-05-310, Rev. 3, " Operation of Containment Polar Crane" l

MSP-07-E 14-299, Rev. 2, " Inspection and Testing of the Dryer and Separator Strongback" i

!

L

..

-.

---

-_. -

-

-

.

5 MSP-07-S-14-300, Rev. 2, " Inspection and Testing of the Drywell Head Lifting Frame" I

MSP-07-S-05-305, Rev. O, " Qualification / Certification of Overhead Crane Operators" MSP-07-S-14-298, Rev. 2, " Inspecting and Testing of the Rx Vessel Head Strongback Carousel" This closes IFI 50-416/82-39-04.

i l

i

!

i

.

!

!

t

.

4 t

.. - - -

,,,,.. -

-.. - - -, -....

,,

,

,

-,

,.. -,.--.- - --,, =- --- _ -_ -.,-,. - --- -....---,

-, -. -. -. -, - -