IR 05000413/1982017

IE Insp Repts 50-413/82-17 & 50-414/82-15 on 820706-09.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Instrumentation, Components & Sys Diesel Generator Storage & Sequencer Calibr,Document Control & QC Inspector Qualifications

ML20062J498
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	07/20/1982
From:	Conlon T, Miller W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062J318	List: IR 05000413/1982017 ML20062J316
References
50-413-82-17, 50-414-82-15, NUDOCS 8208160384
Download: ML20062J498 (4)

Text

.-. ,=. .. .. - _ , - _ , - - - _ ..

e . + t hQ "fG2rg UNITED STATES (p jo,, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION u o REGION il

,,t 101 M ARIETTA STREET, #

>

l k ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 4 s*...+/

!

4 Re - rt Nos. 50-413/82-17 and 50-414/82-15

,

Licensee

Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 Charlotte, NC -28242

Facility Name: Catawaba Docket Nos 50-413 and 50-141 License Nos. CPPR-116 and CPPR-117

, Inspection at Catawba site near Rock Hill, South Carolina Inspecto d M1 -R h 7 .,2 6 - I D I

,

M. D. Hunt Date Signed -

Approved by: O / 4 o 7.ZO- IL T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed l Engineering Inspection Branch

,

Division of Engineering and Technical Programs I

~

.

SUMMARY j

! Inspection on July 6-9, 1982

.

l Areas Inspected

!

'

l This routine, unannounced inspection involved 28 inspector-hours on site in the

areas of instrumentation components and systems; diesel generator (D/G) storage;

! D/G sequencer calibration, documentation control, QC inspector qualifications, i and in place storage of Unit 2 equipment.

i Results

Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

!

!

!

l

!

! i-f e

,

i i-l

!

8208160304 820722

PDR ADOCK 05000413 4 G PDR l _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ . . __ _. _ _.. _ _ __ _ . - - _ . .._-. _ - -. _ _ _ _ _

.-

. -- - .. _

. ..

o . e

.

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• S. W. Dressler, Senior Construction Engineer i *D. P. Hensley, NRC Items Coordinator f

• H. D. Mason, QA Engineer [

• J. C. Rogers, Project Manager

,

• J. C. Shropshire, QA Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included six QC inspectors, three QA auditors, and five office personne t

, * Attended exit interview t

,

i Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 9,1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector identified the

. following unresolved items:

413/82-17-01, Licensee to determine responsibility for d/g sequencer cali-bration.

. 413/82-17-02, 414/82-15-01, Clarify the intent of a QA project memo dated January 4,1982, regarding reproduction of controlled document The licensee agreed to review these items and provide additional information

,

for review during a future routine inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violation 413/82-10-03, 414/82-04-03, Failure to Follow Procedure for Document Control. The licensee's response to this violation was sub-mitted to RII on June 11, 1982. Duke Power Company admitted the violation, r listed the reasons for the violation and described the corrective actions !

I taken. The retraining of QC inspectors was documented on Form QA-131B which .

i is the certification of training for the persons listed in the roster of l this for !

Unresolved Items

,

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to

-

determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia- :

,

tions. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed

in paragraphs 5 and l

~

!

!

l

!

!

'

l

,

.

,. .

o

' Independent Inspection Effort (927068)

The inspector examined the in place storage conditions for the following Unit 2 components:

Component Cooling Pump Motor 2A1 Component Cooling Pump Motor 2A2 Component Cooling Pump Motor 281 Component Cooling Pump Motor 282

Diesel Generator 2A Solid State Protection System Cabinets All components were adequately protected. The motor heaters were energized,

, and covers were in place. The diesel generator is housed in a temporary, heated shelter within the d/g building. The solid state protection cabinets were locked to control access to the internals and the accumulation of construction dust. The equipment was inspected and documented in accordance with the requirements of QA procedure P-3, Storage Inspectio The inspector observed an audit of controlled documents in progress. The

>

discrepancies found during these audits are reported on DPC Form R-2A which is part of QCP R-2, Corrective Action. The R-2A discrepancies are evaluated by the QA Section to determine if a nonconfoming report is require Project management is made aware of the areas in which document control discrepancies are excessiv The inspector reviewed an interoffice memo dated January 4, 1982, and written to the site manager from the QA project engineer regarding the reproduction of controlled documents for office purposes. The wording of a portion of the memo was unclear regarding who could reproduce controlled drawings. During discussions with the licensee's QA personnel the inspector informed the licensee that this memo could possibly cause a conflict with

, procedure QAP G- The licensee agreed to clarify the meaning of the mem This will be identified as an unresolved item 413/82-17-02, 414/82-15-01,

>

Clarify the intent of the January 4, 1982 QA memo regarding controlled l document reproduction.

l Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie One unersolved item was identifie . Instrumentation (Components and Systems I) - Observation of Work and Work

Activities (520538)

The inspector selected two flow transmitters (FT) which measure RHR H Exchanger B outlet flow. This system is considered part of the Engineered Safety Features System. The FTs selected were INDFT5180 and 5181A. These components were installed in accordance with Instrument Standards - Instal-

lation Field Practices, Drawing No. 1CS-A-20.0 thru 1 The seismic

! mounting, sensing line installation, separation and isolation conformed to i

the requirements of the ICS standard. Inspection records are generated in

!

!

_

.. __

.. . X

accordance with M-61A, Instrumentation Installation Inspectio The inspector examined the qualification records for six electrical-instru-mentation QC inspectors. These inspectors were certified Level II in either electrical or instrumentation inspection. All certifications were current along with the supporting test record The inspector observed the inspection of locally mounted differential pressure indicator (D/PI) OYCDPG5160, Control Room Air Handling Unit 2 Cooling Water Inlet Flow. The installation was verified to the requirements of ICS-A-20.0 thru 10, Instrument Standards and the Current Installation Drawings as Required by QA Procedure M-61 Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie . Electrical (Component & Systems I) - Observation of Work and Work Activities (510538)

The inspector examined the installation of the emergency diesel generator 18. The in place storage conditions of the control system cabinets and batteries was found adequate. The starting air compressors and related equipment were installed and protected from other construction activities in the area The inspector requested information for the setting of the time delay relays in the sequencer. The licensee advised that this work had not yet started and the responsibility for this work had not been assigned; therefore, no procedures had been written to cover adjusting and testing of these relay The operation of the sequences in applying loads to the diesel generator is an important function requiring special attention. Therefore this will be identified as Unresolved Item 413/82-17-01, License to determine responsi-bility for d/g sequencer calibratio Within the areas examined, no violations, no deviations and one unresolved item were identified.