IR 05000414/1985041

Insp Rept 50-414/85-41 on 850917-20.Violation Noted: Documentation of Storage Insp Activities for safety-related Cables Unavailable for Insp

ML20133J346
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	10/03/1985
From:	Conlon T, Ruff A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133J330	List: IR 05000414/1985041 ML20133J326 ML20133J332
References
50-414-85-41, NUDOCS 8510180388
Download: ML20133J346 (6)

Text

-. - -- _ . ~ - _ _ - - - - - _ - . . _ _ - . . . - . . _~

.

o UNITED STATES

[SQ Ctc^ , ^

'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[" 3 REGION il y j 101 MARIETTA STREET. * f ATL ANTA, GEORGI A 30323

'

\ .*** /

+

l

!

I

'

Report No.: 50-414/85-41 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket No.: 50-414 License No.: CPPR-117 Facility Name: Catawba Inspection Conducted: September 17 - 20, 1985

Inspector:

A. B. Ruf d b 9

/O'8' C Date Signed i Approved by: / /0 - 5 - W j 'T. E. Conlon,~Section Chief Date Signed

!

Engineering Branch

,

Division of Reactor Safety J

l j SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 27 inspector-hours or site in the areas of electrical components and systems; electrical cables and termina-tions; and Instrument Components and Systems. Observation of Work and Work Activities and review of quality records were examined in the above area Results: One violation was identified - Documentation of storage inspection activities for safety-related cable h 9 PDR

___________________________ ___ ____

.

.

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• L. R. Davison. Project QA Manager

• T. R. Gill, Electrical / Instrument Technical Support

• W. G. Goodman, QA Inspection Superintendent

• K. W. Schmidt, QA Engineer

.

• F. P. Schiffley, II, Licensing Engineer

• D. B. O'Brien, Administrative Methods

• E. G. Williams, Project QA Technician T. Mill, Construction Electrical Engineer P. Honeycutt, QA Receiving Inspector D. James, QA Technician W. Reynolds, Engineer, Electrical Technical Support Other ' licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, technicians, security force members, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector

[

• P. K. Van Doorn, Senior Resident Inspector

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 20, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findin No disse.nting comments were received from the license Violation 50-414/85-41-01, Documentation of Storage Inspection Activities for Safety-Related Cables, paragraph The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed) Unresolved Item 50-414/84-45-04, Determine the Adequacy of the Procedure and Inspection Records for Special Storage and Maintenance of Safety-Related Cable At the time when this unresolved item was identified, specification No. CNS-1390.01-00-0139, Procedure for Handling, Storage, and Shipment of Cables, called for a periodic inspection (not to exceed 1 year) of each reel of cable stored outdoors, and Procedure P-3, General and Special Storage and Maintenance Inspection Requirements, called for a periodic inspection in this area. The inspector was informed that

.. . .

. _ . _ .

-~ -- . . . . - - - - . - . . - . - - - - -

.

-

>

%

i 2

5

. inspections were performed monthly in this area. Since the requirements

were general, all records were not available for these monthly inspections.

1 Consequently, both the specification and procedure were changed to require i monthly inspections. Since the issue of the new requirements, all monthly

! inspection records for this inspection could not be locate This is

-

identified as violation 50-414/85-41-01, Incomplete Documentation of Storage j Inspection Activities for Safety-Related Cables. The inspector toured the -

cable storage yard and observed that all safety-related cable reels were

~

!

protected in accordance with the requiremer.ts in the specificatio In

) addition, a discussion with the cable yard inspector revealed that

inspections were perform ~ed at least once a month and in many cases twice a 1 month. The cable yard inspector also stated that when discrepancies from I the specification were observed, they were corrected immediately. The licensee issued a nonconforming report to notify personnel and management of this problem and to specify . corrective action to prevent recurrence. The QC receiving inspectors were instructed to perform and document inspection of

cable storage yards in accordance with P-3 requirements. Based on the above, no response to this violation is require . Unresolved Items

.

.

j Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio I l Electrical (Cables and Termination) - Observation of Work and Work l Activities, and Review of Quality Records [51063B, 51064B, 510658 and I

51066B]

. The following procedures were examined to determine the requirements for

receiving inspection, storage and maintenance of electrical cables, cable [

'

installation, identification of cable and raceways, separation, cable

,

termination and QC Acceptance requirements.

Procedure M41B, Serial No. 2, Cable Tray Hanger ,

i e

i Procedure CP-301, Control of Electrical Cable Tray Hanger Inspection '

j and Rewor '

!

Procedure M41B, Serial No. 9, Cable Routing Installation.

.

Procedure M413, Serial No. 15, Cable Terminations.

Procedure CP-691, Administrative Control of Cable Termination.

'

1 i Procedure M-53A, Serial No. FP-10, Mechanical and Cable Penetration

{ Firestops (Not Including Reactor Building).

Procedure CP-469, Procedure for Installing and Reentering Penetration j Firestops, Pressure Seals, and Flood Seal !

,

! Procedure P-3, General and Special Storage Maintenanc )

!

<

.--.-- .- . .- _ . - - ._, - _ - . .. - -- .

.

.

.

