IR 05000358/1981026
| ML20011A279 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 09/21/1981 |
| From: | Baker K, Schulz R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011A277 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-81-26, NUDOCS 8110080429 | |
| Download: ML20011A279 (4) | |
Text
- _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,.
.
.
i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-358/81-26 Docket No. 50-358 License No. CPPR-88 Licensee: Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, 011 45201 Facility Name:
Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:
Wm. H. Zimmer, Moscow, OH
,
Inspection Conducted: September 9 and 10, 1981 g
Inspector: Rcbert D. Schulz N. k N
>
/
[ g' ['
Approved By:
K.
. Baker, ief
Management Program Section Inspection Summary Inspection on September 9 and 10, 1981 (Report No. 50-358/81-26)
Areas Inspected:, Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's Quality i
Assurance prog am in the areas of procurement and receipt, storage and handling. Tte inspectica involved 13 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC l
Inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
8110080429 810928 PDR ADOCK 05000358 G
@
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ - -.. - -__
._. - - - -
-
_ __
,
.
d '
&
)
'
l i
t-DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
/
'*J. J. Wald, Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor
- D. Jones, Storeroom Supervisor
- T. Hueneman, Q.C. Technician
- d. R. Sager, Quality Assurance Manager D. Loudabach, Assistant Storekeeper
- T. P. Gwynn, Resident Inspector
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Receipt, Storage and Handling of Equipment and Materials Program Receipt, storage and handling of equipment and materials was reviewed to ascertain whether the licensee is implementing a QA program that g
is in conformance with regulatory requirements and commitments in the implementing procedures. The inspector verified that responsi-bilities were assigned for receipt, acceptance, release, storage
,
and handling of items. Receipt inspection reports were c;amined for i
applicable signatures, justification for use, damage reco :ded, and p
!
stipulated inspection criteria. Procedures were reviewe; for ap-propriate environmental conditions, including shelf Li'e.
Test reports for received material were checked for conformance to pro-
,
cerement requirements.
i
.
!
a.
Documentation Reviewed t
h.
'
,
t FSAR, Section 17.2, Quality Assurance Program for Station Oper-I E
ation.
I i
i PC-SAD-02-Revision 05, Station Receiving of Procured Item and
[
Services l
i f
PC-SAD-03-Revision 01, Handling, Storing, Shipping, and Preser-
[
vation of Materials
!
PC-SAD-04-Movision 03, Storeroom Issues / Credits
'
I
,
QA-SAD-07-Revision 03, Operational QC Inspection Program t
!
QA-SAD-08-Revision 01, QA/QC Personnel Qualifications Require-
'
ments
.
j; QA-D-01-Revision 03, Quality Assurance.
!
J b.
Findings No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
l t,
1.
l l-2-
.;.
l f
n
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
____
-_
e,
,
,
g.
.
c.
Discussion
,
Open Item (50-358/81-26-01)
.
!
The licensee does not have a procedure for controlling material upon turnover from construction to the operating material con-f'~
~
trol storage areas. The turnover period taker on added signi-f ficance due to the fact that much of the material was purchased i
to sarious classes of the ASME B & PV code which appears to re-
j quire separate storage areas and complete documentation concern-
!
!
ing traceability to original purchase order specifications. The f
licensee acknowledged that to avoid turnover difficulties a j
detailed procedure would be useful in controlling material.
g I
3.
Procurement Program i
!
The procurement program was reviewed to ascertain its conformance with regulatory requirements and commitments in the operational j
,
',.
quality assurance program.. Procurement documents were checked l
for technical requirements, QA program requirements, 10 CFR 21 l
provisions, and specific identification of items. Procedures l
were reviewed to determine if responsibilities were assigned in
)
'
h writing for:
(a) Initiation of procurement documents, (b) review l
and approval of procurement docurents, (c) processing of procure-i
ment documents, and (d) basis for classification of procurement l
l items. An approved vendors list was examined. Procurement j
l documents for various systems were checked, along with the
supplied raterials documentation, including traceability to the
.
l item.
l
!
,
i a.
Documentation Reviewed i
'
!
FSAR, Section 17.2, Quality Assurance Program for Station Oper-
ation.
>
QA-SAD-01-Revision 03, Quality Assurance i
!
5 QD-QAI-09-Revision 00, QA Review of Procurement Documents j
PC-SAD-01-Revision 04, Procurement l
i
'
i 07-QA-01-Revision 03, Evaluation and Approval of Vendor QA Programs.
i b.
Findings I
i
!
No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
c.
Discussion l
-
!
.
!
Open Item (50-358/81-26-02)
l
'
&
b
!
-3-l
,
<
y
_ _ _ _ _ _
_. _.. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _. _
_
_
_
-
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ _____
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _.
'
o
.
s The licensee's procedure, PC-SAD-01-Revision 04, on page eleven,
discusses " Emergency Procurement" in Section 5.9 but does not i
detail how the material procured on an emergency basis will be
controlled nor states the time when QA/QC involvement is re-quired or the extent of that involvement. The licensee agreed
to revise the procedure and delineate control of material on an emergency basis to preclude inadvertent installation of deficient or nonconforming material.
!
Open Item (50-358/81-26-03)
The licensee's procedure, PC-SAD-01-Revision 04, on page five,
,
discusses "V-rification Method," of procurement but does not
!
address the requirements of 10 CFR 21, 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, or the fact that the vendor must be on the approved supplier's list. The procedure leaves the inference that all that is required for verification is a determination by a cognizant engineer that the important characteristics of the item can be verified upon receipt inspection and/or testing of the item.
It was discussed with the licensee that the 10 CFR requirements and the requirements of ANSI N45-2.13, which the licensee committed to in the FSAR, should be addressed in the procedura to insure that the applicable quality statements are incorporated in the procurement documents.
Open Item (50358/81-26-04)
,
The licensee needs to expand their approved supplier's list Le include name and address of vendor, products supplied, method of vendor approval as discussed in ANSI N45-2.13-1976 paragraph 4.2, and date of resurvey or expiration. The licensee agreed to expand their approved supplier's list and will issue a pro-cedure concerning the list, methods of approval, reasons for removal, and vendor anylsis for effectiveness of the control of quality concerning material shipments.
Open Item (50-358/81-26-05)
The licensee does include in their procurement documents 10 CFR 21 statements and the fact the order is nuclear safety related, but does not include either a definitive statement concerning the applicable portions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B as they apply to the order or the fact that the material is to be furnished in accordance with a previously approved Q. A. Program. The licensee stated that a reference to quality assurance program requirements would be incorporated in the procurement documents.
4.
Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 10, 1981. The purpose and scope of the inspection were summarized and i
the inspector discussed the open items in each area.
-4-t
--
. - - _
.-.
.
- -.-
-
- _
_.. _ -
- --