IR 05000400/1982031
| ML18018A433 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 09/21/1982 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18018A430 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-82-31, 50-401-82-31, NUDOCS 8212090256 | |
| Download: ML18018A433 (4) | |
Text
Report Nos. 50"400/82-31 and 50-401/82-31 Licensee:
Carolina Po~er and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh.
NC 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Oocket Nos. 50-400 and 50-401 License Nos.
CPPR-158 and CPPR-159 Inspection at Shearon Harris site near Raleigh, NC Inspector:
/
M. O. Hunt
't
/
Approved by:~~
,
pC T. E.
Con on, Section Chief Engineering Inspection Branch Oivision of Engineering and Technical Programs
/
Oat S gned cg Gate Signed SUMMARY Inspection on September 7-10, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved twenty-nine inspector-hours on site in the areas of open violations and equipment storage.
Results Of the two areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in one area; one apparent violation was found in one area ( Failure to follow storage procedures
- paragraph 5).
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees E.
S. Noell, Vice President of Transmission R:.-M; Parsons; Project General Manager G. L. Forehand, Director QA/gC
"A. M. Lucas. Senior Resident Engineer
"G. M. Simpson, Principal Construction Specialist
"E. E.
Willett. Resident Engineer Mechanical
"8. Seyler, Principal Civil Enginee~
"O. C. Whitehead, gA Supervisor
"T. Cockerill, Princfpal Electrical Engineer
"L. T. King, Senior C. I. Engineer Other Organizations
. Q. Goodman, Daniel Construction Company, Project Manager
"J. Poy'thress, Daniel Construction Company, Civil Manager NRC Resident Inspector
"G. Maxwell
"Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 10, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph
above.
Th li, e.
e i,censee was the foll in orme o
the inspection findings listed below.
The licensee ackno
d d
owing inspection finding with no dissenting comments:
now e
ge Violation 400/401 82-31"01, Failure to follow storage procedures.
(paragraph-5)
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters a,
(Closed) Violation 400/82-21-01, Failure to require class IE equipment to be installed and inspected in accordance with procedure and fnstructfons.
The licensee's response dated August 24, 1982 advised that Work Procedure WP-105, Installation and Inspection of Equipment, had been revised.
The inspector verified that additional clarification for signoff of hold points per paragraph 4. 10 had been added by revision level ~
~ 8 (Closed) Violation 400/81-06-02 and 401/81-06-01, Inadequate proced na equate procedure da qua ification of inspection personnel. 'he licensee'
r es o
nsee s
response ated April 23, 1981 advised that construction procedure TP-40, Training and gualification of Inspection Personnel, was revised March 23, 1981.
The inspector compared the requirements set forth by this revised procedure with the training and certification records for four mechanical inspections.
In each case the training records met the requirements of TP-40.
(Closed)
Violation 400/82-05-01, Fai nonconforming condi rica licensee's response dated February 17, has now been implemented that requires which have been inspected and release inspector or the NSSS inspectors.
Th s
in accordance-with gCI 6; 1. Receivin ure to identify and correct cable tray supports.
The 982 informed RII that a program selective inspection of items at the vendor shops by the A-E's e inspections are accomplished ns ection St d.
have an A
basis until 4.
Unresolved Items Th p
at stical Sampling.
e inspector reviewed reports submi ted as a result of these inspec-I+
(Closed) Violation 400/401/81, Failu~e to ident! fy and correct nonconforming cond tions on'ia IE switch gear.
The licensee same as the r
response dated April 1982 ined the corrective a ti t
b h
e preceding item.
Inspection of items received on sit h
h e
w lc or SSS quality release will be inspected on a sampling a confidence of vendor performance is established.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector examined the installation of cable trays.
supports in the spreading room elevation 286'n RA8 1.
No safety related cables h d b installed but the b
e asic tray arrangement requi~ed to provide separation of ca es a
een redundant train cables was in place.
Inspection of the cable tray installation has not yet been completed.
The inspector selected 13 switchgear manufacture's drawings rrom th f
d ectrical switchgear area.
All drawings were found to be the ose oun indicated.
current revision level as verified by the records in document contr l ro The inspector examined various components stored in the warehouse areas.
Heat was applied to those components requiring heat during storage.
Those components requiring protection during storage were covered and protected crete slab which a
from surrounding activities.
The cable storage'rea i
t d
's oca e
on a con-w ic appears to have adequate drainage or surf;ce water to avoid accumulation of water around the cable reel ~
I
~
The inspector observed an electrical penetration ( EP)
being la d
ge.
In reviewing the storage method of other EP's it was revealed that p ace in no provisions had been made to verify that the nitrogen blanket pressure was adequate.
It was also determined that no instructions had been issued requiring inspection of the EP's.
Review of Shearon Harris Construction Procedure AP XIII-07 Revision 15, Instorage Inspection and Maintenance, Appendix A states that the inspection and maintenance program should be in place in 28 days.
"~
V Receipt records indicate that eight EP's were received June 15, 1982, five on June 30.
1982 and eight on July 26, 1982 which had been placed in storage and no storage inspection performed.
This appears to be a violation and is identified as 400/401/82-31-01, Failure to follow storage procedures.
were identified.
Within the areas examined, the one violation was identified N
d e
.
o eviations