Procedure P-1, Receiving Inspectio Procedure CP-371, General Storage Requirement for Equipment and Material The following safety related cables were examined to verify that instal-lation and records for installation, receiving and stcrage were in accordance with requirement Cable N Reel N Type 2*EPC 525 QC 93242B 3X500G8 2*EPC 524 QC 93242B 3X500G8 2*EPC 672 QC 93336 3XJ500G8 2*EPC 671 QC 93336 3XJ500G8 2*EPC 538 QC 8166 37X12G1 2*EPC 529 66168 37X12G1 2*NS 534 574050 ISPTX16G3 2*CA 770 114439 19X12G1 2*IAE 509 31477 8X12G1 2*CA 596 23662A 4X12G1 2*LD 527 8323 12X12G1 2*IPE 588 012209 3X10G2 2*VF 551 QC23659 4X12G1 2*NB 516 36724 12X12G1 <

2*NI 688 15145 3X12G1 The cables were examined to requirements listed in the above procedure Records indicated that the cables met procurement requirements, were properly identified, and approved for use. The installation (pull sheets)

and termination records fce the cables were examined and found to be acceptabl A field inspection was made for the above cables. Routing was verified for several node points listed on the cable pull cards at the two end points of the cable. Fire protection wrapping was installed on some of the cable trays. This installation obscured some of the node points. The cables and raceways were properly identified. Raceway loading met loading requirements and cable separation was adequate. Cable terminations were verified except for those that would disrupt planned plant operations, such as cable being energized and termination cabinets locke Termination points for most of l the cables inspected were sealed to provide visual indication of QC l inspections. This seal is for control and record purposes. Cable reels were also inspected in the cable yard and all were noted to be properly protected from damage and adverse environmen The following cable supports and anchorages were examined in the field to insure that they were installed to requirement The procedures listed above were used in this examinatio Completed QC inspection records also verified that supports were installed properl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

._ . . .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .-. .

.

I j .

2- .

i

<

4 l Cable Support Building /Ele Column I

93A Aux /601' 8" 6'6"N of 62, JJ t

92A Aux /601' 8" W of JJ-62 '

1 89A Aux /600' 9" S of JJ-62 I 91A Aux /600' 4" 9'N of 61, 16'4"E of HH i l 91A Aux /600' 4" 8'4"E of HH, 9'N of 61

] The following fire stops for electrical cable that penetrate different fire

areas were examined in the field. The procedures listed above were used in j this examination. This examination showed that fire stops were installed

'

satisfactorily and a review of QC inspection records also indicated that

, fire stops were satisfactor Fire Stops: JAX-518W12, JAX-518W13, HAX517W17, HAX517W19, HAX-516W28, FAX-354AW42, FAX-354-AW43, FAX-393F-7, FAX-393F-2, CAX260-F-22, CAX260F-4, CAX260F23, GRU2-19, GRU2W-25, HAX516F-31, HAX516F-46, HAX516F-57,

HAX516F-5 Variation Notices 49277, 48976, 49118, 49243 and 49229 were examined to l

insure that they were properly processe The Variation Notices were i incorporated in the as-built electrical installation document which consists

.

of cable pull cards and a location drawing.,

Within the areas examined, no violationsor deviations were identified, i

' Electrical (Components and Systems) - Observation of Work and Work Activities and Review of Quality Records [51054B and 51056B]

i l

The inspector selected 120 Volt AC power panels 2ERPA, B, C and D for I examination to verify that the as-built installation were in accordance with i

approved drawings, procedures and specification. The above equipment was l properly inspected upon receipt at the site. It was located and anchored in '

'

accordance with design drawings. The protection against on going construction activities was adequate, and QC inspections had been performed

and documented in accordance with procedure Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.

CFR 21 Reportable Item That May Apply to Catawba i The licensee was informed of a 10 CFR 21 item that was filed with the NRC ,

j concerning an intake silence on diesel generators manufactured by American j Air Filter Company. Due to an improper manufacturing process, the intake

! silencers could come loose and be ingested in the turbo charge The

'

'

Part 21 gave recommended actions to be taken by the user and indicated that

the likelihood of the presence of the flaw is much lower if the engines have j already been in servic The licensee stated that one diesel would be

inspected starting the week of September 23, and the other after completion

of Hot Functional Testing, j

l

!

!,

,,,s ,. - .- - , - _ . - ., . . . . --_._,,._,__.,..,..__-.,,,,...-,__,_..m_ ..-m,._,..m m.m.,,.,-,.._, - . _ , . , .

r  ;

.

,

5 Instrument Components and System-Record Review [52055] Personnel Qualification Records The qualification records for several quality assurance personnel and the training records for two crews of craft personnel in the instru-mentation and electrical areas were examined. QA personnel records showed qualifications meet requirements and are being maintained in a current status and.they are sufficient to reasonably support qualifica-tions. The training and indoctrination for craft personnel to Catawba procedures specification and revisions thereof is usually conducted by the craft supervisors. The craft supervisor conducts this training for his workers that are designated by a specific crew number. When class-room training is performed individuals are usually required to sign an attendance sheet and this is filed under the proper crew number training records. Catawba also uses on-the-job training but this is not documented. The crew training records shows that training is being performed and indicates that it is the craf t supervisor's responsi-bility to insure that hi.s crew is trained in their areas of wor The licensee stated that the Personnel Department checks to confirm attributes and experiences that are listed on employment applications and these are further judged to be, valid during pre-employment interview Nonconformance and Deviation Reports The inspector selected the following nonconforming item reports (NCIs)

for examination to verify compliance with QA procedure NCIs: 19652, 19678, 19824, 19883, 19886, 18626, 19517, 18321, 18448, 19080 The records were complete, legible, reviewed by QA personnel, and readily retrievable. The NCI's adequately described the deficiency and the corrective action appeared to be proper for the circumstances. The NCIs were dispositioned and closed out in a timely manner with the appropriate review for reportabilit Within the area examined, no violations or deviations were identified.