IR 05000382/1993031

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/93-31 on 930913-14 & 1019-22 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program Including,Mgt Support & Effectiveness,Security Plan & Implementing Procedures

ML20059J900
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	11/02/1993
From:	Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059J871	List: IR 05000382/1993031 ML20059J866 ML20059J882
References
50-382-93-31, NUDOCS 9311150098
Download: ML20059J900 (2)

Text

.

-

,

.

DOCUMENT CONTAINS APPENDIX B U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ,

REGION IV 1 Inspection Report: 50-382/93-31 Operating License: NPF-38 Licensee: Entergy Operations, In Facility Name: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Inspection At: Taft, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: September 13-14 and October 19-22, 1993 Inspector: T. W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist t

Approved: / 4 llA/lClL/

B."Nurray, Chief, Taciliti s Program

'

/!

D6te h

Inspection Section Inspection Summary e Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the Physical Security program including: management support and effectiveness, security plan and implementing procedures, protected and vital area barriers, assessment aids, access control of personnel and packages, records and reports, testing and maintenance, and security training and qualificatio RESULTS: ,

a The security program received strong support from senior management (Section 1.1) .  :

• The security program was well managed. Communications between the staff and the security force was very good. Security Supervisors were very responsive to concerns. The turnover rate in the security organization ,

was less than 2 percent (Section 1.2).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS f UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED 9311150098 931105 PDR ADOCK 05000382 O PDR

.

. .

.

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS * Sacurity plan changes were reviewed and submitted as required. Securi ty plan implementing procedures were generally clear, concise, an appropriate for performance requirements (Section 1.3).

• The protected and vital area barriers and isolation zones were effectively maintained (Section 1.4).

• Assessment aids were very effective. Instrumentation and controls technicians repaired equipment problems in a timely manner (Section 1.5).

• Personnel were properly identified and their authorization checked before a keycard was issued and access provided (Section 1.5).

• A violation was identified involving the failure to search a hand-carried item that entered the protected area. Overall, searches of hand-carried packages and materials were properly conducted in accordance with established procedures (Section 1.6).

• The licensee's security staff was correctly reporting security events as required by regulations. Personnel were knowledgeable of

'

procedures and reporting requirements. Trends and analysis records were maintained and used in a proactive manner (Section 1.7).

• All access control equipment tested performed as required. Testing of equipment was very good and equipment was repaired in a timely manner (Section 1.8).

• Required training had been conducted in accordance with the security program plans and was properly documented. The security organization was provided with good training facilities located at the plant sit The weapons competition was conducted in a very professional and ,

competent manner with the emphasis on range safety .(Section 1.9).

Summary of Inspection Findinas:

Violation 382/9331-01 was opened (Section 1.6).

Attachment:

• Attachment - Persons Contacted and Exit Meetin .

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS' .

' UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

_ _ _ _ _ _ - -_ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _