IR 05000413/1982016
| ML20058G062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1982 |
| From: | Bryant J, Van Doorn P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058G057 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-82-16, 50-414-82-14, NUDOCS 8208030188 | |
| Download: ML20058G062 (5) | |
Text
_
.
s e
norTo t+
UNITED STATES
8'
1, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
e REGION 11
e 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
Report Nos. 50-413/82-16 and 50-414/82-14 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Facility Name: Catawba
>
Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos. CPPR-116 and CPPR-117 Inspection at Catawba site near Rock Hill, South Carolina Inspector:
9[/fz-
,, -
P.
an~Dooff g '
/
Uate Signed
'
s
]//
- fnf khk Approved '.
J. C.yant', Sep Chief, Division of Date Signed PrgectandResidentPrograms SUMMARY Inspection on May 26 - June 25, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 114 resident inspector-hours on site in the areas of review of nonconforming item reports; reactor coolant pressure boundary piping - observation of welding and non welding activities and review of procedures; safety-related piping - observation of welding and review of procedures.
Results Of the three areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8208030188 820712 PDR ADOCK 05000413 G
- _.. _
-
.
_ - _-
e
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. C. Rogers, Project Manager S. W. Dressler, Senior Construction Engineer
- W. O. Henry,.QA Manager, Technical Services
-*T. H. Robertson, Construction Engineer, Civil / Welding R. A. Morgan, Project-QA Engineer
- A.
W.' Jackson, Construction Engineer Systems Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 18, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The unresolved item described in paragraph: 8.b was discussed in detail.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 8.b.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted general inspection of site work and work activities; observed protection and storage of mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, electrical cables, instrumentation and piping; and observed housekeeping. The inspections were performed in the auxiliary building, containment buildings, pipe fabrication shop and storage areas.
No violations or deviations were identified.
-
-.
-
-
.
.
6.
Nonconforming Item Report Review (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector reviewed numerous nonconforming item reports (NCI's) to determine if requirements were met in the areas of documentation, approvals, evaluation, justification, and corrective action.
No violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Safety-Related Piping (Welding) - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 2)
a.
The applicable code for installation of safety-related piping is the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III,1974 Edition plus addenda through summer 1975. The inspector observed inprocess weld Nos. 2NI111-1 and 2 and reviewed records for conformance to code and procedure requirements in the areas of documentation of pertinent information and QC signoffs via a weld traveler, availability of pertinent instructions, use of appropriate qualified welding procedure, provisions for weld repair provided, certification of filler materials, verification of base material certification, control of welding parameters, verification of welder qualification, use of specified shielding and purge gas, condition of welding equipment, provisions for voltage and amperage checks, verification of proper fitup, control of preheat and interpass temperature, condition of weld and base metal surfaces, and verification that appropriate inspections were being performed.
No violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Safety-Related Piping - Review of Frc edures (Units 1 and 2)
a.
The applicable code is delineated in paragraph 7.
Duke is also committed to ANSI N45.2.1-1973 for flushing operations. The inspector reviewed procedures applicable to piping system turnover, flushing, and hydro testing to determine if procedures were technically adequate and met code and NRC requirements. The following procedures were reviewed:
CQAP L-71, Rev. 10 - Construction Cleaning of Piping Systems and Components CQAP N-1, Rev. 12 - Pressure Testing CQAP S-2, Rev.13 - Systems / Structures Verification and Turnover CP-200, Rev. 0 - Control of Temporary Piping Work Packages CP-201, Rev. 9 - Transfer of Systems to The Systems Group for Cleaning, Pressure Testing, and Control of Work
--
.
..
-
-
.
_
-
.
_.
~_
.
-
.
t
'
CP-22, Rev.1 - Installation of Temporary Gaskets and Removal of
Orifice Plates, Annubars, and other Removable Flow Devices for Piping System Flushes
CP-205, Rev. 1 - Control of Flow Diagrams Used for Flush and Hydro Section Schematics l
CP-208, Rev. 4 - Motor Rotation Procedure CP-210, Rev. 3 - Pressure Testing of QA Condition 2, 3 and non QA
.
Condition Piping Systems, Components and Subassemblies
CP-211, Rev. 3 - Final, Flushing and Cleaning of QA Condition 2, 3 and
non QA Condition Piping Systems CP-213, Rev. 1 - Procedure for Cutting on a Clean System CP-515, Rev. 2 - Procedure for Preparing the Mechanical S-2 Package for Pressure Testing and Turnover to Steam Production b.
On June 15, 1982 the inspector noted that Procedue CQAP-L-71, paragraph 4.1.3, requires QC inspector verification for protection of iastalled equipment during flushing operations. The inspector was informed that
'
QC inspectors were not included in flushing operations.
In addition,
>
it could not be determined during this inspection period if ANSI
N45.2.1, paragraph 2.4 was adequately being met. This paragraph requires qualification of examination and inspection personnel.
Since
,
'
these items require further review, this is Unresolved Item 413/82-16-01, 414/82-14-01 - Review of inspector involvement and inspector qualifications for flushing operaticns.
No violations or deviations were identified.
l 9.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping (Welding) - Observation of Work (Unit 2)
l
<
'
j The applicable code is delineated in paragraph 7.
The in3pector observed final weld surfaces and liquid-penetrant inspection (development stage) of
'
!
weld Nos. 2NC112-1 and 2NC119-5 for conformance to code and procedure requirements.
{
No violations or deviations were identified.
10.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 2)
,
a.
The applicable code is delineated in paragraph 7.
The inspector
observed handling and protection of piping for fitup of weld 2NC126-9
!
conformance.to procedure and code requirements in the areas of control of tools for grinding, brushing and filing, use of appropriate handling
!
!
l
--.
- - -..
.-
.-
..
-
--
--.
-
...
.
.
.
and rigging equipment, control of cleanliness, and use of certified materials.
ho violations or deviations were identified.
11. Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Review of Procedures (Units 1 and 2)
The applicable code is delineated in paragraph 7.
The inspector reviewed procedures for turnover, flushing, and hydro testing to determine if procedures were adequate and code and NRC requirements were being met. The procedures reviewed are listed in paragraph 8.
No violations or deviations were identified.
1