IR 05000346/1980004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-346/80-04 on 800310-12.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program Items from IE Insp Rept 50-346/79-15
ML19323E653
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 04/15/1980
From: Baker K, Charles Brown
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19323E644 List:
References
50-346-80-04, 50-346-80-4, TAC-52156, NUDOCS 8005270097
Download: ML19323E653 (4)


Text

e

-

.

f3 LJ U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

.

Report No. 50-346/80-04 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza, 300 Madison Avenue Toled, Ohio 43652 Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Davis-Besse Site, Oak Harbor, OH Inspection Conducted: March 10-12, 1980.

4%

/

f/I [h Inspector:

C. H. Brown

'/

/

Approved By:

a er, Acting Chief t/ [O

.

.

Projects Section 3-2

'/

'/

Inspection Summary Inspection on March 10-12, 1980 (Report No. 50-346/80-04)

Areas Inspected: A routine announced incpection of fire protection program items from IE Inspection Report 50-346/79-15. The inspection involved 16 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

l 8005270 W.[

l

,

-

,

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted E. Wasil, General Physics

  • R. Cheska, Fire Marshal
  • T. Murray, Station Superintendent
  • D. Huffman, Administrative Coordinator
  • B. Geddes, QA Rep / Operations QA
  • L. Reyes, NRC Resident Inspector
  • Denotes personnel attending the management interview.

2.

Licensee Actions on Previous Inspection Findings

.

(Closed) Noncompliance (346/79-15-01): The inspection of June 1979 found that the " Fire Pre-Plans" had not been reviewed and approved as required in the Technical Specifications. The " Nuclear Safety Related" pre-plans were found to have been reviewed and approved by October 25, 1979, which was within the committed corrective time.

(Closed) Noncompliance (346/79-15-02): The failtre to establish, implement and maintain adequate procedures covering fire protection program implementations was noted during the June 1979 inspection.

Acceptable corrective actions as described below have been taken for all of the examples of noncompliance in this area and they are considered closed.

a.

Item: AD 1810.00 needs to list the physical examination requirement for each fire brigade member.

(346/79-15-08)

A : tion: AD 1810.00 now contains a reference to HP 1605.03 vhich contains the list of physical examination requirements.

b.

Item: AD 1810.00 needs to list the minimum eligibility requirements of a fire protection engineer position.

(346/79-15-09)

Action: AD 1810.00 contains the list of requirements for fire protection engineer.

c.

Item: AD 1828.20 needs to provide for classroom instruction program to be repeated over a two year period.

(346/79-1510)

Action: AD 1828.20 states that the retraining program should be completed in a two year period.

.

-2-

.__.

_. _.,.

.

r-T

.

d.

Item: AD 1828.20 needs to provide for practice sessions

.

under strenuous conditions. (346/79-15-11)

Action: AD 1828.20 states that the practice sessions will be conducted under strenuous conditions. This is interpreted

,

by the licensee to mean conditions as found in the area of

,

~'

the drill and associated with the drill.

e.

Item: AD 1828.20 needs to list the requirements to perform at least one drill per year, on a "backshift" for each fire brigade.

(346/79-15-12)

Action: AD 1828.20 now crntains the requ rement to have at least one drill per year on the "backshift" for each of the brigades.

f.

Item: AD 1828.20 needs to list the requirement to perform a sufficient number of unannounced drills. (346/79-15-13)

Action: AD 1828.20 states that one drill per brigade per year will be unannounced.

g.

Item: AD 1810.01 needs to provide for additional portable suppression equipment for transient fire loads. (346/79-15-14)

Action: AD 1810.01 states that portable suppression equipment is available and specifies general location.

h.

Item: AD 1810.01 needs to prohibit smoking in safety-related areas. (346/79-15-15)

Action: AD 1810.01 states the areas where smoking is not allowed. Tour of a selected area revealed that "No Smoking" signs have been posted. Periodic reminders are issued to personnel onsite.

(Closed) Commitment (346/79-15-03): Fire emergency procedure EP 1202.35 needs to be changed to guide control room personnel to the fire pre plans in event of a fire.

Action: The procedure now contains references to the pre-plans.

(Closed) Commitment (346/73-15-04): The service water emergency procedure EP 1202.19 needs to be changed to include a valve line-up and return to normal checksheet.

.

-3-

.

,- -..

'

'4l

.

.

Action: The procedure contains line-up changes necessary. The valve operators are accessible. The line-up was much simpler than expected therefore no line-up checksheet was included. The inspec-tor had no further questions.

-

(Closed) Commitment (346/79-15-07): All fire brigade members were not qualified in respiratory training.

Action: All fire brigade members are now qualified in respiratory training.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (346/79-15-05): The licensee did not provide documentation of engineering calculations for circulating water system minimum flow and head capabilities or load require-ments.

The licensee's evaluation showed that the circulating water system could handle the demand of the service water system. The inspector had no further questions.

J (Closed) Unresolved Item (346/79-15-06): Both channels of redundant wiring of the service water backup system used to accom-plish hot shutdown could be damaged in the event of a single fire.

The licensee's review of system wiring runs indicated that no one fire could disable the systems to prevent cooldown.

3.

Commitment Dates The inspector's review showed that the commitment dates had been met. The items were found to be completed or reviewed and the inspector had no more questions at that time.

4.

Management Interview The inspector conducted a management interview at the conclusion of the inspection. Personnel attending were as denoted in Paragraph 1.

The scope and results of the inspection were discussed.

l l

'

l l

l l

.