IR 05000400/1982015
| ML20054K204 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1982 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hunt M, Merriweather N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054K202 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-82-15, 50-401-82-15, NUDOCS 8207010292 | |
| Download: ML20054K204 (4) | |
Text
. _.
- -.
-
.
.
-
- e UNITED STATES 7,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
E REGION 11 o,
- [
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
- g g'
ATLANTA, GEORotA 30303 Report Nos. 50-400/82-15 and 50-401/82-15 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Docket Nos. 50-400 and 50-401 License Nos. CPPR-158 and CPPR-159 Inspection at Shearon Harris site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspectors:
O') & /e,
_
h_h d L_
M. D. Hunt Date Signed 71. % * s 4.2 - g a N. Merriweather Ifate Signed Approved by: In 6 8 M,
,<- 3 - PL _ _
T'. E. Conlon, Sec Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs i
SUMMARY i
Inspection on May 10-13, 1982 l
Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 52 inspector-hours on site in the areas of work and inspection procedures, QA/QC organization, cable tray instal-lation, conduit installation, process control cabinet installation and storage of electrical equipment.
Results Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8207010292 G20604 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G
_
.
.
--
-
..
,
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- R. M. Parsons, Project General Manager
- A. M. Lucas, Senior Resident Engineer
- A. Cockerill, Principal Electrical Engineer
- G. L. Forehand, Director QA/QC
- D. C. Whitehead, QA Superv1=or
- G. M. Simpson, Principal Construction Specialist
- L. T. King, Senior Engineer
- J. W. McKay, Principal Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included five tecFnicians and five drawing control personnel.
Other Organizations
- L. M. Austin, Davis Electrical Contractor, Superintendent NRC Resident Inspector
- G. F. Maxwell
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 13, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-tions. New unresolved items identified during this. inspection are discussed in paragraph 6.b.
5.
Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures (51051B)
The purpose of this inspection was to ascertain whether QA plans, instruc-tions and procedures relative to electrical components and systems have been established and are in conformance with the SAR. To accomplish this objec-tive the inspectors selected the following procedures for examination:
.
.
Procedures (1) AP-XIII-02, R3 Material and Equipment Receiving (2) AP-XIII-06, R2 Receiving Reports and Documentation (3) AP-XIII-07. R17 In-Storage Inspection and Maintenance (4) AP-XIII-05, R24 Material and Equipment Storage (5) CQC-6,R0 Receiving Inspection (6) CQA-21,R0 Storage Control Surveillance (7) CQA-8 Material Issue Surveillance (8) CQA-24. R1 Procurement Control (9) CQC-7,R0 Marking and Tagging (10) CQA-4 QA Records (11) QCI-6.1, R0 Receiving Inspection Statistical Sampling (12) TP-42 Inspection of Safety Related or Seismically Installed Electrical Raceways and Components (13) WP-203, R4 Installation of Seismic Class I Electrical Cable Tray, Tray Supports, Conduit, Conduit Supports, Boxes and Box Supports (14) WP-205 Documentation and Control of the Installation of Conduit, Cable Tray, and Boxes (15) WP-207 Installation of Conduit, Cable Tray, and Box Identification Markers (16) 2166-B-06 Miscellaneous Electrical Details and Notes The inspector selected the procedures identified above to review the licen-see's program in the areas of receiving, storage and electrical raceway installation. The documents were reviewed to determine whether procedures, including frequency and timing of inspections are adequate to properly control the work and that work procedures and reference documents adequately describe critical points, methods of installation and inspection hold points.
The inspector discussed the organizational structure and functional rela-tionships with the site QA/QC unit director to better understand the respon-sibilities of the QA/QC unit and the Construction Inspection Unit (CI).
The inspector determined that CI is responsible for the QC inspection of electrical equipment installation, cable tray, cable tray supports, conduit, conduit supports, and electrical cable installation. QA/QC is responsible for conducting surveillance of electrical construction activities, receiving, storage and preventive maintenance.
QA/QC is also responsible for performing QC receipt inspection.
The QA/QC unit has recently reorganized into two sections, one being QA inspection and the other being QA surveillance.
The surveillance and QC groups are headed by QA/QC Unit Director.
Stop work authority has been delegated to the QA/QC specialist and inspectors.
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
.
!
-.
.
6.
Independent Inspection a.
The inspectors reviewed the installation of cable trays, cable tray supports, conduits and conduit supports in various areas of the plant.
Several questions relating to the shared installation of cable trays, conduits, and related supports were raised by the inspectors.
The licensee representatives were able in each instance to verify that the installations were in accordance with the approved installation drawings, b.
The inspectors reviewed the installation of the first of many process control cabinets. It was noted that the base plates situated in the floor in the process control cabinet room were not at an even eleva-tion. The difference in elevation of the various sections of mounting plates did not provide a level surface for mounting the process control cabinets.
It was noted that cabinets SA-09, SA-13, SB-10, and SB-14 had been set in place.
In order to level these cabinets it was necessary to place shims around the anchor bolts between the base of the cabinet and the plates mounted in the floor resulting in the cabinet being supported at approximately twelve points only, rather than along the entire base of the cabinets.
The shims measured as much as 7/8" high.
The inspectors questioned the seismic aspect of the installation of the cabinets in this manner as opposed to flush mounting on base plates.
The licensee advised that this had been reviewed by their A-E and was acceptable. Confirming infomration was not available prior to the close of this inspection.
This item is identified as unresolved item 400/82-15-01, Verify that process control cabinets are seismically qualified as installed, c.
The inspectors reviewed the storage areas for class 1E electrical and control equipment. The storage areas appear to be adequate for various storage conditions.
Inspection status of equipment in storage is identified by a tagging process wherein the status of any piece of safety related equipment can be immediately determined by the color of the tag attached to it.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
<
l
<
i
!