IR 05000341/1981009
| ML20009E645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1981 |
| From: | Byron P, Konklin J, Little B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009E641 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-81-09, 50-341-81-9, NUDOCS 8107280333 | |
| Download: ML20009E645 (4) | |
Text
3
.
.
.
S/
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-341/81-09 Docket No. 50-341 License No.
CPPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 Facility Name: Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 Inspection At: Fermi Site, Monroe, MI Inspection Conducted: June 1-30, 1981 US.
'/ '
'(
Inspectors:
JF LAt July 2. 1981
~
/
.M.
. Tin 7 2. 1981 Approved Py:
J.E.
n 2}5 ief Re or Projects Section 2A 7/7/fI.
r r Inspection Summary
i Inspection on June 1-30, 1981 (Report No. 50-341/81-09)
l Areas Inspected: Routine resident inspector construction inspection consist-ing of Licensee action on previous inspection findings, IE Bulletin and Circularfollowup,IndependentInspectionEffort,ParticipationinNRR/Licen-i see Meetings and Plant Tours. The inspection involved a total of 218 in-spector hours on site by two NRC inspectors including 10 inspector hours l
on site during off shift.
Remilts: Of the areas inspected, one apparent violation was identified.
t (The lack of written procedures for the storage and preservation of Q.A.
records - paragraph 4).
l l
l l
$p[$$o ob k
l O
,
-
.
.
t DETAIIS 1.
Persons Contacted
- T, Alessi, Director Project QA W. Boulter, Assistant Project Manager Construction W. Fahrner, Manager Fermi 2 Project
- A. Godoshian, Project Maintenance Superintendent
- E. Griffing, Plant Superintendent J. Gossner, Assistant Project QA Director A. Walker, Project QA Section Supervisor
- D. Wells, Manager, Quality Assurance
- Denotes those attending monthly management meetings 2.
T9 msee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item No. 341/81-03-03: Independent inspection effort revealed deficient practices of the calibration and control of torque urenches. Titis was assigned open item number 341/81-03-03.
The licensee has reviewed and responded to the findings.
In addition the licensee has initiated additional action.
A 50.55e has been issued and will be closed out at a later date. The inspector considers these actions satisfactory.
No items of noncc.mpliance or deviations were identified.
3.
I.E. Bulletin and Circular Follow up IE Bulletins (asued during this period:
None IE Circular issued during this period:
81-08, F< ndatior Materiala l
The inspector verified the above circular has been received and under-going licensee review.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-2-
l
'
.
,
,
-
.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspectors reviewed the maintenance of quality assurance records.
This review consisted of observations of licensee and subcontracter pratt: ces and review of applicable procedures. Findings are as follows:
Tu addition to vault storage, both lic e see and subcontractors store QA records in DECO furnished lockable, metal 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> fiaa rated cabinets. These cabinets are located in various trailers at the plant site. Even though there is no DECO written requirement for the use of these cabinets, verification of such use is included as at audit check list item by DECO Project QA. The most recent auMt in this area was completed by P.Q.A. March 9, 1981.
k Subcontractor procedures relating to QA record storage, one specified
'another " Quality Records storage was to be in " fire-retardant cabinet"h hour minimum fire rating",
l
'
shall be stored in lockable files with one (1 another, specified " Precautions are to be taken to insure that QA records
]
are protected from deteriorating conditions at all times". The inspectors noted that additional measures for record preservation were not provided for by procedure, such as fire suppression capabilities, or area restrictions such as no smoking and water lines.
The licensee does not have written procedures delineating methods for i
storage and preservation of QA records.
This is an apparent item of noncompliance identified in Appendix A (341/81-09-01).
Participation in NRR/ Licensee Meetings The inspectors have assisted NRR in NRR Licensing events by providing area tours, by supporting the Human Factors Branch in the inspection of the control room and attending a subsequent review meeting between the licensee and the Human Factors Branch at Bethesda. The inspectors with a regional inspector participated in the NRR Management Review
.
Audit of the licensee's operational management organization. The inupector witnessed a simulated control room fire, verified that
'
!
mock up panels were representative of control. room panels end that test results satisfied NRR criteria.
6.
Plant Tours i
The inspectors conducted plant tours of the reactor, auxiliary, turbine,
RHR and Rad Waste Buildings. The inspectors observed shift turnovers, reviewed plant status including control room logs. The_ inspectors also observed work controls, work practices and housekeeping activitics.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
e'
_3_
!
!
<
M e,'
,.
.-
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
at the conclusion of this inspection period. The inspectors summarized the scope of the inspection findings. With regard to QA record maintenance paragraph 4(b), the licensee acknowledged the findings and was responsive to the need for additional measures in that area.
-4-